A few weeks ago Jeremy Grantham, in Part 1 of his quarterly letter, told you everything you need to know about current markets. Specifically (1) get rid of stocks, bonds, and just capitalism generally while we’re at it, (2) get yourself a farm, and (3) keep a pretty close eye on soil erosion. Good news: some of you have clearly been listening. For example Perry Vieth, a former quant money manager who now buys farmland at Ceres Partners LLC. And as Bloomberg reports, he is not going to let a dystopian future of soil erosion rain on his 16% returns:

When Vieth wants land, he goes shopping, as he does with Zick and Blum under a partly cloudy southern Michigan sky in May. Armed with aerial and soil maps, they look for farms with predictable rainfall, mineral-rich land and good drainage. They avoid land that slopes too much, which could lead to soil erosion.

So A+ for Vieth. The rest of you are going to get another chance to get in Grantham’s good graces, since he’s out with Part 2 of his letter today and – well, it’s relatively cheerful, for him, even saying that GMO “are now very modest buyers for the first time since mid 2009.” Buyers of equities! Though of course he’s got nothing but praise for those like Vieth who know where the real money is: “For those with a long horizon, I am sure well-managed forestry and farmland will outperform the average of all global assets.”

Well, we did say relatively cheerful. He’s still not keen on a few little things like:

Politicians. Ever the agriculturalist, Grantham has this to say about the debt ceiling debate: “Come to think of it, the choice was between technical default and looking like a Banana Republic and technical blackmail and looking like a Banana Republic! Just different bananas perhaps?”

Entitlements. See above actually:

Predictably, the developed world ages, the percentage increase in new workers declines, pensions and health benefits bloom, and balanced budgets clearly become mathematically impossible without either substantial reneging on commitments or tax increases or both. Any other pretense is beyond wishful thinking or weak math skills. It is either childish or gross and cynical politics: that is to say, even worse politics than usual.

Income inequality and corporate profits. In a deleveraging world, Grantham is not so keen on a consumer whose average real wages have been flat for 40 years:

Today the artificial sugar-coating of increasing debt has been removed and we must live with the reality that an average hour’s work has not received a material increase for 40 years …. Without increased debt and without gains in hourly wages, how can there be sustained broad gains in consumption? Only Chanel suits, Hermes scarves, BMWs, and their ilk have very strong sales, and these top-end items are just too small a fraction to carry the day. If we want to dig out of our current morass, don’t we have to change this equation and isn’t the most direct way of doing this to divide the pie more evenly? That would mean lower income and sales taxes for the bottom 75% of earners and higher taxes for the top 10%! …

There never was – and perhaps, with luck, never will be again – such a terrible comparison between the economic well-being of corporations and their offi cers and the economic ill-being of their ordinary employees.

Judging from Bloomberg’s article, there are a lot more finance types than you’d expect who are following Grantham’s strategy of underweight luxury goods / overweight dirt. Take Singapore hedge fund manager Stephen Diggle, who remembers after Lehman:

“Everyone said, ‘Buy gold.’ But at the end of the day, you can’t eat it. If everything else goes and I just have these farms, it makes me moderately wealthy.”

Being Like Soros in Buying Farmland Lets Investors Reap 16% Annual Gains [Bloomberg]

Danger: Children At Play [GMO Quarterly Letter, pdf]

19 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (19)

  1. Posted by guest | August 10, 2011 at 1:31 PM

    no cow pics? for an article about farms?

  2. Posted by FKApmco | August 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM

    I'd much rather eat a banana than strangle a chicken.

  3. Posted by Guest | August 10, 2011 at 1:45 PM

    Is Matt Goldman's attempt to bring down DB?

  4. Posted by Guy with A.D.D. | August 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM

    I keep clicking on the picture to play the video game.
    Bess, can you put a limit on the amount of words in Matt's articles?
    Thanks

  5. Posted by matt sucks | August 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM

    Matt : DB :: Fredo : Corleone’s

  6. Posted by Former Eastex Trader | August 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM

    Jesus…."dystopian"?? Fuckin big words.

  7. Posted by Gues | August 10, 2011 at 2:12 PM

    Thats's the problem with advice from others. Now they all want to put us into farms. I would be sold though if they had suggested I buy a tent In Ipanema beach to sell caipirinhas in Rio.

  8. Posted by Guest | August 10, 2011 at 2:19 PM

    Can you meet me after work?

  9. Posted by PermaGuestII | August 10, 2011 at 2:19 PM

    You see, I was right all along; now if only you fools hadn't abolished slavery…

    -T. Jefferson

  10. Posted by Guest | August 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM

    it's working

  11. Posted by Swenson from IA | August 10, 2011 at 2:27 PM

    So… even if they end my corn subsidies (which they won't) I'll be ok with my farms as long as I don't spend my money on channel and hermes?

    -Guy tweeting from his CAT combine

  12. Posted by Big Balls | August 10, 2011 at 2:35 PM

    Why slaughter chicks when you can just fuck them.

  13. Posted by HAM05 | August 10, 2011 at 2:37 PM

    jefferson was a dick

    a. hamilton

  14. Posted by Pol Pot | August 10, 2011 at 2:38 PM

    Been there. Done that.

  15. Posted by FKApmco | August 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM

    Sure thing. Bring bananas and a dead cat…we need to check on its bounce.

  16. Posted by deal_mkr | August 10, 2011 at 3:04 PM

    Matt, word to the wise: less copy-paste and more shut-the-hell-up

  17. Posted by guest | August 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM

    Choking a chicken to death while reading this between the lines.

  18. Posted by PermaGuestII | August 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM

    Why not do both?

    -P. Bateman

  19. Posted by Kouwe | August 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM

    Bess, call me.