phils.jpgPHILADELPHIA–The New York Yankees failed to end the World Series last night with a victory over the Philadelphia Phillies. For the superstitious among you, especially the Yankee fans, there’s an extraordinarily stupid “study” that says you should be extra fearful of a Phillies comeback in the series.
Since 1930, when the Yankees have taken home the Commissioner’s Trophy, the U.S. gross domestic product has grown an average of 5% in the following year. On those exceedingly rare occasions that the Phillies are the last team standing, things don’t go so well: In 1981, a year after the Phils’ first-ever championship after 97 years of futility, the economy grew a paltry 2.9% amidst sky-high interest rates and 7.5% unemployment. This year, the reigning champs have presided over what seems likely to be negative economic growth.
Here’s still more reason to root for the Bronx Bombers: The only other time these two teams have met in the Fall Classic, in 1950, the Yanks swept the Phils, leading to a prosperous 7.7% increase in GDP in 1951.


These potentially ominous/potentially promising numbers were crunched by the good folks at The Wall Street Journal’s Real Time Economics blog. And they readily admit a major flaw: The Yankees are the most-successful sports franchise in history, while the Phillies have lost more games than any other professional sports franchise (10,206 and counting). So while the Yanks have been to 33 World Series over the past 79 years and won 23 of them, the Phillies have hoisted just five pennants and two world championship banners.
The Yanks have two more chances to ensure the economy turns around next year, starting tomorrow night at Yankee Stadium.
Yankees World Series Victories Boost Economic Growth

Comments (34)

  1. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM

    All those fancy numbers without one bra size. JS is a homo.

  2. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 8:57 AM

    @1
    A-Rod used to have C cups. Happy now?

  3. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:02 AM

    Baseball talk on DB? Tsk, tsk.

  4. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:04 AM

    This is what happens when Wall Street economists don’t have enough to do in October. Next they’ll tell you that securitized mortgages are safe again.

  5. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:05 AM

    Go Phils, I don’t care what happens to the GDP.

  6. Posted by merkin capital partners | November 3, 2009 at 9:09 AM

    We had Greg’s mom, I think we need Jon’s dad.

  7. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:10 AM

    @MCC
    Why not a wife?

  8. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:16 AM

    @7 I think @6 is a dude

  9. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM

    Here’s an undubious statistic. Every February 2nd MCC steps outside naked in the predawn chill. If her nips swell by more than 2cms, it means 6 more weeks of winter.

  10. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:22 AM

    6=racist

  11. Posted by Ron Burgandy | November 3, 2009 at 9:29 AM

    60% of the time it works every time.

  12. Posted by Joe Mac | November 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM

    Air-in Burnett’s attempt at cleave today woefully inadequate.

  13. Posted by american bandersnatch | November 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM

    Jon is clearly a better writer than Greg, but the comments that Greg invoked were funnier.

  14. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:45 AM

    Burnett is a lost cause. Great puppet but a shitty anchor. No rack, no insight, annoying c**t.

  15. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 9:57 AM

    Let’s go Phils. Redemption time for Pedro.

  16. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:01 AM

    @13, Just because we don’t have Greg doesn’t mean that we can’t take a lesson from @15 and keep up the Greg comments.
    I expect to hear from you regularly Greg’s Mom.

  17. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM

    These kind of statistics are carted out every year during the Super Bowl, Presidential election and World Series to remind us that statistics (and economics by association) are essentially entertainment with little to no mathematical or predictive value. Thanks for reminding us Jon.

  18. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:13 AM

    @17 = Shazanus

  19. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:32 AM

    While it’s too early to tell for sure it does seem that JS is doing a better job than Greg. My concern though is that while better, it (at this point anyway) is only marginal, and therefore not worthy of the thrashing Greg took on a daily basis, and certainly not close to Bess’ witty prose. We therefore enter the more dangerous territory of mediocraty, and that my fellow snarky DB’ers is unacceptible. Please bring Greg back!

  20. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:33 AM

    17=Jim Cramer

  21. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    Go yanks!

  22. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM

    @19 = Greg’s mom

  23. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    WHERE IS GREG MICHAELS????

  24. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    Shazar is only on loan so enjoy him while you can.
    ~Jon’s Boss

  25. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM

    What about skirt lengths? Do they still predict economic cycles? Shorter the skirt, the higher the market?
    Or maybe we can find a correlation with anal bleach sales…

  26. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM

    16 here, what happened to the Macke post oat 15?
    I thought it was clever … a slightly chalkier generic brand of toothpaste … that’s the kind of insidious behavior I’ve come to expect from Jeff Macke.
    Why’d it get deleted?

  27. Posted by merkin capital partners | November 3, 2009 at 11:04 AM

    @24 on loan from that geocities 1998 looking site he came from? I’m sure he can’t wait to return.

  28. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 11:16 AM

    Totally agree with @13/AB and @19. The comments for Greg were some of our best. We are indeed entering a dangerous world of mediocrity and we need to come up with some sort of system/agreement.

  29. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM

    @19 who you callin’ “my fellow snarky DBers?”

  30. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    What happened to Greg? I miss Greg.

  31. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    When the Red Sox win naked chicks rain from the sky.

  32. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM

    @31
    True, but they’re all fat and have atrocious accents.

  33. Posted by Apollo | November 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM

    @16 Oh, but I already hear regularly from Greg’s mom. . . old reliable. . .

  34. Posted by guest | November 3, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    Yeah, I got this press release too. Nice work, Jon.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.