The short answer: there’s more money in a site called GoSuck.It and he’s going to start managing some money again for some of his “very wealthy friends.” [MarketWatch]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (135)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | November 4, 2010 at 8:59 PM

    Cody’s stint on TV was just an attempt to impress NPH, vis-a-vis potential BJ-related opportunities. When that fell through he moved on to more of a self-starting, entrepeneurial autofelatio opportunity.

  2. Posted by Shecky Cronkite | November 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM

    I heard Cody had a terrible accident. Heard he was out walking one afternoon and was hit by submarine’s periscope.

  3. Posted by Jason STATHAM. | November 4, 2010 at 9:02 PM

    cody is highly annoying to listen to on TV.

  4. Posted by Guest | November 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM

    Cody is so vain. I heard he took his own hand in marriage.

  5. Posted by Covey01 | November 4, 2010 at 9:09 PM

    Love the hair! Very 60′s 70′s retro look.

  6. Posted by Guest of guest | November 4, 2010 at 9:11 PM

    I think he is familiar with ‘ the business end’

  7. Posted by IT Hamster | November 4, 2010 at 9:25 PM

    Do I benefit in any way from that website?

  8. Posted by Dave | November 4, 2010 at 9:28 PM

    Gee, c’mon guys he’s altruistic and tells all today on MW he’s just trying to help his friends.

  9. Posted by Penelope | November 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM

    It’s now been 10 months since I quit Fox and it seems that so far I can’t bring myself to go back on TV since I invented it, sooooooo…… I guess anchoring more than 500 million live 24 hour news shows from the Bull & Bear bar inside the crown jewel of the Hilton empire, the Waldorf-Astoria in the Superwoman Suite as my very first job on TV can do that to a girl like me I guess so it can sooooooo…. .

    And yes, I have actually been working with all of the big TV networks that I own sooooo….Working on some genius ideas, but we’ll have to see how those play out because I’m a genius, smarter than you soooooooo…. and gave birth to Albert Einstein and flunked Enrico Fermi and Isaac Newton and sooooooo…… But the fact is that my income dropped tremendously to $90 bazillion dollars an hour…. when I closed the 500 hedge funds I’d been successfully running for fifty years to take the TV jobs, soooooooo…….

    So even though I’ve had a lot of interest and even some offers about hosting another TV show, I find myself channeling all my time, energy and money on apps and writing about apps and helping others make money on apps.

    While the highs of having been adopted by the Steinbrenner’s and given Yankee Stadium as a gift and having played football against actual NY Giants on their field while Archie manning begged me to replace his son, I can also tell you that there was a huge trade off by working in an industry driven by people who get to see their own faces on TV spouting opinions about things they’ve never even heard of or bothered to research, much less actually understand in the way that I do soooooo…….

  10. Posted by Penelope | November 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM

    It’s now been 10 months since I quit Fox and it seems that so far I can’t bring myself to go back on TV since I invented it, sooooooo…… I guess anchoring more than 500 million live 24 hour news shows from the Bull & Bear bar inside the crown jewel of the Hilton empire, the Waldorf-Astoria in the Superwoman Suite as my very first job on TV can do that to a girl like me I guess so it can sooooooo…. .

    And yes, I have actually been working with all of the big TV networks that I own sooooo….Working on some genius ideas, but we’ll have to see how those play out because I’m a genius, smarter than you soooooooo…. and gave birth to Albert Einstein and flunked Enrico Fermi and Isaac Newton and sooooooo…… But the fact is that my income dropped tremendously to $90 bazillion dollars an hour…. when I closed the 500 hedge funds I’d been successfully running for fifty years to take the TV jobs, soooooooo…….

    So even though I’ve had a lot of interest and even some offers about hosting another TV show, I find myself channeling all my time, energy and money on apps and writing about apps and helping others make money on apps.

    While the highs of having been adopted by the Steinbrenner’s and given Yankee Stadium as a gift and having played football against actual NY Giants on their field while Archie manning begged me to replace his son, I can also tell you that there was a huge trade off by working in an industry driven by people who get to see their own faces on TV spouting opinions about things they’ve never even heard of or bothered to research, much less actually understand in the way that I do soooooo…….

  11. Posted by Texashedge | November 4, 2010 at 9:35 PM

    He left to go pitch for the SF Giants

  12. Posted by Texashedge | November 4, 2010 at 9:35 PM

    He left to go pitch for the SF Giants

  13. Posted by Texashedge | November 4, 2010 at 9:35 PM

    He left to go pitch for the SF Giants

  14. Posted by Financial_Servicer | November 4, 2010 at 9:38 PM

    I thought it was less quit and more fired. They added Eric Bolling to his show because Cody was not, how do you say this nicely, providing the necessary man quotient (god that sounds gay). The female responsibilities, as far as FOX is ever concerned, were more than compensated by that hot little mexican sidekick whose name escapes me. Then they cancelled the whole thing but kept Bolling and salsa girl around. That sounds like he was let go to me, unless of course he hates taking easy money for minimal work.

  15. Posted by Financial_Servicer | November 4, 2010 at 9:38 PM

    I thought it was less quit and more fired. They added Eric Bolling to his show because Cody was not, how do you say this nicely, providing the necessary man quotient (god that sounds gay). The female responsibilities, as far as FOX is ever concerned, were more than compensated by that hot little mexican sidekick whose name escapes me. Then they cancelled the whole thing but kept Bolling and salsa girl around. That sounds like he was let go to me, unless of course he hates taking easy money for minimal work.

  16. Posted by Financial_Servicer | November 4, 2010 at 9:38 PM

    I thought it was less quit and more fired. They added Eric Bolling to his show because Cody was not, how do you say this nicely, providing the necessary man quotient (god that sounds gay). The female responsibilities, as far as FOX is ever concerned, were more than compensated by that hot little mexican sidekick whose name escapes me. Then they cancelled the whole thing but kept Bolling and salsa girl around. That sounds like he was let go to me, unless of course he hates taking easy money for minimal work.

  17. Posted by Anonymous | November 4, 2010 at 9:41 PM

    Anybody else see the resemblance between Cody and Lincecum in that picture?

  18. Posted by Anonymous | November 4, 2010 at 9:41 PM

    Anybody else see the resemblance between Cody and Lincecum in that picture?

  19. Posted by Anonymous | November 4, 2010 at 9:41 PM

    Anybody else see the resemblance between Cody and Lincecum in that picture?

  20. Posted by PennyLope | November 4, 2010 at 9:52 PM

    HUH?

  21. Posted by PennyLope | November 4, 2010 at 9:52 PM

    HUH?

  22. Posted by PennyLope | November 4, 2010 at 9:52 PM

    HUH?

  23. Posted by Slothropmail | November 4, 2010 at 10:29 PM

    I am a hedge fund manager. What is an app?

  24. Posted by Slothropmail | November 4, 2010 at 10:29 PM

    I am a hedge fund manager. What is an app?

  25. Posted by Slothropmail | November 4, 2010 at 10:29 PM

    I am a hedge fund manager. What is an app?

  26. Posted by Gentleman Trader | November 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM

    The gay’s AIDS will do terrible things to a person’s attitude and demeaner

  27. Posted by mikey walnuts | November 4, 2010 at 10:38 PM

    That was such a bad show except for the above mentioned salsa girl.

  28. Posted by mikey walnuts | November 4, 2010 at 10:38 PM

    That was such a bad show except for the above mentioned salsa girl.

  29. Posted by mikey walnuts | November 4, 2010 at 10:38 PM

    That was such a bad show except for the above mentioned salsa girl.

  30. Posted by yest | November 4, 2010 at 11:22 PM

    Cody’s fund was under 5 million and was mainly his friend’s money. Neil patrick harris

  31. Posted by yest | November 4, 2010 at 11:22 PM

    Cody’s fund was under 5 million and was mainly his friend’s money. Neil patrick harris

  32. Posted by yest | November 4, 2010 at 11:22 PM

    Cody’s fund was under 5 million and was mainly his friend’s money. Neil patrick harris

  33. Posted by Pitcher | November 4, 2010 at 11:54 PM

    He looks more like a catcher.

  34. Posted by Pitcher | November 4, 2010 at 11:54 PM

    He looks more like a catcher.

  35. Posted by Pitcher | November 4, 2010 at 11:54 PM

    He looks more like a catcher.

  36. Posted by Pitcher | November 4, 2010 at 11:54 PM

    He looks more like a catcher.

  37. Posted by Dan NH | November 5, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    Most TV commentators have a big mouth, low IQ and a goatee….To his credit there is to goatee…

  38. Posted by Dan NH | November 5, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    Most TV commentators have a big mouth, low IQ and a goatee….To his credit there is to goatee…

  39. Posted by Dan NH | November 5, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    Most TV commentators have a big mouth, low IQ and a goatee….To his credit there is to goatee…

  40. Posted by Dan NH | November 5, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    Most TV commentators have a big mouth, low IQ and a goatee….To his credit there is to goatee…

  41. Posted by Dan NH | November 5, 2010 at 1:09 AM

    Most TV commentators have a big mouth, low IQ and a goatee….To his credit there is to goatee…

  42. Posted by GSPS | November 5, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    Get a haircut, hippy.

  43. Posted by GSPS | November 5, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    Get a haircut, hippy.

  44. Posted by GSPS | November 5, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    Get a haircut, hippy.

  45. Posted by GSPS | November 5, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    Get a haircut, hippy.

  46. Posted by GSPS | November 5, 2010 at 1:26 AM

    Get a haircut, hippy.

  47. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  48. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  49. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  50. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  51. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  52. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  53. Posted by Lez Lemon | November 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM

    yes. texashedge did. 6 minutes earlier.

  54. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  55. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  56. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  57. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  58. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  59. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  60. Posted by BNV | November 5, 2010 at 3:09 AM

    Did anyone notice how much he sounds like Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man?

    “Designing apps, definitely apps. Time for making money on apps, yeah, definitely.”

  61. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  62. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  63. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  64. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  65. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  66. Posted by The Joke Briefer | November 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM

    “Penelope” was doing a take off of Cody’s blog comments as though “Penelope” as played by Kristen Wiig on SNL was responding to Cody at the same time as Cody was writing.

  67. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  68. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  69. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  70. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  71. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  72. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  73. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  74. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  75. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  76. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  77. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  78. Posted by Penis_curvature | November 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    I’m happy with his choice, its up to him!

  79. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  80. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  81. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  82. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  83. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  84. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  85. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  86. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  87. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  88. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  89. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  90. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  91. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  92. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  93. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    SNL references require people to have watched SNL. Fail.

  94. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  95. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  96. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  97. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  98. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  99. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  100. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  101. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  102. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  103. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  104. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  105. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  106. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  107. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  108. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  109. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  110. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  111. Posted by Bob | November 5, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Having $100K in investable assets and being called “very wealthy” is the new killling it.

  112. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  113. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  114. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  115. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  116. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  117. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  118. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  119. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  120. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  121. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  122. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  123. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  124. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  125. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  126. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  127. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  128. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  129. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  130. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  131. Posted by Mudslinger | November 5, 2010 at 2:19 PM

    Thought it was football? Tight end?

  132. Posted by Roger Ailes | November 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM

    Cody has a face for radio.

  133. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM

    Wasn’t he Mitch in Dazed and Confused?

  134. Posted by jeff | May 8, 2011 at 5:32 PM

    I agree. He is also quite misleading. I bought his article “50 app stocks that could rise 1000%”. What a lie. All it is is his opinion on the 50 most owned tech stocks. Waste of money. Never again with this guy.

  135. Posted by Lanell Dubrock | May 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM

    I go spreading the really like of WordPress many of the time.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.