cuomo.jpgNew York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is shocked, shocked to discover that misleading advertising is going on in here.
Sell too few cars? Get dropped. Sell too many? Get dropped. Turn around and start issuing misleading advertising

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo today told 40 auto dealers across the state to stop issuing misleading advertisements for the Federal Car Allowance Rebate System, known as “cash for clunkers.”
The government-funded clunkers program, which seeks to boost the economy, allows dealers to credit $3,500 or $4,500 for trade-ins that may be worth less. Dealers’ ads mislead consumers into believing that their trade-in vehicle qualifies for the program when it does not or that they are eligible for a several-thousand-dollar rebate, Cuomo said in a statement today.

Next thing you know they will want to eliminate introductory or teaser rate financing!
Cuomo Tells Dealers to Stop Deceptive Clunkers Ads [Bloomberg]

Comments (19)

  1. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:26 PM


    EP’s posts are: Presented without Comments

  2. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    EP and Greg,
    You guys are making this Bess vacation thing way too complicated for yourselves. Just post the links.

  3. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    Anybody want to start a cutoff jean shorts club with me?
    CG

  4. Posted by NakedShort | August 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM

    @3
    http://www.jorts.com/
    Sorry Charlie youre too late.

  5. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    Damn you JORTS.com!!! Damn you to HELLLL!
    CG

  6. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM

    CG strikes me more as a Zubaz (probably accompanied by a sleeveless sweatshirt) type of guy: http://www.zubaz.com/

  7. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:42 PM

    Cuomo says, “I sentence you all to death by SNU SNU!”

  8. Posted by NakedShort | August 10, 2009 at 1:43 PM

    @6 Excellent point. He also strikes me as the type of person that would show up to a black tie affair wearing a bolo.
    http://www.petestown.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=65

  9. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:44 PM

    Cutoff zubaz shorts are the new killing it.
    Count it!
    CG

  10. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    This is effin drivel.

  11. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 2:03 PM

    Damn, even guest cannot save the day today.

  12. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 2:05 PM

    Yeah, fuck you guest!

  13. Posted by sourceclosetodiscussions | August 10, 2009 at 2:05 PM

    someone find me the chick that got the tat to match the zubaz pants. I’ve got something for her…

  14. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

    @8
    In the earth-shattering event that someone invites CG to a black tie event, I agree.

  15. Posted by HeadlessHorseman | August 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    I was about to tee up a rant regarding the pathetic attempt at humor that this post represents (similar to my rip on the Paulson Goldman piece from earlier today). Then I lost my mojo. This is so weak I can’t even stay hard long enough to fuck it. Congratulations EP, I think I’ve lost my inspiration.
    Decrying this nonsense isn’t even entertaining me anymore. Picking apart these posts is about on par with killing lightning bugs at night with a tennis racket: it’s amusing at first, but then the novelty wears away and at the end of the night you haven’t achieved anything other than ruining your little sister’s tennis racket and getting glow in the dark shit on everything. But I digress (I’m from Ohio, okay?).
    Here’s hoping Spitzer unwittingly propositions a not-so-undercover tranny at some point before day’s end.

  16. Posted by guest | August 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    Hey Headless, what ya wearing today, fella?

  17. Posted by HeadlessHorseman | August 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM

    Some especially tight pants. I had them tailored to enhance my infantile prick in the hopes of impressing a few of the fifty something women I work with, but in the end all I’ve achieved is a perpetual wedgie and an offer to meet the copier repairman for drinks. I’m such a tease.

  18. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM

    For working trucks the rule is not based on the fuel efficieny. As long as it is manufactured before 2001 they all qualify
    but cannot be older than 25 years old..
    Henry
    Blogger
    http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
    http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info

  19. Posted by guest | August 20, 2009 at 6:23 AM

    Yes, Your vehicle must be less than 25 years old on the trade-in date
    Jimhenry
    Blogger
    http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
    http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.