Picture 22.png


Picture 23.png

View Comments

  1. Posted by InfiniteGuest | August 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM

    Nice work.

  2. Posted by Mark Klein, M.D. | August 27, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    I have nothing to say other than:
    The hardworking people at Goldman Sachs have rightfully earned everything they have made.
    I wish I worked there.
    Mark Klien, M.D.

  3. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM

    Just send the damn tips!

  4. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM

    It took them two days to write that? I thought Goldman folks were supposed to be smarter than that.

  5. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:33 PM

    I love you, the checks in the mail, and …

  6. Posted by obviously not that smart | August 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    i don’t get the erin callan pic.
    please explain to village idiot
    kthx

  7. Posted by payday loans | August 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    I liked http://www.dealbreaker.com a lot. It has lots of useful info. This article is very professionally written. http://www.dealbreaker.com I will be back for sure.

  8. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our stock recommendations; we did.
    But you can’t hold all of Goldman Sachs responsible for the behavior of a few sick, perverted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn’t we blame the whole investment banking system? And if the whole investment banking system is guilty, then isn’t this an indictment of our financial institutions in general?
    I put it to you, dear readers – isn’t this an indictment of our entire American society?
    Well, you can do what you want to us, but we’re not going to sit here and listen to you bad-mouth the United States of America.

  9. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:38 PM

    You see??! They are simply acting in the best interests of their clients. This memo should be put this matter to rest, immediately.
    -CG, investigative journalist

  10. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    @6 uh, what are you talking about?

  11. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:46 PM

    @4 the thing writes itself, but the language had to be approved by the BPD.

  12. Posted by punctuation czar | August 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    nice job sticking the comma outside the apostrophe in the second sentence. fucking plebes.

  13. Posted by FI Nagler | August 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM

    Maria Paulson
    PLEASE READ AND STAY BLESSED.
    I am Mrs Maria Paulson,a dying woman with cancer who has decided to will her fortune to you for personal and charitable goals.Contact my lawyer Barr. Edmund Hudgins to secure the fund,click on reply to see my lawyers email address.I pray you act sincerely.
    Maria Paulson.
    I am too lazy to reply to this con… Bet you it is someone from Nigeria…. anyone wants to have some fun with this person???
    The reply email is
    barr.edmundhudginschamberss0@ymail.com

  14. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:52 PM

    Yes, it is the “cuddle” that is the forum for sharing stock or sector “tips.” Get it straight people!

  15. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:58 PM

    So when are the customers leaving?

  16. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM

    @8 – great movie reference

  17. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:00 PM

    @12 – If you are going to make fun of someone for an error, don’t be a dummy and make a mistake yourself. They are called quotation marks you idiot not apostrophes.
    Nice work “fucking plebe”

  18. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:02 PM

    Any memo with multiple mentions of the word “huddle” is just weird.

  19. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:02 PM

    This information was disseminated to me two days ago when I huddled with Lloyd and Luke. Suck it, peons.

  20. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:02 PM

    @#2: Way to go on misspelling your own name. Asshole.

  21. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:03 PM

    @12 In the parlance of our times, PWNED!

  22. Posted by lloyd | August 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    @19 two days ago? as in before it was written? kill yourself.

  23. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:06 PM

    @22 I think #19 was being sarcastic.
    http://sarchasm.net/

  24. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    i can attest to the fact that banker “huddles” have nothing to do with stock tips. ugh…
    -ex-banker chick in murray hill

  25. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:08 PM

    I’m calling bullshit on Blankie!
    Galvin will tear them a new one…and Cuomo will follow right after he a) reads about Galvin in the paper; and b) pulls his head out of his ass.
    Nice!

  26. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    Goldman employees meet at Huddle House for breakfast now? Huh?

  27. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    @8 They can’t do that to our clients. Only WE can do that to our clients

  28. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:55 PM
  29. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:58 PM

    @12, punctuation marks outside the quotation marks is GS style. They believe including punctuation inside the quotation marks means that the puntuation marks appeared in the quote and therefore render the quote imprecise and incorrect. I’m completely not joking.

  30. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 5:59 PM

    @30 fucking idiots

  31. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 6:05 PM

    @28, false. It’s an error.

  32. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 6:12 PM

    @31, Really? How then do you explain that the reverse convention is consistently used throughout their own IPO registration statement:
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/886982/0000950123-98-007892.txt
    You and most grammarians may consider it an error, but I can assure you that in this as in almost everyhthing else, the folks at 85 Broad think they’re right and everyone else is wrong.

  33. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 6:40 PM

    @32 the convention is not used consistently even in the document you cite.
    Brits follow some rule like this. Goldman does not.

  34. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM

    Who wrote this? An intern?

  35. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 7:49 PM

    @33, I can confirm that this is, in fact, GS style. Punctuation is allowed inside the quotation marks only when it appears there as part of the quotation, e.g., in the linked Project Echo prospectus, the period at the end of “Group L.P.” is OK within the quotation marks because it is inherent in the name.

  36. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 7:56 PM

    Goldman thinks they can just change an at least century old established rule of English grammar because they disagree? That might be the douchiest thing they’ve come up with yet.

  37. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM

    34-38 prove that dealbreaker can now be spammed easily.

  38. Posted by Perkins Maxwell | August 27, 2009 at 8:38 PM

    @8 FTW!
    @42: No, they’re just following British usage, which has been around at least as long as our style.
    Frankly, it makes more sense to put closing punctuation outside of the quotation–our system is ass-backwards (closing commas and periods go inside; semicolons and colons go outside).
    This does not mean GS aren’t pretentious assholes for following the British system instead of US usage, but they’re not technically incorrect.

  39. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    Dear Goldman Sachs,
    Blow me!
    Signed,
    Client not big enough to be invited to your huddle

  40. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 9:33 PM

    A1-45
    Whatever. I just thought GS paid for a better class of lawyers. They be recruiting at Fordham?

  41. Posted by guest | August 27, 2009 at 10:50 PM

    how the fuck am I gonna front-run the rest of my peers now, without GS tips? damn!

  42. Posted by accich | September 4, 2009 at 10:11 AM

    Kosten für Star-Strafverteidiger sind bezahlbar
    Hallo,
    man hört, dass Staranwälte wie Rolf Bossi, Eberhard Kempf, Wolf Schiller,Professor Alexander Ignor oder Dr. Ulrich Endres unbezahlbar seien.
    Scheint ein Märchen zu sein. Mein Freund hat bei sich bei Dr. Endres vorgestellt und zahlt ganz normal
    3.500 Euro plus 500,- / Verhandlungstag. Also alles im Rahmen. Bei Staranwalt Kempf ist es nur ein wenig teurer.
    Die Staranwälte sollen den Vorteil haben, die Richter und Staatsanwälte öfter persönlich zu kennen.
    Hat jemand ähnliche Erfahrung bei Strafverteidigern mit großen Namen?
    Achim

  43. Posted by irrirmmek | September 17, 2009 at 1:11 PM
  44. Posted by Глеб | September 28, 2009 at 5:08 AM

    Давно хотел спросить, автор, вы где живёте? В каком городе? Если не серкет:)

  45. Posted by Плоский | October 9, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    На главной странице оч.понравился шаблон…

  46. Posted by Drugged Family Sex]drunk sex orgy fashion spread thumbnails[/url] milfs drunk in a thong | November 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM

    yoo. good thread.

blog comments powered by Disqus