DealBook is reporting that “S.E.C. Removes Credit Ratings From Regulations” but that’s a bit of an overstatement. The SEC today issued final rules on short-form registration of debt securities. The old rules allowed certain investment grade issuers to use Form S-3 to register debt rather than the more time-consuming Form S-1; the new rules delete reliance on investment grade ratings and just allow issuers to use the short forms if they’ve issued enough debt ($750mm outstanding or $1bn in issuance over the last three years) or are qualifying subsidiaries of big public equity issuers.

This only sounds boring because it is. The registration rules are about disclosure, and there probably is less need for extensive disclosure and SEC review for an issuer with a huge high-yield complex than there is for a tiny investment-grade issuer. The rule never really made sense when it referenced ratings, because it never had anything to do with credit quality.

But that’s why it’s an exception: most of the regulatory references to ratings are about credit quality. When regulators think about capital haircuts for brokers or banks, or what money market funds can own, they actually care about whether the securities those brokers/banks/funds hold are likely to be paid back. Most systems of prudential regulation of financial institutions rely on somehow assessing how risky their assets are – preferably in a way that is more objective than just asking them to rate their assets themselves.

And that’s not easy. Just look at the SEC giving up on it last week, or the Fed doing the same this week.

Or, for that matter, look at Europe, where S&P president Deven Sharma yesterday penned an FT column arguing that “reliance on ratings in determining regulatory and policy decisions may be encouraging excessive focus on rating agency opinions”:

For instance, the recent Greek debt rollover proposal from the French Banking Federation was made conditional on rating agencies determining whether it amounted to a default. Likewise, the European Central Bank has emphasised the need for any Greek restructuring initiative to avoid a default as defined by rating agencies. And it continues to consider independent ratings when determining which collateral it will accept and on what terms. Such behaviour places ratings into the heart of policymaking, a role that rating providers did not seek.

A better approach is to drop regulatory mandates to use ratings and avoid making ratings the sole criteria for policy decisions. That would reduce their impact on markets and on public policy. And it would free rating firms to compete entirely on quality.

You could reasonably question whether, in the absence of a regulatory monopoly, ratings agencies compete “entirely on quality” or on what you might call “sucking up to big repeat issuers” (as Freakonomics suggested today in slightly different words). But while Sharma’s article piously tells us that ratings agencies never wanted anyone to rely on them to assess credit quality, it doesn’t suggest much in the way of workable replacements – because they’re tough to craft, particularly in fast-moving crises. Which is why, for all its hatred of the American ratings agencies, Europe nonetheless continues to look to them in policymaking. And why, despite Dodd-Frank’s mandate not to, the U.S. is still doing the same thing.

S.E.C. Removes Credit Ratings From Regulations [DealBook]

SEC Adopts New Short Form Criteria to Replace Credit Ratings

Policymakers must reduce reliance on credit ratings [FT]

17 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (17)

  1. Posted by Guest | July 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM

    COMPLETELY off topic – anybody else see the “Pudding face” ads in Penn Station? Creep the fuck out!

  2. Posted by Guest | July 27, 2011 at 12:31 AM

    what is a penn station?

  3. Posted by KOF Wing 1.8 | May 5, 2012 at 10:57 PM

    Great blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you recommend starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m completely confused .. Any tips? Bless you!

  4. Posted by KOF Wing 1.8 | May 6, 2012 at 6:35 AM

    Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; we have created some nice procedures and we are looking to trade techniques with other folks, be sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  5. Posted by angry birds free online | May 6, 2012 at 8:09 AM

    It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  6. Posted by angry birds free online | May 6, 2012 at 8:48 AM

    Wow! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a entirely different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Superb choice of colors!

  7. Posted by windows 7 key | September 1, 2012 at 3:24 AM
  8. Posted by tigArguriCror | September 8, 2012 at 2:39 AM

    bjvvajwr [url=]chaussures louboutino[/url] rwdbpssg chaussures louboutina ivaagsiz

  9. Posted by ChailmglixHah | September 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM

    ncjdcm [url=]jordan pas cher[/url] gdoumo air jordan pas cher jrgvec tdicitmvr [url=]chaussures louboutin[/url] epbyhchasm louboutin dekzsjq giuwqwea [url=]longchamp pliage[/url] hdbliwckzn longchamp pas cher usxcxhn

  10. Posted by LathyLatanild | September 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM

    lrurjvfe [url=]jordan pas cher[/url] eqmpfidi air jordan zvljgrxx

  11. Posted by Arrivatriva | September 16, 2012 at 2:43 AM

    lutsgszn [url=]polo ralph lauren pas cher[/url] fsobgrqd polo ralph lauren yspsvmng [url=]abercrombie[/url] rwohmrkj abercrombie ezelbnbm

  12. Posted by Faureauff | September 17, 2012 at 9:11 PM

    yhvucd [url=]moncler pas cher[/url] kooroq doudoune moncler ofoejz qsniidto [url=]sac longchamp pas cher[/url] hsylusthhr longchamp pas cher vhmqzwz vxgfiu [url=]mercurial vapor[/url] evfkei mercurial pas cher qqznfn

  13. Posted by Fitness | September 18, 2012 at 10:41 PM

    Very good written post. It will be supportive to everyone who employess it, including me. Keep up the good work – for sure i will check out more posts.

  14. Posted by Arrivatriva | September 30, 2012 at 8:46 PM

    mtdsjtho [url=]louboutin[/url] cytgkzbm louboutin pas cher kizclwdj

  15. Posted by wow gold | October 14, 2012 at 4:25 AM

    I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  16. Posted by buy wow gold | October 16, 2012 at 6:15 PM

    Definitely, what a magnificent site and educative posts, I will bookmark your blog.All the Best!

  17. Posted by Crosswords Solutions | December 21, 2013 at 8:59 AM

    That is a good post.I am bound that the informative you distributed through your mail is beneficial for persons. I'm influenced with the means of writing. Then we will collect all the require information and for solving they slowly lose their heads crossword and they slowly wave nearly as if speech sayonara, to signifies obedience and since their eyes unit on the sides of their heads, they have a much bigger field of vision outgrow their skin or just as a results of their skin is getting recent.