Because there are a gaggle of available ones as of yesterday. Up front, the catch is that you’ll have to work at UBS but it’s a small price to pay when you factor in the second to none tax advice you’ll be getting on the house. Apparently the Swiss bank’s global head of healthcare, Benjamin Lorello, was recently hired by Jefferies and somehow convinced most if not all of his team’s senior bankers to come with. Supposedly the junior bankers on the 36th floor of 299 Park were unaware they were being abandoned until yesterday, when none of their superiors showed up. So, that’s sad, in a three-legged dog with cancer way, but on the bright side, what with the absence of Lorello (he of “asses at desks by 9AM or I’ll make you wish you were never born” fame), everyone will be able to take the summer a little easier, and mosey on in whenever they want (assuming there aren’t any more cuts planned for the near future).
Related: Your Tardy Ass Will Not Be Tolerated At UBS–Fraud, Money Losing Begin Promptly At Nine A.M.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (53)

  1. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM

    would this (ubs –> jefferies) be considered a move up?

  2. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:31 AM

    @1 ya think….dumb dumb

  3. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:33 AM

    @2- 1. are you a kindergarten teacher? who the fuck says “dumb dumb”
    2. most would consider jefferies to be the bottom of the barrel. in better days (for ubs) this would be a move down. now it’s probably lateral.

  4. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM

    “You want to come with….”?? To Nebraskans, it’s normal to end an interrogatory sentence that way. I used to hear that in Nebraska all the time.
    But, if I said, “I’m fixin’ to start trading ML-7 basis….”, the word, “fixin’ would cause all the Nebraska tradestaff to look at me as if Jed Clampitt had just pooped in the cement pond.
    ~P.V. Nasby

  5. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    What is so bad about Jefferies?
    I heard you can make good money there.

  6. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    @3
    I disagree, Jefferies is actually healthy and UBS had to be bailed out to survive. At this point this is far from lateral the times have changed. However, Jefferies is more S&T focused though from what I’ve seen.

  7. Posted by gatzzb | June 16, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    “when i grow up, I want to climb my way to middle management”… which now means you would get to be in charge at UBS!

  8. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM

    agree with @3
    @5 are you some kind of moron? Boutiques are only cool in SoHo, not banking.
    Lastly, who complains about 9am? Seriously??? I’m on the phone by 8am, it’s fucking 2pm in Europe

  9. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    Hey @8, it was just a question. You don’t have to be so mean.
    UVA student

  10. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM

    @8 back to yahoo finance
    If you haven’t noticed the influx of talent either starting there own shops or moving to boutiques you are blind as hell.
    The game has changed assclown

  11. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM

    With that line about boutiques, it’s apparent that #8 took “Leveraged Sellout” way too seriously.

  12. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM

    @10
    Agree.

  13. Posted by Anal_yst | June 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM

    Also, Jeffries has been expanding for the better part of the decade, significantly so in the past 5 or so years. Not defending, just sayin

  14. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:49 AM

    “who complains about 9am?”
    it’s not so much that they had to be in at 9am, it’s that they get marked down as though they’re in elementary school if they’re late, and this edict came down at a time when IBankers weren’t leaving the office until 7am to shower. So getting in at 930 shouldn’t be cause for a demerit.

  15. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:50 AM

    LOL, how embarrassing for current UBS employees.
    Congrats – you are no lower on the totem pole than Jefferies. Might as well end it at this point.

  16. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM

    @10
    Boutique banks lost market share in M&A activity in the first half of 2009. At least in the short term – the game hasn’t changed.

  17. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM

    To cut to the chase, banks provide capital and advice. Game has changed, 10, but don’t forget that there are only a limited number of firms where the quality of advice will compensate for the fact that they have no capital to offer.

  18. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:54 AM

    Jefferies is a wonderful firm!
    - BofA i-banker

  19. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:55 AM

    @16
    Most of the talent has moved in only the last couple of months, I think it will take some time for it to make a difference
    @17 I think your point is valid
    UBS isn’t going to be doing a bunch of lending anytime to soon.

  20. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:57 AM

    Capital and Advice – and in this market, one is more important than the other. Boutiques can only offer one.
    Look at Lazard losing out on the Pfizer deal.
    I agree that the game has changed – it has made a few much more stronger and left the smaller banks to fight over a smaller share of the pie (in the short term)

  21. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:58 AM

    16 – yes it has. The league tables will reflect that in a couple of years, if not next year. Many of banking’s heavy hitters are now at boutiques and mid-market firms.

  22. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:00 AM

    these days…jefferies > ubs
    good move for those guys

  23. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:06 AM

    What about JC Flowers?

  24. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:11 AM

    22 There’s a certain level of emperor’s new clothes among those heavy hitters. Very few can provide value based on their counsel and rolodex alone. Take capital out of the equation and a lot of wannabees will be falling flat on their faces.

  25. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM

    Jefferies is stepping it up. They just announced that they are co-mananger on a $3bb 5 year FHLMC issue.

  26. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM

    I hear JT Marlin is hiring

  27. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    JT Marlin is a fake firm, stupid.

  28. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:28 AM

    @26, I’ve never really understood what a co-manager does. Does anyone know? I’m being dead serious here.

  29. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:29 AM

    JT Marlin is fake??!?

  30. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    Raymond James analyst > GS slave

  31. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    @29 gets a much smaller allotment

  32. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM

    J. T. Marlin is FAKE??????? Jesus, who have I been buying my CDS from????
    ~The Forehead Slapper

  33. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:50 AM

    @11 is correct #8. Less LSO. More reality. Bashing boutiques is so Piper-Jaffrayish.

  34. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    If J.T. Marlin is fake, why is Vin Diesel in my office?

  35. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM

    Vin Diesel is fake.

  36. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:06 PM

    are the senior bankers coming with, or coming with him? learn you some english.

  37. Posted by EZ2517 | June 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM

    Lorello was a super star banker with Salomon Smith Barney back in the day.
    Pulled the same move on Solly when he jumped ship to UBS – he even took the analysts with him!
    Does not surprise me he’s doing it again, now with Jefferies.
    Why Jefferies? Guaratees, better commute, American pride. Whatever reasons, JEF will be a superior Health Care shop because of him.

  38. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:09 PM

    I’m not gonna do what everyone thinks I’m gonna do and… FLIP OUT man… all I wanna know is one thing… who’s coming with me?

  39. Posted by EZ2517 | June 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM

    Lorello was a super star banker with Salomon Smith Barney back in the day.
    Pulled the same move on Solly when he jumped ship to UBS – he even took the analysts with him!
    Does not surprise me he’s doing it again, now with Jefferies.
    Why Jefferies? Guarantees, better commute, American pride? Whatever reasons, JEF will be a superior Health Care banking shop because of him.

  40. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM

    I wish I worked at Kidder Peadbody. That place sounds like it was nice.

  41. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    @41: I did work at Kidder, back in the 80s. Marty Siegel was there, and would insist on having his phones swept for bugs like twice a day. We all thought it was to make sure no one was getting wind of his deals. Instead, he’s buddying up to Boesky. Al Gordon was a great guy, but there were no parents at the daycare, let’s say that.

  42. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:54 PM

    There must be a lot of jobless losers here. Any of you getting laid?

  43. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Dunder Mifflin is also hiring.

  44. Posted by InfiniteGuest | June 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM

    jefferies > ubs > parents’ basement > raymond james > tent in bushwick > bac/ml > spitzer ?

  45. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    @8 congrats, you can read Leveraged Sellout.
    Now answer this: would you rather work at Wasserstein in its heyday or BofA today? What about Lazard?
    Top bankers are moving from the bulge bracket to the boutiques because they can do the same transactions and pocket more of the fees. And junior people get paid better as well, even before TARP.

  46. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM

    JT Marlin is a subsidiary of UBS

  47. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:27 PM

    This is a very good move for the self-appointed Godfather. He must have lost a decent amount of power in terms of calling the group’s shots at UBS after the HealthSouth mess, and in order to do the lipstick-on-pigs deals that Lorello particularly loves, that shot-calling loss is a huge one. I’m still convinced that Ben made a deal with the devil long ago, as no STD’s or former clients have taken his life yet, and he seems to be able to withstand ridiculous corporate scandals relatively unfazed.
    Incidentally, the previous poster was spot-on regarding UBS and its rearranging-the-deck-chairs exercise.
    Good luck, Jefferies.

  48. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM

    Does anyone know which senior bankers left with Ben? Big blow for UBS, as this was probably one their most active groups.

  49. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    all of the MD’s

  50. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 5:33 PM

    also note Jefferies ranking in “Best Place to Work” article. For an alleged bucketshop (@3) they must be doing something right. They have also been expanding at a rapid pace for several yrs now and even pre-Wall Street implosion have consistently attracted talent from both the bulge and respectable Tier II’s…also did not need to go to the US govt hat in hand, guess they knew something that the “best of the best” at the bulges didn’t.

  51. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM

    all but 3MDs (Sarin, Gately and DiGia still there)

  52. Posted by guest | June 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    One question. Why didn’t UBS have non-competes or at least non-solicitation agreements in place with its bankers?
    The latter simply states that an exiting employee cannot solicit/hire staff or key clients for a certain period (typically 6-18 months).
    Geez.

  53. Posted by guest | June 25, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    One question. Why didn’t UBS have non-competes or at least non-solicitation agreements in place with its bankers?
    The latter simply states that an exiting employee cannot solicit/hire staff or key clients for a certain period (typically 6-18 months).
    Geez.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.