It would be a “moral disaster” if the United States were to default on its debts and become unable to pay its obligations, Jamie Dimon said at an appearance in Colorado Thursday evening. The U.S. is the financial linchpin of the world, and the economic effects of the U.S. defaulting could be “potentially catastrophic,” he said at a dinner for the University of Colorado Denver Business School. “It will dwarf Lehman,” Dimon said. [HP]

Comments (19)

  1. Posted by Guess | May 20, 2011 at 8:27 PM

    the default will be so bad, dimon will foreclose on military families on purpose

  2. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 8:39 PM

    All joking aside, how is this topic even open for discussion?  It’s so fucking obvious that it’s the end of the world as know it if the US defaults this summer.  

  3. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM

    So don’t default. Problem solved. My invoice is in the mail.

  4. Posted by Texashedge | May 20, 2011 at 8:52 PM

    Would it? I don’t trade treasurys but the debt ceiling seems to me like an arbitrary construct and that not raising it wouldn’t really affect the ability of the US to service its debt in the longer term.

    And if it were a real concern, then wouldn’t higher yields be priced in now? Intrade http://intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=749123 seems to believe that there’s a 15% chance that the “end of the world” will happen, and I’m not seeing “end of the world” yields right now.

    Then again, during the LTCM thing off the run treasurys at one point traded at a steep discount to on the run ones for no rational reason.

    /guy who is genuinely curious and doesn’t really know

  5. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    The preferred term is “little person.” 

  6. Posted by Golden Boy | May 20, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    Hmmm, why did my comment about Blythe get deleted? Someone here can’t handle the truth.

  7. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    Default = “end of the world”.
    Not raise debt limit = “political games that might imply end of the world, or might not”

    I’m not sure if that site is a real useful way of determining probabilities here… but do note that it shows 95% probable for a Sep-30 debt limit increase.  I think the treasury market itself is pricing in a zero probability of actual default.
    I think truth is, even if the debt limit isn’t increased, the US wouldn’t be crazy enough to default on this debt.  They’ll probably stop paying the defense department or social security before they stop paying the Chinese and Arabs.  

  8. Posted by guest | May 20, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    Trust me, I know dwarfs, and JD speaks the truth

    - Galleon small cap analyst

  9. Posted by trojan | May 20, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    i thought you guys knew yoga pants? 

  10. Posted by pompass | May 20, 2011 at 9:55 PM

    A default could be the best thing that’s ever happened since going off to gold standard: creditors would know we are serious about cutting spending.   They’d know the crack addict has gotten serious about going clean.   Bottom line: some pain, long-term benefits

  11. Posted by pompass | May 20, 2011 at 9:55 PM

    A default could be the best thing that’s ever happened since going off to gold standard: creditors would know we are serious about cutting spending.   They’d know the crack addict has gotten serious about going clean.   Bottom line: some pain, long-term benefits

  12. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 10:02 PM

    Right, I’m sure Countrywide was jumping in joy when the Smiths stopped paying their mortgage… because, you know, that means they’re cutting back.

  13. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 10:02 PM

    Right, I’m sure Countrywide was jumping in joy when the Smiths stopped paying their mortgage… because, you know, that means they’re cutting back.

  14. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 10:13 PM

    In all seriousness, kill yourself. 

  15. Posted by Guest | May 20, 2011 at 10:13 PM

    In all seriousness, kill yourself. 

  16. Posted by Texashedge | May 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM

    Oh intrade is definitely a back of the envelope ref at best. This is why they need to legalize larger, more liquid political betting in Vegas.

  17. Posted by Texashedge | May 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM

    Oh intrade is definitely a back of the envelope ref at best. This is why they need to legalize larger, more liquid political betting in Vegas.

  18. Posted by Dan NIle | May 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM

     ”Once JPMorgan repaid the [TARP] aid, Dimon said he was tempted to include a note to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that said, “P.S. During the whole time you were lending us $25 billion, we were loaning you $200 billion” in the form of Treasury instruments the company holds.”

    Gee I wonder why he doesn’t want a Treasury default.

  19. Posted by InfiniteGuest | May 22, 2011 at 11:33 PM

    LTCM had bought convergence (split among different banks) Their USTs were their best assets, but liquidating turned out to be technically challenging.
    Something similar happened during AIG.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.