toxic_water.jpgMaybe it’s because more and more New Yorkers are using mass transit instead of driving. Or it could be payback for the Giants rolling past the Cowboys on the way to the Super Bowl a couple years ago. But whatever the reason is, Exxon is still on the hook for poisoning the Big Apple’s groundwater.

The trial concerns six wells, five of which New York says are poisoned with MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether), in and near the Jamaica area of the Borough of Queens. The city says it wants to build a water- treatment plant there called Station 6 that will treat 10 million gallons a day.
Exxon lawyers argued during the trial that the city doesn’t intend to build the water-treatment plant, and that the six wells were turned off and unusable because of contaminants other than MTBE.

Other contaminants? What other contaminants could possibly be in the crystalline waters off of Queens?

The groundwater contains pharmaceutical and human waste, dry-cleaning fluid from a company once located near the site, and 70,000 gallons of diesel fuel spill at a nearby bus depot

Well, at least there’s no dispute the water sample was authentic.
Exxon Loses Phase One of New York Groundwater Trial [Bloomberg]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (13)

  1. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM

    If anyone needs me I’ll be pounding my snackretary in her barhind.
    -Snickers Ad Manager

  2. Posted by american bandersnatch | August 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM

    “The groundwater contains … 70,000 gallons of diesel fuel.” That’s a good sized sample.

  3. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    @1 – Please don’t do that again. Ever.

  4. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 4:45 PM

    Our workplace is officially addicted to Bloomberg’s Margaret Brennan’s 10 A.M show.
    This hot babe can talk business!

  5. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM

    @4 Chicks with (mildly) crooked teeth = hot!

  6. Posted by Shakes23 | August 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM

    what the fuck greg, you can at least entertain us by dropping some more fuckin f-bombs if you’re going to make us read thru all of these shit-ass stories you keep pulling out of your ass.

  7. Posted by Anal_yst | August 12, 2009 at 5:35 PM

    What, no one wants to join me for a refreshing dip in the Gowanus Canal?

  8. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM

    what a day for comments in the single digits! Greg is probably a nice guy but is just so uninspiring.

  9. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM

    5,
    Fuckin’ a.
    -Phizzle Falcone

  10. Posted by merkin capital partners | August 12, 2009 at 7:18 PM

    Exxon can litigate longer than NYC. They make more money.

  11. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 7:50 PM

    Can’t run out the clock vs a municipality. Exxon is just waiting until the City’s cash needs explode (next year?) Then they settle.

  12. Posted by merkin capital partners | August 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM

    Clearly you don’t follow Exxon’s litigation history. If you are a living being, they wait for your death. If you are a legal entity, they’ll beat you, appeal until they beat you, or appeal until you take pennies on the dollar whilst begging for mercy due to cash drain. Ask the Alaskans what a Exxon verdict is good for.

  13. Posted by guest | August 12, 2009 at 8:21 PM

    Exxon should sue the government for making them use that fucking MTBE shit.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.