This event needs a corporate sponsor.

The basketball star expressed his intentions to race against Harvard’s top rowers in a four with Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen, and Paul Pierce…Of course, the appeal of this race has little to do with the historical legacies of the two franchises. Just think of all the intrigue that would surround a competition such as this. Would Shaq fit into the boat? What seat would he row? Would any of them be good? (Personally, I think Garnett, Allen, and Rondo have potential.) Could the Celtics manage to stay afloat or would they finish the race (or the warm-up) with a Charles River baptism?

[Crimson via Daily Intel]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (429)

  1. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  2. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  3. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  4. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  5. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  6. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  7. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  8. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  9. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  10. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  11. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  12. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  13. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  14. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  15. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  16. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  17. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  18. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  19. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  20. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  21. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  22. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  23. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  24. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  25. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  26. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  27. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  28. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  29. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  30. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  31. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  32. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  33. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  34. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  35. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  36. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  37. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  38. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  39. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  40. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  41. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  42. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  43. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  44. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  45. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  46. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  47. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  48. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM

    Insert swim and motive examination jokes (here)

  49. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  50. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  51. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  52. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  53. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  54. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  55. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  56. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  57. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  58. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  59. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  60. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  61. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  62. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  63. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  64. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  65. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  66. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  67. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  68. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  69. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  70. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  71. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  72. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  73. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  74. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  75. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  76. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  77. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  78. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  79. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  80. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  81. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  82. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  83. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  84. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  85. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  86. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  87. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 5:50 PM

    I can only assume that Steve Nash will be the coxswain.

    Also before we really get into this I encourage everyone to examine their motives.

  88. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  89. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  90. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  91. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  92. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  93. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  94. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  95. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  96. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  97. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  98. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  99. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  100. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  101. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  102. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  103. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  104. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  105. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  106. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  107. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  108. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  109. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  110. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  111. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  112. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  113. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  114. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  115. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  116. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  117. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  118. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  119. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  120. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  121. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  122. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  123. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  124. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  125. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  126. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  127. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  128. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  129. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  130. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  131. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  132. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  133. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  134. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  135. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  136. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  137. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  138. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  139. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 5:52 PM

    There’s no way that shell stays afloat.

    –Guy who wanted to demonstrate that he knows crew guys call their boats “shells”

  140. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  141. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  142. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  143. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  144. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  145. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  146. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  147. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  148. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  149. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  150. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  151. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  152. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  153. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  154. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  155. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  156. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  157. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  158. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  159. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  160. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  161. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM

    The only way this would be more entertaining is if they were in shackles and had a white coxswain dressed as John Newton.

  162. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  163. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  164. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  165. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  166. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  167. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  168. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  169. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  170. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  171. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  172. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  173. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  174. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  175. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  176. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  177. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  178. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  179. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  180. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  181. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  182. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  183. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  184. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  185. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  186. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  187. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  188. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  189. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  190. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  191. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  192. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  193. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  194. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  195. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  196. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  197. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  198. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  199. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  200. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  201. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  202. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  203. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  204. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  205. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  206. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  207. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  208. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  209. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  210. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  211. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  212. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  213. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  214. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  215. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  216. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  217. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  218. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  219. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  220. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  221. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  222. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  223. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  224. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  225. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  226. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  227. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM

    Your WASPy knowledge is (almost) impressive

  228. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  229. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  230. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  231. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  232. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  233. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  234. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  235. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  236. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  237. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  238. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  239. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  240. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  241. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  242. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  243. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  244. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  245. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  246. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  247. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  248. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  249. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  250. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  251. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  252. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  253. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  254. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  255. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  256. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  257. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  258. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  259. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  260. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  261. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  262. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  263. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  264. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  265. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  266. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  267. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  268. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  269. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  270. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  271. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  272. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  273. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  274. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  275. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  276. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  277. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  278. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  279. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM

    Don’t you mean Shaqles?

  280. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  281. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  282. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  283. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  284. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  285. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  286. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  287. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  288. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  289. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  290. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  291. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  292. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  293. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  294. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  295. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  296. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  297. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  298. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  299. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  300. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  301. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  302. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  303. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  304. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  305. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  306. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  307. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  308. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  309. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  310. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  311. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  312. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  313. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  314. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  315. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  316. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  317. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  318. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  319. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  320. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  321. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  322. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  323. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  324. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  325. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  326. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  327. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  328. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  329. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  330. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  331. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  332. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  333. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  334. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  335. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  336. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  337. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  338. Posted by Dork | November 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM

    I also know that the Celtics might be surprised the first time they “catch a crab” that it’s not the way they’re used to catching crabs.

  339. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  340. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  341. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  342. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  343. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  344. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  345. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  346. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  347. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  348. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  349. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  350. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  351. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  352. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  353. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  354. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  355. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  356. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  357. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  358. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  359. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  360. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  361. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  362. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  363. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  364. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  365. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  366. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  367. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  368. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  369. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  370. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  371. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  372. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  373. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  374. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  375. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  376. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  377. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  378. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  379. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  380. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  381. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  382. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  383. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  384. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  385. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  386. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  387. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  388. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  389. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  390. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  391. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  392. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  393. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  394. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  395. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  396. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  397. Posted by Ping | November 5, 2010 at 6:07 PM

    Can I be the stroke?

  398. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 6:19 PM

    White men can’t jump = black men can’t swim?

  399. Posted by Gozer | November 5, 2010 at 6:25 PM

    Are they going to go the entire middle passage?

  400. Posted by General Disarray | November 5, 2010 at 6:27 PM

    They aren’t going to bother rowing. Those men are all giants. They will simply jog down the Charles River while laughing at the Harvard team.

  401. Posted by tyler winklevoss | November 5, 2010 at 6:36 PM

    Harvard men never lose at anything.

  402. Posted by Ari Emmanuel | November 5, 2010 at 6:41 PM

    Everyone Knows Black people can’t swim

  403. Posted by indridcold | November 5, 2010 at 6:44 PM

    i can’t wait for the follow up story a year from now when their waspy fiances are popping out 3ft half and halfs.

  404. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 5, 2010 at 6:45 PM

    Thank you, that was udderly devine.

  405. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 6:48 PM

    I’m pretty sure ABC already has a stable of corporate sponsors for this ongoing TV show.

    http://abc.go.com/shows/shaq-vs

  406. Posted by General Disarray | November 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM

    Except for those pesky gender discrimination lawsuits.

  407. Posted by Guest26 | November 5, 2010 at 7:02 PM

    Better competion–how many Harvard pussies can Shaq and Co. pound in one hour–male or female…

  408. Posted by Steadfast Morley | November 5, 2010 at 7:10 PM

    Are you a Winklevoss?

  409. Posted by Erin Go Yeah Brah | November 5, 2010 at 7:15 PM

    Yeah. No one go calling Shaquille O’Neal a mick.

  410. Posted by CoveredLong | November 5, 2010 at 7:30 PM

    Neigh, thank you for cowntinuing the animal puns – they have become few and far between, but the resistence lives. Vive la Vache!

  411. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 7:49 PM

    Imposter! Get your own handle! Or at least write something really witty.

  412. Posted by Guest | November 5, 2010 at 7:49 PM

    Perhaps you guys can get together for drinks?

    –”Guest” in the first instance, wiping a tear of joy from his eye because he was able to bring two like-minded people together with his initial comment

  413. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 7:55 PM

    There have to be jokes about strokesides, head races and bump races to crack but, as y’all know, I am not Richard Prior and can’t think of any that are clever enough to post (leave it alone). I will be forever in debt to any of youse who can pop (leave this alone aussi) a ROFLUTS comment for me. Thx. xoxo

  414. Posted by Anonymous | November 5, 2010 at 7:56 PM

    It’s Harvard, not Arizona State. The number of girls hot enough to interest an NBA player is zero.

  415. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM

    Hey! Dark- skinned brothers is comin’ back!

    -Nate Robinson

  416. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM

    Hey! Dark- skinned brothers is comin’ back!

    -Nate Robinson

  417. Posted by Intellectual Masturbator | November 5, 2010 at 8:41 PM

    Don’t get too excited, probably just a red herring. Dulce de leche!

  418. Posted by D. Kneale | November 5, 2010 at 8:46 PM

    I put the gimp in “gimp seat.”

  419. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  420. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  421. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  422. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    Who the hell is this?! Stop pretending you’re me and I’m pretending to be you!

  423. Posted by wow | November 5, 2010 at 9:22 PM

    Read all of these comments with the voice of Stewie from the Family Guy in your head. Scary.

  424. Posted by Lewis Winthorpe III | November 5, 2010 at 9:50 PM

    Meet me at Minetta’s. I’ll be the guy that you think is you. Punch yourself in the face so I know it’s you.

  425. Posted by Wowzers | November 5, 2010 at 10:20 PM

    I did it and it wasn’t scary- it was scary awesome.

  426. Posted by Paco | November 5, 2010 at 10:56 PM

    Rondo will cox.

  427. Posted by Potable Alpha | November 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM

    They should row across the Atlantic and see who makes it alive.

  428. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | November 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM

    See. That’s. Just cold. Cold. You’re a complete asshole. You are.

    Fucking hilarious, though.

  429. Posted by Merlin Summa | May 9, 2012 at 10:55 PM

    Solomon is not free :(

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.