Since the Debrahlee “Too Hot For Citi” Lorenzana story has come out– which has included soft-core porn spreads, morning show appearances, and allegations that DL was canned because her presence distracted her male colleagues, who supposedly couldn’t work in her presence because their “penises were standing up”– Citi has had to keep its thoughts on the matter relatively brief. They still have to go to arbitration with this lady and Jamie Dimon and his firm are the only ones allowed to tell a woman to “zip it, Toots” without taking any heat. So while we’ve heard lots of “this case is without merit,” and so on an so forth, we’ve yet to have Citi tell us how they really feel, re: the girl who dreamed of being “Tits on a Stick.” Today that ends, with a spokeswoman for the bank offering that in her opinion, this chick is not that hot.
Citibank rep Natalie Riper [noted], “Just because she’s saying she was too hot doesn’t mean it’s so.”
Tomorrow, Vikram Pandit’s “brutal truth” on the bazonkas in question. Not to be missed.
Hey Natalie – You’re right, it’s not that I was too hot, it’s that I still am too hot.
-Ts on a S
Does she have a tohas (ass) also?
I would enjoy a vigorous handy from her, with the lights on and MW filming it.
“I would enjoy a vigorous handy from [INSERT RIDER A], with the lights on and MW filming it.”
RIDER A: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703389004575304961535825960.html?mod=WSJ_NY_MIDDLELEADNewsCollection#articleTabs%3Darticle
I’m tryin’ to find the words to describe this girl without being respectful
@5 Hoochie Mama works
Fuck the tits, give me the stick.
-Ping
@4 – Do not want. Do not want! Kill it with fire and malicious malevolent Dealbreaker comments!
I wish I had tits on my stick right now. Sigh.
Why would you want to walk around with those Melon’s on your chest? What’s your motivation?
Funny, I would want to make sure I put a glove on. Not the other way around.
The way we’ve been getting better deals from Citi originators is to wait until they are about to quote us and we say, “How about that Debrahlee??” and it’s like they can’t think and give the damndest good spreads.
@9 It sounds like something Jeffrey Dahmer would have kept in the refrigerator.
I bet she a master at spreads.
George: It took a couple of hours of convincing. I was just like those guys in the movies. And it worked! She said “Yes”! I can’t believe my luck that she was still available . A beautiful woman like that. You think she’s good looking, right?
Jerry: You’re gonna have gorgeous kids.
George: Yes. She’s got great skin – a rosy glow..
Jerry: Pinkish hue?
George: Oh, she’s got the hue.
George: Yes. Yes. Care. You know who I think about a lot? Remember Susan: ? The one that used to work for NBC?
Jerry: Hmm. I thought she became a le$bian.
George: No. It didn’t take.
Jerry: Oh.
George: Did I tell you I ran into her last week? Ho-ho, she looked great.
Jerry: Hmm.
George: You thought she was good looking, right?
Jerry: See, there you go again. What is the difference what I think?
George: I was just curious.
I find nothing at all to excuse her conduct, however much it caters to my baser instincts. Exacerbation. I get that. But I don’t see why pervasive tendenciation of vascillious DB “commentaristas” is necessary to worsen Internet misery pervasiveness.
@17 – that, plus she’s fugly.
forgivenesssss…is more than sayin sorryyyy…
She fired her sleazy lawyer today. Shocking.
Debrahlee or Bess Levin?
This better be the last stop professionally for both Gloria Allred and Debrahlee Lorenzana.
Two male employees of Citibank were unfairly portrayed and, dare I say it, sexually harassed—not just in the workplace but also publicly by both Debrahlee and her attorney, in a poorly written and biased news article in the Village Voice (Elizabeth Dwoskin, 06/01/10). I believe these managers were probably professional, able to control themselves, and were able to think when Debrahlee was present until I see evidence to the contrary. It’s America remember—innocent until proven guilty.
On the other hand, I feel Debrahlee is fair game for the following reasons (Village Voice, Dwoskin):
Debrahlee Lorenzana admits to taking photos of inappropriately dressed female tellers at Citibank. She showed them to Citibank HR. Did these tellers give her permission to take these photos? How and when were these photos taken? Why isn’t Debrahlee being accused of sexual harassment by these women? Why didn’t HR fire Debrahlee the instant they saw these photos?
Debrahlee was hired at a salary of $70,000/year plus three weeks vacation as a “business banker.” In the article, she constantly compares herself to tellers. That fact in and of itself illustrates Debrahlee was incapable of performing her job duties.
Debrahlee objectifies herself in the video for plastic surgery, which she voluntarily agreed to be on, and with her photos in non-business attire (those not taken in her then lawyers office) that she submitted to Village Voice.
While working at the Municipal Credit Union, circa 2003, prior to working for a hospital selling insurance to immigrants, Debrahlee accused a manager of sexual harassment. Supposedly a male manager at the credit union showed her a picture of “his penis”(Village Voice). The timing details are important—they coincide with her 1st breast augmentation, liposuction, and tummy tuck– in the video, she is an “insurance advisor” and seeking her second breast augmentation. Could be coincidence, who knows—well Debrahlee knows and medical records and HR records.
She left B of A, (she doesn’t elaborate on what her position was at the bank, but she was getting awards on “diploma paper” for customer service) when she quit to get married. After the short marriage, she reenters the work force during the financial meltdown, 9/08. She claims she had an offer from WaMu—so the manager at Citibank apparently offered her a salary of $70,000 and three weeks vacation. She was fired within a year’s time and got another job at JPM. (Village Voice, Dwoskin) Curious? What experience did she have for this level of employment? With thousands of unemployed financial workers at this time, willing to take any position, this woman gets three relatively high paying positions, considering her education and lack of English skills—how?
And then we have Debrahlee Lorenzana’s own “testimony” via Village Voice (Dwoskin):
“ ‘Are you saying that just because I look this way genetically, that this should be a curse for me?’”
“ ‘My entire life I have been dealing with this.’”
“ ‘First, I’m a woman, then I’m an immigrant, and I have an accent.’” Allegedly, Debrahlee was born in Queens, spent most of her teenage years in NYC area, including Connecticut, went back to Puerto Rico to become a medical technician, returned to the US pregnant and has since moved around from job to job. In addition, Puerto Ricans are American citizens. How is she an immigrant? The accent is equally baffling. On the video before her augmentations, she has less of an accent that she did on her television interviews recently. For example, in her interview with CBS, it sounds as if she is saying “Citibank Crisis Center” when I think she is saying “Citibank Chrysler Center.” How does this happen? How can business people deal with a “business banker” who they cannot understand? I doubt her Spanish is any better since it appears she has spent a good portion of her life in the U.S.
“If being less good–looking means being happy and finding love and not being sexually harassed and having a job where no one bothers you and no one questions you because of your looks, then, definitely, I’d want that. I think of that everyday.” You can have your implants removed!
Nothing needs to be said about Gloria Allred and her comments–she appears to have taken this case for the money without examining the evidence already out there.
Okay. Waiting for pandit, waiting for pandit, waiting for pandit….
On a serious note my old realtor in Nutley has cell phone video of her giving him head. He is consulting a lawyer to get an opinion if it is kosher to post it.
Well, if the Citibank payoff doesn’t come through, she can always sue the sleazehound, Jack Tuckner, for malpractice. No decent attorney would have done this. In the first place, Lorenzana signed a contract with Citi mandating her to arbitrate her employment claims. Instead, he filed in court, which (of course) got dismissed. The filing is both unethical and sanctionable by the court. Citi should be seeking attorneys’ fees in having to defend the court filing. Next he created this circus by having her photographed (how completely creepy) and shopped her all over the media. If he knew about the video, he was not acting in his client’s best interest. If he didn’t know about the video, then he didn’t do his job during the intake process, when he should have asked her what was in her background that might impeach her credibility. Certainly not the standard of care an attorney should be exercising when representing a client.
No comment on his client – she speaks for herself.
@22–agreed; this whole thing is absolutely disgusting. Even before the discrediting video was dug up, I was pretty certain Debrahlee was not being honest, as I, myself, am an attractive girl working for a large bank and am very familiar with the large bank culture and how firings are handled. I’ve had a couple hundred co-workers throughout my time in banking and have always been treated with professionalism. It is VERY difficult to fire someone in low-level banking. A person needs to pretty much stop working entirely and watch porn on the internet all day to be fired. The boob job video only confirmed to me that Debrahlee was lying about everything. I’m not at all against augmentation or any type of cosmetic work–I think it is wonderful and can be a great “equalizer.” However Debrahlee did say that she couldn’t help that her body was “genetically” this way, and obviously that was a straight-out lie. She is also obviously an attention whore and probably thought she wasn’t receiving ENOUGH comments about her looks.
@24
MAKE IT HAPPEN!
@24: I would pay to see that.
@24 Don’t play with us.
I’m guessing Natalie is not a looker than.
@24 – I’m not sure it would be ‘kosher’ (perhaps we can have some experts comment on the appropriate dietary laws) –
but it certainly WOULD be AWESOME. ;)