Well, here’s a fun twist to Sen. Chris Dodd’s proposal to castrate the Federal Reserve: Big Ben Bernanke is set to travel to the Hill at some point after Thanksgiving for a few rounds with the gentleman from Connecticut, who heads the committee considering Bernanke’s renomination as chairman of the soon-to-be-inconsequential Fed.
Now, Dodd is saying all the right things, telling Bernanke he’s “doing a terrific job” and that his bid to give most of the Fed’s power to others is “not about individuals and personalities.” But then he turns around and says Ben’s Boys have been an “abysmal failure” when it comes to regulating banks.
One of Bernanke’s minions has already spoken out against doing anything to trim the Fed’s authority, with the Kansas City branch warning that messing with the F.R. “could lead to delays or second-guessing of supervisory recommendations and greater political interference.” And it was talking about Rep. Barney Frank’s proposals for financial regulation reform, which don’t go nearly as far as Dodd’s in cutting the Fed down to size.
Dodd’s bill would seek to “enhance” the Fed’s role by giving its power to regulate banks to a new Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration, its consumer oversight powers to another new regulator, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, and overall supervision of financial risks to yet another new regulator, the Agency for Financial Stability, on which Ben—if he is reconfirmed—would be one of nine voices.
Even the Fed’s control over monetary policy, its sole remaining concern under the Dodd plan, could be undermined, some say, by greater politicization. Dodd has proposed getting rid of the directors at each of the 12 regional Fed branches appointed by commercial banks. Instead, they would be picked by the banks’ governors, who are confirmed by the Senate. The Senate would also get to confirm the boards’ chairman under the Dodd plan.
Stay tuned for Dodd vs. Bernanke, live from the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
Fed Faces Biggest Blow to Independence, Powers in Dodd Proposal [Bloomberg]
Senate Democrats Seek Sweeping Curbs On The Fed [WSJ]






Posted by guest , Nov 11, 2009 9:55AM
Is it possible for you to post anything that is remotely comprehensible or at least not riddled with grammatical errors? Is proofreading that hard for you?
Posted by guest , Nov 11, 2009 10:00AM
vote schiff
Posted by guest , Nov 11, 2009 10:07AM
dodd is a classic. he seems to have skated on the friends of angelo stuff and now he has plan to protect us.
Posted by guest , Nov 11, 2009 11:05AM
This is utterly reprehensible. The populists are unravelling the fabric of the American financial system beyond repair. We are far past the days of moral hazard...
Speaking of ruining fabrics, @1, please go try and unleash some of that pent up sexual frustration into something other than your spankerchief (let's say, a woman perhaps). Shazam is loads better than Greggums (no pun intended). It is becoming quite clear that you regular "anyone-but-Bess-haters" are nothing but a bunch of losers who have been locked up pumping out models and presentations so much that you just take your frustrations out on anyone other than your wet dream Bess. I know your type, you make up ~80% of the people in the bulge bracket analyst/associate training classes of the last 3 - 10 years.
-Not Greg or Shazam
Posted by guest , Nov 11, 2009 12:49PM
@4, Greg Michaels and Jon Shazar are either the same person or Jon Shazar and Greg Michaels magically share exactly the same misunderstandings about noun-verb agreement and the meaning of certain commonly used words.