Also, we are reluctant shareholders in this company, which we have no interest running. On another note, paraphrasing, “the Chrysler bankruptcy was completed in 31 days– suck it, experts.”

Comments (26)

  1. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM

    What’s good for GM is good for GM.

  2. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:09 PM

    what about hope? does it got any hope?

  3. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    I believe in you!
    – Phil Lebeau

  4. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM

    The car people are nodding!

  5. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM

    Insightful comment.

  6. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM

    Well gosh, I am glad we have this all solved. I was not appreciating reasons for possible red ticks on my tape.
    Long live the US plan of going green at any cost. Nothing to do with the environment.

  7. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | June 1, 2009 at 12:23 PM

    This is what happens when a bunch of uneducated union members end up writing law.
    The mobocracy is now in full swing.

  8. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM

    Old phil is starting to behave like the government guys who were there to watch the corporations, he is losing his objectivity fast.

  9. Posted by FUNdamental | June 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM

    “The filing indicates a fast trak plan to become a new competitive company” –
    wait GM is merging with Honda?

  10. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM

    Did you see the letter circulating on the internet written by one of the dealers put out of business? It is a strong letter but you feel sorry for the guy, they made him build a new showroom and get in debt over a million and then dumped him? Wonder how many others had this occur?

  11. Posted by merkin capital partners | June 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM

    Have we all read about the “not quite graduate” of Yale Law, Brian Deese? Is he real? 31 yrs old, in charge of “dismantling” GM. From the NYT:
    “(Had)never set foot in an automotive assembly plant until he took on his nearly unseen role in remaking the American automotive industry.”
    “Mr. Deese’s role is unusual for someone who is neither a formally trained economist nor a business school graduate, and who never spent much time flipping through the endless studies about the future of the American and Japanese auto industries.”

  12. Posted by sugardaddy | June 1, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    @merkin- aka Wet Nurse

  13. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    I’m an oath taker, what does “credible” mean?

  14. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    Did anybody hear the bit about GM building a larger share of cars in the US? I’m guessing that the White House demanded that as part of the restructuring deal.
    Protectionism is on its way! Or it’s already been here…

  15. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM

    this is about as credible as “mo one is more focused on cutting the deficit as barak obama”…

  16. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 12:54 PM

    So, if we’re lucky, and GM stabilizes as a viable entity with an enterprise value of about $20-30B, then we’re only spending about $300-$400k for each job saved. Or it could go bankrupt in a few years and then we’ll be spending $70-odd billino for nothing. Tax time is going to feel so rewarding this year.

  17. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:05 PM

    I’m all for building a larger share of their cars in the US as long as it means dumping SAAB. I wonder which developing-economy sucker will be willing to take on a company that has had exactly one profitable year in the last 20.

  18. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM

    @10, link please.

  19. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    The only things I buy from the US Government is…..probably required by law.
    GO USSA!

  20. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    Can someone explain to me why GM stock is up today, I thought the common equity holders just became shit on toilet paper in a bankruptcy?

  21. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    because obama said so!!! US Govt, the biggest, baddest, hottest fund in the world!

  22. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    @20. Same people who bought GM vehicles.

  23. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    @20 people have to cover shorts before it gets delisted.

  24. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    Guests@#10,#18…
    I don’t have a link, but TGFD heard on the radio last week that obama targeted the GM & Chrysler dealers who were large Republican contributors.
    The dealer that #10 mentioned is one of them.
    The Guy from Delaware
    “Ancient Bastard”

  25. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 2:36 PM

    Lets face it, even the name GM in that stupid blue logo sucks. If i never see another GM car it will be not be long enough.

  26. Posted by guest | June 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    Great reference 12

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.