Picture 35.pngAs previously mentioned, Raj Rajaratnam’s younger brother, Regnan, was investigated for insider trading in 2007. But why did baby bro (maybe) get into a game of just the (hot stock) tip in the first place? Based on this quote from 2001, I’m thinking to land some ladies. Here’s what Rengs told Fox in an interview on bachelors competing for a dwindling supply of bachelorettes:

“It definitely feels like there are less quality women out there,” said Rengan Rajaratnam, 31, a hedge fund analyst in New York. “I stress about it. It’s like they’ve all gone away or someone snatched them all.”


Think about it: at the time Reng-Raj lamented the lack o’ ladies, he was working for his brother at Galleon. He’s making pretty good money, but he’s striking out with the females, big time. Finance is his thing but he feels like he needs to work under a boss who could also serve as an ass-tapping mentor, as opposed to some asshole who refuses to share the largesse (“I don’t want your wick where mine’s been dipped and vice versa”), which would explain why he took a job at SAC Capital. Six months later, he sets up his own shop, Sedna, but without Stevie as his wingman, he’s lost. He feels inferior to Raj, who’s got the Big Boy fund, and is constantly asking little bro if he’s gay, ’cause he never sees him with any girls. (“Not that there’s anything wrong with that,” Raj said, turning down the Kenny Rogers. “Just sayin’ what I’m seein’. Don’t feel bad, the panties don’t spontaneously drop ’til you make your first unit. Hey, you want me to toss an IR girl your way?”). So maybe Rengs figures, I’ll show him. I’ll take some of this info I got from this Danielle Chiesi character, score billions and the tail that comes with it, and then I’ll ask that jerk how my ass tastes. And then I’ll dance.

Comments (66)

  1. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:30 AM

    He’s not getting the ladies because he’s probably an idiot!!

  2. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:31 AM

    @1 um, what?

  3. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:33 AM

    I would say that everything I do can be traced back to whether or not it will score me chicks, so I’d agree with this assessment.
    -male

  4. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:35 AM

    @2 um, can you read?

  5. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:37 AM

    2nd @3

  6. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM

    @4 yeah I can read I’m just wondering wtf your comment is about, since it’s neither funny or insightful (you need to be smart to land chicks? no, you need to have a 12″ cock. that should do it. or you just need to not be hideous as fuck, like the rajaratnam brothers).
    -2

  7. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM

    As opposed to findig quality chicks in India??

  8. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM

    Bess, Great work as always. I have a script for a movie. I’d like you to take it and kick it up a notch.

  9. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:42 AM

    “someone snatched them up.” or your brother ate them.

  10. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM

    Just take the fucking Q Train to Sheepshead Bay, make it rain, get out of the train and get into your M5 and every hot russian south-barn baytard hoe will be at your disposal. Literally, they will want you to use them and then dispose of them because they have the self-esteem of a deer with cerebral palsy. It’s that simple, they won’t even care if your tiny penis smells like last week’s punjabi dhabi take out.
    -Reason why south barn baytard hoes have no self esteem

  11. Posted by CoveredLong | November 25, 2009 at 9:45 AM

    @9 – Speaking of eating things…why was 6 afraid of 7 and how are you posting considering what 7 did to you?

  12. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | November 25, 2009 at 9:47 AM

    @7 ftw

  13. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:48 AM

    @10 Please let us know how much of your late model M5 remains when you get there. Or is this a 1985 model that no one would touch?

  14. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM

    @ 6, OK good point.

  15. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM

    “snatched” ??? Interesting. Jung would get a chubby over that.
    Dr. Sigmoid Freud

  16. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 9:58 AM

    Yes the lack of quality is lamentable but I make for it in quantity.

  17. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM

    @16 good point. maybe he wasn’t saying that he doesn’t score any chicks but just not hot ones?

  18. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:03 AM

    2nd @3

  19. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:06 AM

    The hot chicks are all targeting pro sports team members now. The sports players are dumber, have better looking bodies and have shitloads more cash than most hedgefund or banker types.

  20. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM

    @19 “better looking bodies”? speak for yourself!
    -SC

  21. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:10 AM

    @19, that may be true but most will piss through their money and become destitute within a couple of years

  22. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:11 AM

    @19
    Speak for your self
    -SAC

  23. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM

    @19 since when do girls target dumb guys?

  24. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    Gotta say, I knew this kid for years, total douche. But he often had some super hot biznatches hanging out with him – funny what throwing money around does for a guy…

  25. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    heh . . heh . . he said “snatch” . . .

  26. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    @23….ask Jessica Simpson.

  27. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM

    @26 bad example. simpson is an idiot herself. romo is likely smarter than her. it’s all relative. my point is that chicks don’t tend go after guys who are markedly dumber than them, as much as guys would go after airheads.

  28. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    Reng sounds like an idiot. Must be the full-retard brother, never go full-retard, that’s where Raj went wrong. Not the insider trading, gets you in trouble every time.

  29. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM

    @27…aren’t you forgetting the “money angle”…..the phrase “Gold Digger” comes from such female attraction to money regardless of evident intellectual capital.
    ~L. Dykstra
    Refrigerator Box, NY

  30. Posted by Lowly Assistant | November 25, 2009 at 10:28 AM

    1 has to merge with 6 in order to survive.
    -Houlihan Lokey Associate, Huffing Duster

  31. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:32 AM

    @24 So what you’re saying is that the total douche had the money and got the snatch and you didn’t even after knowing him all those years and still not figuring it out.
    Do I have that right? Because if so, you’re the dumb fuck, not him, asshole.

  32. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    Raj Rajaratnam’s younger brother is called “Regnan”???
    Why did his parents name Raj’s little brother after a President of the United States? I’m sure a lot of people were named after President Ronald Regnan, but there must be some sort of connection that helped the family in some way. I’d be very suspicious about that.
    ~Former Lehman Risk Quant

  33. Posted by ex-PMB chick | November 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    IMHO A sense of humor is also important.

  34. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    every single post on db so far has something to do with south asia
    jus’ sayin’

  35. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    I think 32 has “money” and gets plenty o’ “snatch” as a result but is deathly afraid of losing the ability to do so.
    ~Dickey Carl Jung
    Redneck Psychiatrist
    Mom’s Couch, TN

  36. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM

    Why do Indin women have a red dot on their forehead?

  37. Posted by Anal_yst | November 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM

    Apparently the wednesday before thanksgiving dealbreaker commentariat doesn’t understand game, poor schmucks, appreciate you making it easy for me.
    –Guy who gets girls way out of his league because full retards (with money) are such douchebags

  38. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:42 AM

    @anal_yst- yeah you get girls, hah, thanks for that.

  39. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM

    yeah analyst, you’re only one here who understands game…

  40. Posted by Tax Chick | November 25, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    @36 – traditionally it is a sign they have said their daily prayers (hindu). However, it has moved more mainstream and become something of an accessory.

  41. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    @35 meant comment to @31, not @32. Or it was a “Freudian Slip”. And Sigmund leaves a lot of the slips he wears at everyone’s house. Just sayin’…and having said that, I agree with @33 about the sense of humor thing.

  42. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:46 AM

    My Indian girlfriend got mad at me and I said, “Hey, don’t have a cow over this..” and then she really got mad for some reason.
    ~AIG Protocol Quant

  43. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    do we have a pic of the baby bro? is he as hot as rajraj? i can’t wait. someone pls post the pic ASAP. thx!

  44. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    do we have a pic of the baby bro? is he as hot as rajraj? i can’t wait. someone pls post the pic ASAP. thx!

  45. Posted by jakedog | November 25, 2009 at 10:58 AM

    did a google image search of his name
    this is what came up
    http://www.freedomcrowsnest.org/forum/images/avatars/19187892774ab83b24904d3.jpg
    no wonder he has a problem with the ladies

  46. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 10:59 AM

    Why do you call it “tail”?
    ~Chip-Chip
    Leader, Capuchin Monkeys
    Primate Exhibit
    Bronx Zoo

  47. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

    @45 Excellent find

  48. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM

    @31, Hey asshat, you have it wrong.
    Not sure whose ass you’re wearing but its keeping you from your 2nd grade reading ‘skillz’.
    Noone gives a shit about how much poontang I scored, therefore it wasn’t mentioned.
    I knew the kid and, as I made clear, hated him (since…. he was a douche…)
    I was just contributing to the public’s image of Rangan, unlike your shit comment, dickhead waste of life @31.

  49. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 11:25 AM

    Maybe they don’t like smelly, terrorist loving Paki’s.

  50. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 11:41 AM

    Yes.
    Ragnan

  51. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM

    @48 Seems like 31s comment cut you to the bone.
    A little testy there?

  52. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM

    42 is funny and racist at the same time.

  53. Posted by turd_ferguson | November 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM

    In life there are face fuckers and those who get face fucked. Raj got Chiesi, Reg got Nails.

  54. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 12:43 PM

    I see these indian guys all over the meatpacking, soho, village failing to score tail.
    They are almost always dorky, with bad haircuts, chunky, out of style (ie, big striped floppy collars from 2002).
    And they are always trying to get white chicks.
    I think they missed the memo that said….white pussy is possible if you clean up, get some style and be cool.
    They want to take short cuts and think the world cares about their bogus hedge, IT start up, or cell store.
    Take a hint from the other international NYC men who regulary pound pussy.
    Spend heavily on clothes, grooming, your pad, whiten the teeth, dine at 5 star places to get some manners, lose the nasal accent then work your way up from half-breed south asians, to hispanics, to asians, to eastern euros to some white pussy.
    Any shoortcut is like trying to shove a cisco router into your disc drive…..got it Rajiv?

  55. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 1:56 PM

    49, while your Islamaphobia is quaint, its as dated as the 80s
    Last night at Cippriani Downtown there was 1 Ferrari, 1 Lamborghini, and 1 Buggati Parked outside.
    I asked if it was a Hollywoold promotion. Turns out the owners were: 1 Lebanese, 2 Persians….not convenient…but true nevertheless.

  56. Posted by guest | November 25, 2009 at 2:57 PM

    @54
    That is so true. Indians guys try so hard to bag what is really run through high mileage white poon.
    They are almost as pitiful as the Asian girls who fall all over themselves trying to bag the shlubbiest white guys around.

  57. Posted by Anal_yst | November 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    @55
    If your point was to remind everyone that only huge douchebags hang out @ Cipriani (Soho), then you’ve succeeded (although I’m not sure such a reminder was necessary). If you had any other intent, your comment was an epic failure.

  58. Posted by guest | November 26, 2009 at 4:33 AM

    54
    NYC chicks are mediocre at best. I’m not into Jewish, Italian or Irish girls. Sure, 3-5% are hot, but the other 95% are hurtin’
    that’s why I relocated to Orange County. I see more dimes in a night out in Newport or Laguna than a week of going out in Soho, Meatpacking or wherever you think is cool and trendy.

  59. Posted by guest | November 26, 2009 at 10:21 AM

    Loved the artcile. The author must know Rengan personally.It’s right on.
    Heard that his parents funded the “Tamil Tigers” group. http://www.businessinsider.com/raj-rajaratnam-funded-sri-lankan-terror-group-2009-10
    So not only those 2 ugly asses were ripping people off and doing insider trading they were funding a war in their homeland.

  60. Posted by guest | November 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM

    @54. Gotta disagree with the order of the last two in terms of “pussy” alone.
    @55. See 57.

  61. Posted by guest | November 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM

    bunch of douchbags in this post…..

  62. Posted by guest | November 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM

    bunch of douchebags in this post…..

  63. Posted by guest | November 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM

    bunch of douchebags in this post…..

  64. Posted by Laticia | September 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM

    Apparently this is what the esemteed Willis was talkin’ ’bout.

  65. Posted by qucfbh | September 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM

    88tZ6d dkcrktoimqsg

  66. Posted by eaegmg | October 2, 2011 at 12:12 PM

    J1OTaW rjdzvuuxojuy

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.