The article entitled “What Really Happened to Strauss-Kahn,” by Edward Jay Epstein, which appeared in our December 22, 2011, issue, contained a description of what “looked like” a “dance of celebration” by two employees of the Hotel Sofitel in New York City at approximately 1:35 PM on the day that Dominique Strauss-Kahn was arrested in connection with an alleged sexual assault. Security camera recordings have established that the episode, as described, lasted approximately thirteen seconds, not the three minutes mentioned in the article. [NY Review of Books via GW]
— Advertisement —
Comments (16)
Leave a comment
You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.

They like to Move it! Move it!
What is the difference?
~MF Credit Analyst
Thirteen seconds is more efficient. Woman prefer it.
-Lehman Quant
Wow what an exaggeration, who could make that big of a mistake?
Yeah so you cry, and when you see the dancers, you cry again
But how do they know the future?
-Miss Cleo
[cough cough]
– Gartman
A lot can be accomplished in 13 seconds.
-Friendly Neighborhood Ping
Longer than the lap dances I get….
-UBS MD
Strauss-Kahn was done in by Electromagnetic Interference. I can explain in no more than 50K words.
-Prof. Elaine Scarry
Yes, accuracy is important. But so is legitimacy.
- C. Kengeter
They pulled that same looping film shit on me at Campiegne. Bogus.
–Adolf H.
Back to Square One in image rehabilitation
-Lindsay Lohan's publicist
I will refrain from comments.
I’m sure the best for you outletlouisvuitton.snappages.com/ and get big save
bhD5NH A round of applause for your blog.Really thank you! Awesome.