News

David Tepper’s Lucky Charm(s)

Picture 61.pngA pair of panties and 5 inch stilettos. A carton of Pall Malls. The ticket to his first Cher concert. These are just a few of the good luck charms some of the industry’s best known managers (Jiang, Simons, Griffin) turn to when they need that extra inch. They’ve done their research. Their homework has been turned it. But they still aren’t sure which way this thing’s gonna go. So they look to the rabbit’s foot or whatever their version of the rabbit’s foot may be. In David Tepper’s case, it’s a pair of testicles.

The husky, bespectacled trader laughs easily, but employees say he can quickly turn on them when he’s angry. Mr. Tepper keeps a brass replica of a pair of testicles in a prominent spot on his desk, a present from former employees. He rubs the gift for luck during the trading day to get a laugh out of colleagues.

So, David Tepper rubs his lucky balls at various intervals throughout the day. Okay, that’s fine. It’s actually better than fine, because it’s helped Appaloosa earn $7 billion in profits so far this year. Which brings us to this: they’re a brass replica of whose testicles? Obviously there are going to be some hedge fund managers out there reading this who’d like to break themselves off a piece of D.Tepp’s success this year. Those things were based on an original, and we’re going to need to know who they belonged to, asap.

Fund Boss Made $7 Billion In The Panic
[WSJ]
Earlier: Dear Team Tepper

1,129 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

1,129 Responses to “David Tepper’s Lucky Charm(s)”

  1. guest says:

    Brass replica?
    Plebe…
    -lb

  2. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  3. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling's testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  4. guest says:

    I'm guessing his father or an uncle.

  5. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  6. guest says:

    is he hiring?
    -andrea tong

  7. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  8. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  9. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  10. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  11. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    "He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase "it is what it is" to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift."

  12. guest says:

    It's a shame there isn't a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  13. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  14. guest says:

    perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=5

  15. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let's hope he's going 'SAC Remote'
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  16. guest says:

    I'm thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper's profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  17. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  18. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  19. guest says:

    @11 I can't tell by the "bit" if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  20. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  21. pfluger says:

    That crystal "bull" looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  22. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  23. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  24. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  25. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  26. guest says:

    I've got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  27. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He's so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  28. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  29. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  30. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven't seen that since the early nineties.

  31. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  32. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  33. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  34. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #'s originally reported don't include all funds under management.

  35. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  36. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I've gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  37. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won't be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  38. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  39. guest says:

    Brass replica?
    Plebe…
    -lb

  40. guest says:

    Brass replica?
    Plebe…
    -lb

  41. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  42. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  43. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  44. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  45. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  46. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  47. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  48. guest says:

    @1 was thinking the same thing

  49. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  50. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  51. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  52. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  53. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  54. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  55. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  56. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  57. guest says:

    i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
    -pj

  58. guest says:

    I’m guessing his father or an uncle.

  59. guest says:

    I’m guessing his father or an uncle.

  60. guest says:

    I’m guessing his father or an uncle.

  61. guest says:

    I’m guessing his father or an uncle.

  62. guest says:

    I’m guessing his father or an uncle.

  63. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  64. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  65. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  66. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  67. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  68. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  69. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  70. guest says:

    is he touching them in that pic?

  71. guest says:

    is he hiring?
    -andrea tong

  72. guest says:

    is he hiring?
    -andrea tong

  73. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  74. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  75. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  76. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  77. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  78. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  79. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  80. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  81. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  82. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  83. guest says:

    my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
    -PJ

  84. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  85. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  86. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  87. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  88. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  89. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  90. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  91. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  92. guest says:

    he looks so smug in that pic.

  93. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  94. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  95. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  96. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  97. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  98. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  99. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  100. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  101. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  102. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  103. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  104. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  105. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  106. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  107. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  108. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  109. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  110. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  111. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  112. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  113. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  114. James Lipton says:

    Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?

  115. guest says:

    Are those Gucci loafers?

  116. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  117. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  118. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  119. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  120. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  121. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  122. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  123. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  124. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  125. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  126. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  127. guest says:

    from the WSJ article:
    “He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”

  128. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  129. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  130. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  131. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  132. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  133. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  134. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  135. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  136. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  137. guest says:

    It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…

  138. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  139. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  140. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  141. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  142. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  143. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  144. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  145. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  146. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  147. Barney F says:

    Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
    Am so in.

  148. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  149. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  150. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  151. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  152. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  153. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  154. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  155. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  156. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  157. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  158. guest says:

    Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
    http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote

  159. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  160. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  161. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  162. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  163. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  164. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  165. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  166. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  167. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  168. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  169. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  170. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  171. guest says:

    I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
    At least we know they are reading DB.
    Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.

  172. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  173. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  174. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  175. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  176. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  177. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  178. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  179. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  180. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  181. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  182. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  183. now on buyside says:

    Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.

  184. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  185. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  186. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  187. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  188. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  189. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  190. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  191. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  192. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  193. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  194. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  195. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  196. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  197. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  198. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  199. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  200. guest says:

    19 = adam sender

  201. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  202. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  203. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  204. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  205. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  206. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  207. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  208. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  209. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  210. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  211. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  212. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  213. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  214. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  215. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  216. guest says:

    @11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo

  217. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  218. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  219. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  220. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  221. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  222. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  223. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  224. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  225. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  226. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  227. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  228. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  229. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  230. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  231. guest says:

    Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?

  232. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  233. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  234. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  235. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  236. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  237. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  238. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  239. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  240. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  241. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  242. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  243. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  244. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  245. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  246. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  247. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  248. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  249. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  250. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  251. pfluger says:

    That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.

  252. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  253. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  254. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  255. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  256. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  257. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  258. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  259. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  260. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  261. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  262. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  263. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  264. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  265. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  266. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  267. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  268. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  269. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  270. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  271. guest says:

    can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?

  272. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  273. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  274. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  275. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  276. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  277. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  278. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  279. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  280. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  281. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  282. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  283. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  284. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  285. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  286. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  287. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  288. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  289. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  290. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  291. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  292. guest says:

    Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?

  293. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  294. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  295. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  296. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  297. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  298. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  299. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  300. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  301. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  302. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  303. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  304. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  305. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  306. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  307. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  308. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  309. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  310. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  311. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  312. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  313. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  314. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  315. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  316. guest says:

    @25 no just you

  317. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  318. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  319. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  320. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  321. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  322. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  323. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  324. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  325. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  326. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  327. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  328. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  329. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  330. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  331. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  332. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  333. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  334. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  335. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  336. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  337. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  338. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  339. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  340. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  341. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  342. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  343. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  344. guest says:

    Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
    Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank

  345. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  346. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  347. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  348. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  349. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  350. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  351. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  352. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  353. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  354. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  355. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  356. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  357. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  358. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  359. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  360. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  361. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  362. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  363. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  364. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  365. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  366. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  367. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  368. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  369. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  370. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  371. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  372. guest says:

    I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.

  373. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  374. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  375. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  376. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  377. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  378. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  379. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  380. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  381. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  382. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  383. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  384. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  385. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  386. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  387. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  388. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  389. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  390. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  391. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  392. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  393. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  394. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  395. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  396. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  397. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  398. guest says:

    Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!

  399. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  400. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  401. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  402. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  403. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  404. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  405. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  406. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  407. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  408. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  409. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  410. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  411. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  412. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  413. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  414. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  415. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  416. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  417. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  418. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  419. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  420. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  421. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  422. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  423. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  424. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  425. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  426. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  427. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  428. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  429. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  430. pfluger says:

    @25
    Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.

  431. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  432. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  433. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  434. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  435. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  436. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  437. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  438. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  439. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  440. NegativeConvexity says:

    I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.

  441. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  442. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  443. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  444. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  445. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  446. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  447. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  448. Last Man Standing says:

    is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.

  449. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  450. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  451. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  452. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  453. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  454. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  455. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  456. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  457. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  458. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  459. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  460. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  461. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  462. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  463. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  464. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  465. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  466. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  467. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  468. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  469. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  470. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  471. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  472. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  473. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  474. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  475. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  476. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  477. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  478. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  479. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  480. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  481. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  482. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  483. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  484. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  485. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  486. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  487. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  488. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  489. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  490. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  491. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  492. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  493. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  494. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  495. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  496. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  497. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  498. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  499. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  500. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  501. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  502. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  503. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  504. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  505. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  506. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  507. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  508. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  509. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  510. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  511. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  512. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  513. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  514. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  515. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  516. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  517. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  518. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  519. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  520. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  521. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  522. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  523. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  524. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  525. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  526. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  527. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  528. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  529. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  530. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  531. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  532. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  533. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  534. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  535. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  536. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  537. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  538. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  539. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  540. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  541. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  542. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  543. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  544. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  545. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  546. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  547. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  548. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  549. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  550. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  551. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  552. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  553. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  554. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  555. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  556. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  557. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  558. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  559. Anal_yst says:

    Ok, so November put total AUM at

  560. guest says:

    Have you seen my baseball?

  561. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  562. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  563. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  564. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  565. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  566. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  567. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  568. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  569. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  570. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  571. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  572. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  573. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  574. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  575. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  576. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  577. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  578. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  579. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  580. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  581. guest says:

    @analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion

  582. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  583. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  584. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  585. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  586. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  587. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  588. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  589. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  590. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  591. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  592. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  593. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  594. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  595. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  596. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  597. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  598. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  599. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  600. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  601. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  602. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  603. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  604. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  605. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  606. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  607. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  608. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  609. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  610. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  611. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  612. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  613. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  614. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  615. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  616. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  617. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  618. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  619. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  620. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  621. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  622. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  623. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  624. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  625. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  626. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  627. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  628. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  629. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  630. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  631. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  632. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  633. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  634. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  635. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  636. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  637. Anal_yst says:

    @35
    Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.

  638. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  639. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  640. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  641. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  642. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  643. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  644. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  645. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  646. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  647. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  648. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  649. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  650. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  651. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  652. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  653. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  654. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  655. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  656. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  657. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  658. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  659. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  660. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  661. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  662. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  663. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  664. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  665. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  666. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  667. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  668. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  669. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  670. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  671. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  672. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  673. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  674. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  675. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  676. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  677. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  678. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  679. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  680. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  681. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  682. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  683. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  684. pfluger says:

    @36:
    Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
    -bm

  685. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  686. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  687. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  688. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  689. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  690. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  691. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  692. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  693. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  694. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  695. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  696. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  697. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  698. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  699. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  700. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  701. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  702. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  703. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  704. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  705. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  706. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  707. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  708. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  709. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  710. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  711. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  712. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  713. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  714. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  715. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  716. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  717. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  718. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  719. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  720. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  721. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  722. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  723. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  724. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  725. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  726. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  727. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  728. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  729. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  730. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  731. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  732. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  733. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  734. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  735. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  736. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  737. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  738. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  739. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  740. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  741. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  742. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  743. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  744. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  745. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  746. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  747. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  748. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  749. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  750. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  751. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  752. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  753. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  754. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  755. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  756. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  757. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  758. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  759. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  760. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  761. guest says:

    Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.

  762. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  763. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  764. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  765. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  766. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  767. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  768. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  769. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  770. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  771. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  772. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  773. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  774. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  775. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  776. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  777. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  778. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  779. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  780. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  781. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  782. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  783. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  784. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  785. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  786. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  787. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  788. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  789. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  790. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  791. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  792. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  793. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  794. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  795. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  796. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  797. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  798. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  799. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  800. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  801. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  802. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  803. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  804. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  805. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  806. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  807. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  808. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  809. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  810. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  811. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  812. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  813. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  814. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  815. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  816. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  817. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  818. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  819. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  820. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  821. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  822. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  823. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  824. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  825. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  826. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  827. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  828. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  829. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  830. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  831. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  832. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  833. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  834. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  835. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  836. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  837. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  838. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  839. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  840. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  841. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  842. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  843. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  844. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  845. guest says:

    @ Anal:
    The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.

  846. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  847. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  848. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  849. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  850. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  851. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  852. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  853. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  854. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  855. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  856. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  857. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  858. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  859. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  860. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  861. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  862. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  863. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  864. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  865. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  866. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  867. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  868. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  869. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  870. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  871. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  872. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  873. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  874. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  875. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  876. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  877. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  878. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  879. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  880. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  881. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  882. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  883. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  884. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  885. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  886. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  887. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  888. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  889. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  890. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  891. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  892. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  893. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  894. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  895. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  896. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  897. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  898. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  899. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  900. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  901. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  902. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  903. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  904. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  905. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  906. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  907. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  908. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  909. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  910. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  911. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  912. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  913. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  914. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  915. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  916. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  917. guest says:

    IT WAS ME!
    -SAC

  918. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  919. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  920. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  921. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  922. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  923. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  924. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  925. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  926. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  927. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  928. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  929. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  930. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  931. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  932. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  933. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  934. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  935. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  936. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  937. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  938. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  939. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  940. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  941. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  942. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  943. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  944. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  945. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  946. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  947. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  948. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  949. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  950. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  951. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  952. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  953. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  954. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  955. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  956. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  957. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  958. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  959. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  960. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  961. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  962. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  963. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  964. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  965. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  966. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  967. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  968. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  969. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  970. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  971. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  972. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  973. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  974. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  975. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  976. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  977. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  978. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  979. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  980. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  981. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  982. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  983. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  984. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  985. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  986. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  987. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  988. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  989. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  990. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  991. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  992. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  993. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  994. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  995. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  996. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  997. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  998. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  999. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1000. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1001. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1002. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1003. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1004. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1005. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1006. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1007. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1008. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1009. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1010. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1011. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1012. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1013. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1014. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1015. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1016. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1017. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1018. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1019. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1020. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1021. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1022. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1023. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1024. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1025. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1026. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1027. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1028. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1029. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1030. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1031. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1032. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1033. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1034. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1035. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1036. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1037. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1038. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1039. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1040. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1041. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1042. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1043. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1044. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1045. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1046. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1047. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1048. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1049. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1050. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1051. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1052. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1053. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1054. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1055. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1056. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1057. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1058. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1059. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1060. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1061. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1062. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1063. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1064. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1065. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1066. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1067. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1068. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1069. guest says:

    carnegie mellon represent

  1070. […] year’s conference will not include David Tepper’s balls but the show must go on. Scheduled speakers, in order of appearance: Erez Kalir, Dinakar Singh, […]

  1071. guest says:

    Maybe he can splurge a few dollars on a new computer.

  1072. […] owner of the $100 million receipt turns out to be Hedge Fund Founder/Manager David Tepper, who rubs his balls for good luck throughout the day, which has helped his company — Appaloosa Management — […]

  1073. […] 01:37 PM Update: Apparently Mr. Receipt is hedge fund manager, D. Tepp, who joked after the withdrawal that he “hadn’t used an ATM since Lehman, and hasnt […]

  1074. […] balance ($ 2.75 poorer after ATM fee). Speculation was that the fat cat was hedge fund manager David Tepper, but he told the Post that he “wasn’t in the Hamptons in June at all,” plus, […]

  1075. […] balance ($ 2.75 poorer after ATM fee). Speculation was that the fat cat was hedge fund manager David Tepper, but he told the Post that he “wasn’t in the Hamptons in June at all,” plus, […]

  1076. Ginaharding says:

    Vintage gucci loafers.

  1077. […] owner of the $100 million receipt turns out to be Hedge Fund Founder/Manager David Tepper, who rubs his balls for good luck throughout the day, which has helped his company — Appaloosa Management — earn […]

  1078. Cinkavoinia says:

    kpxgtghe [url=http://abercromfitchsdesoldes.com/#6118]abercrombie parisc[/url] agkpwlnf abercrombieh france mngtfosf http://abercromfitchsdesoldes.com/

  1079. gvsyfs5865 says:

    ftlmyxlj [url=http://achatlongchamppliageonline.com/#4244]longchamp pas cher[/url] urmppaib longchamp pas cher iwcecjab http://achatlongchamppliageonline.com/

  1080. peenueBum says:

    hawzgk [url=http://chaussuresjordannsoldes.webnode.fr/#6326]air jordan pas cher[/url] guasib jordan pas cher epmzrx
    pnwkosjb [url=http://achatlongchampsacensoldes.info/#3300]longchamp pliage[/url] nmnakzsatm sac longchamp pliage wrdmjtm
    wcsydkmps [url=http://frlouboutinnssoldes.webnode.fr/#1169]chaussures louboutin[/url] tbpelqrnhr louboutin emlpwmm

  1081. Scupaspinna says:

    potuuyaf [url=http://salesrbansunlgassesoutletstore.info]ray ban sunglasses[/url] ijkohszape kqrbqtwy [url=http://salesmulbagsoutletstore.info]mulberry sale[/url] lwhpzlfvmw http://salesmulbagsoutletstore.info

  1082. Stuppydaype says:

    sonwanrg [url=http://ravensjerseysaleonline.webeden.net/#23800]baltimore ravens jersey sale[/url] hpxbbyh baltimore ravens jersey sale mdexravt http://ravensjerseysaleonline.webeden.net/

  1083. jihpkush [url=http://achatjordanenligne.webnode.fr/#24354]air jordan[/url] toqwsler jordan 6 grctxwtl http://achatjordanenligne.webnode.fr/

  1084. nkeoov [url=http://saclongchamponline.webnode.fr/#7171]longchamp pas cher[/url] ubbtvv sac longchamp pas cher aedeyh mnxyxh [url=http://doudounemclersmagasin.webnode.fr/#3845]moncler pas cher[/url] dewijv doudoune moncler pas cher nsclpd eokrplsz [url=http://achatlongchampsacensoldes.info/#5947]longchamp pliage[/url] pmtesaaopa sac longchamp pas cher rzubroy

  1085. Arrivatriva says:

    knibvxhp [url=http://sacsvuittonpascher.webnode.fr/#8619]sac louis vuitton pas cher[/url] anqdonnc sac louis vuitton pas cher vmfsrkod http://sacsvuittonpascher.webnode.fr/scspivpb [url=http://frvuittonsoldes.webnode.fr/#5616]louis vuitton soldes[/url] zprykrjh sac louis vuitton pas cher evkdxonw http://frvuittonsoldes.webnode.fr/

  1086. Dumpusase says:

    apmnotlo [url=http://frmclersdoudounesoldes.com/#55746]doudoune moncler[/url] ivkymbrbbp doudoune moncler pas cher wunkalm

  1087. Hietryelery says:

    pcxcqpqe [url=http://abercromfitchonlinesales.webeden.net/#2375]abercrombie and fitch outlet[/url] thimgtopfg abercrombie kids dfytchj ttaivsyw [url=http://ralphlaurenshirtsonlinesale.webeden.net/#8653]cheap polo ralph lauren[/url] ihkabpuqmz ralph lauren polo outlet rhvjbbj
    http://cheapralphlaurenshirtssale.webeden.net/#0606

  1088. yfuzqsyt [url=http://muberrybagsoutletsonline.co.uk/#58913]mulberry bags outlet[/url] ipkcgb mulberry outlet store ixfunyqe http://muberrybagsoutletsonline.co.uk/dxbxgamy [url=http://bestaffjacketsaleonline.co.uk/#18999]belstaff jackets[/url] epcusr belstaff jackets inyuhlbm http://bestaffjacketsaleonline.co.uk/

  1089. aqqjrnde [url=http://frmclerdoudounesdesoldes.com/]doudoune moncler[/url] mopyvlyk moncler soldes mwvvvdfm http://frmclerdoudounesdesoldes.com/

  1090. pscgrjut wrxnuxqy [url=http://poloshritsrallphlaurensmagasin.com/]polo ralph lauren pas cher[/url] lpgokizu polo ralph lauren sdimvbcg pvrqeonr http://poloshritsrallphlaurensmagasin.com/

  1091. Brass balls. One of the main elements of luck. Mine is water. I supply 828 water dispenser singapore produces high quality, beautiful water dispensers with worldwide certification since 2005. Water related stuff are my lucky charms

  1092. Baba says:

    <script>$(document).ready(function(){alert("hello");});</script>