Picture 1831.pngAs you’re aware, the PR department over at 85 Broad has been working overtime to get people to stop talking trash about how the bank owns the government, would screw a hobo for a nickel, and could just generally buy your life. All of that is for the most part true, but the bad press is starting to grate, so attempts are being made to ingratiate the Masters of the Universe to the peasants like yourselves. Demonstrate that they’re just regular guys with regular problems. So even though, in reality, anyone with a GS ID could get any woman they want, they’ve started to do stuff like pay for sex, and troll for underage tail on the internet, like a common man/Citi employee:

A lawyer for Wall Street powerhouse Goldman Sachs was caught in a sting operation aimed at perverts who solicit young girls for sex, officials said Tuesday.
Todd Genger, 33, is accused of trying to lure an underage teen with explicit chat on the Internet and then traveling to Westchester to consummate the cyber-affair.
In reality, the “girl” Genger was chasing was an undercover investigator posing as a teen in the chat room, the Westchester County district attorney’s office said.

Genger, a Manhattan resident who is married and has three children, was snared after a series of Internet conversations that began April 13 and ended Monday, officials said.
The investigator was posing as a 15-year-old and made it clear “she” was underage, said Lucien Chalfen, a spokesman for the district attorney.

Update: More coverage at Going Concern.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (67)

  1. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    Hmmm, was he also planning to quit and take juicy money-making trade secrets to some other firm?
    -Tinfoil

  2. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    Chris Hansen: “Why don’t you sit down over there…. Wait, are those wine coolers? I guess Ken Lewis bringing Boone’s to his sting wasn’t that unique.”

  3. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM

    I have no problem with this.
    -jeff eps

  4. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:17 AM

    You can add purported 15-year-old internet dolls to the list of persons you can’t trust.
    -Spitz

  5. Posted by merkin capital partners | July 29, 2009 at 11:17 AM

    After 15 it’s all downhill for the female body.
    /my van has no windows
    but i’m serious

  6. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:17 AM

    This is how I’m going to set Lloyd Blankfein up.
    -Max W

  7. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:20 AM

    If there’s grass on the field, let’s play

  8. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM

    @7 that comment is in really poor taste.
    -jeff/3

  9. Posted by NakedShort | July 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM

    Maybe he goes states evidence divulges where all of the bodys are and all of the dirty secrets that Goldman has been doing to ruin America; all this from a little internet ‘sterbation.

  10. Posted by Tax Chick | July 29, 2009 at 11:25 AM

    I guess George Washington University doesn’t teach criminal law to its budding lawyers.

  11. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | July 29, 2009 at 11:25 AM

    Mr. Genger was overhead. A service provider necessary for managing an onerous legal structure.
    To reduce trafficing in underage women, we need to dismantle the SEC, FINRA, and certain branches of the government (those not appointed).
    GS PR Workoout – Session 1
    The Genger Affair

  12. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    @tax chick- certainly true, but did this guy go to gw? and more the point, would gs really hire a gs grad?

  13. Posted by Tax Chick | July 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM

    He did indeed go to GW for law. So the answer is yes to both of your questions.

  14. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:30 AM

    Genger rape

  15. Posted by highlyconfident | July 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM

    Bummer… My new clown costume had just arrived in the mail.
    -Todd G

  16. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM

    Eh, seems like a nice guy.
    - Chris Hanson

  17. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM

    Married, with 3 kids, a job at Goldman – and he has the time to go to Westchester for sex with a 15-year-old? Things must be slow this summer in legal at Goldman.
    (meanwhile – how is a pedophile released “on his own recognizance”?)

  18. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:37 AM

    oh – and he’s on Facebook. Perfect.
    http://www.facebook.com/people/Todd-Genger/808362220

  19. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM

    Genger? I barely know her. *rimshot*

  20. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:39 AM

    @17 shut your filthy whore mouth.
    -LB

  21. Posted by NakedShort | July 29, 2009 at 11:40 AM

    @17 I am married with one child I cant find the time at home for a decent throatgaggers.com session; the real mystery to me is how he found the time for a drawn out evolving “relationship” with a “15 y/o”

  22. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM

    ol’ Todd’s about to get a lesson in math, 15 will get ya 20

  23. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:44 AM

    @ 18, i’m guessing he’s th eguy in the middle or on the far left of the picture

  24. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:45 AM

    @21: “Honey, I’m going to the study, got a lot of extra work to do. Please make sure the children don’t interrupt me”.
    -17

  25. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:45 AM

    Face book favorites/Politicians
    Sarah Palin
    John McCain
    That says it all, especially from a lawyer.

  26. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM

    Puhleez, guy works in PWM Compliance, makes IT folks feel like revenue generators.
    Guy was an active seller on the internal bulletin board though, recall emailing him for us open golf tix last month. Still has a DVD player listed on the site.
    Sanjay aka the IT guy

  27. Posted by flaunt | July 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM

    The Patrick Henry University of Child Rape

  28. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM

    was Lloyd B. the puported girl?

  29. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:05 PM

    @25 Yes, as opposed to democrats, who only prey on successful people.

  30. Posted by Tax Chick | July 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM

    @29 FTW

  31. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    PWM Compliance?
    Is that Pedophiliac White Man??

  32. Posted by Anal_yst | July 29, 2009 at 12:23 PM

    Like one of the comments on the original story, this guy is primarily guilty of committing thoughtcrime (sending pics of his junk to a girl claiming to be 15 and interested in seeing it is questionable, but that’s another story).
    This entrapment for grandstanding type purposes is highly disturbing.

  33. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM

    Analyst – “Sending” photos, “engaging in explicit talk”, and driving to meet the purported underage girl can in no certain terms be construed as a “thought crime” – are you off your rocker?? Your take on this is what is disturbing
    - Kuntsler, ESQ

  34. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    I am so horny right now.
    GS Employee #05051994

  35. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:46 PM

    This guy’s dumber than a box of rocks. How on earth did he ever get thru law school or get a job at Goldman?
    Christ, there’s hope for me yet…

  36. Posted by Investorcluzo | July 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    when will we see this guy on “to catch a predator”? I love the reactions chris hanson gets when the perps find out they’re on tv. I still laugh when I think about the dude that passed out and hit his head on the counter then gaining consciousness on a stretcher with cuffs.

  37. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    Anal_yst: He set up an appointment to meet with and be physical with a 15-year-old. The only reason it is “thoughtcrime” and not “statutory rape” is that the person on the other end was a cop and not a real 15-year-old who would actually be harmed.
    How is this any different from the guy in North Carolina they just arrested for plotting jihad? They surveilled him, watched him train others, etc. – then arrested him before he did anything like, say, blow up a building and kill people.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/us/29terror.html?_r=1&hp
    He has 3 kids. How badly do you think he wants THEM to be in contact with someone like him in a few years when they’re teens?
    How you can defend a fucking pedophile and rail against his arrest nauseates me, as a human and as a parent. Do you have little sisters or brothers? Nieces or nephews? Imagine one of them going to meet some mid-30s asshole.

  38. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM

    @7
    if there’s no grass on the field, play in the mud

  39. Posted by Anal_yst | July 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    @33/37
    Was looking to provoke a reaction (see @37), but yea, uber-stupid, at best, on his part.

  40. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    Math Quiz: How many times does 33 go into 15?
    –TG

  41. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:08 PM

    Anal_yst: why are you backing down now? Provoking a reaction is one thing, so now you’re saying you DON’T think “This entrapment for grandstanding type purposes is highly disturbing”? It’s no longer disturbing to you?
    More like you misgauged what you said, similar to how little kids say things like “that’s what I MEANT to do” when it doesn’t go exactly how they planned.

  42. Posted by Tax Chick | July 29, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    Anal – Just not your day here on DB. Need a hug?

  43. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    [15sexiprincezz4u] OMG hai lol

  44. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    43 ftw

  45. Posted by Anal_yst | July 29, 2009 at 1:25 PM

    @41
    GFYS, you cease to entertain me and have thus exhausted your usefulness.
    @Tax Chick
    Some people are just no fun to f*ck with, apparently.

  46. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    Am I the only one that hasn’t watch “To Catch a Predator” yet?
    - Todd

  47. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    @43 ftw

  48. Posted by Investorcluzo | July 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM

    @tax chick – I need a hug…
    @43 – classic: “um I dunno lol my bff Lauren was like after skool that GS lawyerz were “basically back-office”
    even the kiddies know that lawyers are paper pushing b1tches!

  49. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:42 PM

    awww, Anal_yst, don’t cry, try using your words.

  50. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 1:48 PM

    Can someone put Anal on suicide watch? He’s supposed to be one of the good guys, but his analysis makes him sound a little off.

  51. Posted by Anal_yst | July 29, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    @50
    What analysis? I’m the only one who can’t be an insensitive asshole every now and then, wtf sorta BS is that?

  52. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 2:32 PM

    awww analyst pew pew, QQ

  53. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    @43 beat the sh*t out of everyone on this thread. Definitely the winner!

  54. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    How come Bess’ good friend, Mike Duvally, at Goldman has not emailed yet to “set the record straight”.
    Mike are you out there?
    Ah, just looking at your picture on Bloomberg makes me weak in the knees…..

  55. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    @54 what the hell are you talking about?

  56. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 3:11 PM

    @55 sometime ago Mike Duvally took it upon his pompous self to try and correct our Blogging Diva Bess Levin, a topic I do not recall, but exposed the comical under belly of Mike and his attempts to shape information as he sees fit…..
    got it, ok?

  57. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    @29 – Most successful people are closet Democrats… throw a rock in a trailer park and you’ll hit a republican these days… thanks to God and Guns.

  58. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    @55 & 57 DB search feature only goes back so far……

  59. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 4:49 PM

    @43… best comment on here in the past month.
    “um I dunno lol my bff Lauren was like after skool that GS lawyerz were “basically back-office”
    hahahaha, i can’t stop laughing.

  60. Posted by guest | July 29, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    58 – 29 here. Perhaps I should have written “liberal” instead of democrat. To your point, either way, that does not stop them from paying more than their share of taxes, regardless of political party. Thanks for stating the complete obvious though.

  61. Posted by InfiniteGuest | July 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM

    @ 54 & co. the mouthpiece goes by “Michael,” not Mike, and I think he was straightening Marla out on some finesse point.

  62. Posted by guest | July 30, 2009 at 11:55 AM

    Just goes to show you Goldman will really screw anything.

  63. Posted by guest | July 31, 2009 at 1:35 AM

    now I know what that “secret sauce” is that makes GS so successful…

  64. Posted by guest | July 31, 2009 at 2:32 AM

    At #7: Very true, very true.
    Sincerely yours,
    Vladimir Nabokov

  65. Posted by guest | July 31, 2009 at 10:13 AM

    ….But how will companies like Goldman-Sachs be able to retain the “best and brightest,” like Mr. Genger???

  66. Posted by guest | July 31, 2009 at 10:43 AM

    Stimulus package at work

  67. Posted by Uyyghttf | December 4, 2010 at 11:21 PM

    Cite as: Matter of Genger, M-4564, NYLJ 1202475297322, at *1 (App. Div. 1st, Decided October 7, 2010)

    Before: Saxe, J.P., Acosta,Freedman, Richterand Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

    Decided: October 7, 2010

    Alan W. Friedberg, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, New York (Mady J. Edelstein, of counsel), for petitioner

    Law Offices of Michael S. Ross (Pery D. Krinsky, ofcounsel), for respondent.

    *1

    Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department. Respondent, Todd William Genger, was admitted to the Bar of the State of New York at a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the Second Judicial Department on May 22, 2002.
    *2

    Per curiam
    Respondent Todd William Genger was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on May 22, 2002, as Todd William Genger. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

    On February 23, 2010, in the Superior Court, Westchester County, respondent pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted dissemination of indecent materials to minors in the first degree, in violation of Penal Law §§110.00 and 235.22, a class E felony.

    During his plea allocution respondent admitted that between December 9, 2008 and June 23, 2009 and between April 13, 2009 and July 27, 2009, he intentionally engaged in a series of computer chat conversations as a means to attempt, importune, invite or induce a person he believed to be a minor to engage in sexual conduct for his benefit. Respondent admitted to engaging in these computer chat conversations with a person he believed to be a 15-year old female, but who was actually an undercover investigator, and that the conversations included discussions of specific sexual acts. On June 29, 2010, respondent was sentenced to a five-year period of probation.

    *3

    The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he was disbarred upon his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law §90(4)(e). Respondent, through counsel, does not oppose the relief sought by the Committee. Respondent was automatically disbarred upon his felony conviction because a conviction for “any criminal offense classified as a felony under the laws of this state” results in automatic disbarment pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(4)(a). Consequently, striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys is appropriate pursuant to Judiciary Law §90(4)(b)(see Matter of Kabas, 30 AD3d 34 [2006][attorney convicted of attempted dissemination of indecent materials to minors in the first degree automatically disbarred]; Matter of Stark, 309 AD2d 4 [2003]; Matter of Paladino, 291 AD2d 127 [2002]; Matter of Chilewich, 20 AD3d 109 [2005]).
    Accordingly, the petition is granted, as respondent ceased to be an attorney authorized to practice law in New York State upon his felony convictions, and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to February 23, 2010.

    All concur.

    Order filed.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.