• 02 Dec 2011 at 2:55 PM

And Now, Blech, Mortgage Lawsuits

It’s difficult to keep track of all the things that all the people are suing all the banks for regarding mortgages. A place to start is by remembering that banks stood in the middle of originating loans to people who didn’t pay them and selling them to people who are now sad that they didn’t get paid. So the flow of money was kind of Investor -> Bank -> Homeowner -> Incinerator. If you think of that flow of money, it makes sense that the people are are doing the most suing are the investors and GSEs who bought mortgages, and regulators who sort of kind of represent the investors, and so in fact there are a lot of big numbers sloshing around in pretty normal securities-fraud-y lawsuits of exactly that sort.

But there are also lawsuits, with quite large dollar numbers attached to them, that go the other way. In these, homeowners, and regulators who sort of kind of purport to speak on behalf of the homeowners, are suing the banks for really quite stonking amounts of money.

It’s analytically helpful for me to separate those suits into two further buckets:
(1) Suing banks for doing a variety of substantive things that put homeowners in a worse position, ranging from refusing to follow their own policies on mortgage modification to not giving proper notice of foreclosure to foreclosing on people who were not in default on their mortgages and stealing their parrots. But also:
(2) Suing banks over things with names like “robosigning” and “MERS.”

The first category is easy enough to understand; if you kick me out of my house and steal my parrot, even if I ultimately get back both the house and the bird, I am at the very least inconvenienced and so you should pay me. That seems obvious and right.

A lot of smart people think the second category of bank actions is just as objectionable. And Massachusetts’s big lawsuit yesterday seems to fall into that category. But I find it really hard to understand. So let’s chat about it.

MERS is an interesting creature. Here’s how the Massachusetts complaint describes it:

146. MERSCORP and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. are owned by some of the nation’s biggest banks and mortgage companies, including several of the Bank Defendants and/or their subsidiaries.

147. MERS has created a private electronic database (the “MERS System”). The MERS System is designed to be a national electronic registry that tracks changes in beneficial ownership interests and servicing rights associated with mortgage loans. Full access to the MERS System is limited to members and/or owners of MERS.

148. Since 1997, more than 63 million home loans have been registered on the MERS System. Indeed, more than 60% of all newly-originated mortgage loans are registered on the MERS System.

149. Through the MERS System, MERS is named the mortgagee of record for participating members either at the origination of the mortgage — by being named the mortgagee as nominee for the originating lender and its successors and assigns in the mortgage documents or by subsequent assignment of the mortgage to MERS. MERS is listed as the mortgagee in the official records maintained by the register of deeds for the county in which the property rests. The lenders retain the promissory notes, which they often sell to investors without recording the transaction in the public record. Lenders likewise are granted the servicing rights to the mot/gage, which they either retain or transfer to other entities. As with the transfer of the promissory notes, a transfer of servicing rights is not recorded in the public record.

150. To facilitate the transfer of beneficial interests in mortgages, MERS and its members typically structure mortgage transactions as follows: …

b. When the promissory note is sold, and potentially re-sold, in the secondary mortgage market, the transaction is, or is supposed to be, tracked – in the MERS database as a transfer of beneficial rights from one investor to another. MERS members are responsible for entering accurate information into the MERS System reporting the transfer of the beneficial interests and servicing rights associated with each mortgage. Members of the general public, however, are unable to access this information.

Okay. Does this sound nefarious to you? It doesn’t especially to me. MERS is to mortgages what DTC is to stocks (and, um, bonds and other things). Time was, I would sell you a share of stock under a tree on the New York Stock Exchange, then I’d go back to my office and tell my clerk to walk the certificates over to you, and you’d tell your clerk to walk your money over to me, and when my clerk got to your office it would be empty and vice versa, and so our clerks would embark on a slapsticky series of near-misses until they finally exchanged money and certificates three days later, which is why we have T+3 settlement. (This is very approximately true.)

But then someone realized that if we just put all the stock certificates in one place, nobody’s clerk would have to go around looking for stock certificates, and someone in that one place could just mark transfers of stock on its books. And, lo, DTC was born, and it was good, and it’s what we have now and it makes a great goddamn deal of sense.

Now, mortgages. A thing about mortgages is that, like everything else related to land, they have to be registered. You register land instruments under the law of the state where the land is. This law, it is safe to say, is old. In most states, you record land documents by actually going to an office – often one per county – and, like, stapling a piece of paper to a file in a musty room. (I’ve been to one in Connecticut. It was fun. But musty.) If Bank A wants to transfer a Las Vegas mortgage to Bank B, someone has to go staple the transfer notice to the file in the musty room in Las Vegas.

If you want mortgages to be tradeable, this is a much, much less efficient system even than my clerk and your clerk tracking each other down on the streets of lower Manhattan and handing each other stock certificates. If we’re selling each other mortgages in a bunch of states, it requires us to send our clerks to each one of those states – maybe each county in each of those states – to do the equivalent of handing over those stock certificates.

So of course MERS was created. For the same reasons and in the same ways as DTC. And it was good, right? Well. Here’s the Massachusetts complaint again:

157. The creation and use of the MERS System — including the assignment of mortgages to MERS “as nominee” for others, and the naming of MERS as the original mortgagee in the mortgage — was adopted by defendants principally to avoid registration and recording requirements. By cutting these corners, MERS and its industry owners, among other purposes, have sought to avoid the payment of millions of dollars of filing fees.

158. In creating and using the MERS System, defendants ignored long-standing and well-established statutory requirements intended to protect property titles and their owners through the land title registration system. Their failure to follow these procedures solely to avoid paying registration fees — and without regard to the impact on the integrity of either the land title registration system or Massachusetts consumers — is unfair and deceptive.

159. Beyond violating the statutes applicable to registered land, this practice conceals from borrowers the true identity of the holder of the debt as memorialized in the promissory note. A borrower whose mortgage is held by MERS cannot readily identify the investor who owns their promissory note, impairing the borrower’s ability to deal directly with the holder of the note.

Well, okay. There seem to be two theories here. First, you could be mad because most states charge a tax or filing fee when you record a transfer of a mortgage. If you transfer a mortgage in MERS’s database, you don’t pay the fee. But the fees aren’t that much – maybe a total of $100 per mortgage – and suing over the fees seems a little childish.

Second, you could be mad that this “impair[s] the borrower’s ability to deal directly with the holder of the note.” This one is … hard to even understand. You deal with the servicer, not the noteholder. The noteholder is in many cases a securitization trust. It’s unclear why “impairing the borrower’s ability to deal directly with the holder of the note” is a thing that we should care about.

That leaves a third theory, which is sort of implicit in the Massachusetts complaint. Here, it’s important to keep in mind that no one is suing just because they don’t like MERS. Massachusetts’s complaint alleges a lot of bad things, some related to shenanigans in the mortgage modification process, others related to actual foreclosure mistakes. And you could – and the states and consumer advocates seem to – have a theory that says that MERS transfers are “cutting corners,” like Massachusetts says, and that when you cut corners houses get foreclosed on incorrectly, and you end up with traumatized parrots.

But – and tell me where I’m wrong here – isn’t that just sort of crazy on its face? Again, I like the MERS:DTC analogy. And DTC works like a charm. One failure of T+3 settlement in 200 is viewed as unacceptable, and it seems unlikely that anyone, ever, has been unable to sell stocks held at DTC because DTC lost them. Stocks going missing on their way from buyer to seller is just not a thing that we worry about any more in the modern world, not in spite of the fact that stocks have gone from being physical slips of paper that we pass around to being computer bits in a centralized database, but because of that fact.

Which system is more likely to be screwed up: The one in which when banks trade mortgage loans by IM or phone, they also make a notation in the electronic database they all have access to changing the beneficial owner of the note? Or the one in which, when banks trade mortgages by IM or phone, they also send someone to hundreds of county clerks’ offices to record those transfers?

My somewhat uninformed guess is that the foreclosure mistakes largely stem from banks having to have a system where in every county they have some schlub responsible for keeping the paperwork together according to local rules, and from those schlubs being, well, schlubs. If all there was was MERS, it strikes me that foreclosure mistakes would be far less likely. Most (not all) of the inaccuracies listed in the Massachusetts complaint are not “they foreclosed on the wrong house” but rather “the MERS owner and the record owner didn’t match up.” You can speculate on which was more likely to be “accurate” (in the sense of “reflecting the desire and understanding and cash flows of the people who bought and sold the mortgage”), but I don’t know why you’d presume it to be the county clerk records.

So what is going on with the animus against MERS? Yves Smith, the leading expert on the mortgage lawsuits: “Consumers are very upset about MERS (I find it resonates with readers more than many of the other securitization abuses).” Why? MERS is just a way of moving mortgages from, literally, the Dark Ages into the 20th century. It’s an electronic central registry of stuff that used to be done on paper in diffuse places, like DTC or, um, Facebook.

There’s one obvious answer: it seems like banks pretty uniformly lied about stuff in their foreclosure complaints, and people hate liars. Emphasis on “seems,” though; your “Bank X lied because it said it was the mortgagee when actually MERS was” or vice versa or whatever could be my “Bank X used language somewhat loosely when it said it was the mortgagee but was in fact only the beneficial interest holder in a mortgage technically registered to MERS.” Those nuns probably aren’t going to hell for saying that they’re “shareholders” of Goldman Sachs when in fact they’re just holders of a beneficial interest in shares owned of record by DTC.

But I think the real answer has to be that MERS is the one place where populists and technocrats, smart people and dumb people, can all come together and say “here is a great place to clamp down on efficient financial intermediation.” And that desire, in some form, is actually pretty widespread. That breakneck increase in speed and efficiency and transferability of claims is maybe contributing to financial system instability, or at least market volatility. It’s why people keep getting really psyched about quasi-Tobin taxes. It’s a plausible explanation for why there’s so much debt knocking around.

If you generally have a vague sense that unrelenting increases in the speed and efficiency of markets for financial claims is responsible for creating and magnifying crises, then you probably want to do something about it. Maybe you go occupy Wall Street. But if you’re a regulator and you say things like “let’s tax all trading to reduce volatility” or “let’s make lending more difficult and time-consuming so that fewer people get loans who maybe shouldn’t have them” or “let’s ban money market funds from serving banking-like functions” then you open yourself to (often accurate) criticism that you’re going to kill jobs ore destroy the economy or whatever.

But if you instead say “let’s kill an effort to modernize the financial intermediation of mortgages and return to a system where paper certificates need to be filed and reviewed by hand in the clerk’s office of every county in the country,” that can work. Because it’s accompanied by dozens of examples of banks misrepresenting who owned the mortgages that they foreclosed on, which sounds kind of bad. Even if the causal connection between the two things is sort of tenuous and directionally unclear.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Bank of America et al. [pdf]

Massachusetts Announces First Comprehensive Lawsuit Against Major Banks [Naked Capitalism]

Massachusetts sues banks over foreclosures [WSJ]

116 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (116)

  1. Posted by NowOnePerson | December 2, 2011 at 2:59 PM

    Oh. My. Lord.

  2. Posted by ShortNaked | December 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM

    good luck tomorrow!

  3. Posted by haha | December 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM

    is it bad that i just skipped the article to see what jokes about matt were made already?

  4. Posted by Anon | December 2, 2011 at 3:07 PM

    Promising start. Then Zzzzzzzz….

  5. Posted by dumb | December 2, 2011 at 3:07 PM

    Matt………………………………………………WTF…………………….. its Friday for Christ's sake………………

  6. Posted by Mexi_Cant | December 2, 2011 at 3:09 PM

    That's fucking long.

    -Shaq's penis

  7. Posted by Matt | December 2, 2011 at 3:10 PM

    Girls are so yucky and blech!

  8. Posted by Chevy_Chased | December 2, 2011 at 3:11 PM

    Bess,

    When does that new freelancer start?

    P.S. The fact that Matt tags his own article as 'boring Friday afternoon legal stuff' and still posts it really chaps my ass

  9. Posted by guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:13 PM

    I'm now convinced that Matt talks in his sleep and that he turns on the Dragon NaturallySpeaking to capture what he says, then turns it into these posts.

    Certainly makes sense that all this talk in your sleep makes me fall asleep.

  10. Posted by optimusprime | December 2, 2011 at 3:14 PM

    TLDR.

  11. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM

    Matt, I enjoyed this article.

  12. Posted by zzzzzzzzzzz | December 2, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    I'm guessing that when matt takes a shit, it comes out an atom at a time. You are in the entertainment business for fuck's sake!

  13. Posted by Mexi_Cant | December 2, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    ahahahaha

  14. Posted by Hate the Dragon | December 2, 2011 at 3:21 PM

    I hate that commercial so much.

  15. Posted by just askin' | December 2, 2011 at 3:22 PM

    Interesting viewpoint, but you seem to be in the pocket of the banks.

    And more curse words!

  16. Posted by Henry VIII | December 2, 2011 at 3:25 PM

    Also at issue is the long-held belief that real property transfers, and by extension transfers in beneficial interests in real property (such as mortgages) are inherently local transactions. People and municipalities don't like the idea that property rights and control over them are taken away from local government. MERS is, in effect, an attempt to nationalize property laws, rules, and regs. And with property law being rooted in feudal times and English Common Law, such nationalization (or at least standardization) is probably long overdue.

    If it was done correctly, and openly, MERS would be a good idea. Give the average homeowner the choice between (a) "your mortgage will always be owned by 1st National Bank of the Swamp" , and you'll always be able to talk to someone here and (b) "if you give me the right to slice, repackage, and trade bits or all of your mortgage like so many baseball cards I'll give you a half-point off of your interest rate", most homeowners are going to choose (b).

    A+ for concept, Epic Fail for execution.

  17. Posted by button chaser | December 2, 2011 at 3:28 PM

    i almost choked on that one. i know i am in for a long read when i click the comments button and i have to scroll up for minutes to find where i left off reading.

  18. Posted by LEH risk management | December 2, 2011 at 3:29 PM

    Matt – you should use your Goldman M&A skills to spin off Matt Levine articles into a separate company called "BoringAnalysis.com"

  19. Posted by 99% of DB Readers | December 2, 2011 at 3:31 PM

    Thats the only reason I click on Matt's articles.

  20. Posted by Joe Smith | December 2, 2011 at 3:33 PM

    Great article. Wrong audience.

  21. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM

    Bookmarked for the next time I have trouble sleeping.

  22. Posted by BigSwinginDicks | December 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM

    You win.

    -Ayn Rand

  23. Posted by trojan_ | December 2, 2011 at 3:37 PM

    +1 for 1st National Bank of the Swamp

  24. Posted by procrastinating | December 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM

    i think people are just mad that it was sloppily executed.

    although on a not entirely unrelated note, dtc is a fucking trial and a half to deal with too if the industry fucks up royally.

  25. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:39 PM

    Matt is like a chef who knowingly serves rotten food to his patrons.

    –Gordon Ramsey

  26. Posted by Cut Me | December 2, 2011 at 3:43 PM

    Holy shit! I just got a finger cramp from scrolling through this entire thing.

  27. Posted by Guessed | December 2, 2011 at 3:43 PM

    Matt Writes Exhaustive, Inconclusive Article About Moderately Relevant, Humor-less Topic

    -UBS Generalist

  28. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:44 PM

    Bawney?

  29. Posted by Comicbook guy | December 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM

    Longest. Article. Ever.

  30. Posted by anonymous | December 2, 2011 at 3:48 PM

    MERS is not the DTC, MERS is as Judge William Young wrote, "the Wikipedia of Land Registration Systems."

    "MERS does not systematically track beneficial ownership rights of the mortgages registered on its system. Recall that MERS only maintains a database that its members can enter information upon if the members want to do so. When the beneficial ownership interest in a loan changes hands, such as through negotiation of a promissory note and a written assignment of the mortgage, the parties to that transaction can send an electronic message to MERS updating a field of information in the database. MERS calls this process an “electronic handshake.” But unlike most county real property recorders, MERS does not keep digital or hard copies of documents that embody such an agreement—making it much more difficult to track fraud and errors through their record keeping system. Even more troubling, it is unclear whether MERS members are legally bound to update this information on the database. In the words of MERS’s CEO, the system “is capable of being used to track [beneficial ownership interests] if the members utilize it for that reason.” But if the MERS members choose not to use the database to reveal themselves, MERS does not investigate further or otherwise insist that members actually use this feature of the database. Instead, MERS leaves this decision to the business model of the financial institution. When asked whether MERS expects financial institutions to update the MERS database regarding changes in loan ownership, the company’s CEO replied, “not so much . . . ”"
    – Chris Peterson

    It's pretty bad if you can't see a problem with MERS in its current implementation

  31. Posted by turniptruck | December 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM

    "I like the MERS:DTC analogy. And DTC works like a charm."

    And MERS doesn't. See how I rendered like five pages of ramblings redundant with three words?

  32. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM

    Wurst comment ever.

  33. Posted by Dr. FeelGood | December 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM

    Matt typed these articles up weeks back. He is posting now to show that he is too cool to need to study for the CFA, even on the day before the exam. Just sayin'

    – Matt's mommy posting between fetching hot chocolate and strawberry yoghurt for Matt who has been studying all night every night for the past six months.

  34. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM

    Get laid often?

  35. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM

    Maybe it's because everyone is against modernizing the financial system, or maybe it's because the banks that created MERS didn't supply State Senator Billy Bob Bumblefuck with hookers and blow to get the law changed.

    Proper channels were clearly bypassed or they wouldn't be in this mess.

  36. Posted by ih8edjfkjr | December 2, 2011 at 3:59 PM

    Now, nobody loves a Matt legal post more than I do, but Matt, you kind of lose me there at the end where you posit that Mass. AG, if only subconsciously, is trying to make financial intermediation less effecient as a means to reduce credit, leverage and…maybe just the whole speed of crazy modern life. But it's Occam's razor: you have to pick a fight with unpopular banks before newspapers will write that you are in a fight with unpopular banks.

  37. Posted by Very Disappointed | December 2, 2011 at 4:11 PM

    No Charts; Didn't Read

  38. Posted by PermaGuestII | December 2, 2011 at 4:17 PM

    People probably wouldn't be so upset about MERS if the banks had done something like actually bother to go get the deed registry laws change in order to make it legal to register mortgages electronically.

    Which by the way is what the securities industry did back in the 1970's to set up the DTCC.

    MERS is basically the Ken Lewises of the world trying to create a copy of the DTCC (or the OCC or whatever) sloshed on Boone's.

  39. Posted by serial rater | December 2, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    I wish we could rate articles as well as comments

  40. Posted by Larissa Stevenson | December 2, 2011 at 5:11 PM

    Seriously, I don't get the Matt-hate, but this article seriously blows. Started off ok, but then dribbles into nothingness

  41. Posted by Guest | December 2, 2011 at 5:14 PM

    Inevitably all of Matt's articles morph into the teacher's voice from the Charlie Brown in my head.

  42. Posted by guest | December 2, 2011 at 5:34 PM

    No way he was in M&A, had to be research or compliance.

  43. Posted by guest | December 3, 2011 at 7:10 AM

    Ding ding ding…..we have a winner…..

    that and it's probably one of the best examples of a totally half-assed technology implementation…..you gotta head into the federal sector to get piles of crap worse than this, and that's saying something….

  44. Posted by Mark Coble | December 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM

    Nothing here about MERS operating under a consent order. Google "MERS CONSENT ORDER" and see what Matt didn't even cover!
    The easiest way to understand this problem is to call YOUR "pretender" lender or "servicer" and ask them a few questions….where is the original mortgage note, who is in possession of the original mortgage note, where can you see the original mortgage note and who is the beneficial owner of the mortgage note? SEEMS simple but you will be lied to, misled and frustrated when you find out that NO ONE KNOWS WHERE YOUR ORIGINAL MORTGAGE NOTE IS! I dare you to try this. So….using FRAUD and FORGERY the banks and their attorneys illegally foreclose on homeowners. They like to call it "robo-signing" as Matt does but it is just FRAUD and FORGERY. Very good article but doesn't go far enough in exposing the lies that banks tell and sell. ARE YOU BRAVE ENOUGH TO CALL YOUR "LENDER"? I warned you.

  45. Posted by VisUS | December 3, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    Let's also not forget the cloud on title which makes your Real Estate impossible to sell. Read Bevilaqua which came out of the MA Supreme Judicial Court.

    MERS is a bad idea implemented poorly by the point of a corporate pen. It will fail and with it, the entire banking system.

  46. Posted by FrankDrakman | December 4, 2011 at 4:10 AM

    To suggest the banks didn't like MERS because it saved them a bit on fees is a bit, er, rich.

    63 million mortgages at $100/pop? That's $6.3 billion dollars, and that's NOT a lot of money to Matt?

    Geez, what do you pay that guy, Bess?

  47. Posted by guest | December 5, 2011 at 8:27 AM

    money – > incinerator -> ??? -> profit!

  48. Posted by Guest | December 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM

    Get out, 1%

  49. Posted by PermaGuestII | December 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM

    Damn straight!

    -City of Harrisburg, PA

  50. Posted by Wahawala | April 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM

    buy a cheap chanel bags , just clicks away

  51. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 9, 2012 at 5:52 PM

    BtLSvk Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Thanks Again. Great.

  52. Posted by music video sites | September 11, 2012 at 10:35 AM

    Im obliged for the blog post.Much thanks again.

  53. Posted by sarti | September 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM

    I really enjoy the post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  54. Posted by toronto limousine rental | September 12, 2012 at 4:09 AM

    I serched through the internet and got here. What a wonderful invention of the mankind. With the help of the network you communicate, learn, read !… That helped us to get acquainted!…

  55. Posted by DUI Lawyer in Michigan | September 12, 2012 at 6:34 AM

    This is one awesome blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  56. Posted by stoffwechseldiaet | September 12, 2012 at 8:07 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article. Great.

  57. Posted by official site here | September 12, 2012 at 8:43 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.

  58. Posted by ExtremeNO | September 12, 2012 at 11:15 AM

    Very informative blog post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  59. Posted by homeowners insurance quotes | September 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  60. Posted by Ronny Kessner | September 12, 2012 at 11:35 PM

    I surely did not realize that. Learnt something new proper now! Thanks for that. [Reply]

  61. Posted by sap crm 7 online training | September 13, 2012 at 4:07 AM

    Fantastic blog article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  62. Posted by beach island | September 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM

    Very informative blog.Really thank you! Awesome.

  63. Posted by AIR DUCT CLEANING | September 13, 2012 at 9:42 AM

    Thanks for the post. Cool.

  64. Posted by free articles directory | September 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM

    I really liked your article.

  65. Posted by Yoga Classes in Punjabi, Surrey, BC | September 15, 2012 at 5:49 AM

    Very informative blog post.

  66. Posted by what to eat when pregnant | September 15, 2012 at 9:37 AM

    A round of applause for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  67. Posted by Nopalea by Trivita | September 16, 2012 at 4:29 AM

    wow, awesome blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  68. Posted by lockouts | September 16, 2012 at 6:37 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  69. Posted by joshua voiles videos | September 17, 2012 at 6:39 AM

    Im thankful for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  70. Posted by piercing chicago | September 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  71. Posted by Inflatable slide rental | September 17, 2012 at 9:30 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great article. Really Great.

  72. Posted by hillcrest dentist | September 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM

    I truly appreciate this article post. Much obliged.

  73. Posted by lida ile zayiflama | September 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM

    Very good post.Much thanks again.

  74. Posted by free image hosting | September 18, 2012 at 10:12 AM

    Very informative blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  75. Posted by cutest baby contest | September 18, 2012 at 12:19 PM

    Im obliged for the article post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  76. Posted by read this post here | September 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  77. Posted by Trainingen | September 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM

    Major thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  78. Posted by seasonal awning | September 18, 2012 at 10:17 PM

    Great article.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  79. Posted by Allevamento rottweiler | September 19, 2012 at 12:04 AM

    Really informative blog. Really Cool.

  80. Posted by porn | September 19, 2012 at 2:17 AM

    This is one awesome blog.Much thanks again. Want more.

  81. Posted by cheratussin ac syrup ingredients | September 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog.Really thank you! Will read on…

  82. Posted by ergasia apo to internet | September 19, 2012 at 5:50 AM

    I loved your article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  83. Posted by Electronic Transfer | September 19, 2012 at 8:34 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  84. Posted by meanwell power supplies | September 19, 2012 at 1:00 PM

    Great blog post. Great.

  85. Posted by how to create a website | September 19, 2012 at 5:48 PM

    Thanks a lot for the article. Much obliged.

  86. Posted by magic of making up | September 20, 2012 at 9:48 AM

    wow, awesome blog article. Awesome.

  87. Posted by shake table | September 21, 2012 at 5:50 AM

    Im grateful for the blog post.

  88. Im obliged for the article.Really thank you! Awesome.

  89. Posted by Exotic domain names | September 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM

    Thanks a lot for the blog. Much obliged.

  90. Posted by salt lake restaurant | September 21, 2012 at 9:43 PM

    This is one awesome blog.Much thanks again. Want more.

  91. Posted by adwords alternative | September 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM

    I am so grateful for your article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  92. Posted by best organic multivitamin for men | September 22, 2012 at 5:17 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  93. Posted by procera | September 22, 2012 at 11:44 PM

    Really enjoyed this article post.Really thank you!

  94. Posted by stomach fat loss | September 23, 2012 at 1:34 AM

    This is one awesome article post.Really thank you!

  95. Posted by aftermarket rims | September 23, 2012 at 7:08 AM

    Im thankful for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  96. Posted by massage sensuel | September 23, 2012 at 2:31 PM

    Thanks a lot for the blog post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  97. Posted by Payday Loans Online | September 23, 2012 at 8:04 PM

    I think this is a real great post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  98. Posted by best porn site | September 23, 2012 at 11:50 PM

    Thank you ever so for you blog article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  99. Posted by die cutting equipment | September 24, 2012 at 1:45 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  100. Posted by Kontaktanzeigen | September 24, 2012 at 3:37 AM

    Im obliged for the article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  101. Posted by Alexander Mans | September 24, 2012 at 7:22 AM

    Wow, great blog article. Awesome.

  102. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 24, 2012 at 10:15 PM

    kL6s2b I value the blog. Keep writing.

  103. Posted by Electronic Music | September 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM

    This is one awesome blog post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  104. Posted by cheap canvas prints | September 26, 2012 at 5:36 AM

    A round of applause for your post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  105. Posted by Reston home buyer rebate | September 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM

    Im thankful for the article.Thanks Again. Cool.

  106. Posted by Peter Francis-Macrae | September 26, 2012 at 7:27 PM

    Really informative blog article. Want more.

  107. Posted by cheap printer cartridges | September 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM

    Hey, thanks for the blog.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  108. Posted by hp 300xl | October 1, 2012 at 12:47 AM

    I truly appreciate this blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  109. Posted by printer ink refill | October 1, 2012 at 2:10 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  110. Posted by cheap archive boxes | October 1, 2012 at 4:55 AM

    Im grateful for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  111. Posted by printer ribbons | October 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM

    Muchos Gracias for your post. Keep writing.

  112. Posted by kc inks | October 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM

    I appreciate you sharing this blog. Much obliged.

  113. Posted by replica piaget | October 2, 2012 at 4:20 AM

    I serched through the internet and got here. What a wonderful invention of the mankind. With the help of the network you communicate, learn, read !… That helped us to get acquainted!…

  114. Posted by free porn | October 6, 2012 at 8:19 AM

    Im grateful for the blog.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  115. Posted by jordancastro618 | October 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM

    I will ask a representative on mortgage ma to know their reaction about this.

  116. Posted by Louise Amused | May 30, 2013 at 3:48 AM

    There's only one word to describe the current situation. UNSUSTAINABLE