Opening Bell: 08.11.2009

Judge Questions Merrill Bonuses (NYT)
“A week after the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had settled the matter, Judge Jed S. Rakoff questioned whether the $33 million agreement with Bank of America was adequate. He refused to approve the deal, saying too many questions remained unanswered, including who knew what and when about the controversial payouts.”
Distressed Debt Deals On The Rise (Reuters)
At $84.4B, distressed-debt deals are on pace to double last year’s numbers.
Stanford Can’t Get Money To Mount Legal Defense (NYPost)
There stands a decent chance the government has the money tied up to the point that Stanford will effectively be getting a team of public defenders.
Despite Negative Revenue, UBS Making High Profile Hires (Bloomberg)
The marginally less client friendly Swiss bank is building out its teams in the downtime, having picked up more than 20 bankers from the competition. No mention of comp plans.
Toxic Assets May Need More Help (Reuters)
The Congressional Oversight Panel is looking for stress tests on the smaller banks/institutions to assure they’re not functionally inept, and wants capital support much in the same way it was available to the larger institutions.
Asia Showing Slow Climb Out Of Recession (NYT)
China released its economic numbers today, showing industrial output raising 10.8% and retail sales up 15%.
New York Fed In Hiring Spree (FT)
“The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is aggressively hiring traders as it seeks to manage its burgeoning securities holdings, making the central bank one of Wall Street’s most active recruiters of financial talent.”

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (25)

  1. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 7:26 AM

    UBS. . . well. . . sucks

  2. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 7:33 AM

    Working for the FED/gummint is the new killin’ it.

  3. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM

    Is a Bess-less day even worth living?

  4. Posted by wcburrs87 | August 11, 2009 at 7:46 AM

    Man, you guys have it ruff.
    -DK’s Collie

  5. Posted by american bandersnatch | August 11, 2009 at 7:49 AM

    The best and brightest will flood to the Fed to serve their country.

  6. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 8:03 AM

    Beth, you filthy animal liar where the hell are you?
    - cliffy

  7. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 8:33 AM

    Let the record officially state that yesterday was indeed the low water mark for Dealbreaker…to-date of course.

  8. Posted by NakedShort | August 11, 2009 at 8:40 AM

    Twas two nights before Bess’s return, when all through the ‘net
    Not a creature was stirring, not even as the Fed monetized public debt.
    The FMF photos were sent to her email with care,
    In hopes that Ms. Levin soon would be there.
    The DB commenters were nestled all snug in their beds,
    While visions of Amanda Drury’s cleave danced in their heads.
    And D. Kneal with his collie, and Greg in his Versace briefs,
    DB readers were tired of the posts stinking like M. Whitney’s queefs.
    With a little huge relevant photo, and text sent from the heavens,
    I knew in a moment it must be Ms. Levin.
    More rapid than eagles the insults they came,
    And she whistled, and shouted, and called them by name!
    “Now noted prostie lover! now, Mexican coke shark! now, Dimon and Blankfein!
    On, P. Tudor! On, Fatty Cohen!, on Asness and the CEO that drinks cheap wine!
    From the top of her head! to the tips of her fingers!
    Now comment away! Comment away! Let the nasty sarcasm linger!”
    She spoke not a word, but went straight to her work,
    And filled all of her posts, while displaying an evil smirk.
    And laying her finger aside of L. Kudlow’s blow filled nose,
    And giving a nod, as if to say LK get ripped up and bang some hoes!
    She sprang to her desk, as she tries to right this ship,
    She tries not to let the fact that she missed us too slip.
    But I heard her exclaim, as she returned to the block,
    “If you hated on DealBreaker while I was gone you can suck a cock!”

  9. Posted by wcburrs87 | August 11, 2009 at 8:43 AM

    I think we need a hotel bill from Bess’ stay in the islands.

  10. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 8:52 AM

    @8 FTW!

  11. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 8:55 AM

    @6
    Cliffy,
    You’ve gone to the deep end of wingnuttery. Stay there, don’t come back.
    PS. And you forgot to add Ph. D. to your signature, you are really losing it.

  12. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 9:15 AM
  13. Posted by Tax Chick | August 11, 2009 at 9:32 AM

    @Naked
    I think I love you!

  14. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM

    @Tax
    I advise against spreading the love too thinly. There are far too many guys to go round.

  15. Posted by Anal_yst | August 11, 2009 at 10:17 AM

    @ Naked
    As remarkable as that opus may be, I fear you may have some newfound free-time on your hands to pen such a work, say it aint so!
    @ Tax
    Ditto @14. For your woman parts’ sake.

  16. Posted by NakedShort | August 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

    @Anal_yst still gainfully employeed.
    It is amazing, however, where your mind can wonder at 3am when you have a liberal arts degree, a 12 rack of pale ale, and a horrible case on insomnia on your hands.

  17. Posted by Investorcluzo | August 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM

    @12 – c’mon man. feed us something new.
    http://dealbreaker.com/2008/06/as-noted-in-yesterdays-comment.php

  18. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    Off-topic, but I need one of y’all whiz kids to help me out here. I see that worker productivity rose by an astonishing 6% last quarter. The media ALWAYS reports productivity rise as a good thing, because it supposedly equates with a higher standard of living.
    My question is this – why can’t a higher productivity mean that people are working their assess off to make the same paycheck / work the same hours? That is, can’t productivity spikes reflect worsened working conditions? I assume not, since it’s never reported like this. Explain to me why. Please.

  19. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 11:00 AM

    Has anyone noticed the headlines that Atticus is closing shop in the US. Barakett is returning money in the funds to investors?

  20. Posted by Tax Chick | August 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM

    @14/ Anal
    One can express love/ appreciation for someone without using their lovely, lady bits. Sheesh! Based on your responses, you must fall in and out of love all the time.

  21. Posted by William Richards | August 11, 2009 at 11:28 AM

    @20/Tax Chick
    I fall in and out of love all the time. When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve fallen in love as many as six times before breakfast.

  22. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 11:30 AM

    Negative revenue?? So Ubs is paying customers to accept their services?

  23. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM

    @22—and those services are still overpriced.

  24. Posted by Tax Chick | August 11, 2009 at 12:16 PM

    @WR
    My age?! You presuppose something you know nothing of. Interesting.

  25. Posted by guest | August 11, 2009 at 1:11 PM

    @22 negative revenue from trading. happens.
    @18 yeah, it’s actually worse than the picture you’re painting. current productivity gains measure nothing more than that employment hours have fallen faster than revenues.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.