As you’re aware, ten more people are expected to be charged with insider trading this week. Some of them may be connected to the Rajaratnam case. Others will be accused of dipping their wick elsewhere. The authorities refuse to give any hints as to who could potentially be perp-walking, forcing us to wildly speculate, since we can’t take the suspense! To that end, we’re just going to throw some stuff out there. Maybe it means something, maybe not! It’s all relative.
One of the cooperating witnesses in the Galleon case is Choo Beng Lee, who started Spherix Capital in March 2008, after working at Stratix Asset Management, a tech fund. Stratix was formed by SAC veterans Ian Goodman and Richard Grodin, and closed in December 2007, supposedly due to personal issues between the founders. Grodin then started Quadrum Capital, another tech-focused fund, around March 2008. We were told yesterday that Quadrum “abruptly” closed at some point last week. And apparently they really don’t want to talk about it, because the firm’s number is now out of service.
Update, 10/24: The WSJ has confirmed all of the above, and notes that Grodin had been subpoenaed for his trading records.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (43)

  1. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM

    It’s not me biotches, and stop talking about my Zamboni.
    -SC

  2. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:18 PM

    bess levin i’m going to eat you alive.
    -you know who

  3. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:22 PM

    Quadrum doesn’t exist on Bloomberg and Richard Grodin is still listed at Stratix. Must have been quite the shop at Quadrum.

  4. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM

    @3
    We ran it out of my mom’s basement, using Scottrade as our prime broker.
    -Quadrum Quant

  5. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM

    @3 stratix closed in 2007. tell the fucking mayor to update his system.
    http://www.finalternatives.com/node/3084
    and Quadrum existed, until recently…

  6. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM

    Bess, a word to the wise– you don’t want to dig further into this one.
    -a friend in Stamford

  7. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    So it WAS the Trannies……with the candlestick….in the library!!!!
    I knew It!!!
    – Cluso

  8. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    @5 I’ll update things when I damn well please.
    Dictator For Life MB

  9. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM

    @7 I think Rich and Ian were out of 72 Cummings before Tranny-Gate.

  10. Posted by Legacy Lehman Quant | October 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

    SAC knows all.
    True Story: AQR is the special project arm of SAC. The physical distance between the two firms was specifically calculated so as not to not affect the tilt and rotation of earth.
    Why do you think both firms share 3 letter acronyms, eh, eh?
    -Legacy Lehman Quant

  11. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    You can take the Israelis out of Brooklyn , but can’t take the Brooklyn of the Israelis

  12. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

    @10 may your next attempt at hilarity be successful. godspeed.

  13. Posted by Legacy Lehman Quant | October 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    @12 shut your dirty whore mouth!

  14. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM

    12,
    Get a sense of humor, you dolt.
    -Not 10

  15. Posted by highlyconfident | October 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

    Raj and Lil Wayne are going to tear up the jailhouse mixtape scene.

  16. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Of all the desks I have visited over the years, Galleon and Stratix seemed the most unnecessarily tense/high strung.
    Ian looked liek he had been up for days every time I met him. Nice guy though.
    Vendor Boy
    (To the Rescue!)

  17. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 1:11 PM

    One buy side fuckstick who chewed me out unnecessarily down – 38 to go.
    Sell Side Desk Jockey

  18. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 1:11 PM

    The difference b/w Galleon and SAC is Galleon used inside information from inside companies. SAC uses inside information from inside Wall St. They get tipped off on all sorts of stuff by the sell side itself, since they are such big commission payers. Stevie is too smart to go around messing with amateur fraudsters at IR firms, McKinsey, and the like.

  19. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    The difference b/w Galleon and SAC is Galleon used inside information from inside companies. SAC uses inside information from inside Wall St. They get tipped off on all sorts of stuff by the sell side itself, since they are such big commission payers. Stevie is too smart to go around messing with amateur fraudsters at IR firms, McKinsey, and the like.

  20. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 1:34 PM

    @18/19 what’s the difference b/t Galleon and SAC?

  21. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    @15 – Chopped and “Screwed”!!!

  22. Posted by Google Cache | October 22, 2009 at 1:49 PM
  23. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM

    @15, bitter much?

  24. Posted by Google Cache | October 22, 2009 at 2:02 PM

    http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:Sh6PeJuSutMJ:www.linkedin.com/pub/richard-j-johnson/5/b89/75+site:linkedin.com+Richard+J.+Johnson
    Google Cache of Linked-in page. Get it before the cache expires, as the page has been wiped to read “Hand Model, Furniture Industry”

  25. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 2:03 PM

    @22 the richard referred to in the post is richard grodin.

  26. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    @24 awesome. he also spelled the name of the fucking fund incorrectly.

  27. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    @24 how can that be real? is he drunk and updating his linkedin profile? under info about Stratix he wrote “we really rocked it.”

  28. Posted by Galleon and Grodin | October 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

    Galleon was a sponsor of the Grodin’s pet charity for Lyme disease. The more constant contributor was Goldman (sacks of coin).
    http://www.turnthecorner.org/2005sponsors.htm

  29. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    @20, a deep fryer, a shark in formaldehyde, some smokin’ trannies and about $16 bio?

  30. Posted by highlyconfident | October 22, 2009 at 3:02 PM

    @23 very bitter. My rap career hasn’t taken off because those Galleon boys have been hoggin all the top spots on the charts.

  31. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @17
    You’re sellside, get used to it or go work with that Chiang fellow at McDonalds.

  32. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    Is this our girl? If so, does Trivium have something to worry about?
    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/roomy-khan/2/238/b52

  33. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    @17
    You’re sellside, get used to it or go work with that Chiang fellow at McDonalds.

  34. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    the detective trail reads like an STD transmission flowchart.

  35. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    @35 what?

  36. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    This is why we need our H1B1 visa system, to keep the skilled workers in this country rather than our competitors.

  37. Posted by guest | October 22, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    @37 what the fuck does that have to do with anything? the guys referenced above are white males. insider trading knows no color.

  38. Posted by guest | October 24, 2009 at 11:18 AM
  39. Posted by Teri | October 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM

    Bess did an excellent job of souring and reporting there were problems with Grodin’s firm and his ties to SAC capital. It looks like Susan Pulliam at the WSJ saw Dealbreaker’s story and figured it’s worth checking out. So I find it very disappointing that that the WSJ doesn’t have the editorial ethics to report that Dealbreaker was first to report news that Grodin had suddenly closed his fund this week. Don’t you?

  40. Posted by guest | October 24, 2009 at 1:14 PM

    it took the journal 2 days to copy this story? nice.

  41. Posted by JT | October 24, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    I think if any Dealbreaker readers also have a WSJ password to comment they should speak out on WSJ’s story and remind readers that Bess was first to this story. We need to hold them accountable for consistantly copying or out right stealing DB’s hard work.

  42. Posted by guest | October 24, 2009 at 9:54 PM

    “Probe Widening .. Ties to a Witness.”
    Bess, you’re right: WSJ has become a straight-up smut factory.
    @42/JT, someone did,
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125632433920204407.html#articleTabs=comments#comment576416

  43. Posted by guest | October 25, 2009 at 2:32 PM

    nice work levin

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.