Off by $2 trillion? NBD.

A mathematical error discovered late Friday by Treasury Department officials threw into limbo, at least temporarily, plans by ratings firm Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the top-notch AAA credit rating the U.S. has held for 70 years, people familiar with the matter said. The wild back and forth between the Treasury Department and S&P Friday afternoon illustrated the dramatic stakes as the ratings firm moved to downgrade the debt.

S&P officials still had not decided how to proceed and could move forward with a downgrade despite the issues raised by the White House, the people familiar with the matter said. A decision could come later Friday. S&P officials notified the Treasury Department early Friday afternoon it was planning to downgrade the debt, a government official said, and the firm presented its report to the White House. S&P has previously warned such a downgrade might come if Washington didn’t move to comprehensively tackle its long-term fiscal woes.

After two hours of analysis, Treasury officials discovered that S&P officials had miscalculated future deficit projections by close to $2 trillion. It immediately notified the company of the mistakes. S&P officials later called administration officials back to say they agreed about the mistakes, though they didn’t say whether it would affect the rating. White House officials remained waiting Friday evening to see what the company would do.

Math Error Fuels Fight Over Rating [WSJ]

Comments (42)

  1. Posted by Guest | August 5, 2011 at 9:31 PM

    I'd still work for S&P than UBS

  2. Posted by Give Me Druries! | August 5, 2011 at 10:11 PM

    AA is the new killing it.

  3. Posted by Guest | August 5, 2011 at 10:47 PM

    70 years and 12 Presidents(both Democrat and Republican)………AAA.
    2 1/2 years of Obama's wild spending………………Downgrade.
    Everyone repeat after me:
    Thank You, Comrade Obama!!!

  4. Posted by lolol | August 5, 2011 at 10:50 PM
  5. Posted by so f*cked | August 5, 2011 at 10:59 PM

    Change. Now I get it.

  6. Posted by guest | August 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM

    I hope you burn for your stupidity.

  7. Posted by anon | August 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM

    you're a fucking idiot.

  8. Posted by SRH | August 5, 2011 at 11:25 PM

    First repeat after me: I have shit where my brains should be.

  9. Posted by ggg | August 5, 2011 at 11:26 PM

    Is that S&P's motto?

  10. Posted by Gay Fin Jock | August 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM

    Bess you should run for Treasury Secretary. I'm sure you'll find $3 trillion error instead of $2.

  11. Posted by ggg | August 6, 2011 at 12:07 AM

    what?

  12. Posted by David Guest | August 6, 2011 at 12:11 AM

    Yeah! She could be not only the first woman T.Sec but the first person to ever run for a gig that you're appointed, not elected to.

  13. Posted by counterparty | August 6, 2011 at 12:45 AM

    So, you're impressed by self-serving tripe from the White House? How nice for you.

  14. Posted by Guest | August 6, 2011 at 1:40 AM

    I see what you did there, but do you see what you did to yourself?
    Semantics bro

  15. Posted by rymu | August 6, 2011 at 11:01 AM

    i wouldn't trust her

  16. Posted by anon | August 6, 2011 at 11:28 AM

    Kill yourself.

  17. Posted by Backdoor_Bess | August 6, 2011 at 12:06 PM

    Looks right to us……..

    ~ SEC

  18. Posted by dumb credit guy | August 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM

    This is beyond irresponsible. IMO the mortgage issue was caused by these rating agencies selling ratings.
    At least in the short term we are fucked!

  19. Posted by CAPM is fucked | August 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM

    Using the Liechtenstein 30-yr AAA notes as the risk-free rate in finance is the NKI

  20. Posted by The Rest of America | August 6, 2011 at 1:59 PM

    I hate people like you – you're probably not very intelligent, don't know much in the way of facts, watch a lot of fox news, the list can go on….

  21. Posted by Guest | August 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM

    I've been using Isle of Man's for years….

  22. Posted by AIG Quant (Ex UBS) | August 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM

    What's the big deal really? This is actually going to revive the housing market., AIG, BofA, Citi etc. The only AAAs left will be RMBS senior tranches. Who's long RMBS? Boom. Done.

  23. Posted by rymu | August 6, 2011 at 7:57 PM

    No, you,

  24. Posted by redman | August 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM

    just shows you can't trust an injun (dot not feather).

  25. Posted by Guest | August 6, 2011 at 11:05 PM

    "we've made ratings decisions using worse math"

    -S&P Official

  26. Posted by Guest | August 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM

    Not entirely fair. This is also due to what happened on other people's watch.

    Given that that's the case, how about this:

    Obama deserve as much credit for S&P's downgrade as he does for catching Bin Laden.

  27. Posted by Top Tier | August 7, 2011 at 12:03 AM

    Evidently it was not a mathematical error, instead they were using the wrong baseline assumption. Sounds like an associate fucked up

    -Top Tier

  28. Posted by GuestNOW | August 7, 2011 at 2:22 AM

    As long as it was just an associate and none of his superiors caught the error, we're all good, thanks.

  29. Posted by guest | August 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM

    "S&P stands revealed as not understanding basic analysis of budget estimates. "
    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/i-hea...

  30. Posted by Guest | August 7, 2011 at 12:42 PM

    Oh spare me, if anything the S&P was being generous to us by not downgrading the U.S. much sooner and you're just not a serious analyst (i.e., Paul Krugman) if you're going to dance around that fact.

    This was deserved. Quit whining and blaming the messenger.

  31. Posted by guest | August 7, 2011 at 3:53 PM

    Eat shit and die

  32. Posted by FinnHopKee | August 7, 2011 at 5:37 PM

    So, what you are saying is that after $10 trillion of debt, a near collapse in 2008 where assets deflated, where government revenue has dropped, in addition to tax cuts demanded by Republicans in a 2010 deal, and where the 2009 budget was Bush's, and where the costs of two wars were brought "on budget" (instead of excluded per Republican practice) it's all Obama's fault?

    What is this wild spending of which you speak? If you are going to make wild ridiculous characterizations, at least, back it up with some context and truth. Trump is that you?

  33. Posted by @JustinUrrkunt | August 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM

    The fact that lolol's chart figures taxes as a zero-sum game is ridiculous. Anyone advancing it as proof doesn't fully undertand the effect that raising or lowering taxes has.

    For an understandable lesson, study the devastation that happened to the luxury yachting industry after the 10% luxury tax.

  34. Posted by UFO | August 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM

    Uhm, people still pay attention to S&P? Who the fuck cares what they have to say either way on the issue? It's not like they missed any important details in the course of the last decade…..

  35. Posted by merkin capital ptnrs | August 8, 2011 at 12:45 AM

    im gone for 2 months being terribly gainfully employed and there is a completely new commenting system? wtf. my likes to comment ratio on disqus was the stuff of legend…LEGEND.

    AND NOW MY NAME IS TOO LONG?!! Good God this place is falling apart.

  36. Posted by UFO | August 8, 2011 at 12:50 AM

    It's S&P's fault

  37. Posted by Guest | August 8, 2011 at 1:11 AM

    Even taking the chart at its word–it's kinda glossing over the $3.6 trillion in new debt from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid that's listed at the bottom of your link. This, along with defense, has also been the fasted growing part of the debt (except that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid account for a lot more of the budget than defense does).

    To label that thin slice in the middle as "Obama's policies" is a slight of hand. Obama and the Democrats had been fighting to keep these expenditures from being cut. For that matter, Bush attempted to have these expenditures cut early in his second term and was thwarted by the Democrats. They're still going nuts over plans to cut this. This is their turf. This is a gigantic part of the debt that they're responsible for and that they continue to bear the blame for.

  38. Posted by Guest | August 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM

    Weekend comments are the NKI.

    - Kid with a life

  39. Posted by kid w/ buying power | August 8, 2011 at 10:11 AM

    Get yourself a box of cereal and shut the fuck up.

  40. Posted by PermaGuestII | August 8, 2011 at 11:12 AM

    2 things-
    1. Australia opened at 6:30 last night, NY time; Tokyo at 8:00 p.m.; London at 3 a.m. Your weekend doesn't necessarily correspond to the rest of the folks on this board;
    2. Whilst I'm sure this news had no affect on your pool time with your 14 new best friends at your share house in Hampton Bays, some of us were actually on the desk this weekend. Just sayin'

  41. Posted by Elszstain | August 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM

    Yes because this is so much less worrying for global financial markets… http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/07/rick-...

  42. Posted by MarFa | August 8, 2011 at 1:09 PM

    Be sure you grandma was a bitch, your mom was one too and you are the filthiest of them all…boy you are!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.