Screen shot 2009-10-29 at 3.09.23 PM.png


Q&A:
Screen shot 2009-10-29 at 3.12.34 PM.png

Comments (38)

  1. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    that’s hunky-dory. so why is rohit d’souza leaving griffo high and dry after only a year? they need to hire margaret brennan as head of investor relations — maybe then i’ll take these chumps seriously.

  2. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    Screw you, Bess.
    The Sorkin

  3. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    “Any closing Remarks on the fourth Quarter of 2008?
    Never again.”
    NICE

  4. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | October 29, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    Now the crash can happen.
    Tyler Durden

  5. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    Bess. You are killing it today.

  6. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM

    @2 you like that, bitch?
    -Bess

  7. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM

    geez. doesn’t cnbc need to cite their source?

  8. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:27 PM

    @7 just assume that it’s always bess.

  9. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    Never again? Isn’t that what everyone said in 1998 after LTCM failed?

  10. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    @9 that’s what they said after WW2

  11. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    BESS LEVIN FOR THE MOTHERFUCKING WIN

  12. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    @9 If I remember properly it was more like, “Great job, Merry, you fucking douche, I was having a good year and now THIS.”

  13. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    I decided to lift the suspensions on my donations at the sperm bank. For very different reasons.
    -Kenneth “Genetic Masterpiece” Lewis

  14. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    (.)(.)

  15. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    serious question. HOW CAN THEY SAY IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGIN? who do they knwow that?
    -LB

  16. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Anybody else like to wander around the office with a raging hard-on?
    The Sorkin

  17. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Oh yeah, never again… riiiiight.
    The dollar crumble will make LEH/AIG/BSC/ML look like a hand job…
    Do any of us honestly think the world will cough up $10 trillion over 7 years to fund our deficits?

  18. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    @17 Yes.

  19. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    under/over til someone rips this off?

  20. Posted by pfluger | October 29, 2009 at 4:07 PM

    An investment in US treasury debt is a solid long term investment.
    Our budgets are balanced, our money supply is well constrained, unemployment is low, and dropping thanks mostly to the success of the brilliantly designed “stimulus” including the cash for clunkers and all the money shuffled to the public sector unions.
    Everything is going exactly according to plan!
    - Christine Romer

  21. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    57%? what are they running–a closet index fund??? for all their hot air about ‘determination and hard work’ you’d think they’d at least beat the nasdaq!

  22. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    @21, you’re an idiot that can’t do math. Market indices are up only around 10% YTD. They are up around 57% from the year’s low (which occurred March/April).

  23. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:45 PM

    Bess, I think about you quite often.
    The Sorkin

  24. Posted by Teri | October 29, 2009 at 4:52 PM

    It’s shameful that once again we are seeing the NY Times copy-cat reporter Zach Kouwe borrow Dealbreaker’s news and report it as his own. I think readers should flood the NYT’s Dealbook comment section and remind them to man up and creidt Bess for the fresh news she clearly broke ahead of Kouwe.
    http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/citadel-to-allow-withdrawals-in-november/#comment-332287

  25. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 4:57 PM

    Nice…down 55% in 2008, up 57% in 2009. Congratulations investors, you are still down 30% from December 31st 2007!
    What a BS way to spin a 30% capital loss.

  26. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM

    @24 absurd.

  27. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    @25 Citadel really earned its 2 and 20. Remember it’s not about investors but Ken’s ego.

  28. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM
  29. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 5:58 PM

    @28 wow, who the fuck cares about a) that story at all b) that story weeks after the fact?

  30. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM

    @22 … apparently i’d better do the math for you:
    Nasdaq low, 3/9/09 = 1265.52
    Nasdaq close today = 2097.55
    % rise from bottom = +65.7%
    Nasdaq open 1/2/09 = 1579.19
    Ytd gain = +33%

  31. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 6:02 PM

    @29 = Teri

  32. Posted by JT | October 29, 2009 at 6:03 PM

    I posted a comment on Dealbook’s Citadel story about them stealing Dealbreakers news 20 min ago. And they didn’t post it. Looks like Kouwe can’t hadle the heat. He’s also a Dealbook editor so it’s clear they really control the comments at their site. Grow some balls NY Times.

  33. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM

    @31 more like someone who doesn’t care about a month old story about the rockettes.
    -jimmy d

  34. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 6:08 PM

    here’s a joke: ken griffin

  35. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM

    32,
    Same.
    -LA

  36. Posted by guest | October 29, 2009 at 11:36 PM

    Ken the Grief is leveraging up with a teen watching youporn and massaging a raging hardon. He’ll spill it and crash again within a year, mark my words.
    – Former citadel guy

  37. Posted by oldoiltrader | October 30, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    @32 I also tried to comment on Dealbook’s story lift of the Citadel news. They didn’t post my comment but I clearly struck a nerve with their reporter. He wrote back trying to justify his lack of sourcing and seems to still not understand that lots of other publications like Bloomberg, Business Insider, Reuters source Dealbreaker all the time for being first to a story. He says this is a ‘small news item’ yet checking the number of his reports on Dealbook I see he doesn’t report daily and this was likely a decent size story for him. I doubt Kouwe actually got his own copy of the Citadel letter. Here is his email:
    Old Oil trader,
    If I spent my time trying to figure out where every small piece of
    news was first reported, then I’d spend all day trying to figure out
    which blog, website, Facebook page ect. was first to have a certain
    piece of information instead of actually reporting. I started writing
    this piece after I received the letter, which is around the same time
    others most likely received the letter. Bloomberg and other wire
    services often receive pieces of news before one another and don’t
    spend all day crediting those who had the info an hour before.

    Zachery Kouwe
    Business Reporter
    The New York Times
    620 Eighth Ave
    New York, NY 10018-1405
    (p) 212-556-3824
    (c) 551-655-4032
    kouwe@nytimes.com

  38. Posted by guest | October 30, 2009 at 6:45 PM

    @37 that is so funny. Isn’t Kouwe the former NY Post reporter who wrote a bunch of stories that read like he was shilling for T.H. Lee and his P.E. deals.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.