• 18 Dec 2009 at 3:36 PM

Pining For The Ice

falcone.jpgStill rocking the hockey hairAll things considered, Phil Falcone would prefer playing a professional sport that no one watches anymore to being a billionaire. So he’s done the next stupidest thing: He bought a hockey team.
Some of a hockey team, anyway. He’s got a 40% chunk in the Minnesota Wild, the team that replaced his hometown team after they moved to that great hockey city, Dallas.
A due-diligence specialist once told me that what he called jock-sniffer syndrome was one of his key red flags. But Falcone, who seems to have a thing for dying industries, bought his stake in the Wild for an altogether more pathetic reason.

“I think the dream come true would be to be out there playing,” he says. “But things work out in different ways.”

I guess he’ll just have to go cry in his $2 billion. Or hang out in his conference room, which he’s named for the Chicago Blackhawks.
As with many of his fellow jocks-turned-hedge-fund-managers, Falcone likes to hire other former athletes, so they can talk about the good old days and all the pussy that the members of the Harvard hockey team got back in the day. And rationalizing hiring one another.

“I think [team sports] give you a lot of insight into competition and learning how to work with a team,” says Falcone. “Hockey has been a very critical part of getting me to where I am today.”

It also looks to play a critical role in losing him millions and millions of dollars.
Hockey’s Billionaires [Forbes]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (867)

  1. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    Oh now you've done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It's gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  2. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he's skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I'd like to pull the goalie and play in his wife's crease.

  3. Posted by american bandersnatc | December 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  4. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it's almost Christmas.

  5. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  6. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  7. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM

    "Still rocking the hockey hair" would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  8. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  9. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM

    @6,
    I'm pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn't mean what I'm saying is 100% accurate

  10. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn't matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  11. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  12. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn't gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  13. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 12:41 PM

    I'd take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  14. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  15. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  16. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  17. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There's a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn't see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners' position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it's his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  18. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 1:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  19. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn't watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn't need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  20. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    I'd invest in a women's field hockey league.

  21. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  22. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  23. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  24. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  25. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  26. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  27. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  28. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  29. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  30. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  31. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  32. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  33. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  34. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  35. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  36. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    Oh now you’ve done it you dumb son of a bitch – you went and made fun of hockey. It’s gonna suck to be you Shazzhole.

  37. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  38. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  39. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  40. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  41. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  42. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  43. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  44. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  45. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  46. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  47. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  48. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  49. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  50. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  51. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  52. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  53. Posted by CoveredLong | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    This is an illiquid and wild investment that will freeze up funds…I think he’s skating on thin ice.
    …on another note, I’d like to pull the goalie and play in his wife’s crease.

  54. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  55. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  56. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  57. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  58. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  59. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  60. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  61. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  62. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  63. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  64. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  65. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  66. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM

    The conference room is kinda cool – very Star Trek Enterprise.

  67. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  68. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  69. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  70. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  71. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  72. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  73. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  74. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  75. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  76. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  77. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  78. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  79. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  80. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  81. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  82. Posted by Comfortably Smug | December 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    All jokes aside, this is a very uncharacteristically angry post coming from you, Jon. Cheer up big guy, it’s almost Christmas.

  83. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  84. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  85. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  86. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  87. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  88. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  89. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  90. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  91. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  92. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  93. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  94. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  95. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  96. Posted by pfluger | December 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM

    I beat da shit outta Bob Probert, ya know.
    -cg

  97. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  98. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  99. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  100. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  101. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  102. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  103. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  104. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  105. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  106. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  107. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  108. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  109. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  110. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  111. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  112. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  113. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  114. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  115. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:03 PM

    So Jon, you think buying a hockey team in Minnesota that has had over 200 straight sellouts while being a mediocre team is a bad investment?
    Use some independent thought please.

  116. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  117. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  118. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  119. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  120. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  121. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  122. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  123. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  124. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  125. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  126. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  127. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  128. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  129. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  130. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  131. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    “Still rocking the hockey hair” would have been a DB classic if it were written by the more popular DB writer/editor.

  132. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  133. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  134. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  135. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  136. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  137. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  138. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  139. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  140. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  141. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  142. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  143. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  144. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  145. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  146. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  147. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    Bob Probert is a bad man

  148. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  149. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  150. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  151. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  152. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  153. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  154. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  155. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  156. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  157. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  158. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  159. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  160. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  161. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  162. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  163. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  164. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  165. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  166. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  167. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  168. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  169. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM

    @6,
    I’m pretty sure every game in Wild history has been a sellout, which would include the last 200. The risk to the investment is that the NHL sucks and actually fails as a league. The Wild are one of the few profitable franchises in the NHL. Given that the NHL will probably consolidate before it fails, this is probably a damn good investment. The owners sold because of a liquidity need, not because this franchise sucks.
    Yes, I am a complete homer from MN. Doesn’t mean what I’m saying is 100% accurate

  170. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  171. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  172. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  173. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  174. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  175. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  176. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  177. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  178. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  179. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  180. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  181. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  182. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  183. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  184. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  185. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  186. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  187. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  188. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  189. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  190. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  191. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  192. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  193. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  194. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  195. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  196. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  197. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  198. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  199. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  200. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  201. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  202. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  203. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  204. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  205. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  206. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  207. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  208. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  209. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  210. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  211. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  212. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  213. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  214. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  215. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  216. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  217. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  218. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  219. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    @ 7 doesn’t matter if they sellout every game in history and sell nachos for $20 to every fan. Hockey teams are not good investments. Best case scenario you lose 10 million a year for 10 years and sell it for more than you paid.
    Do some research please.
    -not Jon

  220. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  221. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  222. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  223. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  224. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  225. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  226. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  227. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  228. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  229. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  230. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  231. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  232. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  233. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  234. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  235. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  236. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  237. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  238. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  239. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  240. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  241. Posted by Braverman | December 18, 2009 at 4:37 PM

    Probert the worst thug in NHL history? Maybe, but fucking fun to watch…

  242. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  243. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  244. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  245. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  246. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  247. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  248. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  249. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  250. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  251. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  252. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  253. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  254. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  255. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  256. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  257. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  258. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  259. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  260. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  261. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  262. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  263. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  264. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  265. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Sound like someone got shoved into a few lockers in high school and still hasn’t gotten over getting picked last in gym class

  266. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  267. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  268. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  269. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  270. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  271. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  272. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  273. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  274. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  275. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  276. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  277. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  278. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  279. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  280. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  281. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  282. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  283. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  284. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  285. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  286. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  287. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  288. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  289. Posted by trojan | December 18, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    I’d take an MLS team, even D-League hoops, over any NHL squad.

  290. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  291. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  292. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  293. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  294. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  295. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  296. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  297. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  298. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  299. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  300. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  301. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  302. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  303. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  304. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  305. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  306. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  307. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  308. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  309. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  310. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  311. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  312. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  313. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  314. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  315. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  316. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    I am a due-diligence specialist. What is hockey?

  317. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  318. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  319. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  320. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  321. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  322. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  323. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  324. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  325. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  326. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  327. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  328. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  329. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  330. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  331. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  332. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  333. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  334. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  335. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  336. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  337. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  338. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  339. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  340. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  341. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  342. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  343. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  344. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  345. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  346. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  347. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  348. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  349. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  350. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  351. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  352. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM

    @11,
    except the wild are currently, and have been for every season, profitable.
    Thanks for playing.

  353. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  354. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  355. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  356. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  357. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  358. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  359. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  360. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  361. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  362. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  363. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  364. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  365. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  366. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  367. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  368. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  369. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  370. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  371. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  372. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  373. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  374. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  375. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  376. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  377. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  378. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  379. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  380. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  381. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  382. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  383. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  384. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  385. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  386. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  387. Posted by Shitting on Tryon St | December 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM

    NERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRD!

  388. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 6:38 PM
  389. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  390. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  391. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  392. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  393. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  394. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  395. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  396. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  397. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  398. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  399. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  400. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  401. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  402. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  403. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  404. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  405. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  406. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  407. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  408. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  409. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  410. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  411. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  412. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  413. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  414. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  415. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    I think buying an NHL team right now is buying low. There’s a lot of upside–people will realize hockey on HD TV is actually watchable (the biggest problem historically has been that you couldn’t see the puck, making it an awful television sport)
    Also, if they contract a few teams in the southern US, it will be accretive to the talent pool, strengthen the owners’ position in negotions with labor, and increase interest in the league among the core fanbases up north.
    Also, Phil might just think it would be fun and it’s his damn money to spend as he pleases.

  416. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  417. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  418. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  419. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  420. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  421. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  422. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  423. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  424. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  425. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  426. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  427. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  428. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  429. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  430. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  431. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  432. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  433. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  434. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  435. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  436. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  437. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  438. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  439. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  440. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  441. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  442. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  443. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  444. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  445. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  446. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  447. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  448. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  449. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  450. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  451. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  452. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  453. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  454. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  455. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  456. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  457. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  458. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  459. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  460. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  461. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  462. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  463. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  464. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  465. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  466. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  467. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  468. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  469. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  470. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 5:52 PM

    Where is everyone today?

  471. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  472. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  473. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  474. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  475. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  476. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  477. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  478. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  479. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  480. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  481. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  482. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  483. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  484. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  485. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  486. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  487. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  488. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  489. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  490. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  491. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  492. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  493. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  494. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  495. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  496. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  497. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  498. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  499. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  500. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  501. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  502. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  503. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  504. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  505. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  506. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  507. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  508. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  509. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  510. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  511. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  512. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  513. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  514. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  515. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM

    Show me one guy who can skate that doesn’t watch and love hockey…
    Shazanus saying no one watches hockey is like virgins saying no one is getting laid.
    Hockey doesn’t need a bunch of toothless rednecks as casual fans …being a hockey fan is like being a heroin addict – its not something that you indulge in every once in a while…
    The NHL will soon move money losing teams back North and prosper – once they get rid of that dwarf Bettman and scrap his unrealistic dream of a national US TV contract

  516. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  517. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  518. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  519. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  520. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  521. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  522. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  523. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  524. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  525. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  526. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  527. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  528. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  529. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  530. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  531. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  532. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  533. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  534. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  535. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  536. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  537. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  538. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  539. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  540. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  541. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  542. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  543. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  544. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  545. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  546. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  547. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  548. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  549. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  550. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  551. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  552. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  553. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  554. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  555. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  556. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  557. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  558. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  559. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  560. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  561. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  562. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  563. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  564. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  565. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  566. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  567. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  568. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  569. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  570. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  571. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  572. Posted by guest | December 18, 2009 at 11:38 PM

    I’d invest in a women’s field hockey league.

  573. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  574. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  575. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  576. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  577. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  578. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  579. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  580. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  581. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  582. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  583. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  584. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  585. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  586. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  587. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  588. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  589. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  590. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  591. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  592. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  593. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  594. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  595. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  596. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  597. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  598. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  599. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  600. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  601. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  602. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  603. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  604. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  605. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  606. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  607. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  608. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  609. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  610. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  611. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  612. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  613. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  614. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  615. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  616. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  617. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  618. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  619. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  620. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  621. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  622. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  623. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  624. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  625. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  626. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  627. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  628. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  629. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  630. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  631. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  632. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  633. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 1:36 AM

    @16
    Too bad the NHL has revenue sharing.
    Better luck next season.
    -11

  634. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  635. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  636. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  637. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  638. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  639. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  640. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  641. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  642. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  643. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  644. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  645. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  646. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  647. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  648. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  649. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  650. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  651. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  652. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  653. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  654. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  655. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  656. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  657. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  658. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  659. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  660. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  661. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  662. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  663. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  664. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  665. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  666. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  667. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  668. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  669. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  670. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  671. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  672. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  673. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  674. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  675. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  676. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  677. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  678. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  679. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  680. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  681. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  682. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  683. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  684. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  685. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  686. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  687. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  688. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  689. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  690. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  691. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  692. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  693. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  694. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  695. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  696. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  697. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  698. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  699. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  700. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  701. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  702. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  703. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  704. Posted by guest | December 19, 2009 at 3:38 AM
  705. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  706. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 7:40 AM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  707. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  708. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  709. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  710. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  711. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  712. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  713. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  714. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  715. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  716. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  717. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  718. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  719. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  720. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  721. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  722. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  723. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  724. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  725. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  726. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  727. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  728. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  729. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  730. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  731. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  732. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  733. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  734. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  735. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  736. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  737. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  738. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  739. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  740. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  741. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  742. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  743. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  744. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  745. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  746. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  747. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  748. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  749. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  750. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  751. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  752. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  753. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  754. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  755. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  756. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  757. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  758. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  759. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  760. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  761. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  762. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  763. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  764. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  765. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  766. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  767. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  768. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  769. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  770. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  771. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  772. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  773. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  774. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  775. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  776. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Jon,
    I guess Research Edge/Ice Edge are also idiots. You probably think NASCAR is a money-losing proposition too, huh? You probably only invest in index funds, I imagine.

  777. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  778. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  779. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  780. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  781. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  782. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  783. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  784. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  785. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  786. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  787. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  788. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  789. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  790. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  791. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  792. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  793. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  794. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  795. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  796. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  797. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  798. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  799. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  800. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  801. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  802. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  803. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  804. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  805. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  806. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  807. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  808. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  809. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  810. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  811. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  812. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  813. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  814. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  815. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  816. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  817. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  818. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  819. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  820. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  821. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  822. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  823. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  824. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  825. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  826. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  827. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  828. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  829. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  830. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  831. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  832. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  833. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  834. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  835. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  836. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  837. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  838. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  839. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  840. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  841. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  842. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  843. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  844. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  845. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  846. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  847. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  848. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  849. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  850. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  851. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  852. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  853. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  854. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  855. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  856. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  857. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  858. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  859. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  860. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  861. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  862. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  863. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  864. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  865. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  866. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

  867. Posted by guest | December 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM

    Hey man it gets cold in Dallas…..sometimes

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.