In a piece today on John Paulson’s 2010 performance, the Journal notes that while it was pretty good, the hedge fund manager shouldn’t exactly be doing any victory dances in the end zone. Sure, 30+ percent returns, when you’re managing more than $30 billion, are “very rare” in the business. But, they’re just saying, JoPau probably shouldn’t be doing any bragging and may in fact want to think about where he went wrong, considering in 2007 he returned 590 percent. They don’t want to be critical! They’re merely pointing out: no one’s written a book about Paulson’s 2010 trades. Perhaps feeling a bit bad, or as though they’d gone too far, they do charitably note that the $5 billion Paulson earned is a lot more than some people.

One way to view the size of Mr. Paulson’s $5 billion profit: It is nearly as much as the $6.4 billion that Forbes magazine last year estimated as the total net worth of Steven Cohen, the well-known head of $12 billion hedge-fund firm SAC Capital.

Uncalled for.

Trader Racks Up Epic Second Gain [WSJ]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (51)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | January 28, 2011 at 4:12 PM

    The second mouse gets the cheese.

    Steve C.
    Dominos Cheese Pizza Lover

  2. Posted by Anonymous | January 28, 2011 at 4:12 PM

    The second mouse gets the cheese.

    Steve C.
    Dominos Cheese Pizza Lover

  3. Posted by tits | January 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM

    Think about Biff!

  4. Posted by tits | January 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM

    Think about Biff!

  5. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:19 PM

    I really feel badly for Stevie Cohen – - man is he poor.

  6. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:19 PM

    I really feel badly for Stevie Cohen – - man is he poor.

  7. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  8. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  9. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  10. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  11. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  12. Posted by Dee Lee | January 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    Goddammit so much this blog gone straight into the shitter.

  13. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM

    Try that comment again, this time with proper English.

  14. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM

    Try that comment again, this time with proper English.

  15. Posted by CT | January 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    yeah, no.

  16. Posted by CT | January 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    yeah, no.

  17. Posted by Anon | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    actually it’s better than ever. but please, continue the attempt to feel better about your life by noting in an anonymous comment about things going “straight to the shitter.”

  18. Posted by Anon | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    actually it’s better than ever. but please, continue the attempt to feel better about your life by noting in an anonymous comment about things going “straight to the shitter.”

  19. Posted by Anon | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    actually it’s better than ever. but please, continue the attempt to feel better about your life by noting in an anonymous comment about things going “straight to the shitter.”

  20. Posted by Anon | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    actually it’s better than ever. but please, continue the attempt to feel better about your life by noting in an anonymous comment about things going “straight to the shitter.”

  21. Posted by Anon | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    actually it’s better than ever. but please, continue the attempt to feel better about your life by noting in an anonymous comment about things going “straight to the shitter.”

  22. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  23. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  24. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  25. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  26. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  27. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  28. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  29. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM

    you’re an idiot.

  30. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 4:29 PM

    Learn Eng-rish and then you can comment, Dee Lee.

  31. Posted by Non-Entity Hedge Fund Manager | January 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM

    One commenter is a Justin Bieber fan

  32. Posted by Youguestit | January 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM

    All these numbers are confusing me.

    -guy who is still trying to figure out if size matters.

  33. Posted by Youguestit | January 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM

    All these numbers are confusing me.

    -guy who is still trying to figure out if size matters.

  34. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 7:15 PM

    yea but what was his bonus?

  35. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 7:15 PM

    yea but what was his bonus?

  36. Posted by NotGay | January 28, 2011 at 7:25 PM

    Bess, this deserved to have his portfolio shoot included.
    -Guy that wants to see the John ‘Fonz’ Paulson

  37. Posted by Poo | January 28, 2011 at 7:46 PM

    OMFG SO JOHN PAULSON LEAVES AS TREASURY SECRETARY AND THEN SUDDENLY KNOWS HOW TO MAKE $5 BILLION WITH EVERYONE ELSE STILL EATING CAT FOOD … I WONDER HOW MUCH HE SPLIT WITH HIS FORMER EMPLOYER MR JAMIE DIAMOND OF GOLDMAN SACKS??? HELLO SHEILA BEAR WHEN WILL THE SEC STEP IN TO STOP THIS RAPINE

  38. Posted by Anonymous | January 28, 2011 at 7:51 PM

    shouldn’t you be Winning the Future?

  39. Posted by Richard Cripples | January 28, 2011 at 7:52 PM

    Normally I don’t take these kinds of comments very seriously, but your use of “OMFG” and all Caps leads me to believe you are someone whose judgement should be heeded. Please, go on.

  40. Posted by Richard Cripples | January 28, 2011 at 7:52 PM

    Normally I don’t take these kinds of comments very seriously, but your use of “OMFG” and all Caps leads me to believe you are someone whose judgement should be heeded. Please, go on.

  41. Posted by Richard Cripples | January 28, 2011 at 7:52 PM

    Normally I don’t take these kinds of comments very seriously, but your use of “OMFG” and all Caps leads me to believe you are someone whose judgement should be heeded. Please, go on.

  42. Posted by Mr. Market | January 28, 2011 at 8:56 PM

    You are truly, the last bastion of balance / reason and such. Protect us

  43. Posted by CT | January 28, 2011 at 10:50 PM

    it was the omfg? not the whole, mistaking john paulson for hank paulson?

  44. Posted by Details | January 28, 2011 at 10:50 PM

    remind me again when john paulson was treasury secretary?

    -knowledge, get some of it

  45. Posted by Guest | January 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM

    I love so much of this comment:

    - the confusing of john paulson for hank paulson
    - the confusing of jamie dimon for lloyd blankfein
    - the confusing of sheila bair for mary schapiro

    but most of all, ‘rapine’

  46. Posted by Gueste | January 28, 2011 at 11:15 PM

    sarcasm much? any?
    or just too dense to see it?

  47. Posted by guest | January 28, 2011 at 11:17 PM

    sarcasm much? any?

  48. Posted by guest | January 28, 2011 at 11:17 PM

    sarcasm much? any?

  49. Posted by guest | January 28, 2011 at 11:17 PM

    sarcasm much? any?

  50. Posted by Jimmy | January 29, 2011 at 12:02 AM

    Joke briefer?

  51. Posted by IRS | January 29, 2011 at 8:38 PM

    so how much tax will he pay? 2 billion? are hedge fund managers paying the full 40% federal and state rates on investment gains (being mtm), as well as on fees?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.