Based on the recent trend of slipping systemically critical labels under the front doors of financial institutions as easily as take out menus, the US is setting the stage for the era of average banking. The regulatory overlords seem hell-bent on establishing a landscape of average size banks making average size profits. However, as little as DC wants to hear it, there is still a convincing argument for bigger is better. Just because the Sandy Weil/Chuck Prince experiment failed in spectacular fashion, with special help from Bob Rubin, that shouldn’t condemn firms like JPM to live with Washington’s acumen in determining the proper size and shape for a bank.
The Perils of a Smaller Wall Street [WSJ]
Comments (9)
Leave a comment
You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.
coked up Mexican Cocaine Sharks, with lasers, are old news.
How about “coked up Australian Cocaine Wallabies that make Crop circles” ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8118257.stm
This is all bullshit. Word.
Banks
Large
And
Noteworthy
Utilize
Stimulus
!
!
!
!
Is Greg Michaels the ValueStockTips Guy?
name-dropping sucks
@1 Holy shit that was funny! The comments were even better!
Gregus Bleachum Anus
Chavez
Greg sits down to pee
Mom’s making meatloaf today
He forgets to flush
The “financial supermarket” model is not inherently impossible, its just that C (etc) epically failed to integrate the businesses