Earlier today, Diamondback Capital was the second of god knows how many firms to be raided by the FBI as part of its Insider Trading Fest(ivus) 2010. The hedge fund had nothing to say about the matter at the time but they’ve just issues a statement letting every who was worried know that nothing is fucked.

“We received an inquiry this morning from the FBI. Diamondback is voluntarily cooperating. The firm is fully operational and we, along with our team, continue to manage the portfolio and Diamondback’s business for the benefit of our investors.” (via Reuters)

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (49)

  1. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM

    Proof that they are totally screwed. Redemptions should be going on EVERYWHERE about now. If you had money in SAC would YOU leave it there?

  2. Posted by Texashedge | November 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM

    Truly nbd; the FBI is just airing its grievances

  3. Posted by B2B MD | November 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM

    Dear Valued Customer,

    We are running late with our normal Monday route in the Stamford/Greenwich area. Pls do not leave documents in garbage as we have had reports of quite a few dumpster divers recently.

    Your Friends at Iron Mountan Secured Shredding

  4. Posted by Theangrytrader | November 22, 2010 at 8:50 PM

    stop the BS everyone knows these guys are guilty they are all going down its about time how else do u think they make so much money when returns for the last 10 years suck
    THEY STEAL IT

  5. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:51 PM

    I guess you first have to ask yourself if you want Bess Levin to accuse of lacking a pair or not.

    19 Nov 2010 at 3:51 PM

    FrontPoint Forced To Shutter Healthcare Fund Thanks To Investors’ Lack Of A Pair

    By Bess Levin

    A few weeks back, FrontPoint Partners’ healthcare fund had its name in the press due to its association with a French doctor who allegedly passed one of its managers some hot tips. Not really that big a deal in the grand scheme of things (especially considering the firm itself was never actually charged with any wrongdoing) but apparently investors thought differently. They have redeemed en masse, forcing FrontPoint to liquidate the $1.5 billion fund. And now they need to sit down for a little chat re: the ways of the world.

    What’s most shocking about this news is that this group of individuals lacks the stomach for ONE measly not very scandalous at all insider trading scare. Do they see the investors of, for example, one of the world’s most successful hedge funds, let’s just call it SMACK Capital, redeeming every time someone connected to SMACK is suggested to be an insider trader? No, they don’t and it happens all the time. In fact, no hedge fund worth its fees hasn’t had its name whispered alongside the words ‘insider trading’ at least a dozen times. You want to invest with the best? Then man the fuck up or go by a Vanguard index mutual fund. And a word to FrontPoint next time you go raising capital– more important that the minimum? A ‘no pussies’ clause and a forewarning that any stories of possible illegality set off an immediate gate.

  6. Posted by Chuddy | November 22, 2010 at 8:52 PM

    somewhere on Park Ave Phil Falcone is breathing a huge sigh of relief as the media has now moved on……………

    what’s worse, 1) being down 15% with two pigs in your house or 2) being ass raped by FBI raid?

  7. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:52 PM

    Fyi, I just drove to every Staples/Ofice Depot in SW CT trying to find a shredder. Everyone is out right now.

  8. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:52 PM

    Fyi, I just drove to every Staples/Ofice Depot in SW CT trying to find a shredder. Everyone is out right now.

  9. Posted by Shut up | November 22, 2010 at 8:53 PM

    I assumed that they were just better traders than you. Don’t confuse good research with insider trading just because you suck at your job and your ego is too delicate to handle what sounds like a lifetime of failure.

  10. Posted by Anon | November 22, 2010 at 8:54 PM

    2nd paragraph…who knew what she knew, when she knew it?

  11. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM
  12. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 8:56 PM

    Good because I need someone to talk to about withdrawing my funds.

  13. Posted by DrVanNostrand | November 22, 2010 at 8:56 PM

    Rumor – Kruger Industrial Smoothing is next!!!

  14. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 9:00 PM

    3) being down 15% while being assraped by two pigs with the FBI taping the whole thing with pinhole cameras that will later be made public during your trial

  15. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 9:01 PM

    eerie…

  16. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:03 PM

    I’m not usually one to defend semi-literate rants on this board, but it seems like a connection to SAC has been the common denominator of every major insider trading case that’s hit the press in the last 12 months. Seems pretty clear that these guys share a willingness to skate pretty close to the edge of legality in their trading…

  17. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Let the redemption party commence

  18. Posted by Cmon_cmon11 | November 22, 2010 at 9:05 PM

    This is going to be a train wreck.

  19. Posted by Mitch Cumstein | November 22, 2010 at 9:09 PM

    On the bright side, after the raping you’ll be able to lie back, smoke a cigarette, and listen to a live version of Hungarian Rhapsody No.12.

  20. Posted by Guest | November 22, 2010 at 9:14 PM

    I’ve heard if you paint lamb’s blood over the doorway, the FBI won’t come. Can someone confirm?

  21. Posted by Lloyd_Blankfein | November 22, 2010 at 9:17 PM

    yes

  22. Posted by B2B MD | November 22, 2010 at 9:17 PM

    Wow. An industrial strength magnet just sold on ebay for $60,000 to somebody named punjab@sacbackoffice.com.

  23. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:18 PM

    someone is going down, who will be the “new” Fabrice?

  24. Posted by Casey Jones | November 22, 2010 at 9:21 PM

    Don’t I know it!

  25. Posted by NorthWackerStud | November 22, 2010 at 9:21 PM

    If I was the FBI or a priest, I would totally molest myself.

  26. Posted by Sobczek Securities | November 22, 2010 at 9:24 PM

    nothing is fucked here, dude. you’re being very un-dude. they’re a bunch of fucking amateurs!

    -Walter

  27. Posted by a religious | November 22, 2010 at 9:25 PM

    FBI:DB::Priest in 3some:FB

  28. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 22, 2010 at 9:26 PM

    levin spelled backwards is schwartz. coincidence?

  29. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:27 PM

    So THAT’s what they use the Zamboni for!

  30. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:30 PM

    Jerry: “Excuse me I’d like to redeem my investment.”
    DiamondBack: “Certainly. May I ask why?”
    Jerry: “……..For spite…”
    DiamondBack: “Spite?”
    Jerry: “That’s right. I don’t care firm sold me on it.”
    DiamondBack: “I don’t think you can return an item for spite.”
    Jerry: “What do you mean?”
    DiamondBack: “Well if there was some problem with the investment, If it were unsatisfactory in some way, then we could do it for you, but I’m afraid spite doesn’t fit into any of our conditions for a refund”
    Jerry: “That’s ridiculous, I want to redeem it. What’s the difference what the reason is.”
    DiamondBack: “Let me speak with the manager…excuse me ………….RICHARD!”
    (walks over to the Richard Schimel and whispers)
    DiamondBack “……..spite…..”(Manager walks over)
    Richard: “What seems to be the problem?”
    Jerry : “Well I want to redeem this investment and she asked me why and I said for spite and now she won’t take it back.”
    Richard: “That’s true. You can’t redeem an investment based purely on spite.”
    Jerry:. “Well So fine then ..then I think its to risky and that’s why I’m redeeming it”
    Richard: “Well you already said spite so……”
    Jerry: “But I changed my mind..”
    Richard: “No…you said spite…Too late.”

  31. Posted by trojan | November 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM

    j’accuse!

  32. Posted by trojan | November 22, 2010 at 9:34 PM

    the SAC parallels to a baseball player testing positive for estrogen are many

  33. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 22, 2010 at 9:37 PM

    So I assume I’m not the only one here who’s wondering how the hell everything wasn’t shredded yesterday given that this was leaked days ago? How much more warning do you really need?

  34. Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2010 at 9:38 PM

    Precisely.

  35. Posted by Otcb | November 22, 2010 at 9:43 PM

    I think that most investors are familiar with the insider trading law when it comes to not trading on inside information if it is non public, material and when the tipper or tippee owes a fiduciary duty to the company, directly or constructively. What i think most are confused about is what consititutes “misappropiation”.

  36. Posted by Irish Scumbag | November 22, 2010 at 9:52 PM

    Don’t know about the others but a couple of Diamondback guys were dirty as hell.

  37. Posted by rd | November 22, 2010 at 9:57 PM

    Ah… yes I would. find me a better place to put my money. Worst case scenario: liquidation occurs and I get my money back. You are a moron.

  38. Posted by Guestoramovitz | November 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM

    Shredders are so 2003. I know a man who can implant an idea in a person’s mind during a dream-like state, so that perceptions of the past are forever altered. Once the idea takes hold, it can never be eradicated. Yes, I’m talking about is misperinception.

  39. Posted by Frank Costanza | November 22, 2010 at 10:16 PM

    Hey Diamondback, my son tells me you couldn’t smooth a silk sheet if you had a hot date with a babe………………..i lost my train of thought. Enjoy your dinner

  40. Posted by Kovachev | November 22, 2010 at 10:16 PM

    ALL LEVEL GLOBAL and DIAMOND INVESTORS RUN!!! RUN!!! RUN!! Redeem while you can!!! get out before Ganek takes you down with him. You will get a copy of Dani Ganek’s hamptons memoirs if you are lucky!!!

  41. Posted by Ugh | November 22, 2010 at 10:17 PM

    Really enjoying that sec reg class, huh?

  42. Posted by Sawwhatudidthere | November 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM

    Yes, but you’ve got to walk through a sea and then travel for 40 years in the desert before you’re in the clear.

  43. Posted by Bear RM | November 22, 2010 at 10:26 PM

    Thats the Ironman competition you idiot

    - Bear Stearns RM

  44. Posted by Chuddy | November 23, 2010 at 12:41 AM

    i guess all of those gifts to the Human Fund will come back to bite them in the ass!

  45. Posted by Socratic Method | November 23, 2010 at 2:16 AM

    Does this mean it’s not too late for me to apply for the Head of IR job?

    –Marjorie

  46. Posted by Anonymous | November 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM

    Only if Charlton Heston paints it with his cold bloody hands.

  47. Posted by Blackwidow3865 | November 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM

    I believe SAC and Stanford Finanical are the same ppl only without R. Allen Stanford

  48. Posted by Spam | November 26, 2010 at 3:16 PM

    @Socratic Method: my 7 year old is more qualified to run IR at Diamondback than the clowns they have now. I could care less, I was once an interested investor but those schmucks never called me back after 2 messages and 2 emails because apparently there were even bigger schmucks trying to get in all throughout this year. You don’t call me back, I don’t invest (it’s a simple, but effective rule).

    On second thought, I owe the team lunch. You just made me look like a star for passing on the “investment”.

  49. Posted by Polishng Marble WEST PALMBEACH | January 8, 2011 at 9:56 AM

    The hedge fund had nothing to say about the matter at the time

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.