At some time in the future, near or distant, at least a few of you are going to have to explain why you brought in a bunch of prostitutes for your colleagues and/or clients. Given. The circumstances will vary, as will the types of girls hired (Peter likes brunettes, Jim wants someone who will call him Judy, the guys on the commodities desk like to attend rodeos) but it’s likely that you’ll all have to provide a rationale for the impetus behind this particular perk of the job, and why, in the eyes of the law, it should be seen as no big deal. And when that happens, I think you should all consider taking a page from David Brooks’ playa-book.

DHB, which specialized in making body armor used by the military in Iraq and Afghanistan, paid for more than $6 million in personal expenses on behalf of Mr. Brooks, covering items as expensive as luxury cars and as prosaic as party invitations, Ms. Schlegel testified. Also included were university textbooks for his daughter, pornographic videos for his son, plastic surgery for his wife, a burial plot for his mother, prostitutes for his employees, and, for him, a $100,000 American-flag belt buckle encrusted with rubies, sapphires and diamonds. [Brooks'] also defended the hiring of prostitutes for employees and board members, arguing in court papers that it represented a legitimate business expense “if Mr. Brooks thought such services could motivate his employees and make them more productive.”

At Military Contractor’s Trial, a $100,000 Buckle [NYT]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (57)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM

    This kind of thing happens at the SEC all the time. It’s no big deal.

  2. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:48 PM

    @1 very original, you’re hilarious…he..hee.

  3. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:49 PM

    This happens at _________ all the time. Its no big deal.

  4. Posted by client 9 | July 27, 2010 at 1:52 PM

    pornographic videos for his son… a burial plot for his mother, prostitutes for his employees

    defense attorneys argued that brooks is not an embezzler, just a very sh**ty businessman. as evidenced by his failure to consolidate the cost of these three expenses into one.

  5. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:54 PM

    Sounds like a great father, husband, son, boss and patriot.

  6. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:55 PM

    In Soviet Russia, prostitutes hire you!

  7. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM

    Clearly, every expense justifiable and should be upheld by his lawyers in a court of law.

  8. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM

    In Soviet Russia, dead horse beats you!

    - Over and Out

  9. Posted by Noted Hooker Fucker | July 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM

    I approve of this expense.

  10. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:01 PM

    How did you know??!!!

    - Jim

  11. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM

    What’s a rodeo? And how did 4 produce italic text?

  12. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:07 PM

    Let this be a lesson to all of you. Do not check the box labeled “prostitution” on your company’s t&e expense form. Its usually a trap.

  13. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:11 PM

    50 Cent at your bat mitvah is the new killing it

  14. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 2:14 PM

    Aaargh! As usual the MSM gets it wrong. The NYT has gone completely down hill over the last 3 or 4 years. As someone that has often patronized prostitutes I can assure you that it’s not as simple as pay money bang bang. Of course, leave it to the NYT to skip the research. I’m sure I could come up with a better justification for hooker-fucking. NYT, how about contacting some of us who dabble in the trade for some real insight?

    -Anal_yst

  15. Posted by In Soviet Russia, Girl Facebooks You | July 27, 2010 at 2:15 PM
  16. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    We can’t cut defense spending! What other douchebags would keep the ruby-studded belt buckle market alive?

    Prosties, however, I’m cool with.

  17. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:21 PM

    Couldn’t he of just said they were IR girls from Carlyle, and not REAL prosties?

  18. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:25 PM

    But, but, your honor, I did it because I always wanted to be a banker, and I never realized that dream!

  19. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:26 PM

    @8 meet me at Minetta’s. I’ll be the guy in an “I <3 Ana Chapman" t-shirt and ushanka hat chugging ice cold vodka from a mug as I simultaneously recite lines from Chekov's Cherry Orchard and dance the kalinka. Throw a matryoshka at my face so I know its you and then I'll let you know exactly how In Soviet Russia, beat horse deads you!

    -The In Soviet Russia Guy

  20. Posted by ChicagoChick | July 27, 2010 at 2:34 PM

    @6 I have heard that is actually true

  21. Posted by client 9 | July 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM

    @11 it’s all disclosed in the prospectus

  22. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:41 PM

    @19 I love you

  23. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 2:52 PM

    @14 made me laugh, thank you

  24. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:57 PM

    @23/anal_yst forgot to log out huh? ^^

  25. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM
  26. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM

    @11
    Do you mean like this?

    -guy who swears he doesn’t work in IT but knows a little bit of HTML

  27. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:02 PM

    oh wow.

    Thanks.

    - 11

  28. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM

    Did this guy trade energy for El Paso at some time in the past? The story just sounds so “Houston”.

  29. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:19 PM

    The interesting thing here is that Brooks likely learned his protocols from someone who probably hasn’t been found out yet.

  30. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM

    So… did they make them more productive??

    - your future boss

  31. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM
  32. Posted by jj | July 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM

    savants

  33. Posted by Animal Liberation | July 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM
  34. Posted by the_jackal | July 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM

    in Sao Paulo, the closing dinners are always held at a brothel. examine your motives to stay in the US. just saying…

  35. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 3:50 PM

    @23/Anal_yst. Wow, just wow.

  36. Posted by creditquant | July 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM

    if only we can get the blink tag working

  37. Posted by PermaGuest | July 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM

    @5 Better than prosties for the son and a burial plot for his wife, though.

  38. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 4:04 PM

    seriously @23, unreal

  39. Posted by b2b MD | July 27, 2010 at 4:10 PM

    self congratulating posts is the new killing it….

    -guy who makes himself laugh..thank you

  40. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM

    @25 I agree

  41. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 4:31 PM

    @35

    Huh?

  42. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 4:42 PM

    Anal_yst, are you Seth Kleinman?

    - 11

  43. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 4:46 PM

    @24/@35/@39

    You realize @14 wasn’t me, right? Morons.

  44. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 4:47 PM

    Anal_yst, was that you last night outside of Minetta’s getting fisted by a midget with cuff links?

  45. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 4:57 PM

    @44 – yes. I’m walking funny today.

  46. Posted by Anal_yst | July 27, 2010 at 5:05 PM

    NO, I am the REAL Anal_yst.

  47. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 5:25 PM

    @42
    Yes, I am Seth Kleinman

    -Anal_yst

  48. Posted by PoBoy | July 27, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    @45, you’re stinking up the place

  49. Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2010 at 6:57 PM

    I think I could get fired just for reading this article

  50. Posted by IT Hack | July 27, 2010 at 10:39 PM

    alert(“LOLOL I HOPE BESS LEVIN KNOWS HOW TO ESCAPE MALICIOUS JAVASCRIPT”);

  51. Posted by derivative deviant | July 28, 2010 at 5:59 AM

    sigh… missing the good old days when we regualy took 10 clients to Asia on a fact finding and analysis trip… for 10 days, all in …

    the weekend skiing in Verbier stunt just doesnt match it…

  52. Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2010 at 8:29 AM

    @47 lies. Quote from stone street advisors: ‘I mostly follow individual stocks in the consumer discretionary space’. Sound like commodities to you??

  53. Posted by Dead_Cat | July 28, 2010 at 9:19 AM

    That’s nothing. In the music industry, nose-candy has its own expense line in the management accounts, viz “fruit and flowers”.

  54. Posted by DJ LIBOR | July 28, 2010 at 10:09 AM

    this guy is my idol

  55. Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2010 at 6:17 PM

    [/i]boom boom[i]

  56. Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2010 at 10:04 PM

    Mark Shields will probably joke about this in the next Shields & Brooks PBS NewsHour.

  57. Posted by Anonymous | July 29, 2010 at 4:32 PM

    @55 wrong way round.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.