A pair of panties and 5 inch stilettos. A carton of Pall Malls. The ticket to his first Cher concert. These are just a few of the good luck charms some of the industry’s best known managers (Jiang, Simons, Griffin) turn to when they need that extra inch. They’ve done their research. Their homework has been turned it. But they still aren’t sure which way this thing’s gonna go. So they look to the rabbit’s foot or whatever their version of the rabbit’s foot may be. In David Tepper’s case, it’s a pair of testicles.
The husky, bespectacled trader laughs easily, but employees say he can quickly turn on them when he’s angry. Mr. Tepper keeps a brass replica of a pair of testicles in a prominent spot on his desk, a present from former employees. He rubs the gift for luck during the trading day to get a laugh out of colleagues.
So, David Tepper rubs his lucky balls at various intervals throughout the day. Okay, that’s fine. It’s actually better than fine, because it’s helped Appaloosa earn $7 billion in profits so far this year. Which brings us to this: they’re a brass replica of whose testicles? Obviously there are going to be some hedge fund managers out there reading this who’d like to break themselves off a piece of D.Tepp’s success this year. Those things were based on an original, and we’re going to need to know who they belonged to, asap.
Fund Boss Made $7 Billion In The Panic [WSJ]
Earlier: Dear Team Tepper
Brass replica?
Plebe…
-lb
@1 was thinking the same thing
i make replicas of all my underling's testicles. is that weird?
-pj
BALLS
I'm guessing his father or an uncle.
is he touching them in that pic?
is he hiring?
-andrea tong
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
he looks so smug in that pic.
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Are those Gucci loafers?
from the WSJ article:
"He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase "it is what it is" to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift."
It's a shame there isn't a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=5...
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let's hope he's going 'SAC Remote'
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.ht...
does he have these on his prius?
I'm thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper's profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
19 = adam sender
@11 I can't tell by the "bit" if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
That crystal "bull" looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
@25 no just you
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
I've got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He's so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven't seen that since the early nineties.
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Have you seen my baseball?
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #'s originally reported don't include all funds under management.
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
Glass balls or not, I've gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won't be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
Brass replica?
Plebe…
-lb
Brass replica?
Plebe…
-lb
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
@1 was thinking the same thing
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
i make replicas of all my underling’s testicles. is that weird?
-pj
BALLS
BALLS
I’m guessing his father or an uncle.
I’m guessing his father or an uncle.
I’m guessing his father or an uncle.
I’m guessing his father or an uncle.
I’m guessing his father or an uncle.
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he touching them in that pic?
is he hiring?
-andrea tong
is he hiring?
-andrea tong
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
my lucky charms are whiteboard markers, fucking get it right!!!
-PJ
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
he looks so smug in that pic.
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Are those Gucci loafers?
Anal_yst, testicles, your thoughts?
Are those Gucci loafers?
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
from the WSJ article:
“He claims to have popularized on Wall Street the phrase “it is what it is” to explain the need to adjust a portfolio if facts on the ground shift.”
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
It’s a shame there isn’t a piece of glass poop behind the bull on his desk…
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
Cher concert tix? Ball rubbing?
Am so in.
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
perhaps he has a deskful of these also http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=54421
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
Do you think Tepper is worried about being tied into any trades that Stevie Cohen is doing. Would any of those bets have needed inside info to make him stay in the trade? Let’s hope he’s going ‘SAC Remote’
http://hf-implode.com/article/sac-remote
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
http://www.trucknutzandbikerballz.com/Big_Nutz.html
does he have these on his prius?
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
I’m thinking WSJ Zuckerman got the idea to write about Tepper’s profits after he first read his q3 investor letter that Bess published on Dec 4th. Dealbreaker was first to publish this guy was going to score coin which then just opened the door for the WSJ to figure out how he did it.
At least we know they are reading DB.
Great work Bess – we know MSM gets most of their ideas from you.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
Only one screen? I thought there was a rule that to be an HF BSD you need to be photographed with at least five on your desk– and flatscreens, natch.
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
19 = adam sender
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
@11 I can’t tell by the “bit” if they are Gucci or Ferragamo
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
Oh! SNAP! Guess what I saw?
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
That crystal “bull” looks like some kind of un-Godly beast, with the head of a horned man.
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
can someone at appaloosa pls send in a pic of said nuts?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
Anyone else wondering why we are getting blitzed with life insurance ads?
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
@25 no just you
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
Testicles….on my chin….make me gwin….and smile!
Bawney Fa Fa Fa Fwank
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
I’ve got a Chamorran priapus that would put his balls to shame.
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
Wow, what a man, Tepper is. Such a fearsome trader. He’s so butch. He prolly looks hot in a pair of leather chaps with his bar ass exposed. Toodles, sweetie!
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
@25
Rumor has it that Gasparino is going to go on some kind of rampage against bloggers soon.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
I had no idea Corky made the transition from acting to alternative investments.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
is that the kilt on his loafers? wow, i haven’t seen that since the early nineties.
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Have you seen my baseball?
Ok, so November put total AUM at
Have you seen my baseball?
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
@analyst- november aum was $4.3 billion
carnegie mellon represent
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@35
Yea for some reason 80% of my comment got cut off. My point is that if november AUM is $4.3bn, its impossible for the firm to have returned $7bn, unless the #’s originally reported don’t include all funds under management.
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
@36:
Why is that impossible?? It is perfectly legitimate to pay out more in dividends than AUM, provided that future capital commitments exceed the difference by at least $1.
-bm
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
Glass balls or not, I’ve gotta give the guy kudos for buying that crap (Citi and B of A) when the world looked like it was gonna end. That was a scary time.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
@ Anal:
The guy has $7.5bn in his main strategy and $4.5 in his fixed-income biased fund. I won’t be the one to post the numbers for his namesake fund, but the YTD performance is equally impressive.
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
IT WAS ME!
-SAC
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
carnegie mellon represent
[...] Related: David Tepper’s Lucky Charm(s) [...]
[...] year’s conference will not include David Tepper’s balls but the show must go on. Scheduled speakers, in order of appearance: Erez Kalir, Dinakar Singh, [...]
[...] via gawker and Dealbreaker [...]
Maybe he can splurge a few dollars on a new computer.
[...] owner of the $100 million receipt turns out to be Hedge Fund Founder/Manager David Tepper, who rubs his balls for good luck throughout the day, which has helped his company — Appaloosa Management — [...]
[...] 01:37 PM Update: Apparently Mr. Receipt is hedge fund manager, D. Tepp, who joked after the withdrawal that he “hadn’t used an ATM since Lehman, and hasnt [...]
[...] balance ($ 2.75 poorer after ATM fee). Speculation was that the fat cat was hedge fund manager David Tepper, but he told the Post that he “wasn’t in the Hamptons in June at all,” plus, [...]
[...] balance ($ 2.75 poorer after ATM fee). Speculation was that the fat cat was hedge fund manager David Tepper, but he told the Post that he “wasn’t in the Hamptons in June at all,” plus, [...]
Vintage gucci loafers.
[...] owner of the $100 million receipt turns out to be Hedge Fund Founder/Manager David Tepper, who rubs his balls for good luck throughout the day, which has helped his company — Appaloosa Management — earn [...]