That this is what happens when you f a stranger and/or employee in the ass? In the figurative sense of not compensating him as much as he thought was deserved (we can’t speak to whatever off the clock relationship Aleynikov had with Lloyd Blankfein)? Matthew Goldstein, who broke the story, says yes.

Comments (50)

  1. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM

    Levin’s boyfriend was stealing from Goldman

  2. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    when have computer programmers ever made as much as traders?

  3. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:07 PM

    @1 you left that comment yesterday and it got no traction. back for another shot?

  4. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    “This is what happens when you fuck an employee in the ass (*by not compensating him as much as he thought was deserved)”
    Actually, I literally fucked him in the ass, so that could be what this is about.
    –LB

  5. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    Bernie Madoff is about to have a lot to say about this (the fucked up the ass part).

  6. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:10 PM

    I don’t think I’m being compensated enough so I might give this tactic a shot.

  7. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM

    @1 I wasn’t the guy who posted it yesterday, stop osting with the guest handle Bess

  8. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    @7 what is ‘osting’?

  9. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    400k is plenty good for a sloppy programmer like him who didn’t even know how to delete all traces of his little theft.

  10. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM

    Lets put together a spaghetti fund raiser dinner for Sergey. I’ll bring the pot. MCS, you bring the coke and Trojan you bring the Indian chicks with big ta ta’s.
    SPODE

  11. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM

    @9 for real. what kind of programmer wouldn’t know his scam could be easily traced?

  12. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    I’m going to send some Oreos to him in prison.
    –Teddy KGB

  13. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    I just ‘osted’ all over my secretary’s ass.

  14. Posted by Tax Chick | July 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM

    @11 perhaps this is part of his defense: had I intended to steal prop code, I would have covered my trail better. Given that I didn’t, I must not have thought I was doing anything wrong.

  15. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM

    #7 is really me.
    Bess, you no damn good and well what ‘osting’ is you silly little A2M freak.
    SPODE

  16. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    @ tax chick, good call.

  17. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:32 PM

    In Soviet Russia everyone take prop code home.

  18. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:35 PM

    I think Sergey implemented the Dealbreaker PHP code. I’d arrest and deport him just for that.
    PS. Tax Chick is H O T !!!!

  19. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:38 PM

    @14 Nice try. He did try to explicitly clear his history file but GS had a backup method and was able to trace all his commands. So unfortunately, that won’t hold.

  20. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    400k is already way too much for a programmer; only 25-year-olds whose parents put them through an Ivy League school and then pulled strings to get them a job at a trading desk and who lose money every time they hit the Enter key should be getting that kind of compensation.

  21. Posted by Tax Chick | July 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM

    @19 Then he is stupid and f*cked. Crime doesn’t pay, just ask Bernie… oh wait, it did for 40 years. Nevermind. Crime pays, being stupid doesn’t.

  22. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    do any programmers make more than 400k?

  23. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM

    And we’re sending a message right back: not in our house, Russkie fuck!
    –LB

  24. Posted by Tax Chick | July 6, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    @22 Steve Jobs, Bill Gates…

  25. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:08 PM

    Fucking GS seems to know what everybody else is doing, but nobody knows (or can prove) what they’re doing.

  26. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    @24 i’m talking about at financial institutions. in the video goldstein/cnbc seemed to be saying maybe the guy did it because he didn’t make as much as traders, and thought he should be.

  27. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:14 PM

    People do this kind of thing all of the time (not that it’s right). The moral of the story has to be don’t cross GS.
    Also, who knows what sort of hardware would be needed to replicate this strategy? How many firms have the servers/routers/switches needed to process data and execute trades at this speed?

  28. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:16 PM

    Anyone have first year programming numbers?

  29. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    @24
    Rentec, some hedge funds, algo trading firms.
    Gs/old leh/ms if you were over svp and were any good. But at that point you’re not coding anyway.

  30. Posted by Anal_yst | July 6, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    @26
    Are you saying he pulled a quasi-Kerveil?

  31. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:26 PM

    @analyst– huh? I’m saying that in the video, goldstein suggests sergey did this because he, as a computer programmer, didn’t make as much as traders at gs. how is that what kerveil did? (not trying to be an ass, just not sure what you mean/if i get the joke.)

  32. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM

    I guess this guy never watched Office Space….

  33. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:36 PM

    What is an example of the kind of trade this mystery super double-secret trading system does?
    How did GS get the govt to take this guy down over the holiday?

  34. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    @33 front running their customers.

  35. Posted by InfiniteGuest | July 6, 2009 at 5:49 PM

    @22, yes.

  36. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 5:51 PM

    34 FTW

  37. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM

    @34
    That doesn’t compute. Frontrunning is illegal. Who wants this guy to testify in his defense that he really is a whistleblower who was about to expose the illegal activities of his employers?
    Oops, I just gave ZH another conspiracy theory to exploit. And his defense lawyer owes me big time.

  38. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 7:08 PM

    maybe this is about detracting from Michael Jackson’s funeral festivities…..

  39. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 8:08 PM

    @2. bill gates, paul allen, steve jobs, steve wozniak,and larry ellison, for starters.

  40. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 8:17 PM

    Why are people complaining about programmers making money? Why has no-one complained that traders are making “way more”? WFT have those guys accomplished that is so special?

  41. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM

    there is something else to this. for starters, i have no idea why they are saying “computer codes” everywhere rather than “computer software”. “codes” is terribly vague.
    also, the story i read said he transfered like 32mb, which is really nothing. which implies either he had access to gigs of code and picked out this tiny portion as he already figured out his new job and this code was specific to his new firm’s expertise, or he managed to magically pick out generic code that is the magic sauce, which, in 32mb, is impossible.
    the guy though obviously can’t be that good of a programmer. at the very least all he had to do was, with access to the source, one-time pad encrypt it and dump it to a flash drive. it would be practically impossible to get caught doing that which means he probably did something completely stupid like threaten GS before he left and then GS then monitored everything.
    plus, he probably didn’t know what he was copying. if he had actually worked on the code that he copied he wouldn’t have needed to copy it verbatim, he could have easily just rewrote it from memory.
    or he’s dumb.

  42. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    @41 All good points.
    I have no problem/difficulty reproducing anything I’ve worked on, ever. Whether I do that or not is entirely down to my own internal ‘honor’ code.
    As to copying to flash drives, etc, I think you’ll find that outfits where that could be a vector tend to have those avenues shutdown.
    However, where there’s a will and the smarts …
    Just sayin’
    @40 some traders actually make money? while programmers are often viewed as a cost center. Besides, most [but not all] programmers I’ve dealt with recently are fucking clueless idiot talking heads with accents.

  43. Posted by guest | July 6, 2009 at 9:52 PM

    This guy is an idiot. He probably oversold himself to some algo shop for the reported $1mil+ package (if that is even true). “Da! I build all of Goldman’s high-frequency, low-latency, systems!” If he was really the man he a) wouldn’t need the source code in the first place as he would have the knowledge of how things worked in his head, and/or b) he would have figured out a way to take the code without anyone being the wiser. Instead he’s spending the hoiday weekend in the Tombs.

  44. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM

    Only the lowest paid programmers try to steal from companies in the financial sector.
    Come on have you seen office space the movie?

  45. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM

    russian people are all shady

  46. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    @41
    Those times are gone, when somebody could write the whole system and then be able to re-write each part of it from memory. These days, even if you create really authentic profit generating code, it usually depends on the number of existing frameworks: quantitative, numerical, optimization, market data, order entry, etc. And those in Goldman I figure should be quite useful and convenient to work with. As far as low latency trading is concerned, that pure analytical, decision making business logic can not be well decoupled from the rest of the code due to the performance requirements. The guy spent only 2 years with the company, so even if he wrote something authentic he could rewrite later, that code was the most probably based on Goldman’s infrastructure and it would take some time to extract the logic from there.
    I figure, he copied it in chunks with the intention to examine and re-engineer everything later. Some useful framework code could make its way there as well.
    ———————————-
    The whole story smells rotten. The thing they claim he did is way too stupid: you don’t leave GS for noname competitor in MM$ business and take your ‘belongings’ with you. There should be something behind all this. If he was so important and knew too much, GS could enforce its NCA and keep him fed but jobless for some significant amount of time.
    If that ‘Russian ex-Citadel start-up’ wasn’t part of the scam itself, trying to chip off some of the GS money, I would agree that he probably just oversold himself, and being blinded by tripled salary, completely lost his mind and did what he did.
    The real victims though are his wife and kids, since he will be flushed in the toilet.

  47. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    @26 – Chief Technology Officer of BAC made 10 million. Thus is the path of middle office programmers.

  48. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 10:52 AM

    47 Doubt the CTO of BAC ever programmed anything beyond his voice mail. CTO is a typical senior staff function. Requires managing thousands of well paid people and overseeing a very big budget. Responsibility for a core critical function of the organization. Knowledge of info tech yes, but no programming skills required.

  49. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 10:55 AM

    What the F**k? I am so sick of people claiming that people steal and cheat because they are underpaid. They do it because they are unethical scumbags…. period… end of story. Does this excuse also apply to the guy who robs little old ladies, etc?

  50. Posted by guest | July 7, 2009 at 10:59 AM

    @49 True

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.