A few more numbers from the HoD. No word on how anyone is “feeling” about them at this time (if you’d like to get something off your chest, lay it on us):

IBD associates (highs w/o base):
1st year: high of 200, 20% stock w/ base of 110

2nd year: range of 180-260, 25% stock w/ base of 120
3rd year: high of 350, 30% stock w/ base of 160

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (139)

  1. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:06 AM

    I'd take it.
    -john 'no bonus' mack

  2. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:07 AM

    Maybe what we thought was worth 500k a year is worth 250k after all.

  3. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM

    @2/3 do you think what we thought was worth 500k a year is worth 250k after all?

  4. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:10 AM

    Pronounced Hoe-D.

  5. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:11 AM

    I think there is something foreign in my pants.

  6. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:12 AM

    these are bonus or total compensation numbers?

  7. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:13 AM

    @7 first number is bonus, second is base. bonus + base = total comp

  8. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:14 AM

    @7
    "highs w/o base"
    i.e. first year high total comp 310 = 270 cash 40 stock

  9. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:29 AM

    Anyone else a little sick to their stomachs that some douchebag frat-boy in his late 20s is pulling down almost $300K+/year?
    Maybe I'm missing something (besides an Ivy League degree…)

  10. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:31 AM

    Heard UBS IBD folks got screwed again this year

  11. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:31 AM

    @10 no

  12. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:31 AM

    @10 – uh oh, someone's gonna tell you to go back to huffington post, yahoo finance, or call you a liberal, populist or socialist. Cue the predictable frat-boy esque entitled response.
    -former frat boy

  13. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:32 AM

    a little off topic, but its something i've been curious about for a while.
    what exactly does cody willard stand for? i follow him on twitter (bad idea, i know), and all he seems to do is bitch and complain about lawmakers on both sides of the aisle rather than offering up ideas that he'd implement. its rather obnoxious and really highlights his severely diminished intellectual capacity. any thoughts here?
    thanks in advance

  14. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:32 AM

    Not really, sick to my stomach. In your late 20's ~150k (post-taxes) isn't an obscene amount. Especially if you just got out of B=school and have a ton of loans to pay back.

  15. Posted by Pfluger the Barbaria | January 20, 2010 at 9:33 AM

    @10: Why would you care? Any opinions on professional athletes' or hollywood actors' comp?

  16. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:33 AM

    Any ideas on associate stub?

  17. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM

    @15 and esp if you're living in new york city.

  18. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:35 AM

    "Anyone else a little sick to their stomachs that some douchebag frat-boy in his late 20s is pulling down almost $300K+/year? "
    nope, just you.

  19. Posted by Pfluger the Barbaria | January 20, 2010 at 9:36 AM

    @19:
    And working 80 hour weeks, with no union to cover your ass if you fuck up.

  20. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM

    @18 beat me to it

  21. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM

    @16 – stupid analogy. No one bailed out Hollywood or the Yankees. There are more bankers in JPM than actors and/or athletes making over $30,000 a year in the entire country (ever heard of extras or minor leaguers?. Come up with something original.

  22. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM

    @14 Cody Willard stands for Rock-n-Roll! And if you wanna rock, you gotta break the rules. You gotta get mad at the man. And the man is everywhere:
    in the White House, down the hall, ruining the ozone, he's burning down the Amazon, and he kidnapped Shamu and put her in a chlorine tank.

  23. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:39 AM

    I went to Cornell.

  24. Posted by Pfluger the Barbaria | January 20, 2010 at 9:39 AM

    @20: No, not a stupid analogy at all.
    These guys pay their taxes, do nothing at all illegal, and the "bailout" money that was received was repaid by most of the firms.
    Besides, most of the $300K worker bees who wander around Wall Street had little or nothing to do with their firms' risk management.

  25. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:43 AM

    25 = david einhorn

  26. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:44 AM

    Are these numbers for bankers or S&T?…any word on S&T numbers? Sounds high for S&T (well unless you're running your own book and killing it, then comp is theoretically uncapped).

  27. Posted by NakedShort | January 20, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    @10 if you dont like what is going on then simply dont engage in the financial services these institutions offer.
    Keep a minimal amount of cash at a local credit to cover living expenses on a month to month basis and the rest of your money in Treasuries.
    Dont use debt to purchase cars, homes, education ect. Dont save for retirement in a 401(k); if you do have a pension take it as a lump sum and buy more Treasuries.
    Your call champ.

  28. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:48 AM

    @28
    "IBD associates"

  29. Posted by NakedShort | January 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

    If you want to buy stock of individual companies call the Transfer Agent for said company and request share certificates to be mailed to you and keep them in a fire proof safe in your house or a deposit box and a credit union
    -29

  30. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:50 AM

    @28 your attempt to sound informed resulted in a massive fail when your inability to read ("IBD Associates") reared it's ugly head. also, yes, there is word on S&T numbers: http://dealbreaker.com/2010/01/bonus-watch-10-jpm…

  31. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM

    The whole bonus ruckus is amusing. It's just a PR thing. If the recipients, if the most highly compensated, were to explain to the enraged populists all that they did to earn the comp, I think all but the most reasonable people would be satisfied that it was money well-earned. So why is the PR so bad? Aren't there any good looking women out there who can explain this for a living?

  32. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM

    @10 LOLz @ "late 20s"
    -Non Ivy League degree

  33. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:53 AM

    I deserve good things. I am entitled to my share of happiness. I refuse to beat myself up. I am fun to be with. Because I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and, doggonit, people like me!
    Stuart Smalley
    JPM employee

  34. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM

    @15,18,29 – I recently have my MBA from a reputable non Ivy b-school and I'm pulling down a THIRD of that in CPG Brand Mgt in my mid-late 20s, and I think I'm doing okay for myself and I live in the city. I do work 55-60 hrs a week and have to utilize most skills they do.
    True I chose not to go down the Financial path, but I still think there are great opportunities. I guess no one really "gets it" unless they are the ones getting those sweet bonuses. I know you guys make my life better by doing…..whatever.

  35. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM

    @33 let's not be a douche here…S&T falls under the umbrella of the IB, as I used to work there. Sorry I missed the "D", ass.

  36. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:57 AM

    @20, 80 hour week huh?
    5 hrs = finding someone to do the statistical work that u cheated on in b school
    10 hrs = trying to figure out the chart functions in excel
    15 hrs = telling everyone how many hrs u work
    30 hrs = reading the reviews for korean massage parlors that recently changed names
    5 hrs = name dropping the college that u went to
    10 hrs = reading sports scores
    5 hrs = wondering if the secretary that u jerled off to last night was worth it, or shud u have gone with the intern from South America

  37. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM

    @37 you disgust me
    -Ivy MBA secretly fucking @37's gf

  38. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:01 AM

    @38/28 the numbers are for bankers.
    @39 how does one "jerle off"? it sounds kinky.

  39. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM

    @37 how are you living in NYC on ~50k post MBA? I'm smelling something fishy here…. do you live with your parents?

  40. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM

    @39 "trying to figure out the chart functions in excel"
    fuck you very much, thanks. we are excel masters.

  41. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM

    @41, it's more sensy than kinky
    -39

  42. Posted by Pfluger the Barbaria | January 20, 2010 at 10:03 AM

    @39:
    Look, if you didn't want to work for the help desk you should have gotten an MBA, a CFA, or another degree and then done it yourself, if you can.
    Why the hell do you care what people earn? As NS correctly pointed out, if you don't like Wall Street, find a credit union to finance your house and your Prius, and put your savings with them. And buy Gold coins from the Treasury. Your choice…
    (Your last point was a good one, but it is hardly confined to Wall Street workers.)

  43. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:03 AM

    @15, you're thinking too much man. You're supposed to just get angry.

  44. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM

    I went to Washington and Lee.

  45. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM

    @39 South American intern ftw

  46. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM

    What do associates actually get paid for? I thought Analysts do all the work and Associates just proofread stuff.

  47. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:10 AM

    @49 it's the VPs that do no work, no associates.

  48. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM

    @49 It might be seen as cruel to smack an analyst in front of a client. Just sayin'.

  49. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM

    always amusing to watch comments coming in from folks that know their days of being overpaid relative to the value they provide to the economy are numbered.

  50. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:15 AM

    @10, I'm a former NY-based IBD associate that left the industry and went to work for a client company. Whist in NY, I was chained to a desk or a conference room all of my waking hours, had no life, was absolutely miserable (I also hate cold weather)–though I made roughly the amounts stated above (which is a lot less after tax and and NYC COL)
    Now I work in a much warmer climate about half the hours, make half the money and am very happy doing it.
    So do I think these frat boys are making too much? Well, for me, it wasn't enough money, so no.

  51. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:17 AM

    53 = voice of reason

  52. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:18 AM

    (thinking about south american intern)
    fap fap fap fap fap fap

  53. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:20 AM

    @ NS/29
    Usually a great fan of your work, but that argument is specious.
    It's like a farmer's cooperative saying, "well if you don't like the fact we pay ourselves >$250k and offer substandard produce at inflated prices, then go on a fast. No one's forcing you to eat." (Maybe OPEC would be a better analogy.)
    Just because banker's provide an important service in today's world, and are organized enough to make a decent paycheck for themselves does not mean they should pay themselves outrageously. Specially at a time when many Americans are living out of their cars as a result of something that bankers had some role to play in (albeit partial.)

  54. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:22 AM

    @53 is correct-
    As I said earlier, and I hope you all were listening, escaping Manhattan for the fresh air and good living is wonderful. Bonuses are a carrot, you are the donkeys.
    - not Ralph Waldo Emerson, but a terrific linguist

  55. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:22 AM

    @52 if they save enough to buy a truck the frat boys could always quit and run for senate in a dumb as bricks northeastern state.

  56. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:23 AM

    does anyone have the first year Anal_yst numbers?

  57. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:23 AM

    @ 58 = liberal fag

  58. Posted by NakedShort | January 20, 2010 at 10:25 AM

    @56 agreed on the fact that I might have gone a tad overboard on my rant. I'll stick to the humor.

  59. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM

    @10 – I work in corporate finance, and chose not to pursue IB opportunities. But my wife did, and went through what @53 described: 90 hour work weeks, no sleep, getting called into the office at 2 AM. So yes, a lot of the folks who work in IB deserve the money their getting. They're doing a job that no 50 year old punk ass, Obama-voting, union guy could do, or would want to do. Anyone can put doors on a car. Few can master the art of being a value creator, 24/7/375.

  60. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:27 AM

    For Yael- What are first year Blogger numbers? Just curious.
    Greg (from Jon's computer)

  61. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM

    @62 = Dick Fuld

  62. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM

    Associates are the ones who have to yell at the pitchbook monkeys

  63. Posted by Pfluger the Barbaria | January 20, 2010 at 10:33 AM

    @58 = "Marsha" Coakley.

  64. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM
  65. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM

    @62 – hahaha, teriffic trolling. Well played, sir.

  66. Posted by ex-PMB chick | January 20, 2010 at 10:35 AM

    hey.

  67. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:36 AM

    @42 – I make a third of 300k is 100k post MBA, I was talking about total comp

  68. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:37 AM

    @62 obvious troll is obvious

  69. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:45 AM

    @37 – they make your life better by buying the products your company produces, therefore providing you with a job. The bankers will now accept your apology and your thanks for keeping you employed.

  70. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:51 AM

    @37. And make my life better…
    Typical self-entitled loser that attended a third-tier public university and cannot figure out why bankers are compensated that way.
    The world owes you nothing. Douchebag.

  71. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM

    @72-74 Repetition. Examine youre mouse button

  72. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM

    Babar makes 3 sticks a year

  73. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM

    I take it up the ass 24/7/52/365. And twice on Sundays. Give me a fucking break.

  74. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM

    @76, huh?

  75. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:06 AM

    All who enjoy fluffing ones own ego… I have been in the IB world and am now on the S&T side(Commodity Fixed price, mostly options). I have an MBA and an MS in Quant Finance. First off, please stop bragging about your MBA. All of you who have one know the whole program was a joke. That is unless you attended Devry for undergrad.
    Secondly the whole value add thing is bs. Anyone who is really creating "value" is not generating the real cash. The cash is found in Interest Rate Arbitrage and Financial Engineering…. Restructuring Risk, packaging it, and selling it for more than your entry price.
    Oh… wait a stock offering. Huge value add. Wait a minute. I am remembering Corp Fin 101… additional stock adds no real value.
    wait debt offering… HUGE MONEY. MY daily VAR is more than what you made last year.
    I have no problem with bonuses. but I do have a problem with a bunch 28-32 year olds patting themselves on the back who have added only 20% to the bottom line. Get over yourselves.
    FROM THE REAL REVENUE CENTER (S&T)
    NS. Glad you retracted. Have much respect for your posts.

  76. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:11 AM

    @10: the frat boys putting in solid hrs with tangible value adds bother you, but Kesha can sing an inane song about brushing her teeth with whiskey, pull down 10x that, and you let it slide?
    I'd trade 10 3rd yrs for a pop singer any time.

  77. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:13 AM

    @79: you're my hero.

  78. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:13 AM

    @79 = The derivatives guy that destroyed the economy

  79. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:16 AM

    @79: you so big.

  80. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:19 AM

    79 is right. The bonus would be half as big for these chumps if it wasn't for S&T. Nothing the bank does adds any "value." i have an MBA and work at a hedge fund so i know the basic deal. 2009 was all fixed income trading thanks to all the new debt issuance. if you work at a bank and want to defend yourself then simply point to the fact that profit was generated and you're entitled to a part of it. but spare me bullshit like i work 90 hours a week, i have an MBA loan, i create value, etc. nobody said you will get paid by the hour. nobody gives a shit you have loans. and you most certainly dont create any value.

  81. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:21 AM

    @80 fuck you. that's a fantastic song.

  82. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:22 AM

    @79 why did you get your MBA to work at a hedge fund?

  83. Posted by Mr. Guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:23 AM

    YES, derivatives guys totally destroyed the economy. All 200 of them. Shame on you.
    Give me a break.

  84. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:25 AM

    @79. I don't need a daily VaR. I only have to drop my pants. Ask your mom/sister.

  85. Posted by Babar | January 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM

    This goes out to half of you:
    Sealclap.Sealclap.Sealclap.

  86. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM

    I dont have bedbugs kenneth, I went to Princeton.

  87. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:32 AM

    I went to NC-squared suckas

  88. Posted by Wholesaler | January 20, 2010 at 11:35 AM

    When Gobama nationalizes student loans and healthcare, anyone have an idea what my nut'll be?
    Dialin for donuts in Denville.

  89. Posted by Tax Chick | January 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM

    @20 How do you figure the Yankees didn't get a taxpayer bailout?
    Taxpayer funding for the new Yankees' stadium consists of $1.2 billion in tax-exempt bonds and $136 million in taxable bonds; the Mets got $697 million in tax-free bonds.
    Some have argued that the taxpayers' tab for Yankee Stadium will eventually total $4 billion.

  90. Posted by CMungerFTW | January 20, 2010 at 11:43 AM

    @ 79 ='s:
    a) snookie
    b) j-woww
    c) the situation
    d) the p#ssy ron-ron knocked out w/ one punch.
    Pls discuss.

  91. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:44 AM

    @86 that was before I knew any better.
    Honestly… who really got a lot out of their MBA program. I pose this point to help those who are reading and considering getting one.
    IMHO: continue on as an analyst and while you are waiting for your VP or MD to get you the redline of the oh so great prospectus, study for your CFA. Every CFA I know can run circles around your average MBA. Now, if you are looking at University of Chicago, Berkeley or Carnegie Mellon… (more technical programs, and yes I did not mention HBS for a reason, NOT THAT GREAT OF A PROGRAM… sorry) I would consider the cost… CFA around 5K (work will pay for it)… MBA 60 – 80K.
    Here is some value add for the younger readers

  92. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:46 AM

    @32
    don't act all high and mighty because you got a remedial math degree ("business" or "finance") from that shit school you call a university. Sure Cornell sucks (maybe not all those in engineering) and is in the middle of cow country, but getting in as a legacy to a safety school really isn't any better. Go to one of the schools in cambridge and then you can talk.
    Loser.
    - math major from a school in Cambridge (you may have heard of it!)

  93. Posted by NakedShort | January 20, 2010 at 11:52 AM

    @96 Bunker Hill Community College?
    -guy who thinks bragging about where they went to undergrad is fucking pathetic.

  94. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 11:53 AM

    @95 I asked the question @86 (and am probably the same age as you). Out of college I worked at a bank for a few years and have been working at an hf for the past ten. Just asking because most of the guys I work with do not have mbas and (obviously) do not need them. some have CFAs but even those three little letter are unnecessary.

  95. Posted by volatilitysmile | January 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM

    CFAs can interpolate better than a MBA. MBAs can delegate down the responsibility to the CFAs.
    Sorry. (full disclosure, have both)

  96. Posted by volatilitysmile | January 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM

    omg, @100!

  97. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:03 PM

    @98 To a certain extent I agree with you, but look at if from an IB's eyes (corp finance, capital markets, the ever so sexy M&A). A CFA is almost a one stop shop. It will cover almost everything you need to know.

  98. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:05 PM

    $300K Bonus – 70% Cash / 30% Equity
    >$400K Bonus – 65% Cash / 35% Equity
    2nd year associate bonus – $150K – $260K / Base to $120K
    3rd year associate bonus – $180K – $350K / Base to $160K
    1vp bonus – $425K range / Base to $180K
    CONFIRMED

  99. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM

    @102 thanks for reprinting the numbers posted above.

  100. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:08 PM

    @103 – don't be a smart ass – i added 1VP to the mix – kiss off.

  101. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:36 PM

    97 FTW

  102. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:52 PM

  103. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM

    @95 Do you think there's a good ROI on a CFA program such as this? http://www.cfa.org/mentor/index.html

  104. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:03 PM

    @39 We really work hard for our clients so that they can get their deals done. An average of 80 hours hides a lot of all nighter doing stuff for high risk, high stakes stuff for our clients. We take a lot of pain off their backs.
    Perhaps you'd want to do that in your "normal" job? I dont think so.
    So do I think we make too much money? Nope, I don't. We make what we have earned.

  105. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:04 PM

    Question are these stub numbers?
    For example is a first year associate, someone who started in July of 2009 and then is getting a bonus now?
    Are they really getting 200k?? Or is that someone a year out?

  106. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:05 PM

    @79, not that I don't generally agree with you, but "Oh… wait a stock offering. Huge value add. Wait a minute. I am remembering Corp Fin 101… additional stock adds no real value. "
    isn't this the same as:
    "packaging it, and selling it for more than your entry price" on the FI side?

  107. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:29 PM

    @110: Ugh… ignorance! Stock offering = capital => Capital = investment => investment = value add!
    Remove the capital, you won't get to the value add. (Sorry for the other folks, I had to stoop down to a "dumb" level to explain)
    No wonder you didn't make it into investment banking (judging from your disgust at the industry), perhaps you should go back to school.

  108. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM

    @111, "more than your 'entry price'" = capital was invested => investment = investment => value add
    Remove the capital, you won't get to the value add. (Sorry for the other folks, I had to stoop down to a "dumb" level to explain)
    It's possible I've misunderstood what you wrote in your rather unusual prose.
    /guy who said he largely agrees with you in his first post @110 and does not disdain the industry
    //guy who does not miss the "S&T vs. IBD" debates of two years ago any more than the "CFA vs. MBA" debates of last fall

  109. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:00 PM

    @111 – I said Value not Capital…. so why do stock prices fall after an offering? Ohhh I don't know maybe dilution. There is this other thing called a dividend distribution too, but we don't have to worry about that in the IB world.
    I guess by your standards everyone should split stocks and the treasury should print print print more money because that generates "VALUE".
    Perhaps you should go back to school, or maybe you finish up those books.

  110. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:05 PM

    @101 sure, from an IB's eyes, but I'm talking about working at a hedge fund, where I don't think it'll do much for you re either getting hired.

  111. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM

    Maybe what we thought was worth 500k a year is worth 250k after all.

  112. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:11 PM

    @113, is English your first language?

  113. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:27 PM

    @115 Really!
    Add the word, "should" to the last sentence.
    I am glad you are quick to pick up on grammatical errors. It is a good skill to have when proofing books.
    By the way, take a towncar out to Greenwich and drop them off when you are done. Your MD needs them before his flight in the morning.

  114. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 1:38 PM

    @16 – stupid analogy. No one bailed out Hollywood or the Yankees. There are more bankers in JPM than actors and/or athletes making over $30,000 a year in the entire country (ever heard of extras or minor leaguers?. Come up with something original.

  115. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:42 PM

    This comment thread is magnificent. Please continue.

  116. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 2:45 PM

    @37 – they make your life better by buying the products your company produces, therefore providing you with a job. The bankers will now accept your apology and your thanks for keeping you employed.

  117. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 4:50 PM

    @109 – these are full year numbers. If you got a stub, you'd receive half of the figures above.
    Anecdotally, I've heard similar levels for JPM S&T, but 1st year associate high of 230, 25% stock with base of 110.

  118. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 6:42 PM

    @118- assuming research associate numbers are same as S&T… Does that sound right?

  119. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 6:42 PM

    @118- assuming research associate numbers are same as S&T… Does that sound right?

  120. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 6:42 PM

    @118- assuming research associate numbers are same as S&T… Does that sound right?

  121. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 7:03 PM

    2nd year research associate bonus – $125K/Base to $120K

  122. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 7:22 PM

    what's about analysts 3rd in IB?

  123. Posted by guest | January 20, 2010 at 8:53 PM

    @79 – no value add from a stock offering and huge value add from financial engineering? really? better go get your corp fin 101 again buddy and might also have to retake mba / cfa. seems like you learned all the technical skills that a monkey can do but didn't really get it. just riddle me this – what do you think drove more value over the past century – innovation (vc/tech/ipo) or financial engineering?
    btw, i have an mba and a cfa. two wildly different animals. i view them as complimentary, not exclusive, just fyi.

  124. Posted by guest | January 21, 2010 at 6:06 AM

    @122 Are you saying that 2nd year associates in ER made 120K in bonus ? That's close to 220K total comp. Sounds pretty high for ER in this market. Can someone please confirm the ER numbers ???

  125. Posted by guest | January 21, 2010 at 9:28 AM

    penn>cornell

  126. Posted by guest | January 21, 2010 at 10:06 AM

    @122 Are you saying that 2nd year associates in ER made 120K in bonus ? That’s close to 220K total comp. Sounds pretty high for ER in this market. Can someone please confirm the ER numbers ???

  127. Posted by guest | January 21, 2010 at 4:05 PM

    @125 FI, not ER

  128. Posted by guest | January 21, 2010 at 7:27 PM

    @124 Fail.
    You have a CFA and MBA but still can't spell "complementary" correctly.
    Unless you mean that your studies were free or they attract compliments from others?
    Better go and study English 101 again buddy!

  129. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 6:52 AM

    @128
    So around 220K for FI Research . Wow. i thought research numbers were lower than 200K

  130. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 10:16 AM

    What is research associate's total comp at a mid-level firm, like a Jefferies or an Oppenheimer

  131. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 10:31 AM

    @131 more than you'll ever see.
    I bet most of you clowns can barely get through Qs and Ks, and probably have a tough time with DCF models.
    I left that world a while ago. Now at a strategic long/short equity Fund, trading your life savings away you overly liberal dickheads

  132. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 10:43 AM

    @131 That really answers my question you jock sniffing loser that won't have a job 6 months from now. At "strategic" long/short equity fund. Wow, i talk to monkeys like you everyday and you don't know your head from your ass. Trading yourself out of business like all the others. Have wandering the streets next year explaining to people that you swear you understand DCF models and can read a K and Q in the most efficient manner when you are interviewing for some god awful job.

  133. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 1:43 PM

    @129 – OWNED
    you were owned in that post buddy, the fact that someone didn't "turn" his comment 10 times and had a slip up doesn't change that fact.

  134. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM

    @132 sorry, a shit-ton of people on this site work at hf's, probably more prestigious than whatever 25mm in aum "shop" you sort the mail for.

  135. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 2:37 PM

    @134 – you are a massive DOUCHE!
    Was not owned at all.
    VC and IPO = providing companies access to equity capital. Innovation? Not likely.

  136. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM

    @108 "high risk/high stakes" …give me a break. Compare your "high stakes" DCF or comp sheet to the kid in Iraq, the CIA operative in Pakistan, or the brain/heart surgeon who is scrubbing into the OR every morning at 5AM. Get real and realize A) your overpaid and B) an Indian/Chinese college grad could do probably do your job for about $20/hr. (and I'm in IBD, so need to say I don't understand the game).

  137. Posted by guest | January 22, 2010 at 6:37 PM

    @134 – you are a massive DOUCHE!
    Was not owned at all.
    VC and IPO = providing companies access to equity capital. Innovation? Not likely.

  138. Posted by guest | January 23, 2010 at 10:16 AM

    @136 (i assume you are @79 too) – you are not very smart, are you? why don't you go google (do you think google is innovative btw? where did they get their capital to continue to innovate?) something on the role of markets in distributing capital and ENABLING innovation. while at it, why don't you also read up a bit on why most innovation occurs where the financial markets are best developed. also please do a search within the documents you read on the things you do at your job and report back on how you ENABLE innovation.
    unfortunately, apparently the labor markets are far from efficient if someone like you has a job. now go back to doing your magic and earning your big bonus aka financial waste in this case.

  139. Posted by guest | January 26, 2010 at 8:49 PM

    @139 – Fail again. You've changed tack, but unfortunately still no wind in your sails.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.