As you may have noticed over the last year or so, Charlie Gasparino is no fan of anonymous bloggers. Usually he’s content to let them live in their holes, like bums, but they step into his den, they step too far. Take this fellow Dear John Thain, for instance. He recently wrote a piece for the Huffington Post about Goldman Sachs. In it, he takes issue with Chaz’s assertion that “Goldman benefits from a subsidy from the government because of its status now as a bank.” I’m not going to get into DJT’s other points, or Gaspo’s lengthy rebuttal. Neither much matter because in doing so, according to Gaspo, we make ourselves pawns in their sick games. That’s right my friends: Charlie Gasparino is positing that Dear John Thain and, really, anything positive written under a pseudonym, re: the Vampire Squid, is coming from the inside, as part of Goldman’s new offensive. He judiciously offers that perhaps DJT is just some random pissant but that’s just for show. This guy, and everyone else so much as hinting that GS does not in fact traffic human fetuses created with the sole intent of one day putting grass on that field is, in actuality, a Goldman employee. Sayeth CG:
There are almost too many ways to attack the posting from the anonymous blogger (who goes by the name “Dear John Thain”), titled “2010 Will be A Challenging Year for Goldman Sachs,” (this guy obviously has a flair for understatement) so I will make the following points. Because he’s anonymous, we don’t know if he’s a Goldman executive (one way Goldman is now looking to attack its critics is by blogging positively about the firm, I am told) an investor with holdings of Goldman Sachs stock (a substantial conflict of interest if this is true), or just some guy with too much time on his hands.
As Wall Street’s foremost investigative journalist, he’s gotta be right, RIGHT?! According to Goldman Sachs spokesman Lucas Van Praag, however, this is the first known instance in which the Jabroni Pony’s sense of smell has been compromised by a bad piece of sopressata, left in the glove compartment for too long. LvP told Dealbreaker, “If I were going to be propaganda blogging, I’d do so under a more anonymous name. Something of an Italian origin, maybe.”
Sorry Bess, I already have a trademark registered on those initials – Donald J. Trump
Time for some Just For Men Chaz.
Who is this guy? I like the cut of his jib.
All-a-yous bastids is jealous. All-a-yous wish you had da opportunity to get into "my lengthy rebuttal," because I got da brains, and da fuckin' beauty. Eat yer hearts out, ya baldracca fuckin' bloggers.
-cg
baldracca f. (vulgar) whore, slut.
@4 What took you so long?
Sorry Chazza, you didn't cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours("The Sellout," eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he's done and isn't ashamed to say "I'm Good Enough, I'm Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!"
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
Comment removed by moderator.
He looks yummy in that photo.
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
Comment removed by moderator.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie "Idiot" Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can't intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
I love you Bess and you're a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS'S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
digital dickweeds
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz's motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I'm guessing it's Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@22 "I think she was kidding"
if you don't know she was then you're an idiot.
@16 – That was one of the sickest comments I have ever read on this blog.
jeebus….
Sorry Bess, I already have a trademark registered on those initials – Donald J. Trump
Sorry Bess, I already have a trademark registered on those initials – Donald J. Trump
Sorry Bess, I already have a trademark registered on those initials – Donald J. Trump
Sorry Bess, I already have a trademark registered on those initials – Donald J. Trump
Time for some Just For Men Chaz.
Time for some Just For Men Chaz.
Time for some Just For Men Chaz.
Time for some Just For Men Chaz.
Who is this guy? I like the cut of his jib.
Who is this guy? I like the cut of his jib.
Who is this guy? I like the cut of his jib.
Who is this guy? I like the cut of his jib.
All-a-yous bastids is jealous. All-a-yous wish you had da opportunity to get into “my lengthy rebuttal,” because I got da brains, and da fuckin’ beauty. Eat yer hearts out, ya baldracca fuckin’ bloggers.
-cg
baldracca f. (vulgar) whore, slut.
All-a-yous bastids is jealous. All-a-yous wish you had da opportunity to get into “my lengthy rebuttal,” because I got da brains, and da fuckin’ beauty. Eat yer hearts out, ya baldracca fuckin’ bloggers.
-cg
baldracca f. (vulgar) whore, slut.
All-a-yous bastids is jealous. All-a-yous wish you had da opportunity to get into “my lengthy rebuttal,” because I got da brains, and da fuckin’ beauty. Eat yer hearts out, ya baldracca fuckin’ bloggers.
-cg
baldracca f. (vulgar) whore, slut.
All-a-yous bastids is jealous. All-a-yous wish you had da opportunity to get into “my lengthy rebuttal,” because I got da brains, and da fuckin’ beauty. Eat yer hearts out, ya baldracca fuckin’ bloggers.
-cg
baldracca f. (vulgar) whore, slut.
@4 What took you so long?
@4 What took you so long?
@4 What took you so long?
@4 What took you so long?
@4 What took you so long?
Sorry Chazza, you didn’t cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours(“The Sellout,” eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Sorry Chazza, you didn’t cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours(“The Sellout,” eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Sorry Chazza, you didn’t cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours(“The Sellout,” eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Sorry Chazza, you didn’t cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours(“The Sellout,” eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Sorry Chazza, you didn’t cover all suppositions. DJT could also be ARS trying to discredit you to elevate his book sales over yours(“The Sellout,” eligible for free super saver shipping for orders over $25 on Amazon).
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
Hey charlie! Uppa you assaholi with some pasta fagioli, eh!
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he’s done and isn’t ashamed to say “I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!”
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he’s done and isn’t ashamed to say “I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!”
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he’s done and isn’t ashamed to say “I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!”
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he’s done and isn’t ashamed to say “I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!”
I admire a man who is proud of the journalistic work he’s done and isn’t ashamed to say “I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People (Except for Squidites) Like Me!”
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@7 = the Mob = GS.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
@4:
Sorry. I was staring at the Ashley Jugs photo.
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
you know peter sutherland is a member of the steering committee of the bilderberg group and a member of the trilateral commission? just sayin…probably nothing wrong…
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
He looks yummy in that photo.
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
Dear Charlie
Dear John Thain work(ed/s) at Merrill, hence the name, no great mystery there.
Hope this helps.
-guest
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
@14 wait a second? so gasparino was…WRONG????
-the forehead slapper
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
The article by Dear John Thain that Charlie “Idiot” Gasparino is attacking is actually very good. Charlie can’t intelligently dispute any of the main points in the article so instead he argues about one inconsequential line.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
I love you Bess and you’re a very talented writer but I had to throw up when you wrote that delusional sentence claiming Gas-Bag is one of Wall Street foremost investigative journalist. Maybe Maybe he did investigative reporting years ago at the WSJ but what comes out of his mouth at CNBC is just rumor leaks. Very little hard news that really holds up and if it does he got it from a print reporter at NY Post, Bloomberg,Reuters or WSJ that he forgets to source.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
@18 holy crap are you serious? please meet my friend called BESS’S RABID USE OF SARCASM before posting again.
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
digital dickweeds
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@20 that dennis. know your cnbc dbags.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@17 you nailed it on Chaz’s motive
@18 I think she was kidding but then Gasparino called himself her mentor the other day – I agree that line made me want to barf.
Overall I’m guessing it’s Bess who is Gasparinos mentor and source to any decent real news that comes out of his mouth.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@22 “I think she was kidding”
if you don’t know she was then you’re an idiot.
@16 – That was one of the sickest comments I have ever read on this blog.
jeebus….
@18 you are fucking dumb
Too gaba, didn't gool.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
@27 The post Mr. Gasparino references reads more like someone watching Goldman from the outside. And Goldman didn't get where they are by apologizing. Their message is much more focused on the benefits they bring shareholders and the larger economy by responsibly redistributing exogenous risks.
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they'd be skinned alive (by GS).
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@18 you are fucking dumb
@18 you are fucking dumb
Too gaba, didn’t gool.
Too gaba, didn’t gool.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
I think it makes sense just from a probability/numbers point of view – a GS interest (an employee, PR agent or whoever) is way more likely to spend his or her time writing Goldman apologies than anyone else. Common sense.
@27 The post Mr. Gasparino references reads more like someone watching Goldman from the outside. And Goldman didn’t get where they are by apologizing. Their message is much more focused on the benefits they bring shareholders and the larger economy by responsibly redistributing exogenous risks.
@27 The post Mr. Gasparino references reads more like someone watching Goldman from the outside. And Goldman didn’t get where they are by apologizing. Their message is much more focused on the benefits they bring shareholders and the larger economy by responsibly redistributing exogenous risks.
@27 The post Mr. Gasparino references reads more like someone watching Goldman from the outside. And Goldman didn’t get where they are by apologizing. Their message is much more focused on the benefits they bring shareholders and the larger economy by responsibly redistributing exogenous risks.
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@28 agreed and @27 no fucking way some GS employee is going to be anony blogging about the firm, they’d be skinned alive (by GS).
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@29 if it were an analyst, i agree with you. but within the circle of execs i could easily see one of them being asked to blogged positively about this shit, or hiring someone to do it
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.
@30 christ, no fucking way. see @28. end of story.