Recovering crack addict John Mack has requested that the board not pay him a bonus this year, for the third year in a row. Going out with a bang!

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (259)

  1. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:12 AM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  2. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 6:13 AM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  3. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:15 AM

    @2 this isn't a deferred bonus. he's asking not to get it at all

  4. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:17 AM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  5. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 6:17 AM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  6. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:18 AM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  7. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:21 AM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  8. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 6:21 AM

    The board's not paying Mack a bonus, that's what's happening, that's the situation.

  9. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 6:24 AM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  10. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:25 AM

    John Mack is a Fillipina.

  11. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:28 AM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  12. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 6:40 AM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  13. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:47 AM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What's next?

  14. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:54 AM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  15. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:55 AM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let's see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  16. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 6:57 AM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz's kids to help run it in the summer.

  17. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 6:59 AM

    @14 I report the news, I don't make it happen. Ball's in your court, Hoss.

  18. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM

    I'll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  19. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  20. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 7:21 AM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  21. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  22. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  23. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  24. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  25. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  26. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM

    I would like to take this moment to wish Dan Loeb a Happy Birthday.

  27. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  28. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  29. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  30. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  31. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 10:13 AM

    Defer bonus, keep retirement benefits. Solid move by J-Woww.

  32. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    @2 this isn’t a deferred bonus. he’s asking not to get it at all

  33. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    @2 this isn’t a deferred bonus. he’s asking not to get it at all

  34. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    @2 this isn’t a deferred bonus. he’s asking not to get it at all

  35. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    @2 this isn’t a deferred bonus. he’s asking not to get it at all

  36. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  37. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  38. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  39. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  40. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  41. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  42. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    do i still get a bonus this year?
    -vik

  43. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  44. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  45. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  46. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  47. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  48. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  49. Posted by Anal_yst | December 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @2
    Good call, Mack should definitely die his hair, install a tanning bed in his office, and embrace his inner guido (or whatever the lebanese version is)

  50. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  51. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  52. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  53. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  54. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  55. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    John Mack is Xerxes.

  56. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  57. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  58. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  59. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  60. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  61. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  62. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  63. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  64. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  65. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  66. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  67. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  68. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  69. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    The board’s not paying Mack a bonus, that’s what’s happening, that’s the situation.

  70. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM

    John Mack is a Puerto Rican drag queen.

  71. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  72. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  73. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  74. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  75. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  76. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  77. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  78. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  79. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  80. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM

    @3, poor wording on my part. you are correct. substitute refuse.

  81. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    John Mack is a Fillipina.

  82. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    John Mack is a Fillipina.

  83. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM

    John Mack is a Fillipina.

  84. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  85. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  86. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  87. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  88. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  89. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  90. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  91. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  92. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  93. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  94. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  95. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  96. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM

    John Mack is not Anal_yst.

  97. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  98. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  99. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  100. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  101. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  102. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  103. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  104. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  105. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  106. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  107. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  108. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  109. Posted by wcburrs87 | December 18, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    J-Woww will spend his days in retirement at his villa overlooking seaside heights, pounding out guidettes.

  110. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  111. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  112. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  113. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  114. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  115. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  116. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  117. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  118. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    Calling Mack a crack addict. Scheeze. What’s next?

  119. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  120. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  121. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  122. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  123. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  124. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  125. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  126. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  127. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  128. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  129. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  130. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Hey Bess just putting it out there, a good ol Friday eating contest would be nice….im just sayin

  131. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  132. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  133. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  134. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  135. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  136. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  137. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  138. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  139. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  140. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  141. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  142. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  143. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Wow! No bonus for Mack. Let’s see, he failed in an $11 Billion bet, almost took the whole the firm down, and now will score the first annual loss for the firm in its history.
    How could the board give him a bonus???
    Now he wants to play the Martyr? His reputation is crap!

  144. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  145. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  146. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  147. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  148. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  149. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  150. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  151. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  152. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  153. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  154. Posted by Motive Examiner | December 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    John Mack is retiring to Jersey Shore, setting up tee-shirt business, and bringing in Chazz’s kids to help run it in the summer.

  155. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  156. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  157. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  158. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  159. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  160. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  161. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  162. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  163. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  164. Posted by Bess Levin | December 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    @14 I report the news, I don’t make it happen. Ball’s in your court, Hoss.

  165. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  166. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  167. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  168. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  169. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  170. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  171. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  172. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  173. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  174. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  175. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  176. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  177. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    I’ll take that bonus. I love Disneyland.

  178. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  179. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  180. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  181. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  182. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  183. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  184. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  185. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  186. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  187. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  188. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  189. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  190. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  191. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:01 AM

    Bess, I bet if you really wanted to, you could make news happen. I believe in your skills my little chalamala!

  192. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  193. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  194. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  195. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  196. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  197. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  198. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  199. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  200. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  201. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  202. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  203. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  204. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  205. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  206. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  207. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  208. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  209. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  210. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  211. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @2,3
    His retirement package has been adjusted in the past when he received no bonus, so presumably it will be again. Purely a PR move.

  212. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 6:17 AM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it's not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm's dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let's not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It's a goddamn shame.

  213. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 8:04 AM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack's watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  214. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 8:12 AM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn't get an offer from GS or MS. Now it's better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  215. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  216. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  217. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  218. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  219. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  220. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  221. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  222. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  223. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  224. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  225. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  226. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  227. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Mr. Mack is responsible for some of the biggest blunders and demonstrations of incompetence in modern financial history: DW merger, Saxon Mortgage acquisition, Frontpoint aquisition, financial loss in subprime/CDOs, prop trading losses extraodinaire across many asset classes, compliance violations galore (email loss? pleez), 2008 promotion of an army of back-office clerks to front office sales positions (most of these folks are strivers but know exactly jack), brokerage account monthly statements that look like a junior achievement project, etc. etc. He is a prime example of the danger of extreme charisma combined with extreme professional incompetence. His breathtakingly simplistic business frameworks are exceeded in their stupidity only by the sheer incompetence of their execution. In short, it’s not enough for him to forgo bonus: he should be compensating shareholders for the damage he has inflicted on the mighty name of Morgan Stanley. The damage has been achieved through the firm’s dishonorable conduct, financial losses incurred, and profits foregone. This statement about leverage is just a small hint of his financial ignorance. Oh, and let’s not forget Pequot insider trading weirdness. It’s a goddamn shame.

  228. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  229. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  230. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  231. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  232. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  233. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  234. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  235. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  236. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  237. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  238. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  239. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  240. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  241. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  242. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  243. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    at 21, I remember when Morgan Stanley was neck and neck with a still private Goldman. Under Mack’s watch and his slapfight with Purcell, Morgan Stanley is now a second tier player. He never got his head around the new wallstreet model.
    JP Morgan is a better i-bank than Morgan Stanley. Could you imagine ever saying that in the 1990s?

  244. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  245. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  246. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  247. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  248. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  249. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  250. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  251. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  252. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  253. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  254. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  255. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  256. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  257. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  258. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

  259. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    True dat. Before Mack, JP was a place for guys who couldn’t get an offer from GS or MS. Now it’s better than MS. Great job, Mack.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.