• 19 Nov 2009 at 11:11 AM
  • /
  • News

Ratings Agencies To Australia: F-You

head-in-sand.jpgGiven their well-known incorruptibility and infallibility, is it any wonder that ratings agencies would take exception to any suggestion that they might do wrong?
Well, that’s exactly what those outback yahoos in Australia seem to be implying. So Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s are picking up (most of) their toys and going home, withdrawing their applications to offer corporate debt ratings. The lily-white ratings agencies object to a new rule, coming into force on Jan 1., that would turn over disputes between the all-knowing and their idiot retail investor clients to a financial ombudsman.
But that “would effectively be second-guessing S&P’s analysts,” S&P cries! “This would ultimately create investor confusion and harm financial markets.” And S&P has never done anything like that.


And how dare Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd accuse them of being “hopelessly conflicted by the lure of big profits in return for easy ratings.” Give us one piece of evidence, Mr. Rudd.
OK, two pieces of evidence. Three? Four?
Give us one more piece of evidence than you are able to provide, Australia. Then, and only then, will the great unspoiled ratings agencies consider allowing some ex-convict to tell them how to do their jobs.
S&P withdraws Aussie licence application [Sydney Morning Herald]
S&P Joins Moody’s to Scale Back Australia Ratings [DealBook]

Comments (15)

  1. Posted by bmoc11 | November 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM

    AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!

  2. Posted by bmoc11 | November 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE!

  3. Posted by pfluger | November 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM

    The Angelic Bankers of Goldman, and the crackwhore bankers at other firms would never engage in ratings shopping, and bouncing structured deals from one Ratings Factory to another. Never!

  4. Posted by american bandersnatch | November 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM

    Australia is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them, and that is why they don’t trust the rating agencies.

  5. Posted by CoveredLong | November 19, 2009 at 11:42 AM

    Hi Jon,
    Where’d you get that picture of me from…can I borrow the negatives, I’d like to make some copies for my mom.
    -Greg Michaels

  6. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    That is one of my favowit positions.
    Bawney Fwank

  7. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    great headline

  8. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    That headline is indeed a big improvement. Jon-Boy, here are a few other tips to keep us readers interested….drop in shit, piss, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker or tits in addition to fuck once in a while.

  9. Posted by HeadlessHorseman | November 19, 2009 at 12:14 PM

    Jon,
    Excellent work. The heading is succinct, the picture priceless and you’ve sprinkled in nuggets such as “lily-white”.
    Cheerio mate!
    On another note, I’m surprised Amanda Drury has yet to weigh in on this post. Hope she’s okay.

  10. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM

    AT 4- Back then Australia was full of criminals not now.
    Australian living in the States.

  11. Posted by trojan | November 19, 2009 at 12:52 PM

    “That’s not a knife. THIS is a knife.”
    “That’s not a knife, that’s a spoon.”
    “Ah, I see you’ve payed knifey-spooney before.”

  12. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 12:53 PM

    @10,
    “Back then Australia was full of criminals but now we’re all living in the States.”
    -fify

  13. Posted by guest | November 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM

    Ratings like the vice presidency – worth a bucketfull of warm spit

  14. Posted by Becky Boot Fan | November 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    Naehry a mintion of ligs er brists!?
    -Amanda Drury Accent Fan

  15. Posted by The Dalai Lama Himself | November 19, 2009 at 9:47 PM

    @1,2 Oi! Oi! Oi!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.