As you’ve probably noticed, Tim Geithner’s had a pretty tough go of it lately. People are pissed at him about the bailouts, no one will get off him about AIG, many feel he “coddles” Wall Street and rarely a day goes by that the Treasury Secretary’s ousting is not called for, and not just by pissants on the internet. His job doesn’t actually seem to be in any actual danger at the moment– according to Rahm Emanuel, “The president’s view is that Tim is one of the stars,” but clearly something needs to be done about how the public sees TG. To show them he cares. That he “gets” it. That he’s just one of them. But how? An article this morning concerning T. Geith’s “charm offensive” included the following photo of Mr. Geithner, touring a supermarket in Philadelphia with Michelle Obama:

geithnerproduce.jpg
Our initial thought: what the hell? How is Tim Geithner mixing it up at the grocery store and smiling maniacally at a bunch of produce going to endear him to the public? Then, a few lines later, this:

Mr. Geithner says even his wife has urged him to show more emotion in confronting the banks.

So, okay. Grocery stores…not being afraid to show his feelings….he’s not working the…vagina angle is he? No, come on. You’re making huge leaps in logic here, we said to ourselves. We actually almost started to feel guilty for coming to such gender stereo-typing conclusions, and would’ve continued to do so, if the next thing we saw hadn’t been this:

Tim Geithner’s VOGUE Interview

That’s right ladies. Tim Geithner is in the latest issue of Vogue. Talkin’ bailouts, talkin’ fashion, talkin’ Obama but mostly just being one of the girls. Are you around that age where the fine lines are mounting and Botox seems more and more like a viable option? You’ve seen his forehead– TG can relate! Do your breasts hurt the week before you get your period? His too! No more fireside chats with CNBC (unless its to discuss how to display just enough cleave to show one means business), no more Congressional hearings, no more trying to please men. Unless we’re talking about 1001 ways to please a man in the bedroom (or backseat- dirty!), which will be the focus of TG’s upcoming spread in Cosmo. Tip number 391: those balls aren’t going to suck themselves. And for novelty, pop rocks (35). And don’t neglect the taint (275). Are you loving him now?
PS: Lest you think we’re been unnecessarily harsh, or misogynistic or whatever (like I care, but go with me on this one)– this was the Timescomment on the matter: “And Sarah Palin thinks she’s photogenic. The race is on.” Andrew Ross Sorkin is calling you a ‘mo.* Take two to let that sink in.
*Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (59)

  1. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM

    Bess! How was your weekend?

  2. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:38 AM

    next he’ll be telling Mack, “I love you Johnny Cakes”

  3. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:38 AM

    bess = national treasure

  4. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:40 AM

    I could kill for some ben and jerry’s right now!
    -TG

  5. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:45 AM

    Also, don’t neglect the taint.
    -TG

  6. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:47 AM

    love it!
    -ping j

  7. Posted by CoveredLong | February 22, 2010 at 10:49 AM

    @3 – I must find her.
    -Nic Cage

  8. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:51 AM

    Nice to have you back Bess. Taint ftw.

  9. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM

    so true on the sorkin point

  10. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 10:58 AM

    Like I need to read his ways to please a man. I could teach a class on the subject.
    -Andrea T

  11. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM

    Words to live by from the Vogue interview:
    “It’s not about what you believe. It’s about what you can achieve.”

  12. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM

    Winner winner Geithner dinner!

  13. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 11:16 AM

    That was awesome, Bess.

  14. Posted by Anal_yst | February 22, 2010 at 11:28 AM

    He looks as if he’s taken aback, “*gasp* so THATS what Arugula looks like? I always thought it was a cookie!”

  15. Posted by NakedShort | February 22, 2010 at 11:32 AM

    Did you know that the best night I’ve had since I became Treasury Secretary is a night that Bernanke and I split a bottle of wine, we made a summer salad and watched Chocolat together?

  16. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM

    @NS your knowledge of rom-coms is truly astounding.

  17. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM

    -BL, awesome

  18. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM

    @ 16 – comes with being married. Ah, the joys of Lasse HalLstrom movies.

  19. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM

    @14 agreed. hilarious.

  20. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM

    ARS calling TG a ‘mo ftw.

  21. Posted by NakedShort | February 22, 2010 at 12:01 PM

    @VS I watched 17 Again 3 times this weekend. Fuck me.

  22. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 12:16 PM

    @ NS – Nothing irks me more than Burr’s (the 17 Again director) movies. Igby Goes Down, et al. He’s connected, though, so money is not an issue – brace. Urgh. Very ouch, my heart and soul are with you today.

  23. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM

    P.S. – I got caught watching hockey last night…
    Cariter, here I come.

  24. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM

    @volatility- it should be ‘etc’ not ‘et al.’ and while his rom-com’s are shameful (HOW TO LOSE A GUY IN 10 DAYS???), you can’t seriously say you’re irked by some of the movies he’s acted in (pulp fiction, reservoir dogs, etc).

  25. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM

    @24 VS’s usage of “et al” is preferred when listing titles by a single author, authors of a single work, works of a single genre, etc.
    Rather, “etc.” is conventionally used to continue a list of less closely-related items after enumerating at least the first three.
    - keeping Latin alive on DealBreaker

  26. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM

    bess i want to touch your boobs

  27. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 12:34 PM

    I would love to indulge in a bit of Snooki vagina.

  28. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM

    @ 24 – QT is overrated, give it some time. Plus, a voice over is not “acting”. Et al was an ill attempt at humour, thanks for not getting it.

  29. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM

    @ 24 – QT is overrated, give it some time. Plus, a voice over is not “acting”. Et al was an ill attempt at humour, thanks for not getting it. Et al = etc, or and company, fyi. So, back to the studio for you.

  30. Posted by Investorcluzo | February 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM

    @VS/NS – I’m generally a fan of your work. however, today’s banter has left me convinced that marriage has an uncanny way of removing one’s spine. c’mon guys – don’t pull a tiger! is the mrs really THAT good?
    on a separate note, when making an exception to the 1/2 your age + 7 rule, what is the max allowable (she’s above 21)?

  31. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 1:34 PM

    @30 IC: In my case, it is a combo of two kids I love, and a lousy prenup.
    I’ve done same age +3, that is the 3 stdev upper band. There has been a skew down towards lower band, though, in general, but moving average tends to correlate well with 2/3 age + 6.

  32. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 1:41 PM

    @26 get in line.

  33. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 1:51 PM

    @32: can we incorporate a BL Time Share LLP? Might be BL’s exit strategy… That, or marrying rich.

  34. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM

    Now where the hell did I put those birth control pills? I’m sure I left them in this drawer!!!
    – Mrs. Tim Geithner

  35. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 3:08 PM

    @volatility- hearing the exit strat is a book and the rich dude- already covered.

  36. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM

    That is a “oohhh that’s where I left my balls, hehehe” smile. Sadly, Timmy quickly realized he was looking at chickpeas… Bess post the “after” pic please.

  37. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 3:49 PM

    Bess, you knows best. She Elohim yevarech et darkecha le shalom. Monetize the revenue stream (NY Times, or it did not happen!).
    Book? Too much work, too little titilation. LLP might be more like it, given the captive audience (you need a shamwow for the drool, though, so it is a toss).

  38. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:04 PM

    @VolS- please leave that comment again, this time in English (and make the part in English make sense).

  39. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:23 PM

    Vintage Bess.

  40. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:26 PM

    TG- first time in a supermarket.

  41. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM

    @vol- why the fuck would BL want to work at the Times? which steals her content? and is in a death spiral? and sucks in general?

  42. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM

    @39 Judging from that note she left re: the tech issues, I think bess was just as demoralized as the db readers about it. good to see things seemed to have been resolved and our little energizer bunny has her spirits back.

  43. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 4:33 PM

    so true on the ARS point.

  44. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    Bess:
    Seriously – what the “hell”???
    You’re getting soft…

  45. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 5:54 PM

    Bess:
    Seriously – …’what the “hell”?’
    You’re getting soft!

  46. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM

    @44 uh, if you read the rest of the post, she’s clearly not.

  47. Posted by guest | February 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM

    @44/45- she’s discussing TG sucking balls, massaging taints, and giving pop rocks bj’s. using the word hell is fine. especially given that it was part of a build up. examine your motives.

  48. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 8:49 PM

    for the reading comprehension challenged, monetizing the revenue was referring to an act that people usually announce on the pages of the NYT. G-d forbid she joins ARS…

  49. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 8:49 PM

    for the reading comprehension challenged, monetizing the revenue was referring to an act that people usually announce on the pages of the NYT. G-d forbid she joins ARS…

  50. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 8:50 PM

    for the reading comprehension challenged, monetizing the revenue was referring to an act that people usually announce on the pages of the NYT. G-d forbid she joins ARS…

  51. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 8:53 PM

    apologies, my PA posted only once…

  52. Posted by volatilitysmile | February 22, 2010 at 8:54 PM

    apologies, my PA posted only once…

  53. Posted by guest | February 23, 2010 at 3:19 PM

    timmay, tampax headed your way. Enjoy.

  54. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM

    Seriously, how dicks have passed thru Getihner’s crooked mouth to get where he is today. Blankfein, Paulson, Obama, Thain, Robert Gibbs, Steve Liesman, Jamie, Vikrim……………………………………………………………

  55. Posted by guest | February 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM

    Seriously, how dicks have passed thru Getihner’s crooked mouth to get where he is today. Blankfein, Paulson, Obama, Thain, Robert Gibbs, Steve Liesman, Jamie, Vikrim……………………………………………………………

  56. Posted by ardhsruavy | February 25, 2010 at 6:32 PM

    mJGXVv jvptxksjvxxw, [url=http://tbfeqfzgdxfw.com/]tbfeqfzgdxfw[/url], [link=http://zbrcehkwfppo.com/]zbrcehkwfppo[/link], http://fepkhesoljjo.com/

  57. [...] previously mentioned, Tim Geithner recently embarked on a pussy outreach program. He’s sick of trying to please you men and has moved on to the [...]

  58. [...] previously mentioned, Tim Geithner recently embarked on a pussy outreach program. He’s sick of trying to please you men and has moved on to the [...]

  59. Posted by Harvard MBA Seeks Future Trophy Wife « A Proportional Response | September 6, 2010 at 10:37 PM

    [...] that this phenomenon is very real, ask my coworker. He stumbled upon the site on Dealbreaker, an active ally in the feminist struggle, and read aloud the strikingly accurate headline, “Have Women Pay To [...]

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.