• 09 Nov 2009 at 9:57 AM

Ken Lewis’s Final Days

As we’ve seen, it’s become pretty clear that no one wants the Worst Job on Wall Street. This morning, The Wall Street Journal explains precisely why.

Kenneth D. Lewis never imagined his eight-year run as chief executive of Bank of America Corp. would end this way.
He had faced a year of headaches big and small. His mother nudged him about paying back the $45 billion of aid his bank got from the federal government. As he pondered his future during a Colorado vacation in August, a bear rummaged through the refrigerator in his mountain home. But what drove the banker out the door was his inability to get along with Uncle Sam.

It gets worse.

As early as last December, a Federal Reserve official emailed a colleague seeking ideas on getting a “pound of flesh” from Mr. Lewis, amid controversy over his then-pending acquisition of flailing Merrill Lynch & Co.

Well, they got it when Lewis decided to step down from the firm he’s worked for for 40 years. But whoever will succeed Antonio?
The Journal looks at that, too, in the inaptly headlined, “Board May Reject Lewis’s Picks to Succeed Him.” The article doesn’t really deliver on the promise of further indignities heaped upon Lewis, but it does let us know who Lewis thinks should be put on the rack next.
First up is Gregory Curl, the old steady hand and current chief risk officer, who Lewis thinks would do a great job steering the S.S. BofA through the icebergs while giving “younger candidates more time to mature.”
If the board’s not interested in that kind of prudence, well, Kenny says, give it to the young bucks. Brian Moynihan is his first choice amongst the three available, with the consumer banking chief besting investment bank head Thomas Montag and mortgages head Barbara Desoer.
Lewis warned that if the board that had turned against him went outside the firm for its next CEO, it would risk an “exodus of top executives.” And given the tremendous job they’ve all done, who wants to see that?
We could know as soon as Thanksgiving.
Of course, Lewis and his cronies are hardly the only reason that BofA finds itself in such an unpleasant position. The federal officials who bullied the bank into buying the failing Merrill Lynch sure have a funny way of showing their gratitude. In April,
Regulators, including those from the Fed, said they planned to file a confidential memorandum of understanding against the bank because of concerns about such things as governance and its ability to manage risk and fund operations in times of stress.
Directors were shocked Fed officials would slap the bank for its performance after other officials, from the Fed and Treasury, had pressured it to complete a deal it was wary of, the Merrill purchase. The sanction, issued soon after, required the bank to overhaul its board and fix risk-related issues.
Lewis raised the white flag in September. But BofA couldn’t even get his final act right. Lewis told three of the bank’s directors that he’d announce his plans to leave on Oct. 2. But Chairman Walter Massey couldn’t wait to spread the news, leading BofA’s chief marketing officer to worry about a leak. Lewis complied on Sept. 30.

Mr. Lewis spoke to directors on the call without notes, seated at a white marble conference table in a Manhattan office. At one point, he ambled to a window and looked toward Central Park, saying nothing.

Shakespearean.
With Feds, BofA’s Lewis Met His Match [WSJ]
Board May Reject Lewis’s Picks to Succeed Him [WSJ]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (14)

  1. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM

    Too long, didn’t read.

  2. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM

    @1 exactly what I was thinking.
    Is this EP is disguise?

  3. Posted by Anal_yst | November 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM

    wait, they’re seriously considering making the chief RISK officer…at BofA…CEO? Is that a f*cking joke?

  4. Posted by Investorcluzo | November 9, 2009 at 10:30 AM

    @1 – exactly…damn, when did “pithy” go out of style?

  5. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    @cluzo – the commentariat only wants curry slurs and regal sensy pix.

  6. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    boring article.

  7. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 12:43 PM

    @6 go make something happen, bitch.

  8. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 12:47 PM

    @ 7- I will. Don’t you worry.
    -6

  9. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    @3….same brilliant thinking put Chuck Prince at the head of Shitty to clean up the ethical and legal messes Weill’s reign of error created. How’d that go?

  10. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM

    @1,2,4- this actually wasn’t a bad read at all. Maybe you need to take today’s dose of adderall

  11. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM

    Montag. It’s the quiet ones you have to watch out for.

  12. Posted by guest | November 9, 2009 at 9:30 PM

    Pretty transparent. KL wants either Curl or Moynihan as his successor, even though everyone who knows them, knows they are clearly unqualified. But because they were connected at the hip with KL on the Merrill transaction they are unlikely to cut him loose to fend for himself in the dozens of lawsuits and government investigations. He figures they are as tainted as he is so much more likely to keep the spin going.
    The only guy that can save this ship is de Molina, but after standing up to KL, Ken has trashed him with the board.
    Don’t look for BAC to turn anytime soon.

  13. Posted by guest | November 10, 2009 at 3:58 AM

    Moynihan = not qualified
    Short the stock if he is named CEO

  14. Posted by guestst | November 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM

    Curl= Mr.Peabody
    Short the stock if he is named CEO

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.