Over the last several years, people have been obsessed with determining who truly caused the financial crisis. Was it Alan Greenspan? Was it the banks? Was it the mortgage lenders? Evil short sellers? People who bought homes they couldn’t actually afford? Jimmy Cayne drug dealer? It’s up for debate and no one has yet to be unanimously, definitively blamed. Today in London, Nassim Taleb revealed the true villain, who’s been hiding in plain sight.

The Nobel Prize Committee.

Taleb said that the Nobel Prize for Economics has conferred legitimacy on risk models that caused investors’ losses and taxpayer-funded bailouts. Sweden’s central bank will announce the winner of this year’s award on Oct. 11. Taleb singled out the Nobel award to Harry Markowitz, Merton Miller and William Sharpe in 1990 for their work on portfolio theory and asset-pricing models. “People are using Sharpe theory that vastly underestimates the risks they’re taking and overexposes them to equities,” Taleb said. “I’m not blaming them for coming up with the idea, but I’m blaming the Nobel for giving them legitimacy. No one would have taken Markowitz seriously without the Nobel stamp.”

And he’s not just throwing this out there for his health– he wants you to hold these fucks accountable.

“I want to make the Nobel accountable,” Taleb said today in an interview in London. “Citizens should sue if they lost their job or business owing to the breakdown in the financial system.”

What, too much of a pussy to go after the rat bastards? Fine, he’ll do it himself.

“If no one else sues them, I will,” said Taleb, who declined to say where or on what basis a lawsuit could be brought.

Yeah, never you mind that. Just lawyer up, ’cause you’ll be seeing his ass in court.

Comments (35)

  1. Posted by Texashedge | October 8, 2010 at 7:36 PM

    “Nassim Taleb Identifies Real Villain Of The Financial Crisis”

    If it turns out to be Yevgenia Krasnova again, I’m going to be very disappointed.

  2. Posted by Mathman Prophecy | October 8, 2010 at 7:39 PM

    Well, he’s partly correct. But that’s not the crux of the issue at all. Yes, those models are limited in calculating risk.

    But, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, SEC, 3 Branches of Government have created conditions that promote risk taking either by legislated force (passing laws for unqualified people to get loans for instance), back stopping losses, allowing for crime to continue unpunished, interfere with (instead of uphold) contract laws, etc.

    That’s like blaming a statistician for saying you have a 1 in 20 chance of getting a 30 to 1 pay out in Roulette. Meanwhile, the Casino is structured in a way that if you lose, you get your money back. At that point, who gives a shit about the accuracy of Markowitz’s equations.

  3. Posted by Keyser Soze | October 8, 2010 at 7:57 PM

    We have found a nemesis for Quant Man

  4. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 8:00 PM

    If there was a “dislike” option on Mathman’s posts I’d really appreciate it.

  5. Posted by indridcold | October 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM

    Then i’m suing the Fields Institute for giving out Fields Medals to those that helped create the underlying mathematics for the stochastics. Fuck it, I’m suing Isaac Newton! I’z gots to gets mines!

  6. Posted by Traderjoe10 | October 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM

    The villain of the credit crisis is the fractional reserve banking system and the privately-held Federal Reserve. The system requires parabolic credit growth (exponential) in a finite growth world. The end of the banking system was/is mathematically certain.

  7. Posted by Hotel Receipt Guy | October 8, 2010 at 8:10 PM

    The Nutt House
    119 East Bridge Street,
    Granbury, TX 76048

    Guest: Taleb, N.
    Room: Black Swan Suite
    Rate: $950.00
    *****************************

    Charges to Room:

    5 Lace “epistemic limitations and constraints (black)”…………..$ 175.00
    6 pair white stochastic tube socks…………………………………… 44.00
    9 pair white, rolled intellectual underwear ballast…………………. 34.00
    2 silk-screen image “Danny Thomas” T-shirts…………………….. 29.00
    3 Romance Novels in Caanonite script……………………………… 167.00
    In room movie: “Platonic Phallusy”………………………………….. 12.00
    Meatball Sandwich………………………………………………………. 8.00
    1 Parrot w/obscene vocabulary………………………………………. 355.00
    Thorazine Popsicles…………………………………………………….. 65.00
    Shaving “Ludic” Into Guest’s Chest hair……………………………. 175.00
    Penis Tattooing of :”Black-Scholes-Merton”………………………. 425.00
    Consultation w/Phil Davis, Stark Co, OH, on “Robustification”.. 550.00
    “J. G. Wentworth” Face mask………………………………………… 124.00
    Opaque blindfold for nude game of “Find the 4th Quadrant”……. 16.00
    Book: “Life without Viagra – The Unexpected Effort”…………….. 27.00
    Voice Scrambling Device for Pranking Nobel Prize Candidates.. 277.00
    Volvo Station wagon Burn fees……………………………………….. 345.00
    Life size nude photo: Merton Scholes……………………………….. 265.00
    Hand held Butane torch………………………………………………… 18.00
    Disconnect smoke alarm……………………………………………….. 55.00

  8. Posted by xxxxxxxx | October 8, 2010 at 8:14 PM

    is it just me, or does he closely resemble bin laden in that pic?

  9. Posted by KingBadger | October 8, 2010 at 8:15 PM

    Nassem you go girl! Slap dose Nobel mammas in da face! Jerry! Jerry!

  10. Posted by Dudley7 | October 8, 2010 at 8:17 PM

    Can I sue him for making my ears bleed??

  11. Posted by trojan | October 8, 2010 at 8:19 PM

    there’s this cool new site http://www.zerohedge.com, you should take a look man

  12. Posted by Texashedge | October 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM

    You are really blaming this credit crisis on the system of banking that has existed throughout the Anglo-American world for 200, 300 years and then saying that it is “mathematically certain” this system will end? Really? Did zerohedge lose it’s craziest commenter?

  13. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 8:26 PM

    you see, I have written a book, you may have heard of it – about a swan…should the committee decide to legitimize their award by giving it me, then maybe I may reconsider. and no, I’m not bitter or jealous.

    -NT

  14. Posted by A Fan | October 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM

    NNT is at a public urinal and he notices the guy next to him has BSM tattoed on his penis and goes, “Hey! We have the same tattoo.”
    “What do you mean?” says the other guy, so NNT shows him: “Under the right circumstances it says ‘Black-Scholes-Merton.’”
    And the other guys says, “Sorry mine says ‘By the time you See this Message I’ll be ready.’”

  15. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 8:41 PM

    Et tu Krugman.

  16. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 8:44 PM

    More like Lenin, I think: http://www.bolshevik.org/graphic/lenin.jpg

  17. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM

    hotel receipt guy – I’m a fan of your work. however, the accounting department would like to know if there were two life sized nudes or just one? the myron nude retails more than bob’s (his name is not on the model).

    Head Controller,
    The Nutt House

  18. Posted by Anonymous | October 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM

    Of course, it’s all the Federal Reserve’s fault. Because the economy and the monetary supply was so much more stable before 1913… oh wait.

  19. Posted by PussyArms | October 8, 2010 at 9:26 PM

    Man, this guy needs a fucking blowjob!!

  20. Posted by Figaro | October 8, 2010 at 9:34 PM

    The big question is what to do now? What is the best way to invest in the financial markets then? There are very profitable traders out there who make money in up and down markets. One of those is John Palatine at http://www.trendarchitect.com. They are so-called trend followers and this is something that needs to be taken into consideration for your own portfolio.

  21. Posted by Guest | October 8, 2010 at 9:41 PM

    Our financial system is looking more and more like a banana republic every day. I wouldn’t diss that site.

  22. Posted by Wwwwww | October 8, 2010 at 10:48 PM

    It’s amazing how fucking stupid this guy is.

  23. Posted by Evil Banker | October 8, 2010 at 10:54 PM

    Wait, so an environment that does not promote risk taking is the answer? That sounds like a great path to growth. Way to identify the inputs and come to the wrong conclusion… Kinda like the models NT referenced.

    Perhaps sir, people like you are the problem.

    -Evil Banker

  24. Posted by Farenheit451 | October 9, 2010 at 2:01 AM

    The books! we must burn all of them!!

  25. Posted by Blow Me | October 9, 2010 at 3:00 AM

    The bigger question is “do we hang spammers by one ball or both”? We’ll let someone affectionately referred to a “Bess” decide.

  26. Posted by Guy who had to do it | October 9, 2010 at 3:05 AM

    Wait for it . . .

    In Russia, prize winners sue you!

  27. Posted by Mathman Prophecy | October 9, 2010 at 4:57 AM

    HuH? Not what are you..I’m not… I’m talking about drawing a line in the sand, dude. Beyond that line you do not…. Look, EB, way to put words in my mouth and then shoot it down.

    What I’m talking about is an environment where those who take risks face the consequences of those risk good OR bad. You cannot have rational behavior if you disassociate risk with consequence. There’s a reason why people born with a genetic disorder that prevents them from feeling pain have short life expectancies.

  28. Posted by Biff Bassness | October 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM

    It’s people like you is what the sub-prime is in trouble.

  29. Posted by osama | October 10, 2010 at 8:25 PM

    This guy needs a hooker quick!

  30. Posted by Anonymous | October 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM

    What if they have no balls, as I suspect is the case here.

  31. Posted by Anonymous | October 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM

    Nassim is completely correct and you can tell because he has his hands together, which means he is either praying, in the preliminary stages of making a church and steeple, or is the very, very wise man that he imagines himself to be. Obviously it’s the latter, him giving no previous indications of religious inclinations. The posture says deep thought, the facial expression says ready to lick some Swedish ass.

  32. Posted by Dead_Cat | October 11, 2010 at 1:02 PM

    And that pretty much every bank management team thought they were on a Vegas bachelor party.

  33. Posted by AndyTong | October 11, 2010 at 1:47 PM

    Wow Ron Paul comments on DB

  34. Posted by AIGQuantTeam | October 11, 2010 at 1:54 PM

    We too use parabolic and exponential functions interchangeably

  35. Posted by Anonymous | July 14, 2011 at 7:39 PM

    Nassim – if a guy were about to lose a house, one with highly customized bathrooms lets say, do you think he should sue too?nnThanksnR. Kelly

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.