Press release (and excerpts from the Tan Man’s emails):
SEC Charges Former Countrywide Executives With Fraud
Former CEO Angelo Mozilo Additionally Charged With Insider Trading
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Washington, D.C., June 4, 2009 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged former Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo and two other former executives with securities fraud for deliberately misleading investors about the significant credit risks being taken in efforts to build and maintain the company’s market share. Mozilo was additionally charged with insider trading for selling his Countrywide stock based on non-public information for nearly $140 million in profits.
The SEC alleges that Mozilo along with former chief operating officer and president David Sambol and former chief financial officer Eric Sieracki misled the market by falsely assuring investors that Countrywide was primarily a prime quality mortgage lender that had avoided the excesses of its competitors.
The SEC’s enforcement action alleges that from 2005 through 2007, Countrywide engaged in an unprecedented expansion of its underwriting guidelines and was writing riskier and riskier loans, which these senior executives were warned might ultimately curtail the company’s ability to sell them. Countrywide was required to disclose these important trends to its investors in the Management Discussion and Analysis portion of its SEC filings, but failed to do so.
“This is the tale of two companies,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Countrywide portrayed itself as underwriting mainly prime quality mortgages using high underwriting standards. But concealed from shareholders was the true Countrywide, an increasingly reckless lender assuming greater and greater risk. Angelo Mozilo privately described one Countrywide product as ‘toxic,’ and said another’s performance was so uncertain that Countrywide was ‘flying blind.’”
Rosalind Tyson, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office, added, “Angelo Mozilo had access to detailed and alarming information about Countrywide’s operations. He knew that Countrywide was gambling with increasingly risky mortgages and he kept those details from investors while he was actively taking his own chips off the table.”
According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, Countrywide’s annual reports for 2005, 2006, and 2007 misled investors in claiming that Countrywide “manage[d] credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, quality control and surveillance activities.” Its annual reports for 2005 and 2006 falsely stated that the company ensured its “access to the secondary mortgage market by consistently producing quality mortgages.” The annual report for 2006 also falsely claimed that Countrywide had “prudently underwritten” its Pay-Option ARM loans.
The SEC alleges that Mozilo, Sambol, and Sieracki actually knew, and acknowledged internally, that Countrywide was writing increasingly risky loans and that defaults and delinquencies would rise as a result, both in loans that Countrywide serviced and loans that the company packaged and sold as mortgage-backed securities.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Countrywide developed what was internally referred to as a “supermarket” strategy that widened underwriting guidelines to match any product offered by its competitors. By the end of 2006, Countrywide’s underwriting guidelines were as wide as they had ever been, and Countrywide made an increasing number of loans based on exceptions to those already wide guidelines, even though exception loans had a higher rate of default.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that Mozilo believed that the risk was so high that he repeatedly urged that Countrywide sell its entire portfolio of Pay-Option loans. Despite these severe concerns about the increasing risks that Countrywide was undertaking, Mozilo, Sambol, and Sieracki hid these risks from the investing public.
The SEC further alleges that Mozilo engaged in insider trading of Countrywide stock that he owned. Mozilo established four executive stock sale plans for himself in October, November, and December 2006 while he was aware of material, non-public information concerning Countrywide’s increasing credit risk and the expected poor performance of Countrywide-originated loans. From November 2006 through August 2007, Mozilo exercised more than 5.1 million stock options and sold the underlying shares for total proceeds of nearly $140 million, pursuant to written trading plans adopted in late 2006 and early 2007.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that each of the defendants violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and aided and abetted violations of Sections 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The complaint further alleges that Mozilo and Sieracki violated Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act. The SEC’s complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, officer and director bars, and financial penalties against all of the defendants and the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest against Mozilo and Sambol.


Here Are Some Thoughts On Men And Wall Street
Jerk Running Ferry To Fire Island Not Up On The Celebs Of Financial Reform
“Countrywide was primarily a prime quality mortgage lender that had avoided the excesses of its competitors”
HAH!
About time the orange lizard got what was coming to him.
Can someone remind me why Ken Lewis bought the angel’s company again?
Are you sure he wasn’t charged with insider TANNING?
Are you sure he wasn’t charged with insider TANNING?
Was the complaint on orange paper?
Knock knock.
Who’s there?
Orange.
Orange who?
Orange you glad the SEC’s on top of this?
CLAWBACK the illicit profits!
ALL of the profits.
If not, this is all for show.
-TGFHouston
Was the complaint on orange paper?
Was the complaint on orange paper?
What happened to the SEC’s new mission to establish credibility?
I can only guess that Lewis sold him out when Paulson did a Joe Pesci and put his head in a vice during the ML negotiations.
Can TANMAN finance the clawback and/or penalties using pay option adjustable financing and does he need to document he proof he still has such assets or income?
I guess he won’t need the orange jumpsuit in prison.
This is what happens when you f**k a stranger in the ass, Angelo. Do you see what happens?!
@3,5,12 Try again, I recommend using funny.
HIS SKIN IS ORANGE!!!!OMGLOLROTFL!!!!!!!
“Everyone made money and now they are trying to screw me? What about everyone else? It’s not fair.” said Moz.
@2 Two Words: Boone’s Farm
@12 – you’re comment was best in show. Everyone else, thanks for playing.
Civil enforcement (not criminal) — the govt just wants their cut. Angelo et al, will not be spending any time in the former Casa de Milken.
So it looks like our wish of seeing Mr. Mazilo neck deep into some Hoover Duce’s ballzack will have to come another day.
@19….guess again. SEC is ONLY Civil…once they finish with him the USDOJ will have a word with the man!
Hey – has anyone noticed that Mozilo appears to be orange-tinged?
It could not have happened to a greasier Guido. Hope you like the spaghetti in the joint Goom-Bah.
Joint? Surely you gest. Angelo doesn’t do the joint. This entire exercise is a revenue raising effort by the SEC. Angelo’s gonna write a nice fat check and ride off intot he sunset.
Joint? Surely you gest. Angelo doesn’t do the joint. This entire exercise is a revenue raising effort by the SEC. Angelo’s gonna write a nice fat check and ride off intot he sunset.
Joint? Surely you gest. Angelo doesn’t do the joint. This entire exercise is a revenue raising effort by the SEC. Angelo’s gonna write a nice fat check and ride off intot he sunset.
@21: That’s nothing, he’s waxing gibbous in that picture; you should see him when he’s full…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz1b__MdtHY