In Which Gretchen Morgenson Gets Credit For Understanding Derivatives

Here’s a trade. I’ve got these bonds, see? I will sell them to you. You will pay me $100 and get $100 face amount of bonds (if you like, you can get $80 or $120 face value of bonds, depending on where the bonds are trading – but let’s make them par bonds, to keep things simple).

But we’re not done. I will also write a contract under which, if these bonds default prior to maturity, you can hand them back to me, and I will give you back your $100. My loss will be the $100, minus whatever I can get from the defaulted bonds. In exchange for this commitment from me, you will pay me a running payment. That payment will be equal to (1) the coupon payment on the bonds (remember, they’re par bonds, for simplicity), minus (2) a risk-free rate of equal maturity, plus or minus (3) a basis driven by the cost of funding and differences in relative demand for different sorts of payments. Let’s say the bonds pay 6%, the relevant risk-free rate is 2%, and our funding costs are 50bps. Then you pay me 350bps running. The payments, and the contract, expire at maturity of the underlying bond.

Ah, but you have an objection. You’re paying me this running payment in exchange for my promise to cash you out if the bonds default – but how do you know I’m good for it? Fair. Why don’t we do this. I will collateralize that promise. At first my collateral will be quite small, since default is unlikely so the expected value of my promise is small, but it will go up if the bonds decline in value and/or my credit deteriorates.

Okay, fine, now we’ve got a deal. So … what is our deal? I’ve sold you bonds in a spot sale – that much seems clear – and we’ve got … this other thing, this contract. What do we call that contract?

Well, we could certainly call it a “credit default swap.” Right? You make quarterly payments to me, in exchange for which I pay off par (and get the defaulted bonds) if the bonds default. Your quarterly payments are in an amount more or less equal to the “credit spread” of the bonds. There are some differences from the normal ISDA-approved CDS – for one thing, our contract as I described it above is about one particular bond, not a cheapest-to-deliver bond of the issuer; for another, real ISDA contracts now have fixed spreads and up-front payments rather than running payments actually equal to a credit spread – but those are within the bounds of a stylized CDS contract. Certainly if we actually wrote each other that contract, we could call it “CDS” and not have anyone get too broken up about any misuse of terms.

But we can also, with very teeny adjustments that do not affect the economic substance, call it something else. Specifically a “repurchase agreement,” or perhaps – since that term is more usually used for overnight trades – a “repo to maturity.” The main differences, I think, are:

(1) Instead of you paying me a “credit spread” on the bonds, I keep the income on the bonds and pay you a “financing rate,” which is kind of a risk-free rate plus some sort of funding cost. Like, 2.50%. So I keep 350bps of payments on the bond. So no economic difference from the CDS.*

(2) Instead of my agreeing to pay you par and take the bonds if the bonds default, I agree to pay you par and take the bonds at maturity (or prior default). If the bonds go to maturity, then I pay you par and get a thing that immediately cashes out at par – which is a transaction that has no substance, no different from the CDS just expiring worthless at maturity. (In fact, you’d probably net it so I don’t even go through the motions of paying you par.) If the bonds default prior to maturity, our trade looks like CDS: I pay you money and get defaulted bonds. Again, no economic difference from the CDS.

(3) Various mechanical bits and bobs are different. Maybe our running payments are daily or monthly or one-time rather than quarterly. Probably our collateral mechanics are expressed differently, though they get at the same thing – my ability to pay you off if the bonds default, whatever my then-current state of credit is. These things might have substance but they’re second-order; the basic gist of you get real(ish)-time mark-to-market collateral is mostly true in both circumstances.

Okay. Now. It is normally a good and noble endeavor to make fun of Gretchen Morgenson, because she really really doesn’t care at all if what she writes about Big Evil Banks is true or not, so it’s mostly not. Thus when she writes a column in the Times that says:

MF Global’s debacle was a result of complex swaps deals it had struck with trading partners. While those partners owned the underlying assets — in this case, government debt — MF Global held the risk relating to both market price and default.

… it is easy to interpret that as saying “MF Global was blown up by CDS,” which is false: it was blown up by cash holdings of bonds, financed by fairly normal repo-to-maturity arrangements that got exploded by collateral calls. And getting that wrong would be sort of stupid, so lots of people – including, with majestic disdain, ISDA itself – pile on and call her a moron. Or at least:

Morgenson is one of those reporters who sees CDS beneath every rock, and even blamed CDS for Greece’s fiscal problems — twice. … In the MF Global case, she’s seeing CDS when she was actually looking at bog-standard repos, which aren’t derivatives at all.

But she actually doesn’t say that! She doesn’t say anything about CDS blowing up MF Global. She just says that MF Global wrote trades where the counterparty owned the bonds and MF Global bore the market and default risk. And that is true!**

Now, no one can deny that using the term “swaps” for repo trades, while maybe layman-intuitive, is unfortunate – or that calling even the simplest things “complex” is a terrible affectation for someone pretending to explain complexity – or that she then goes off the rails and talks a lot about CDS and credit-linked notes and God-knows-what having nothing to do with MF Global or anything else good and true and sensible. I am not here to defend Gretchen Morgenson.

I’m just here to say that, if Gretchen sees derivatives under every rock – so do I. And so should you. If you get hung up on whether to worry about “derivatives” posing risks to the financial system, or just plain old “leverage,” don’t.

I grew up in a derivatives business, so when I see a thing that takes one asset and disaggregates some of the risks and costs of that asset and apportions them to different parties – I sometimes, just for fun, like to call that thing a “derivative.” Our little trade above separates the funding of the bond from its credit risk – one of us has the ownership of the underlying asset, but we’re both parties to a bilateral contract that has payoffs based on the state of that asset.

It seems to me that, if you see derivatives in all zero-sum bilateral contracts that disaggregate risks of underlying financial instruments – and if you think in cash flows and triggers rather than names – then you will have a clearer head in thinking about derivatives. On the one hand, you won’t run around flapping your lips about how terrifying Evil Derivatives are and how they’ll blow up the world. (And you won’t worry about the difference between vanilla repos and CDS, because CDS is pretty pretty vanilla.) On the other hand, you will probably be a little less sanguine to learn that the thing that blew up MF Global was not a “derivative,” but rather just “leverage,” or “secured lending,” or “bog-standard repos.” Because deep down they’re the same thing.

Sad Proof of Europe’s Fallout [NYT]

Sad Proof [ISDA blog]

CDS demonization watch, ISDA vs Morgenson edition [Reuters/Felix Salmon]

* These numbers – or rather, their relationship – are not arbitrary. Adjusting for technicals in different markets, the bond interest rate minus the CDS spread really should kind of equal the risk-free rate plus the cost of funding the bonds.[Update: a comment at Felix Salmon’s blog points out that I’m being a bit cute in assuming that the risk-free rate on our trade is a fixed rate. That is, in effect, the way CDS works – you keep the bond and its rates risk; I get only the credit risk. Normally, however, in repo-to-maturity, I would pay you a floating financing rate, so I’d retain the interest rate risk. I was eliding this point, which does have economic substance, to focus on the splitting of financing costs from credit risk, so, mea culpa. This is not, I think, an essential point: you can certainly have a secured financing with a fixed interest rate, and you could even reasonably call it a “repo-to-maturity” though it would be a bit different from a regular-way repo trade (more so than our stylized CDS is a bit different from a regular-way ISDA CDS contract). In any case, you don’t need a “derivative” to fix the rate, or to parcel out funding, rates and credit risk.]

** Or, true enough. You can debate the semantics of who “owns” the bonds in a repo trade. Legally Gretch is probably right; for accounting purposes it’s murkier.

(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

64 Responses to “In Which Gretchen Morgenson Gets Credit For Understanding Derivatives”

  1. dumb says:

    cliff notes?

  2. Bandersnatch says:

    Jesus Christ Matt, what in God's name possesses you to write this shit? And what is wrong with me that I like to read the crap you write?

  3. Dddddsd says:

    It's not nap time yet Matt.

  4. FKApmco says:

    Matt Levine > Andrew Ross Sorkin > Gretchen Morgenson > Louise Story > Charlie Gasparino

  5. BrotherLehman says:

    What if the bond matures before I'm finished reading the article?

  6. Carlos S. says:

    What if NYT defaults before Gret-gret understands CDS?

  7. Guest says:

    Too Matt, didn't read

  8. Nervous Agnostic says:

    You know, Matt didn't used to be too much of annoyance. He used to only post one, maybe two, articles per day. His first article usually didn't show up until late in the afternoon, and the second one (if there was one) wasn't for hours later until everyone had already gone home. So he was easy enough to ignore… However, yesterday he posts two consecutive articles in a row and today he has a post up by 11am?! This is too much!

    – Not the Nervous Jew but a fan of his work

  9. Texashedge says:

    Question (and this will make me sound dumb b/c I'm not a FI guy): if you are going to buy a bond with a credit spread of x and then pay x back in the form of CDS coverage, why not just buy the Rf security in the first place?

    Because it seems to me you're just exposing yourself to counterparty risk (even if cash collateral posting or an L/C is promised) + a Rf return..

    /hick from the oil patch

  10. Guest says:

    That's it? Slacking a little, Matt.

  11. Avid Reader says:

    Good stuff again, Matt. Make fun of the people making fun of Gretchen Morgenson, and ignore the people making fun of you.

  12. Guest says:

    Lights off in the black interview room, harley leather jacket on, dentures out…

  13. Bessemer Process says:

    Repo + Derivative(a) – Derivative(a) = A derivative!

    -LEH Quant

  14. Practioner says:

    ….And then we have synthetic exposure.. This is so 2003…Get with the times people!

  15. stanleyfatmax says:

    This isn't disaggregation of risks, it's financing. Do you also think it's acceptable to call long stock plus a margin loan a derivative? If not, you're making a distinction on the technicality of title transfer in a repo that has nothing to do with the economics of the trade, just the rights of the repo buyer in bankruptcy. It's just a secured loan with a legal structure designed to help the lender foreclose without interference of the bankruptcy stay. The instant case was a problem of financing and leverage, not of synthetic risk transfer. When you conflate the two, as Gretchen did and you are defending, you imply that derivatives caused the problem and that enhanced derivatives regulation is therefore necessary. But no one is contending that derivatives regulation would reach the repo market and therefore it would have no effect on what happened at MF Global. I think that was ISDA's point, and to be honest, it's a little weird that you don't understand that.

  16. mbwzqesx says:

    PfLqNn yfdagccwruqc, [url=]bxobfyygrqxc[/url], [link=]yfzmgnlebmgf[/link],

  17. This post is worth everyone’s attention. Where can I find out more?

  18. Hiya very nice web site!! Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds alsoI’m satisfied to search out so many useful information right here within the put up, we need develop more strategies on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

  19. Adolph Sewer says:

    I enjoy the astronomical connections throughout as well as description from the penultimate paragraph is so gorgeous!

  20. Major thankies for the blog article.Really thank you! Want more.

  21. But Romney can be wise to offer her a place of some sort, along with many of the many others who ran against him, and toss in Sarah Palin far too. When Obama explained he was going to fundamentally change the United States, numerous considered he meant to the much better. Now that we know the truth, lets get about really changing it into a lively growing place, and never a broke has-been nation that has to bow down to many others.

  22. nusajaya sq says:

    For example, with an auto insurance policy, you might want to know you employment history for obvious reasons. We also live in a stable job. From holidaymakers all over the world. {||||

  23. nusajaya sq says:

    You will inevitably begin to see your options and make the payments on their secured debt, and it’s usually credit card debt. Their homeowner’s insurance policy will cover any damage you caused up to date. {||||

  24. Your right Samural, they should be the last to have pay cuts.

  25. Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a totally different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Great choice of colors!

  26. ebikes says:

    ebikess are genuinely cheaper and efficient. It is always up to a neighborhood convenience store.

  27. You have ended a number of good points near. I checked proceeding the web to learn extra on the subject of the deliver and found most inhabitants will go down with your views by this site.

  28. It’s accurate that no small business particular person could reside with out of getting a business enterprise card to hand to prospective clients or consumers. Simply because for them, handing out a company card is so much a lot easier than writing out all of your speak to information griffin holdings group llc for any person you’ve just met.

  29. Daphne Acero says:

    wonderful issues altogether, you just won a emblem new reader. What would you suggest about your submit that you made a few days ago? Any positive?

  30. I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website :).

  31. You especially make it seem in truth easy all along with your presentation but I in pronouncement this topic to be in fact one thing which I think I’d by rebuff instrument appreciate. It classify of feels very knotty and very broad representing me. I am attractive a look advance in your next suggest, I

  32. Personalized holiday cards give your holiday cards a unique touch and tends to make it stand out inside the holiday season. Today the demand of personalized holiday cards has enhanced so a great deal that there are lots of companies discovered both on the internet and off line that create such cards for people’s use. These holiday cards are usually silkscreen printed which can be printed on bright white and cream papers. One of the principle reasons for using a silkscreen card is that it produces vibrant colors and rich metallic. This silkscreen printing is a lengthy process wherein each card is run through the press for each color. So if the design has four different colors, it goes through the press Astra Resources Cambodia four different times before it is actually complete.

  33. KPI software package griffin holdings gabbay may help offer you in addition to concept exactly what it may well resemble using the data from the previous. Managing will use these reports along with examine all of them using other reviews to spot developments available period they’re within. KPI computer software also creates projecting less complicated which suggests a lot more with the financial well being of your corporation. With possessing a thought regarding what exactly maybe coming let’s a person placed income where by it is desired the majority of as well as help save this in which it will not always be essential. It will guide your own corporations important thing.

  34. KPI software program offers much more employs and as you have the item with your unique software the utilizes can become evident. One’s destiny involving KPI computer software appears to be also better nowadays than any other moment because of just what this software program is able to do to aid business people. Getting the KPI computer software would be the very best enterprise move people griffin holdings actually help make.

  35. Defining KPI Software. Many people may don?t you have heard of KPI software, but in reality they’ve already benefited greatly from it’s uses some way. KPI software basically can be a tool that will businesses use to acquire a quick introduction of precisely how their business is progressing. KPI software to a lot businesses are the lifeblood which direction egal gabbay they’re headed.

  36. Dale Perico says:

    To produce enterprise cards in Microsoft Word is simple as 1, 2, 3. Initial step, inside a blank document open in Word, decide on Tools|Letters and Mailings|Envelopes and Labels. Click the Labels tab after which click Selections. Second step, inside the Label Selections dialog, be certain the drop-down says Avery Regular and then scroll the Item Number down to 5371. Click OK. Third step, back inside the Envelopes and Labels dialog box, ensure that beneath Print, it says full web page of the Same Label. Then click New Document. A table seems having a bunch of 2 inch x three.five inch cells. Now you are able to get started setting up your initial organization card. There you’ve it! Fast and straightforward organization cards of Astra Resources appropriate from Microsoft Word.

  37. “wow, awesome blog post. Cool.”

  38. Is enormous in China’s congested urban areas, giving the typical Chinese worker access to 3 years. Associate Professor Christopher Cherry at the benefits: * Easy to use: Just plug in your bike’s battery to any outlet and get it recharged anywhere you are.

  39. Older men declare war, but it is the youth that must fight and die.

  40. Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.I will remember to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back someday. I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great posts, have a nice holiday weekend!

  41. Im obliged for the article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  42. hello!,I love your writing very a lot! share we communicate extra approximately your post on AOL? I need an expert in this house to resolve my problem. May be that’s you! Taking a look forward to see you.

  43. Hi. I just noticed that your website looks like it includes a couple of code errors in the very bottom of your site’s page. I’m not certain if everybody is seeing this exact same bugginess when browsing your blog? I am employing a totally different browser than most individuals, known as Opera, so that’s what may be causing it? I just wanted to make sure you realize. Many thanks for posting some excellent postings and I’ll try to return back again having a totally different browser to check points out! Also, I set a hyperlink for your blog at my website,hope you dont mind?

  44. Web Site says:

    I have been browsing on-line greater than 3 hours as of late, but I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty value sufficient for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made just right content as you did, the internet shall be a lot more helpful than ever before. Read On

  45. I’m not sure exactly why but this web site is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  46. “I’m worried to know the items web site system you will be dealing with? We are having lots of little safety and security issues by way of excellent best and newest website and additionally I would usually look for a problem a lot more risk-free. Do you have whatever options? “