Last Friday, Third Point founder Dan Loeb released his latest quarterly letter, in which the Third Point founder redirects the feelings he once had for Ken Griffin on the current administration. Paul Krugman read it and he’s pretty sure he knows why Loeb and, for that matter, all the other financial services employees who donated to Obama’s presidential run have lately been switching teams. Sayeth the Professor:

…they went for Obama because he seemed like their kind of guy, then turned on him with a vengeance because they think he’s looking at them funny. Based on what I know, that’s about right. I talked to some financial-industry backers of Obama back during primary season; they really didn’t know or care much about policy issues, but were in love with Obama over his style — and also over the prospect of being in his inner circle, something they knew wouldn’t happen with Hillary. Now they’re mad because they don’t feel that they’re getting enough stroking.

And you have to bear in mind that this comes after Obama has made immense efforts to placate the financial industry. There were no bank nationalizations; there were hardly any strings attached to bailouts; the financial reform bill was by no means draconian given the scale of the disaster. But Wall Street is furious that Obama might even hint that they caused the crisis — which he does, now and then, because, well, they did.

And as far as I can tell, hardly any of the new anti-Obamanites is thinking at all about what will really happen once John Boehner is speaker. You know, one might have thought that having all the money in the world would make people less petty, less concerned about whether they feel that they’re in the in-group. But nooooo [/Belushi]

We contacted Dan to see if he wanted to confirm or deny whether or not his letter was a result of a lack of “stroking.”  Reaching him on the beach in Montauk, he told us he had no comment on Krugman’s theory but did offer that today was one of his “best surf days of the summer,” in case anyone’s able to cut out early today.

Earlier From Paul Krugman: Suck It, BusinessWeek (Paulson, Anyone Who Ever Doubted This BSA*)

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (60)

  1. Posted by Meyer8 | August 31, 2010 at 6:34 PM

    what a bunch of crap….wall st. did not cause the crisis, that’s this lying administration telling everyone that. mortgages were in trouble years ago when clinton MADE fnma and fhlmc lower their underwriting standards and lend to people who couldn’t afford a mortgage and it blew up. this blaming wall st thing is really old.

  2. Posted by C. Carter | August 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM

    I stroke it’ to the east, I stroke it to the west, I stroke it to the woman that I love the best, I be strokin . .

  3. Posted by guest | August 31, 2010 at 6:38 PM

    So, not nationalizing banks = huge effort to placate financial services??
    I’m starting to think Krugman LIKES being called a communist.

  4. Posted by Dood | August 31, 2010 at 6:38 PM

    This blaming Wall Street thing is a total doodfest.

  5. Posted by Big Cat | August 31, 2010 at 6:39 PM

    You’re wrong if you think the reform bill is draconian. One time this guy who called himself the Onion King forced me to eat not one but two pounds of onions. Talk about draconian policy…

  6. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | August 31, 2010 at 6:41 PM

    Clarence!

  7. Posted by Sheriff | August 31, 2010 at 6:43 PM

    Truth-talkin like that’s liable to git sum one hurt round here

  8. Posted by The Homosuspicious Banker | August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM

    I definitely prefer getting into Obama’s “inner circle” over Hillary’s. That thing’s more toxic than Lehman’s derivative book

  9. Posted by an admirer | August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM

    O mighty cognitive dissonance, wondrous to behold.

  10. Posted by bobo | August 31, 2010 at 6:56 PM

    that’s gross.

  11. Posted by guest | August 31, 2010 at 6:57 PM

    Paul Krugman almost makes Frank Rich seem like a moderate and I used to believe that was impossible

  12. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 6:59 PM

    Krugman is a whining douchebag, and a guy who believes that repeating the same lie multiple times makes it ever more true.

  13. Posted by PasteSpecialFormats | August 31, 2010 at 7:01 PM

    Krugman is from Louisiana and drives a white 5-series?

  14. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM

    So rather than starting from the premise that people who disagree with him (and the administration) may actually be of good will and have legitimate concerns, and attempting to present a convincing counter-argument, the Professor immediately resorts to belittling and denigrating those who disagree with him. Way to stand up for reasoned discourse, there, Prof!

  15. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM

    So rather than starting from the premise that people who disagree with him (and the administration) may actually be of good will and have legitimate concerns, and attempting to present a convincing counter-argument, the Professor immediately resorts to belittling and denigrating those who disagree with him. Way to stand up for reasoned discourse, there, Prof!

  16. Posted by Mitch Cumstein | August 31, 2010 at 7:13 PM

    Barack Obama makes Paul Krugman look like Malcolm X.

  17. Posted by Pfluger the Barbarian | August 31, 2010 at 7:17 PM

    No one on this planet is more fiercely protective of cats than Krugman.

  18. Posted by DK | August 31, 2010 at 7:22 PM

    nice pussy.

  19. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 7:28 PM

    Doesn’t Krugman’s explanation apply equally well to his own attitude toward Obama?

  20. Posted by guest | August 31, 2010 at 7:35 PM

    “Wall St. got drunk” – George W Bush.

  21. Posted by Guest | August 31, 2010 at 7:54 PM

    hahahaha awesome

  22. Posted by ericl | August 31, 2010 at 7:57 PM

    right off the fox news talking point sheet. wow, never heard that one before LOL

  23. Posted by ericl | August 31, 2010 at 7:59 PM

    no, not taking out the main bankers in charge, shooting them and billing their families for the cost of the bullet was placating them. They got off easy.

  24. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 8:10 PM

    That you, Zhou? Thought you defectors weren’t allowed internet access until after the debriefing.

  25. Posted by guest | August 31, 2010 at 8:25 PM

    chappelle reference FTW

  26. Posted by InfiniteGuest | August 31, 2010 at 8:34 PM

    Which animal is the normal one?
    -other than that, the pizza is very good

  27. Posted by Anonymous | August 31, 2010 at 8:45 PM

    what about everyone with a cfa?

  28. Posted by Turndownservice | August 31, 2010 at 8:50 PM

    We have the clearance, Clarence.

  29. Posted by Milton | August 31, 2010 at 9:07 PM

    Krugman’s Nobel Prize was as much earned as Obama’s for Peace

  30. Posted by Bob Loblaw | August 31, 2010 at 10:45 PM

    cuddling your pussy and/or being the surf nazi in montauk is the new killin’ ‘it.

  31. Posted by Yo | September 1, 2010 at 5:49 AM

    Killing it with a Capital K, Bob! All arguments are moot at this point! How do we get ourselves out of this mess is the question. Any takers?

  32. Posted by Catullus | September 1, 2010 at 10:08 AM

    http://blog.mises.org/10153/krugman-did-cause-the-housing-bubble/

    The man who for more than 2 years demanded that the Fed lower interest rates for the specific purpose of causing a bubble in housing.

  33. Posted by NakedShort | September 1, 2010 at 1:01 PM

    Dont you mean all arguments are “moo” at this point?

  34. Posted by Jsmith | September 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM

    Krugman is a publicity hound. He only spews this nonsense to gain notoriety in an effort to raise his speaking fees. No sane person takes this asshole seriously and he knows it.

    The truly sad sad fact is that impressionable young minds (Princeton students and others) are being poisoned by Krugman’s anti-capitalist bullshit.

  35. Posted by Trajan | September 2, 2010 at 5:54 PM

    To those who know him, Dan’s an insecure idiot who obsesses over how he’s perceived by others, so I think there’s merit to Krugman’s view that Dan’s just throwing rocks because he’s not part of the club. The real talented hedge fund managers keep their mouths shut and their cards close and don’t bother with politics. All Dan does is rip off their ideas and pretend he came up with them.

  36. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 18, 2012 at 7:44 PM

    qRkQq0 Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  37. Posted by acn inc | April 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  38. Posted by Johor Bahru Jobs | April 20, 2012 at 5:12 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  39. Posted by webcams | April 20, 2012 at 6:13 AM

    I think this is a real great blog. Will read on…

  40. Posted by Free Ads | April 20, 2012 at 8:57 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your blog post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  41. Posted by termite barriers brisbane | April 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM

    Thanks again for the blog post.Much thanks again. Great.

  42. Posted by Matilde Whiters | April 21, 2012 at 5:46 AM

    Very neat article.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  43. Posted by Cheap Holidays in Albufeira | April 21, 2012 at 8:34 AM

    Say, you got a nice article post.Much thanks again. Great.

  44. Posted by adjustable dumbbell weights | April 21, 2012 at 11:10 PM

    Very neat article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  45. Posted by las vegas strip club limousine | April 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM

    Im obliged for the blog article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  46. Posted by Flying when pregnant 101 | April 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM

    A big thank you for your article post. Really Great.

  47. Posted by honey | April 22, 2012 at 6:28 AM

    Thanks again for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  48. Posted by Gratis Sex | April 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM

    Im thankful for the blog article. Really Cool.

  49. Posted by windows password recovery | April 23, 2012 at 10:51 PM

    Im obliged for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  50. Posted by seospidy | April 24, 2012 at 1:26 AM

    I really liked your post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  51. Posted by lose weight fast | April 24, 2012 at 3:27 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  52. Posted by chinese course | April 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM

    I am so grateful for your blog article.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  53. Posted by hearing aids Pittsburgh | April 24, 2012 at 9:18 PM

    Im thankful for the post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  54. Posted by internet marketing consultancy | April 25, 2012 at 7:47 AM

    Im grateful for the blog post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  55. Posted by Moisturizer For Men | April 28, 2012 at 2:55 AM

    Thank you ever so for you article post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  56. Posted by Mobile Application Developer | April 28, 2012 at 9:38 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Really looking forward to read more.

  57. Posted by Kids Quilts | April 29, 2012 at 4:40 AM

    Awesome blog article.Thanks Again.

  58. Posted by Vehicle Donation | April 29, 2012 at 5:18 PM

    Say, you got a nice post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  59. Posted by mass email marketing software download | May 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM

    Just want to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is just cool and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please carry on the rewarding work.

  60. Posted by my | May 7, 2012 at 11:59 PM

    I value the blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.