Parliament.jpgBefore Bear fell on its face and people had other thngs to worry about, there were massive amounts of smack talk coming from both sides of the Atlantic about whether New York or London was the true financial capital of the world. A couple trillion in losses later and the battle is still on. But while the Big O administration is considering regulation that looks draconian, the UK is busy producing a veritable blueprint for how to drive top financial professionals (and their business) out of London and out of the EU.
On top of the 50% tax for those earning over £150,000/yr and the prospect that your compensation may be the lead story on the evening news, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has indicated that top earners at British banks may have to wait up to 5 years to collect half of their bonuses. With some London-based hedge funds already considering packing up and moving to less punitive locations, should this most recent series of suffocating regulatory proposals lead to a mass exodus to places such as New York, the UK government may inadvertently wind up providing the Big Apple and the US with a true stimulus package.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (47)

  1. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM

    1st cheers

  2. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    EU workforce is not that mobile outside of the EU
    Squeeze them Gordon

  3. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    EU workforce is not that mobile outside of the EU
    Squeeze them Gordon

  4. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    That’s the thing. The US is always the final refuge. Once the US follows Europe down the drain there won’t be anyplace left on Earth that a man can go and make his own way.

  5. Posted by Novice | July 16, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    @2/3 Yeah, because it takes factories with thousands of employees to run a single fund in Mayfair.

  6. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    No, BLANUS, no.

  7. Posted by mktmkr | July 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    Why would they move to NYC where they’re gonna end up paying nearly 60% in tax to fund health care.
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/07162009/news/regionalnews/dem_health_rx_a_poion_pill_in_ny_179525.htm?&page=0

  8. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    don’t worry, we will all be given employee numbers under obama and will be taxed such that we all have the same net take home. bonus’ and getting paid well for bringing in revenue are ‘shameful.’ paying for everyone’s healthcare is ‘moral’ and ‘responsible’.

  9. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    Stupid Brits
    - a brit

  10. Posted by american bandersnatch | July 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    @8 – Work brings freedom. We know what to do with those who complain.

  11. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    word on the street is the actual place they will end up is Geneva

  12. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    @1-5, 7-10 don’t encourage him.

  13. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    Cayman’s pretty nice.

  14. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM

    Looks like Greg has other “thngs” to worry about too. Like vowels.

  15. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    Greg,
    Stop banging your Mom.
    Dad

  16. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Chamonix>Aspen
    Monaco>Palm Beach
    Plus, more eastern bloc pros…

  17. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Mommy, they have been mean to me all day and keep picking on me and comparing me with that Levin girl. Please come and give me a hug and tell me I’m the best.
    -Greg

  18. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    good riddance

  19. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    (!)
    :

  20. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    good riddance

  21. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    I’ll stimulate all of you just be patient.
    greg’s mom.

  22. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    key point here…. 50% tax, liberals take note.

  23. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM

    Greg can you pls buy me a nice firm cucumber and some olive oil please? Also pls buy some dinner, love you,
    Mom

  24. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    Man that stinks for them. Not only do they have to do their financials with an abacus, now they are getting a 50% tax rate.
    “That’s why I’m proud to be an American…” You know how the rest of that song goes.

  25. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 3:35 PM

    @24 americans suck ass and they are fat and they fart constantly.
    a londoner

  26. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    @25 that’s why we live longer than you.

  27. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    Lived in London. The English smell bad, more than compensates for the farts
    Soap…It’s not just for Sunday

  28. Posted by Anal_yst | July 16, 2009 at 4:24 PM

    @16 hits the nail on the head

  29. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    @25 Your “inexplicable insouciance” and disrespect is fascinating; it must be a English aristocratic thing.
    Dan Loeb

  30. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    on a realistic level, how hard (beyond language barrier) would it be for a UK fund of 1-5 billion AUM to move to Switzerland?

  31. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

    marissa miller did some pleasant photos for the british gq. why don’t u use that as a pic. dumb anus

  32. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

    Hungarian hotties in London is way sweeter than the hookers in NYC. That settles it. If still doubtful, go ask Eliot.

  33. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 5:20 PM

    once again greg places his stupidity on display – nfw anyone is going to move to nyc for tax reasons -

  34. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM

    Exactly. This Greg person really doesn’t like using his brain. I hear Geneva is on the table, and I know one fund will be making pretty soon.

  35. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM

    Exactly. This Greg person really doesn’t like using his brain. I hear Geneva is on the table, and I know one fund will be making the move pretty soon.

  36. Posted by guest | July 16, 2009 at 6:13 PM

    I’m disgusted at our inept Gordon Brown & Alistair Darling – who clearly has no clue about financial markets. Rightly said, Brown is making the UK to be less competitive as possible. It is Switzerland that would be the new financial center of Europe,while NY would be undisputed No.1 for now. But big mega deals to come would still be driven from Asia & these companies may not necessary list in NY, perhaps Shanghai,HK etc. Hedgies in London with AUM 1-5b or more have already started to relocate to Zurich/Geneva but in subtle ways. These are not high profile relocation, but subtle moves – it goes by the announcement of opening an office in Zurich & they then quietly close their London offices.
    This could be the biggest stimulus NY has received yet!!

  37. Posted by Anal_yst | July 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM

    Why are these guys going to Switzerland, prey tell, when the US Gov’t is starting to seriously crack the whip on the Swiss?

  38. Posted by Bulging Bracket | July 16, 2009 at 8:09 PM

    @Analyst – They’re going to Switzerland for the friendly tax regime for employees. There are huge benefits for everyone who is not an American to a Swiss address – Americans get screwed by global taxation irrespective of residency. Especially nice for Brits since you can be non-dom in both Switzerland and the UK if you do the travel right and have sufficient meetings/vacations elsewhere.
    It’s nice for the account holders too, but those worried about tax haven benefits would be invested through the offshore entity of the fund anyways. Again, the investors interests are secondary (but aren’t they always).
    This is all besides the point, since nothing said by Brown & Co needs to be listened to. The Tories are looking at something between a large and a stupendous majority next spring. Anything not enacted by Dec 31 won’t be enacted and pretty much anything enacted recently will be overturned.
    As mentioned above, this will also be driving an exodus from Manhattan – 60% tax rates are huge, you lose 1/3 of your net income moving from 39%. Sure lots of the really big earners are CT domiciled anyways, but this will do huge damage.
    As a side note – Toronto is really nice. Real estate is cheap, it’s just more than an hour to Newark on Porter (a 5 minute cab ride from your office downtown). Personal income taxes are lower, corporate taxes are far lower and no stupidity over offshoring. Final benefit to running your fund from Toronto – IRS can bully Switzerland but you can’t bully such a huge source of oil, uranium, NG, and potash, plus there’s the control of Chicago’s easiest access to the ocean.

  39. Posted by Bulging Bracket | July 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM

    @Analyst – They’re going to Switzerland for the friendly tax regime for employees. There are huge benefits for everyone who is not an American to a Swiss address – Americans get screwed by global taxation irrespective of residency. Especially nice for Brits since you can be non-dom in both Switzerland and the UK if you do the travel right and have sufficient meetings/vacations elsewhere.
    It’s nice for the account holders too, but those worried about tax haven benefits would be invested through the offshore entity of the fund anyways. Again, the investors interests are secondary (but aren’t they always).
    This is all besides the point, since nothing said by Brown & Co needs to be listened to. The Tories are looking at something between a large and a stupendous majority next spring. Anything not enacted by Dec 31 won’t be enacted and pretty much anything enacted recently will be overturned.
    As mentioned above, this will also be driving an exodus from Manhattan – 60% tax rates are huge, you lose 1/3 of your net income moving from 39%. Sure lots of the really big earners are CT domiciled anyways, but this will do huge damage.
    As a side note – Toronto is really nice. Real estate is cheap, it’s just more than an hour to Newark on Porter (a 5 minute cab ride from your office downtown). Personal income taxes are lower, corporate taxes are far lower and no stupidity over offshoring. Final benefit to running your fund from Toronto – IRS can bully Switzerland but you can’t bully such a huge source of oil, uranium, NG, and potash, plus there’s the control of Chicago’s easiest access to the ocean.

  40. Posted by Bulging Bracket | July 16, 2009 at 8:13 PM

    damn double post. I reloaded twice to check that I hadn’t…
    Bess could you maybe fix the comments?

  41. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 12:14 AM

    Great post bulge. Regardless of doubling up.

  42. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    @10 commie or troll

  43. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 11:57 AM

    @10, socialism works so well right? that’s why there is a waiting list in most countries with socialized medicine for basic procedures…oh yeah and the life expectancy is lower. we’ll also attract the best doctors in a socialized medicine system right? how stupid are you?

  44. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM

    @43: I think @10 was being fecetious. As an aside, what are the chances we experience a G-shaped recovery?

  45. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 12:13 PM

    @43: I think @10 was being fecetious. As an aside, what are the chances we experience a G-shaped recovery?

  46. Posted by guest | July 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM

    no recovery until asset prices come back down to earth. homes are still way to expensive relative to the average american’s income. that goes for many other goods as well, cars, industrial products etc.

  47. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 19, 2012 at 4:14 AM

    T7Q1Kt Thanks again for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.