There’s one person in particular the government seems to just be dying to get it’s hands on but up until this moment, no one has had the vaguest clue– none whatsoever!– as to who it could possibly be, nor has there been nary a hint. Until now.
Mr. Gasparino said, “Regulatory sources are telling the FOX Business Network that the FBI, the Justice Department, are using the same techniques they used against the mobs and against terrorists. There is a gentleman in the middle they want to snare.”
“Sources are telling us among those top players in the middle Steve Cohen the head of SAC Capital is clearly on the radar screen. The lower level guys are the people they are looking to arrest, flip, gain information from, and make the case against the top guy. It is classic mob related, terrorist related investigation.”
Since when does big blingin’ make you a terrorist?
golf clap for chaz.
is the situation fluid?
SAC only handles 16 billion in assets, that’s still considered small fish territory, no?
did you eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?
Who cares if they are using similar tactics that they use against the mob? Gasbag constantly excuses criminal behavior in the name of his personal opinion that insider trading is no big deal.
To: CGasparino@FoxBN.com
From: [Redacted Underling]@FoxBN.com
Re: Re: SEC Investigation
Chuck,
Sorry, I wasn’t able to get all the info from that Wikileaks stuff a few weeks back. However, I think I’m on to something with this hedge fund sting. I was watching “Goodfellas” last night – great movie, thanks for lending it to me – which got me thinking. Well, it seems that this SEC sting is taking a page from the movie. I think we both know what’s going on here, we’ve got our story! Ain’t it funny how life imitates art?
Regards,
[Redacted Underling]
Gasparino, stick to fellatio in the Equinox steam room, faggotini.
Lots of nervous SAC employees ’round these parts…
Charlie blows WHAT??? Oh, it’s a metaphor. I see. You got me all excited there for a minute.
True. You need to get to a few T before you’re talking real money.
what an insightful comment. leave it again.
What is worse, having the Feds arrest you or touching the sacred thermostat on the trading floor?
So the Disgrace from Pace once again demonstrate his intellectual dishonesty which is second only to his lack of any intellect at all. Yes indeed that batting average of being correct 14% of the time is holding steady. Gossiparino strikes again. The only question is how does an organization that portrays itself as fair and balanced allow the comments by an idiot without any knowledge who picks up stories at bars at 2am and then goes on air with them the next day. Is there not some duty to be correct at least every once in a while. Little wonder why “da dope” who can barely string two sentences together was fired by CNBC. Even they couldn’t take his sleezy approach to business reporting – and they’re lefties.
So how’s that book “Selling Out” there Chucky? I see that it lingers near the 20,000 mark on Amazon despite you having paid for good reviews from TV commercial watchers.
Question: who’s more desperate: FBN or CNN? One hires The Hooker Fucker (Eliott) and the other hires the Disgrace from Pace / the dumbest mofo on the boob tube / the Punk that talks Bunk / The Gossip King (you).
I’m still laughing about the line someone wrote that your best writing was done with a can of spay paint on a wall in the Bronx. Remember this: you will always be a moron, a punk and an insecure fool who likes to argue in an effort to combat your intellectual deficiencies.
Here is the actual section of the USC (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00000078—j000-.html) used to prosecute insider trading:
It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange—
(b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered, or any securities-based swap agreement (as defined in section 206B of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act), any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
So let me get this straight- you’re cool with wiretapping, raiding, and jailing people for several years for a crime without a statutory definition (and a vague SEC definition) derived from an anti-fraud provision when the people in question haven’t actually defrauded anyone?
What’s wrong with hookers?
you protest too much
you protest too much
you protest too much