Doubtful! Oh, but not so, says the the Post, claiming that not only does SK want the job, but that she “went public with her ambitions to run the bank” yesterday on CNBC. Those of you who saw the appearance live might be wondering when exactly Krawcheck revealed her plot to take over Bank of America. Were you in the bathroom at the time? Was the TV on mute? Were you momentarily distracted by Caruso and Cabrera? Apparently, according to the paper, it was when the Kraw made the statement that she’s “very much focused” on what she’s doing running BofA’s wealth-management unit. If that doesn’t say “Krawcheck for CEO 2010,” the Post don’t know what does. Confused? Let us assist you in following the giant leaps in logic.
Krawcheck was responding to Charlie “I’m workin’ the phones here” Gasparino’s demand that she tell him point blank whether or not she’s after her boss’s job. Although CG only gave SK two options (“Yes or no? Yes or no? Yes or no?”), she went with scenario C, which Gaspo seemed to interpret as an affirmative (you can tell by the “nailed it” look on his face at the end of the clip). The Post is sold, are we? Take a looksee at the damming evidence and let us know. (Krawcheck unveils her plan at 14:15.)
I thought she kept her kraw pretty well in check.
Would that make Montag leave?
- Beleaguered BAC Shareholder
I’d hit it.
@3 I’d fire it.
-vik
Would you hit it? Discuss.
Would you hit it? Discuss.
I like when sk tells cg “we don’t go back that far” in response to him claiming they’ve known each other for years.
charlie gasparino is not a friend of mine.
-the kraw
@4 that’s because you hate women.
-zoe c
@5 – Anyone who says no is an idiot, a homo, Greg, a ZH reader, Tax Chick, or an idiot, a homo, Greg, a ZH reader, Tax Chick, or…wait, what?
Yes, and I’d probably choose the pay to play option if I had to.
When CG, the David Halberstam of the financial journalism gig jumped in, the interview went to shit.
The Kraw’s initial response to the Gasser’s question was the appropriate one — she laughed it off.
She knows it all about “da self promotion” of a hack.
@11 admit it, I nailed that broad to the wall.
-cg
“Workin da phones” = PBS pledge drive with Danny Tartabull.
@5
I’d hit it.
“it moved,” however, unfortunately for me, it is moving continuously and I have a meeting in a couple minutes.
@11
Look man if you think I’m a self promoting hack you should buy my upcoming book to see that I’m truly the Walter Cronkite of financial journalism. Oh and…. dis n dat!
Dis ‘n dat.
-CG
I would repeatedly hide da salami in between her meat curtains.
I am not Dennis Kneale
She should do a cooking show.
-Larry S.
ORGASMEEEEEP!
after I leave, do you think I can hit it, legally? I dont need andrew cuomo on my ass for anything else.
-KL
This skank is no Erin Callan. I know the recruiter with the CEO mandate. I’ll suggest EC.
I find her sensy
@13 ftw
For a donation of only $40 you get a tote bag with the likeness of KL holding a bottle of Boone’s Farm Strawberry Hill
@21 “snank”? really? kill yourself.
@24, I believe he said “skank”
I love the.. (at 0:47)
“People are getting a little bit tired of the…RUBBERNECKING…(pause)…”
snank is the new slore/whunt.
Too attractive; didn’t hear the words coming out of her mouth
@Covered
You are right, but I don’t like the company in which I find myself.
@12/cg:
Yeah, Charlie, you were great, as usual. Almost up there with MM, another renowned “journalist.”
Your financial expertise is almost (not quite there) at his level. I like your “insights” into the rating agency oligopoly problems very much:
“Its da issuer pays model! Da issuer pays model. I’m tellin’ ya, its da issuer pays model. Dat’s what I’m tellin’ ya.”
You have the insights of a former amateur boxer. LD looks like a genius compared to you. Greg writes better prose than you. You are a leech. A bum.
i have thought she was kinda sexy since the 2002 cover of Fortune Mag…still do.
The BofA board knows you’d hit it. But would you work for it?
@30
Did you write a fuckin’ book on da crisis? Dats what I thought, you figlio di puttana.
-CG
@30/pfluger
Did I disgrace you in the gym or something? I’m sorry if by me punishing my lats next to you attempting to bench the bar I made you look bad in front of the ladies, but don’t try to wipe out mah rep brah, just cuz’ you’re a puny little Nancy.
OK, let me suggest that if you’re a man, the answer is no. You’d rather work for Lloyd. When you examine Lloyd’s gold-plated scrot (with awe) you can imagine, “I can get one like that, encrusted with jewels too; yes, mine will be better.” But when you examine Sallie’s gold-plated, platinum filigreed labia, you draw a blank. Feeling yourself, you think, “huh, this is not like that.”
You fuckin’ cawlin’ me a figlio di puttana, ya fessacchione??!.
If I didn’t have to be workin’ da phones today, I’d come ova dare and woik ova yer finocchio mug, ya bastid!
Glossary:
figlio di puttana m. (vulgar) son of a bitch.
finocchio m. (vulgar) queer, fairy, gay.
fessacchione/a n. a [complete] idiot; (lit.): big idiot.
How’d she get the Fisher account?
I like chicks with short hair, they tidy up nice and quick following office BJs.
@29/TC – Allow me to re-phrase. What I meant to say was: ‘anybody who says no is either, Giselle, Sallie Krawcheck, Bess, or Tax Chick.’
Better?
@31 Fortune = People mag for middle managers
TC, we’re all friends here, ‘fess up: you’d totally hit it.
@37. I am Marcus Halberstam. Who is Patrick Bateman?
handbridge, no question
@Covered
Much better company.
@41
If I say yes, there will be a flurry of girl-on-girl fantasy posts. Let’s stay focused here people!
http://www.imagesofsociety.com/webready_women113006/images/prevs/DSC_0197.jpg
Handbridge.
someone has to say it:
it tees up some nice girl on girl action between SK and MWhitney, with the former trading favors to the latter in consideration of favorable coverage…..
someone has to say it:
it tees up some nice girl on girl action between SK and MWhitney, with the former trading favors to the latter in consideration of favorable coverage…..
someone has to say it:
it tees up some nice girl on girl action between SK and MWhitney, with the former trading favors to the latter in consideration of favorable coverage…..
someone has to say it:
it tees up some nice girl on girl action between SK and MWhitney, with the former trading favors to the latter in consideration of favorable coverage…..
enough
already