“Knowing today what I know, what I would do differently is I just would never have mentioned it to Warren, and just made my own investment and left it alone.”


“Knowing today what I know, what I would do differently is I just would never have mentioned it to Warren, and just made my own investment and left it alone. I think that’s a disservice to Berkshire, but if that’s what people want to do in the future, that’s fine. You can’t — or at least I don’t think you can executives to not invest their own family’s capital in a company that Berkshire had no interest, or even knowledge of, and somehow police that. The only thing you can do is just say if you invest your own money, don’t ever mention it to anyone at Berkshire. That doesn’t make sense to me either, but that’s certainly what it sounds like.”

Sokol Speaks On Surprise Exit [CNBC]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (108)

  1. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:39 PM

    Its a shame Uncle Warren never had the foresight to institute a best bid policy with the proceeds going to charity.

  2. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:39 PM

    Its a shame Uncle Warren never had the foresight to institute a best bid policy with the proceeds going to charity.

  3. Posted by Jamie Jude | March 31, 2011 at 1:40 PM

    What does he know today that changed from a few months ago? That’s a weak mea culpa.

  4. Posted by Jamie Jude | March 31, 2011 at 1:40 PM

    What does he know today that changed from a few months ago? That’s a weak mea culpa.

  5. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:50 PM

    I’m not saying who but an investor with brass balls used to circumvent trading rules at GS with brazen regularity. Eventually the firm clamped down so tightly that he actually had to resign and start a hedge fund.

  6. Posted by CoveredLong | March 31, 2011 at 1:52 PM

    Fukushima, VCU>Kansas, and Adonis DNA.

  7. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:52 PM

    it’s astonishing how big an idiot you are.

  8. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:52 PM

    uh, Tepper left because they didn’t make him partner.

  9. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:54 PM

    he’s so full of shit it’s amazing.

  10. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:56 PM

    Were you there?

  11. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:56 PM

    how the FUCK is he being allowed to make the argument that “gee I was just mentioning it to Warren I had no idea he’d actually be interested in the company”?

  12. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 1:58 PM

    Yes. Next question?

  13. Posted by Diesel7 | March 31, 2011 at 2:00 PM

    Yeah, Im sure he put his rep and one of the best jobs in the world on the line for this traade. Gimme a break. If this Raj thing wasnt happening this wouldnt even have come up.

    And by Raj thing, I mean slimy greedy s-bag Raji Raj and Danny C yo!

  14. Posted by JR | March 31, 2011 at 2:01 PM

    Warren’s hypocrisy is hilarious – according to WSJ: The policy on the website also states: “When in doubt, remember Warren Buffett’s rule of thumb: ‘…I want employees to ask themselves whether they are willing to have any contemplated act appear the next day on the front page of their local paper—to be read by their spouses, children and friends—with the reporting done by an informed and critical reporter.’”

    Despite this, Warren issues a statement as clams up re providing further details. I guess Warren’s idea of an informed and critical reporter is Becky on her knees making slurping sounds.

  15. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:01 PM

    Not to infringe on a good friend of mine’s territory, but “I’m doing God’s Work”…the policies here are just trying to make the world a better place, that and make sure my peons understand that I am their superior in every way.

    -Stevie

  16. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:02 PM

    Next question: You don’t remember the firm trading guidelines that we called “Tepper Rules”? Like you can’t trade the stock of any company in which you trade the debt? And then, later, you can’t trade stock if you’re trading bonds (which they later retracted)?

  17. Posted by Anonymous | March 31, 2011 at 2:03 PM

    I see nothing wrong here. He put together the mosaic.

    -Raj “Big Daddy” Rajaratnam

  18. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:08 PM

    you’re a moron.

  19. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:08 PM

    Knowing today what I know? What’s that? That the SEC was now going to have to start reporting insiders activities of everyone, not just the plebs?

  20. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:08 PM

    welcome to dealbreaker, david!

  21. Posted by Anonymous | March 31, 2011 at 2:14 PM

    perhaps mr. sokol needs to lawyer up with counsel from a new york securities firm and not the clowns in omaha who allowed him to go on air and talk about his insider trading…just another example of poor judgment – oh, and white people problems (now trending on twitter)

  22. Posted by ctrl + z | March 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM

    Dave,
    Now that you have some free time to explore other career avenues, please consider giving me a call about guest/co-host opportunities on my show.

    -J. Cramer

  23. Posted by CT | March 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM

    I remember that. Good times.

  24. Posted by One-Man Wolfpack | March 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM

    What Sokol did isn’t illegal; it’s frowned upon…like masturbating on an airplane.

  25. Posted by One-Man Wolfpack | March 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM

    What Sokol did isn’t illegal; it’s frowned upon…like masturbating on an airplane.

  26. Posted by Diesel7 | March 31, 2011 at 2:18 PM

    He doesnt make money, he prints it.

    Hes meeting me at Minettas to discuss why UBS Sucks, Ping Jiang, etc. We will of course order the burger and the golden scrot

    As you were…

  27. Posted by Diesel7 | March 31, 2011 at 2:18 PM

    He doesnt make money, he prints it.

    Hes meeting me at Minettas to discuss why UBS Sucks, Ping Jiang, etc. We will of course order the burger and the golden scrot

    As you were…

  28. Posted by JG Wentworth | March 31, 2011 at 2:21 PM

    I think he should get a pass on this one.

  29. Posted by D Leash | March 31, 2011 at 2:23 PM

    Is there perchance a pet store near you?

  30. Posted by Thrive | March 31, 2011 at 2:24 PM

    David sokol, frontrunner…

  31. Posted by Joe | March 31, 2011 at 2:25 PM

    As long as he doesn’t wear red, he’s hired

    - Raj^2

  32. Posted by Former Lehman Risk Officer | March 31, 2011 at 2:26 PM

    In this classic match-up between Guest vs. Guest, I predict Guest will win.

  33. Posted by ChiefJStrongComplianceOfficer | March 31, 2011 at 2:26 PM

    As guilty as a guy with a pair of pliers in a North Face fleece looking for that 4th garbage truck in Manhattan.

  34. Posted by WB | March 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM

    Please see my joke on this matter in the comments section under Bess’ post yesterday on said matter.

    - guy whose joke you stole but who is in no way bitter bc BL liked yours and not his

  35. Posted by ExtraOrdinaryPopularDelusions | March 31, 2011 at 2:30 PM

    This falls under the “not illegal enough to fire you, too boneheaded to keep you” category.

  36. Posted by HugeMember | March 31, 2011 at 2:33 PM

    Sokol spelled backwards is Lokos.

    just saying

  37. Posted by HugeMember | March 31, 2011 at 2:33 PM

    Sokol spelled backwards is Lokos.

    just saying

  38. Posted by HugeMember | March 31, 2011 at 2:33 PM

    Sokol spelled backwards is Lokos.

    just saying

  39. Posted by Diesel7 | March 31, 2011 at 2:36 PM

    I have no concerns, unless he funneled info to Sawyer, Sayeed and Hurley. Then that is a whole nother monster

  40. Posted by Rainman | March 31, 2011 at 2:37 PM

    I’m pretty sure that’s illegal too….

    ya maybe after 9/11 when everyone got so sensitive, thanks a lot Bin Laden

  41. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:39 PM

    I don’t get it. His defense is, “next time, I’ll make sure that I do this great trade in my personal account and not my fund’s”?

  42. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:42 PM

    Combining DB memes is the NKI. Other than that, I have no concerns.

  43. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM

    his defense is also that he couldn’t have imagined in a million years that WB would go for the deal one of his main guys was pitching him on.

  44. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM

    his defense is also that he couldn’t have imagined in a million years that WB would go for the deal one of his main guys was pitching him on.

  45. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM

    his defense is also that he couldn’t have imagined in a million years that WB would go for the deal one of his main guys was pitching him on.

  46. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM

    his defense is also that he couldn’t have imagined in a million years that WB would go for the deal one of his main guys was pitching him on.

  47. Posted by Jim Simons | March 31, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    It’s also an anagram for Kools.

  48. Posted by Jim Simons | March 31, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    It’s also an anagram for Kools.

  49. Posted by Jim Simons | March 31, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    It’s also an anagram for Kools.

  50. Posted by Jim Simons | March 31, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    It’s also an anagram for Kools.

  51. Posted by Jim Simons | March 31, 2011 at 2:45 PM

    It’s also an anagram for Kools.

  52. Posted by InfiniteGuest | March 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM

    I’m sorry I’m not sorry.

  53. Posted by InfiniteGuest | March 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM

    I’m sorry I’m not sorry.

  54. Posted by InfiniteGuest | March 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM

    I’m sorry I’m not sorry.

  55. Posted by InfiniteGuest | March 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM

    I’m sorry I’m not sorry.

  56. Posted by InfiniteGuest | March 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM

    I’m sorry I’m not sorry.

  57. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  58. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  59. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  60. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  61. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  62. Posted by Nosmo King | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Front running me is like saving sex for old age or swimming naked when the tide goes out. In the end, I fuck you.
    - Warren Buffett

  63. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  64. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  65. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  66. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  67. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  68. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  69. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  70. Posted by Ron Artest | March 31, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Is giving a shout out to your granddaughter like you just just won the Superbowl when being interviewed on CNBC for a questionable stock deal / resignation the NKI?

  71. Posted by The Joke Briefer | March 31, 2011 at 3:10 PM

    Milton Berle made it possible to steal jokes and still be respected.

  72. Posted by East Texas Gas Trader | March 31, 2011 at 3:14 PM

    MidAmerica is an energy company. So, why are we surprised?

  73. Posted by Barry O., DC | March 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I quit them some time ago. Shelly Sasquatch gave me an ultimatum.

  74. Posted by Barry O., DC | March 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I quit them some time ago. Shelly Sasquatch gave me an ultimatum.

  75. Posted by Barry O., DC | March 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I quit them some time ago. Shelly Sasquatch gave me an ultimatum.

  76. Posted by Barry O., DC | March 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I quit them some time ago. Shelly Sasquatch gave me an ultimatum.

  77. Posted by Barry O., DC | March 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I quit them some time ago. Shelly Sasquatch gave me an ultimatum.

  78. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 3:31 PM

    Hey! He pioneered it, but I perfected it.

    -Dane Cook

  79. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 3:32 PM

    YES.

  80. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 3:54 PM

    kill yourself

  81. Posted by research paper | March 31, 2011 at 4:02 PM

    agree with you) don’t you think that the title is awesome)) [...] i did nothing wrong but… [...] there is always but) you know people always hidd something and there is always some ‘but’ in the end..

  82. Posted by Mtbike | March 31, 2011 at 4:18 PM

    Its the hoity toity version of a pump and dump.

  83. Posted by Wahoo | March 31, 2011 at 4:20 PM

    what I wouldn’t do to have BL like one of my comments

    -guy who’d do anything to have BL like one of his comments

  84. Posted by Wahoo | March 31, 2011 at 4:25 PM

    Bloody LOCO, foo’!. Respect that name. Aye-Sap!!

    - David Sokol, to WB.

  85. Posted by UMM_only_one | March 31, 2011 at 4:26 PM

    What a mess!! Talking about health issues of another executive and his son. Then talking about what investors need to do to get comfortable with Lubrizol. Dude needs a lawyer (or anyone with a brain) to tell him to shut up!!. his guy has shown himself to be utterly unqualified for filling WB’s shoes.

  86. Posted by UMM_only_one | March 31, 2011 at 4:26 PM

    What a mess!! Talking about health issues of another executive and his son. Then talking about what investors need to do to get comfortable with Lubrizol. Dude needs a lawyer (or anyone with a brain) to tell him to shut up!!. his guy has shown himself to be utterly unqualified for filling WB’s shoes.

  87. Posted by UMM_only_one | March 31, 2011 at 4:26 PM

    What a mess!! Talking about health issues of another executive and his son. Then talking about what investors need to do to get comfortable with Lubrizol. Dude needs a lawyer (or anyone with a brain) to tell him to shut up!!. his guy has shown himself to be utterly unqualified for filling WB’s shoes.

  88. Posted by WF | March 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM

    Milton Berle called . . . he wants his bladder back

  89. Posted by WF | March 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM

    Milton Berle called . . . he wants his bladder back

  90. Posted by WF | March 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM

    Milton Berle called . . . he wants his bladder back

  91. Posted by Anonymous | March 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM

    He only made a meager 350k out of this little front-run. Other than that, no concerns.

    DISCLAIMER: I have held back nothing in this statement. Therefore, if questioned about this matter in the future, I will simply refer the questioner back to this release.

  92. Posted by bockwai | March 31, 2011 at 5:16 PM

    So tell me this then, based on Sokol’s reasoning, I would assume its perfectly acceptable for the C banker/s who provided the intro of the LZ CEO to Sokol to also buy the cr@p out of LZ stock for their own PA’s, no? Its all just a fringe benefit of being an employee of C and BKS, right?

  93. Posted by bockwai | March 31, 2011 at 5:16 PM

    So tell me this then, based on Sokol’s reasoning, I would assume its perfectly acceptable for the C banker/s who provided the intro of the LZ CEO to Sokol to also buy the cr@p out of LZ stock for their own PA’s, no? Its all just a fringe benefit of being an employee of C and BKS, right?

  94. Posted by TI BAII+ | March 31, 2011 at 5:47 PM

    You’re missing a zero there, bro.

  95. Posted by Mont Blanc | March 31, 2011 at 5:56 PM

    Mont Blanc,

    Sokol is an asshat, great operator of WB’s portfolio companies notwithstanding, he royally screwed the pooch. And, yes WB is incorrect by the letter of insider trading laws as written, Sokol most certainly DID break the law.

    The very moment the Citi banksters showed him the list of companies as POSSIBLE TARGETS for BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, yes he became……………drum roll…………an insider. Period. There is no way around it, lucky for WB and Sokol the SEC is even more daft than this yokel from Omaha. They will be busy making video requests of CNBC for said interview for months before they get around to even making an evaluation of whether any securities laws were broken. Sokol is an insider at BH period. The information he obtained was “material” and “non public”. Why was it material? The companies are being proffered for an ACQUISITION not an investment, a fucking ACQUISITION!

    This is bullshit. Sokol broke the law and guess what? WB broke the law too, why? The moment he committed BH to purchase LZ, he allowed Berkshire to become a conspirator after the fact.

    MB

  96. Posted by House Guest | March 31, 2011 at 6:43 PM

    That would make more sense if you weren’t hitting your keyboard with a hammer. Just sayin’.

  97. Posted by C. Gasparino | March 31, 2011 at 6:46 PM

    My sources tell me it is.

  98. Posted by BRK Counsel | March 31, 2011 at 6:52 PM

    You’ll have to be more specific.

  99. Posted by BRK Counsel | March 31, 2011 at 6:52 PM

    You’ll have to be more specific.

  100. Posted by 2StopShop | March 31, 2011 at 7:25 PM

    I think you mean bin liner.

  101. Posted by bockwai | March 31, 2011 at 7:27 PM

    Sorry, meant BRK. Fringe benefit of BKS employee is getting a handed a pink slip after theyre fully liquidated.

  102. Posted by bockwai | March 31, 2011 at 7:27 PM

    Sorry, meant BRK. Fringe benefit of BKS employee is getting a handed a pink slip after theyre fully liquidated.

  103. Posted by GuyPosingAsBess | March 31, 2011 at 8:21 PM

    liked

  104. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 8:36 PM

    I believe the Citi Broker was Sokol’s personal Broker and the list of companies were areas where the Citi Broker thought Sokol should invest personally. Being that Sokol does not determine where BRK invests (though he does have WB’s ear), he brought it up to WB after the fact.

    It looks shady, and it may be, but there’s too many assumptions for a good case. If the SEC did anything it would be a dog and pony show.

  105. Posted by Guest | March 31, 2011 at 8:39 PM

    Don’t ask don’t tell compliance policy. I think it worked for Madoff too. So far no arrest for Peter and Shayna.

  106. Posted by Mont Blanc | March 31, 2011 at 10:23 PM

    Mont Blanc,

    Much like Wall St., what parades on these threads as “informed opinion” is fucking frightening. See the below, courtesy the WSJ:

    Fall 2010: Sokol, as part of a general meeting with bankers at Citigroup, receives information about possible deals for 18 companies. The list included Lubrizol, according to the SEC filing released Friday by Lubrizol.

    Dec. 13: Sokol and Citigroup met again to discuss the list of companies. “During the course of the meeting, Mr. Sokol said that the only company on Citi’s list that he found interesting was Lubrizol,” according to the SEC filing. Sokol asked Citigroup to relay to Lubrizol CEO James Hambrick about Sokol’s interest in meeting to discuss Berkshire and Lubrizol.

    December 14: Sokol first bought 2,300 shares of Lubrizol, Buffett said in his letter. Lubrizol shares closed at $108.03 that day, up 3.2% on the day

    See that last sentence for the date Dec. 13th? Yes Virgina, THAT is an insider. And no, genius he brought it to WB;s attention after he bought shares, and yes at this point he is already an insider; whether or not Sokol determines where BRK invests has no bearing here. That argument is a simple red herring. Sokol has a “control position” at BH and that alone makes him an insider at BH;and in this instance he has material and non -public info. This is a text book example of insider trading.

    Btw, whether or not WB and Sokol “believe” they broke the law has jackshit to do with IF they broke the law. See the thousands of imprisoned NY state citizens in prison right now who were carrying a legal limit or marijuana in non public view only to be stopped and searched and forced to reveal in public view their marijuana and thereby carted off to jail. I know this doesn’t happen in Murray Hill or NoHo but take a day trip to the Bronx why don’t you, and be a Guest there for a day.

    MB

  107. Posted by Mont Blanc | March 31, 2011 at 10:23 PM

    Mont Blanc,

    Much like Wall St., what parades on these threads as “informed opinion” is fucking frightening. See the below, courtesy the WSJ:

    Fall 2010: Sokol, as part of a general meeting with bankers at Citigroup, receives information about possible deals for 18 companies. The list included Lubrizol, according to the SEC filing released Friday by Lubrizol.

    Dec. 13: Sokol and Citigroup met again to discuss the list of companies. “During the course of the meeting, Mr. Sokol said that the only company on Citi’s list that he found interesting was Lubrizol,” according to the SEC filing. Sokol asked Citigroup to relay to Lubrizol CEO James Hambrick about Sokol’s interest in meeting to discuss Berkshire and Lubrizol.

    December 14: Sokol first bought 2,300 shares of Lubrizol, Buffett said in his letter. Lubrizol shares closed at $108.03 that day, up 3.2% on the day

    See that last sentence for the date Dec. 13th? Yes Virgina, THAT is an insider. And no, genius he brought it to WB;s attention after he bought shares, and yes at this point he is already an insider; whether or not Sokol determines where BRK invests has no bearing here. That argument is a simple red herring. Sokol has a “control position” at BH and that alone makes him an insider at BH;and in this instance he has material and non -public info. This is a text book example of insider trading.

    Btw, whether or not WB and Sokol “believe” they broke the law has jackshit to do with IF they broke the law. See the thousands of imprisoned NY state citizens in prison right now who were carrying a legal limit or marijuana in non public view only to be stopped and searched and forced to reveal in public view their marijuana and thereby carted off to jail. I know this doesn’t happen in Murray Hill or NoHo but take a day trip to the Bronx why don’t you, and be a Guest there for a day.

    MB

  108. Posted by Guest | April 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM

    TS/A/NFDR

    (Too serious/angry/not funny didn’t read)

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.