Honestly, it's fine. Just relax. I know what I'm doing here. I bounce back from 86% losses all the time.

I’m not asking for myself, I’m asking for Ebullio Capital Management, and its founder, Lars Steffensen. In February the commodities fund took a 86 percent hit, after declining 70 percent in January, and YTD, is down 96 percent. Investors are forming a disorderly line for the exits. From the outside in, things look ass-bleedingly bad. But it’s cool! Lars is not stressing. People come back from this sort of thing all the time, Lars included.

“Extraordinary circumstances” forced the fund “to liquidate and/or cancel parts of the physical book and liquidate some long-held speculative positions, mainly in LME non-ferrous metals,” Ebullio founder Lars Steffensen wrote in the report, referring to the London Metal Exchange.

“We took the hit,” Steffensen, 42, said by phone today, confirming the contents of the letter and declining to elaborate. “I’ve always bounced back,” he said.

The fund is waiving its 2 percent management fee for 2010.

So, anyway, like I said, I’m polling the group so we can give Lars an accurate picture of whether or not this is feasible. Do bounce backs like this happen all the time? Looking for hard data and/or total guesstimates.

Ebullio Hedge Fund Fell 86% Last Month on Metals Loss [Bloomberg via BI]

Comments (85)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 1:35 PM

    WOW

    Completely fucked

  2. Posted by CoveredLong | March 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM

    Those losses are from their inability to deliver physical, which they never really had in the first place, but they are actually GS traders who meant for this to happen because it helped out the rest of their book, and makes it easier to push through their political agenda against ferrous metals who are acutally the root cause of all evils and Geithner Obama’s work horrible evil banksters.

    -Tyler

  3. Posted by Investorcluzo | March 16, 2010 at 1:38 PM

    bessy – I believe the tag should be “nothing is fk’d.” also, where is the reference to a$$ bleeding? are you getting soft on us?

  4. Posted by Bess Levin | March 16, 2010 at 1:40 PM

    @cluzo- where is the reference to ass bleeding? you mean the one in the 4th sentence? (“Investors are forming an disorderly line for the exits. From the outside in, things look ass-bleedingly bad.”) and then again in the tags? (“Extraordinary circumstances caused blood to literally gush from our asses- seriously duck for cover”)

  5. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM

    @1 not completely.

    - Lars

  6. Posted by creditquant | March 16, 2010 at 1:49 PM

    0 value added and 10x leverage go wooowoo. 14% of the time it works every time.

  7. Posted by Investorcluzo | March 16, 2010 at 1:51 PM

    @bess – ok, looks like nothing is fk’d here…carry on.

  8. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 1:54 PM

    Hi everyone, its me again, Chaz!

    A friend-a-mine is a hedge fund manager. He had an 80% loss. I put all-a-my money wit him, and even dough I’m down 80%, he told me he would gain 80% dis year, and den I’d be even!

    I did da math, and it worked out! I’m lettin’ it ride! So yeah, Beth, its easy to recover from dese huge losses.

    Best,
    The Thug

  9. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM

    Hi Bess!

  10. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM

    stuff like this happens all the time. it’s no big deal.

  11. Posted by Guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:02 PM

    Do what I always do – ditch the HWM start a new fund. There’s a sucker born every minute!

    -JWM

  12. Posted by NakedShort | March 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM

    This guy is a hack

    -J Cassano

  13. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:04 PM

    That my friends, is a bald bald man. Bald. B A L D.

    -John Rocker

  14. Posted by 50nClassy | March 16, 2010 at 2:05 PM

    I’m going to sue the bejeezuz out of that bald bastard.

    Ruth Madoff

  15. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM

    …give me back that fillet-o-fish…
    …give me that fish…..

  16. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM

    Even when I use an alias I still lose money

    - Jeff Mackie

  17. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM

    @cluzo/tax chick having a bad day today?

  18. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:14 PM

    i bounced back…thanks to murdoch.

    damn ars.

    cg

  19. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:14 PM

    i bounced back…thanks to murdoch.

    damn ars.

    cg

  20. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:15 PM

    Is that Porker Stansberry?

  21. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM

    I love this guy, so positive despite the overwhelming indications of complete failure, you go Lars!

  22. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM

    Lars should lube up his head, shove it far up Ashley Dupre’s cavernous vagina, then take her legs and spin her around like a wind mill.

    -guy who thinks about things

  23. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM

    Recovery is easy. Just pick the right 5 numbers between 1 and 65 and get the Powerball correct. Bingo! Back in the game.

  24. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 2:26 PM

    @22:

    Wouldn’t it be more like a helicopter, unless Lars’ head was pointed down at a 90 degree angle?

    - Guy who visualizes things

  25. Posted by highlyconfident | March 16, 2010 at 2:29 PM

    Detective Frank Wrench?

  26. Posted by Quebert | March 16, 2010 at 2:32 PM

    An animated history of Ebullio Capital Management:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M17aG_Po2Y

  27. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:32 PM

    @24 – Yeah, you’re right. Anyway, that is what he should do.

    -22

  28. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:33 PM

    @22 and @24, more like a gyro copter?

  29. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:33 PM

    NEVER AGAIN!

  30. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:34 PM

    So, you are all saying that his head resembles a phallus?

  31. Posted by Louis Winthorpe III | March 16, 2010 at 2:37 PM

    @11- John, I think you and Lars should sit down and talk. Maybe even invite him over to your fund. He looks like “JWM material.”

  32. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 2:42 PM

    @28: I got a message saying I’m posting too fast, so I will respond to your question at a later time. Thank you for your patience in this matter.

  33. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM

    regal returns

  34. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:51 PM

    dude ONLY needs to be up 2400% to hit breakeven

  35. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:52 PM

    It gets better…the guy had a small discrepancy in January numbers…

    “Ebullio Capital Management LLP said its commodity hedge fund fell almost 70 percent in January, not the 1.1 percent decline originally reported to investors,letters to investors show.

    The 1.1 percent drop was announced in the January notice
    and changed to 69.65 percent in the February report, the
    documents show. The fund, based in Southend-on-Sea, England,
    fell another 86 percent last month, taking its plunge in the
    first two months to 96 percent. The biggest losses were in
    copper, nickel and tin, according to the February letter.

    “The moment we knew the actual January loss, we brought
    that up to our investors immediately,” Lars Steffensen, the
    founder of the company, said today by phone. He declined to
    comment on the size of the discrepancy.”

  36. Posted by muchado | March 16, 2010 at 2:54 PM

    pfluger anagram: fuld

  37. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:54 PM

    Since no one else has done this, a little lesson in the asymetry of returns. In order to get back to even, Lars the man from Mars will need to generate a 2500% return. The reason for this is that the lower remaining capital base, the higher the PERCENTAGE one needs to recoup the losses. For example, lets say Larsy boy tons it and makes 100% in the last three quarters. An existing investor will how have his 4% remainder double to 8%, but thus would still be down a not immaterial 92% for the year.

    @8. If you follow the my math, you still have 312.5% to go. Sorry.

  38. Posted by Guest | March 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM

    @31 Our strict recruiting process requires prospective employees to have blown up at least two funds and have lost no less than $100MM of their personal net worth, before we can consider them for candidacy.

    -JWM

  39. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 2:59 PM

    @37 actually, @34 did it.

  40. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM

    i liked this guy better when he was the lead singer of Aqua

  41. Posted by Tex Chibsy | March 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM

    @36- I know Dick Fuld, and Pfluger is no Dick Fuld

  42. Posted by guest | March 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM

    @37 no, we’re talking about just the *original* 86%. Duh.

    -another former Lehman quant.

    PS don’t feel bad, it’s like the Monty Hall problem, counter-intuitive for most people.

  43. Posted by MD | March 16, 2010 at 3:04 PM

    Its costs about $50K to launch a fund; and if you keep it to 1-2 people; and do a FoF and reinvest all the cash with a top tier fund or two, you can beak even on $20M of AUM; and actually make like $500K for matching th SP500, which after tax is better than slaving at some BB where your risk weighted comp (ie, making zero for 2+ yrs) over 5-7 years is much less.

  44. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:11 PM

    I wouldn’t mind his bald lubed up head being inside of me.

    -Dennis Kneale

  45. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

    @37, so there is still hope then?

  46. Posted by bob lawbla | March 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM

    @25
    of the hit tv show “wrenched”? does kinda look like him…i’ll give you bonus points for obscurity…

  47. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM

    @46 Maybe I can get a wrench to strip my nuts

  48. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM

    @36: Is that you, Chaz? Where’s the “d” in pfluger? And what about the other letters?

    @41: And Pfluger is no Fuld, either.

    @37: Now, as far as the math goes, I’m sticking with Chaz’ numbers. If you sustain an 80% loss in one year, you will break even by earning 80% the following year. Its simple arithmetic. I have a CFA.

  49. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:23 PM

    What you left out in your mathematical wizardry is the variable representing sarcasm.

  50. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 3:28 PM

    Gryrocopter.

  51. Posted by pfluger with the lost password | March 16, 2010 at 3:29 PM

    @28:

    Gyno-copter.

  52. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM

    BALDANUS!

  53. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:37 PM

    I love how traders defend such results: “But look at all the money he made the year before!!”

    That’s like saying a pilot who flies a jet into the ground and survives it is a good pilot because “look at all the successful landings he made the year before!!”

  54. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:48 PM

    Santelli: “Thanks, Sharon, well as I look around he room I see “malaise” and no one is telling me I am wrong. How does a one-armed man count his change? With “tea” and it’s time for a party. Who among us cares what the spreads are?? If your country goes down like John Edwards with an hour to kill, who’s gonna know? Are we out of the woods, Tiger? Yeah, you, Liesman are a tiger for sure with you yikes stripes, Bechnut’s got em way to chew up a good financial report! And you with the lazy left eye: What have you ever done in a pit full of “Wolfmen” and guys who scream out in the last bastion of free enterprise?? Sure, sure the Tea Party people have tough times spelling the simplest of derogatory words but hey thats America, a nation of those who can spell “moron” with the second “o” and who pay most of the taxes paid in this country which are high like Kudlow in the old days. Back to you Becky.

  55. Posted by Mitch Cumstein | March 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM

    86? That’s what they call me down at Elaine’s.

    -Charles “I Don’t Need No Fuckin’ Spotter” Gasparino

  56. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM

    I would definitely gyro-copter B. Quick and her not so lazy brown eye.

  57. Posted by Me | March 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM

    @34, @37

    Guys, how did you get 2,400-2,500%?

    I got 4%:
    $1000 initial
    96% hit
    $1000*100/96 = 100*96/$1000 = $9.6 left
    now we use annuity formula: $9.6*(1+return rate needed) = $1000 -> (1+return rate needed) = 104%
    return rate needed = 4%

    -AIG Quant

  58. Posted by american bandersnatch | March 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM

    January: ‘Tis but a scratch!
    February: I’ve had worse.
    March: All right, we’ll waive the management fee

  59. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 4:19 PM

    I am a headge fund manager. What is “ass bleeding”?

  60. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM

    @58 +1

  61. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 4:33 PM

    @54 Nice!

    ~A fan

  62. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 4:33 PM

    @54 Nice!

    ~A fan

  63. Posted by sex goddess | March 16, 2010 at 5:23 PM

    @22 & @24 + @44 – what does sex have to do with this article? you are sex addicts. Face it.

  64. Posted by Guest | March 16, 2010 at 5:46 PM

    @47 +1 Well done

  65. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    Bounce back? Take the balance of the money, fly to Vegas and place it all on #28. Easy.

  66. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 6:42 PM

    If you’re gonna blow up, blow up big. Like Rock Star big.

    -D. Trump

  67. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM

    @57

    oops – sorry I made an error in my calculation above, I was too busy counting my ERP money I got paid yesterday….sorry!

    - AIG Quant

  68. Posted by Anonymous | March 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM

    why would anyone waste time giving money to clowns like these? you’d probably do better by just gambling in a casino.

  69. Posted by mtp | March 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM

    ebullio [lat]: to produce in abundance

  70. Posted by mtp | March 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM

    ebullio [lat]: to produce in abundance

  71. Posted by mtp | March 16, 2010 at 10:45 PM

    definitely only hit post comment once

  72. Posted by Quant Guy | March 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM

    @8
    Ermm, lets say you have 100 bux, the fund looses 80%. You’d be left with 20 bux. If next year your friend makes 80% you’d only have 36 bux left (from your original 100). Not sure how you can invest when you cant figure out basic math…

  73. Posted by creditquant | March 17, 2010 at 11:36 AM

    @57 No wonder AIG is such a piece of shit…

    1 000 * (1 – 0.96) * (1 + 24) = 1 000

  74. Posted by wtf | March 17, 2010 at 12:16 PM

    48- thank you.

    37- you’re a dope.

  75. Posted by judge | March 17, 2010 at 12:16 PM

    48- thank you.

    37- you’re a dope.

  76. Posted by guest | March 17, 2010 at 3:18 PM

    People like 72 & 73 is what the subprime is in trouble.

  77. Posted by Anonymous | March 17, 2010 at 10:50 PM

    @76 Truth.

  78. Posted by Jim Simons | March 18, 2010 at 1:07 AM

    Tags go into the Bess Hall of Fame.

    72 & 73 are so dumb, it is frightening. Hopefully, they are unemployed.

  79. Posted by Lars for ever | March 18, 2010 at 4:18 AM

    the guy tried to corner the TIN market, that was a bad idea

  80. Posted by Lars for ever | March 18, 2010 at 4:18 AM

    the guy tried to corner the TIN market, that was a bad idea

  81. Posted by Lars for ever | March 18, 2010 at 4:19 AM

    the guy tried to corner the TIN market, that was a bad idea

  82. Posted by MooseFister | March 18, 2010 at 1:27 PM

    72&73: Congrats, you pass 3rd grade arithmetic! Unfortunately, you could not handle the leap in brain power it took to realize @8 & @57 were joking.

    It would be a public service if Bess told us what firms 72 & 73 work at. I want to make sure they are not managing any of my money.

  83. Posted by Anonymous | March 19, 2010 at 1:58 PM

    @82

    This blog is mostly read by IB wannabes, so lacking in the 3rd grade arithmetic is not something I’d put past them…

  84. Posted by Anonymous | March 19, 2010 at 2:01 PM

    @83 actually this blog is ready mostly by people who actually works at investment banks and hedge funds (read the wsj? then you’d know that includes little known guys like Jamie Dimon and Ken Griffin). In sum: kill yourself.

  85. Posted by Anonymous | March 22, 2010 at 9:09 AM

    @85 Oh please, every other day the comment section has a frat dbag fight about which private east coast highschool is better. The largest portion of the readership is first/second year BBAs daydreaming about bottles and models.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.