• 05 Nov 2010 at 1:42 PM

Shaq Versus The Harvard Crew Team

This event needs a corporate sponsor.

The basketball star expressed his intentions to race against Harvard’s top rowers in a four with Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen, and Paul Pierce…Of course, the appeal of this race has little to do with the historical legacies of the two franchises. Just think of all the intrigue that would surround a competition such as this. Would Shaq fit into the boat? What seat would he row? Would any of them be good? (Personally, I think Garnett, Allen, and Rondo have potential.) Could the Celtics manage to stay afloat or would they finish the race (or the warm-up) with a Charles River baptism?

[Crimson via Daily Intel]

449 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (449)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 6:19 PM

    White men can’t jump = black men can’t swim?

  2. Posted by Gozer | November 5, 2010 at 6:25 PM

    Are they going to go the entire middle passage?

  3. Posted by General Disarray | November 5, 2010 at 6:27 PM

    They aren’t going to bother rowing. Those men are all giants. They will simply jog down the Charles River while laughing at the Harvard team.

  4. Posted by tyler winklevoss | November 5, 2010 at 6:36 PM

    Harvard men never lose at anything.

  5. Posted by Ari Emmanuel | November 5, 2010 at 6:41 PM

    Everyone Knows Black people can’t swim

  6. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 5, 2010 at 6:45 PM

    Thank you, that was udderly devine.

  7. Posted by indridcold | November 5, 2010 at 6:44 PM

    i can’t wait for the follow up story a year from now when their waspy fiances are popping out 3ft half and halfs.

  8. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 6:48 PM

    I’m pretty sure ABC already has a stable of corporate sponsors for this ongoing TV show.

    http://abc.go.com/shows/shaq-vs

  9. Posted by General Disarray | November 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM

    Except for those pesky gender discrimination lawsuits.

  10. Posted by Guest26 | November 5, 2010 at 7:02 PM

    Better competion–how many Harvard pussies can Shaq and Co. pound in one hour–male or female…

  11. Posted by Steadfast Morley | November 5, 2010 at 7:10 PM

    Are you a Winklevoss?

  12. Posted by Erin Go Yeah Brah | November 5, 2010 at 7:15 PM

    Yeah. No one go calling Shaquille O’Neal a mick.

  13. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 7:30 PM

    Neigh, thank you for cowntinuing the animal puns – they have become few and far between, but the resistence lives. Vive la Vache!

  14. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 7:49 PM

    Imposter! Get your own handle! Or at least write something really witty.

  15. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 7:49 PM

    Perhaps you guys can get together for drinks?

    –”Guest” in the first instance, wiping a tear of joy from his eye because he was able to bring two like-minded people together with his initial comment

  16. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 7:55 PM

    There have to be jokes about strokesides, head races and bump races to crack but, as y’all know, I am not Richard Prior and can’t think of any that are clever enough to post (leave it alone). I will be forever in debt to any of youse who can pop (leave this alone aussi) a ROFLUTS comment for me. Thx. xoxo

  17. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 7:56 PM

    It’s Harvard, not Arizona State. The number of girls hot enough to interest an NBA player is zero.

  18. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM

    Hey! Dark- skinned brothers is comin’ back!

    -Nate Robinson

  19. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM

    Hey! Dark- skinned brothers is comin’ back!

    -Nate Robinson

  20. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:41 PM

    Don’t get too excited, probably just a red herring. Dulce de leche!

  21. Posted by D. Kneale | November 5, 2010 at 8:46 PM

    I put the gimp in “gimp seat.”

  22. Posted by wow | November 5, 2010 at 9:22 PM

    Read all of these comments with the voice of Stewie from the Family Guy in your head. Scary.

  23. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:50 PM

    Meet me at Minetta’s. I’ll be the guy that you think is you. Punch yourself in the face so I know it’s you.

  24. Posted by Wowzers | November 5, 2010 at 10:20 PM

    I did it and it wasn’t scary- it was scary awesome.

  25. Posted by Paco | November 5, 2010 at 10:56 PM

    Rondo will cox.

  26. Posted by Potable Alpha | November 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM

    They should row across the Atlantic and see who makes it alive.

  27. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM

    See. That’s. Just cold. Cold. You’re a complete asshole. You are.

    Fucking hilarious, though.

  28. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  29. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  30. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  31. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  32. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  33. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  34. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  35. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  36. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  37. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  38. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  39. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  40. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  41. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  42. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  43. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  44. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  45. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  46. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  47. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  48. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  49. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  50. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  51. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  52. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  53. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  54. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  55. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  56. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  57. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  58. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  59. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  60. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  61. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  62. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  63. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  64. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  65. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  66. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  67. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  68. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  69. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  70. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  71. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  72. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  73. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  74. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  75. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  76. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  77. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  78. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  79. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  80. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  81. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  82. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  83. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  84. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  85. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  86. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  87. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  88. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  89. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  90. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  91. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  92. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  93. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  94. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  95. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  96. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  97. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  98. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  99. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  100. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  101. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  102. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  103. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  104. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  105. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  106. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  107. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  108. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  109. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  110. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  111. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  112. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  113. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  114. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  115. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  116. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  117. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  118. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  119. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  120. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  121. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  122. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  123. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  124. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  125. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  126. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  127. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  128. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  129. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  130. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  131. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  132. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  133. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  134. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  135. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  136. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  137. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  138. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  139. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  140. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  141. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  142. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  143. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  144. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  145. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  146. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  147. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  148. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  149. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  150. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  151. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  152. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  153. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  154. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  155. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  156. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  157. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  158. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  159. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  160. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  161. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  162. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  163. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  164. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  165. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  166. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  167. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  168. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  169. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  170. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  171. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  172. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  173. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  174. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  175. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  176. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  177. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  178. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  179. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  180. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  181. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  182. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  183. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  184. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  185. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  186. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  187. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  188. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  189. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  190. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  191. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  192. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  193. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  194. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  195. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  196. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  197. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  198. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  199. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  200. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  201. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  202. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  203. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  204. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  205. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  206. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  207. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  208. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  209. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  210. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  211. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  212. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  213. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  214. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  215. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  216. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  217. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  218. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  219. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  220. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  221. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  222. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  223. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  224. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  225. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  226. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  227. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  228. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  229. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  230. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  231. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  232. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  233. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  234. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  235. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  236. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  237. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  238. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  239. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  240. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  241. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  242. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  243. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  244. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  245. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  246. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  247. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  248. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  249. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  250. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  251. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  252. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  253. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  254. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  255. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  256. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  257. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  258. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  259. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  260. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  261. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  262. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  263. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  264. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  265. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  266. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  267. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  268. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  269. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  270. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  271. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  272. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  273. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  274. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  275. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  276. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  277. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  278. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  279. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  280. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  281. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  282. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  283. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  284. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  285. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  286. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  287. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  288. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  289. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  290. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  291. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  292. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  293. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  294. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  295. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  296. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  297. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  298. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  299. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  300. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  301. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  302. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  303. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  304. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  305. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  306. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  307. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  308. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  309. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  310. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  311. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  312. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  313. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  314. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  315. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  316. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  317. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  318. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  319. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  320. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  321. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  322. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  323. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  324. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  325. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  326. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  327. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  328. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  329. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  330. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  331. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  332. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  333. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  334. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  335. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  336. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  337. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  338. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  339. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  340. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  341. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  342. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  343. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  344. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  345. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  346. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  347. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  348. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  349. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  350. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  351. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  352. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  353. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  354. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  355. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  356. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  357. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  358. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  359. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  360. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  361. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  362. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  363. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  364. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  365. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  366. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  367. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  368. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  369. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  370. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  371. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  372. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  373. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  374. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  375. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  376. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  377. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  378. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  379. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  380. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  381. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  382. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  383. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  384. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  385. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  386. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  387. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  388. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  389. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  390. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  391. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  392. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  393. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  394. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  395. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  396. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  397. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  398. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  399. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  400. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  401. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  402. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  403. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  404. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  405. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  406. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  407. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  408. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  409. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  410. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  411. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  412. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  413. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  414. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  415. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  416. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  417. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  418. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  419. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  420. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  421. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  422. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  423. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  424. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  425. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  426. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  427. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  428. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  429. Posted by Merlin Summa | May 9, 2012 at 10:55 PM

    Solomon is not free :(

  430. Posted by manage diabetes | May 25, 2012 at 8:25 PM

    Very interesting topic , thankyou for putting up. “There are several good protections against temptations, but the surest is cowardice.” by Mark Twain.

  431. Posted by http://aremedyforhemorrhoids.blogspot.com/ | July 16, 2012 at 7:19 AM

    Thank you for every other fantastic post. The place else could anyone get that type of info in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the look for such info.

  432. Posted by site here | August 24, 2012 at 12:20 AM

    hello there and thank you for your info – I’ve certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical issues using this website, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon..

  433. Posted by Phlebotomy Certification HQ | August 29, 2012 at 9:59 AM

    Pleasant info and straight away to the purpose. My spouse and i don’t determine this can be a best place to question however do you mankind has any kind of ideas on where you should make use of a few ghost writers? http://www.phlebotomycertificationhq.com

  434. Posted by Get More Info | August 31, 2012 at 8:10 PM

    hi!,I really like your writing very so much! percentage we keep up a correspondence more approximately your post on AOL? I need an expert in this house to resolve my problem. May be that is you! Having a look ahead to see you.

  435. Posted by check this | September 1, 2012 at 10:23 AM

    I¡¦m not sure the place you’re getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend a while finding out much more or figuring out more. Thank you for excellent information I used to be looking for this information for my mission.

  436. Posted by www.SilkRoadGoldBuy.com | September 5, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    I believe additional web owners must take this web site as a product, very neat and excellent user-friendly format. I truly experienced looking at it so that you help to make quite some amazing information. I will take a note of this website to the prospective! My partner and i truly enjoyed reading it and you just make quite a few excellent factors. Let me save this web page for the long haul! http://www.silkroadgoldbuy.com

  437. Posted by full bed dimensions guide | September 7, 2012 at 6:26 PM

    I have been examinating out some of your posts and i must say nice stuff. I will make sure to bookmark your site.

  438. Posted by http://WWW.SLIDINGDOORSIDEAS.COM/ | September 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM

    Very good article and right to the idea. I don’t determine this can be a best position to question however would you guys have just about any notion where you might get some professional writers? I’ll be the customer your bottles right now. http://www.slidingdoorsideas.com/sliding-glass-doors

  439. Posted by hamilton classifieds | September 9, 2012 at 7:51 AM

    There is noticeably a bunch to realize about this. I consider you made some nice points in features also.

  440. Posted by native american bead patterns | September 15, 2012 at 9:38 PM

    I just expect you don’t decrease your lifestyle on account of you can be most surely one of several greatest bloggers currently. Be sure to keep it down as the net desires any person as if you distributing the term. http://www.silkroadgoldbuy.com/how-to-make-beaded-bracelets.html

  441. Posted by heating oil companies nj | September 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM

    Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this information. Today bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is really irritating. A good blog with interesting content, that’s what I need. Thank you for keeping this site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  442. Posted by oil companies in nj | September 16, 2012 at 5:22 PM

    It is truly a great and helpful piece of info. I¡¦m satisfied that you shared this helpful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  443. Posted by tips to dating | September 17, 2012 at 9:50 PM

    You completed several good points there. I did a search on the theme and found nearly all folks will go along with with your blog.

  444. Posted by succeed at dating | September 18, 2012 at 4:46 AM

    I simply could not go away your site prior to suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the usual info an individual supply on your visitors? Is going to be again regularly in order to inspect new posts

  445. Posted by onebuckresume | September 20, 2012 at 7:43 PM

    Whats Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively helpful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & help different users like its aided me. Good job.

  446. Posted by Kody pocztowe | September 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM

    What a abundant threaded discussion! I a lot feel vastly on your own in my choice not to immunize. I gone my “I am sunny with non-immunized patients” pediatrician after human being told that people approximating me are the reason that whooping cough at rest exists.

  447. Posted by tableau home deco | September 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM

    I¡¦ve read several just right stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much effort you put to make the sort of great informative website.

  448. Posted by tutor online jobs | September 22, 2012 at 12:21 PM

    What i don’t understood is if truth be told how you are no longer actually a lot more well-preferred than you might be now. You’re so intelligent. You know therefore considerably when it comes to this matter, produced me for my part believe it from numerous various angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated except it is one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs excellent. Always deal with it up!

  449. Posted by visit my website | October 16, 2012 at 4:17 PM

    Valuable information. Lucky me I found your website by accident, and I’m shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.