In a recent interview, Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg finally strayed from his usually scripted remarks, getting really worked up about a certain person, who he won’t name, but is among those who “really do believe they are entitled to $9 million, [which] is a problem.” But what really got to Kenny, is that this $9 million -unnamed- person had the (nuclear) balls to ask him what was up with all the bonus backlash and why people were so mad at him. “Why don’t you like me?” that anonymous “bigwig” asked him.
Feinberg also opened up about his relationship with Timmy G., to whom apparently one can’t say “no”(“You try”). Also, he’s not a fan of AIG people who are just greedy b&*@#$.

Comments (13)

  1. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM

    Fuck you, Czarina.

  2. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:27 AM

    But I went to MIT and never lost money!!!!!

  3. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM

    Its not about money, fast cars and mansions!! Why didnt anyone tell me….
    Bear in mind, this guy is someones grandfather and they probably dont even let him hold the remote control…

  4. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM

    Yael, I really think you’re coming along with your writing. You’re beginning to show flashes of Bess (perhaps some osmosis after hours in the editorial offices?) and so I just wanted to give you a heads up and say you’re much better then shazzums, or Greg, and so keep up the good work.
    High five for you.
    call me.

  5. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:40 AM

    You can say bitches/bastards here, Yaelie. Don’t be shy. Go ahead. Swear.

  6. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

    @4 would be nice for a writer to do something in their own voice, rather than an inferior imitations of BL…

  7. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:44 AM

    @6 Bess > Chaucer > Dante, so based on revealed preferences (review consumer theory chapter in your intermediate microeconomics textbook) if Yael becomes an imitation of Bess, he/she(it?) is def. better than Dante, and could potentially be better than Chaucer, but never better than Bess.

  8. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM

    @6 Bess > Chaucer > Dante, so based on revealed preferences (review consumer theory chapter in your intermediate microeconomics textbook) if Yael becomes an imitation of Bess, he/she(it?) is def. better than Dante, and could potentially be better than Chaucer, but never better than Bess.

  9. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM

    As a member of the tribe, Feinberg should know better than to try to get between a Jew and his shekels.

  10. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM

    @9 kill yourself.

  11. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 12:07 PM

    @9 We and the Hindoos be rockin’ it, man.
    http://www.good.is/post/transparency-america-s-wealthiest-religions/

  12. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 12:17 PM

    @9 because other religions part with their money so well?
    You are a fucking idiot. Kill yourself slowly.

  13. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM

    i wonder how much feinberg makes a year

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.