Credit

MF Global Was Doing Great Until It Wasn’t

“Every banker knows that if he has to prove that he is worthy of credit, however good may be his arguments, in fact his credit is gone,” but every banker also seems to forget the modern corollary, which is that, if you have to prove you are worthy of credit, however good may be your arguments, don’t do it over email. Here’s someone who forgot that and does it surprise you to find his name in the same sentence as “House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations”?:

A week before MF Global Holdings Ltd. collapsed, its chief financial officer told Standard & Poor’s in an e-mail that the futures broker had “never been stronger.”

S&P provided the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations with an excerpt of the e-mail from MF Global CFO Henri Steenkamp. S&P also informed the panel that Jon Corzine, then MF Global’s chief executive officer, met with its analysts on Oct. 20 to reassure them that his $6.3 billion bet on European sovereign debt was no threat to the firm, according to a Jan. 17 letter obtained by Bloomberg News.

U.S. lawmakers will turn their attention to the role of the ratings companies in the failure of MF Global at a Feb. 2 hearing after summoning Corzine, the former governor of New Jersey and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. co-chairman, to two hearings in December. S&P ranked MF Global as investment grade until its failure, while Moody’s downgraded it to junk status four days earlier.

“MF Global is in its strongest position ever,” Steenkamp told S&P on Oct. 24, according to the letter to Representative Randy Neugebauer, a Texas Republican, from Craig Parmelee, a managing director at S&P in New York.

Who can understand the workings of an MF Global? Not me. Apparently they had a money vaporizing device, which in its final days was being manned by employees not wholly familiar with its proper operation, and which caused some unpleasantness when it was aimed at clients’ money. Still to a first approximation it seems reasonable to think that poor foolish-sounding Steenkamp was basically right. MF Global had some assets and some liabilities and its assets exceeded its liabilities. It had a short-term reasonably safe bet on some European government bonds that proved reasonably profitable, and that bet was funded with matched-maturity funding that was reasonably stable until it wasn’t. Then everything went south, that matched-maturity funding was pulled, MF Global needed to sell assets and post more collateral to remain in business, and in the confusion someone accidentally turned on the vaporizer.

But from a casual observer’s perspective it seems reasonable to conclude that Steenkamp was more or less right in the boring old senses of “our assets exceed our liabilities by the most ever” and “our liquidity exceeds our current need for liquidity by the most ever.”* It’s just that, a week later, liquidity needs were rather higher than anticipated and asset values were harder than anticipated to realize. There is nothing new under the sun; banks look solvent until the run, and then they look insolvent. Implicit in Steenkamp’s email, or any pronouncement by any banker ever of the form “we are in awesome shape,” is the caveat “unless there’s a run on us.” Nobody survives losing all of their credit.

Of course nothing inspires a run quite like a lack of confidence, so people in Steenkamp’s job are in a rough spot. If they say “yeah, maybe we’ll survive, maybe we won’t, who can say?,” then they probably don’t survive. If they say “we are doing GREAT, thanks for asking!,” then their chances of survival improve, but not to 100%, and, conditional on non-survival, they dramatically increase their chances of having their email make it into a snarky headline and become fodder for congressional and/or criminal investigations. Good. Times. This feels like a corollary of the you-fuck-one-sheep theory of email management: not only can one negative email sink you if you’ve gone around saying how good a deal is; one positive email can sink you if you’ve gone around … well, filing for bankruptcy and losing $1.2 billion of client money.

To be fair, the congressional hearing isn’t about Steenkamp’s overconfidence. It’s about S&P’s and Moody’s overconfidence:

S&P did not alter its opinion of MF Global’s creditworthiness until October 26, less than a week before the brokerage failed on October 31.

Moody’s waited until October 24 to downgrade the company’s credit, more than seven weeks after MF Global disclosed that regulators required it to hold more capital against its European bet.

Members of Congress plan to quiz Moody’s and S&P executives about why the rating services were allegedly “overreliant” on MF Global to provide them with information, rather than conducting their own due diligence, people familiar with the matter said.

So, yeah, sure, fair questions. But not in the form “why did Moody’s only downgrade MF a week before it failed?” Moody’s didn’t “downgrade MF a week before it failed”; MF failed a week after Moody’s downgraded it – the downgrade started the vicious spiral of lost confidence and collateral calls that led to its failure. When dealing with highly leveraged financial institutions that rely on short-term credit, Moody’s and S&P have a magnified version of Steenkamp’s problem. As long as they say things are going great, the bank will probably more or less survive – but maybe not. To keep any credibility at all, the agencies have to occasionally be willing to downgrade a financial institution to junk even if before it has filed for bankruptcy. (This actually happens all the time outside of FIG. Go figure.) Doing so dramatically raises the risk of a run on that financial institution – which in turn dramatically raises the risk of a bankruptcy. Which raises to a near certainty the risk of a congressional committee saying “damn, Moody’s, why did you wait until a week before bankruptcy to downgrade MF Global?”

MF Global Said ‘Never Been Stronger’ a Week Before Failure [Bloomberg]

Ratings agencies to be quizzed over MF Global [FT]

* Again, from a casual observer’s perspective. It would also be reasonable to conclude that, given a September revolver draw, MF’s liquidity could not fairly be described as the best ever.

66 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

66 Responses to “MF Global Was Doing Great Until It Wasn’t”

  1. ReaganLaw says:

    "Members of Congress plan to quiz Moody’s and S&P executives about why the rating services were allegedly “overreliant” on MF Global to provide them with information, rather than conducting their own due diligence, people familiar with the matter said."

    'Due Diligence' – Can you use it in a sentence, please? May I have the language of origin, please? May I have the definition, please?

    – Moody's Exec.

  2. Dos Equis Quant says:

    I don't often read multiple long winded, overly verbose financial blog posts but when I do, their Matt Levine posts.

    -The most interesting insider trading aficionado in the world.

  3. Ray says:

    The guy wasn't smart enough to wear a seat belt, why would anybody think he could run a brokerage firm?

  4. j coorz says:

    "hmmm…. wonder what I could get for this place now…2.8, 3 ? "

  5. goldtracker says:

    What continues to boggle my mind is why we aren't hearing about criminal charges? The level of corruption for all this to take place is not legal, at least legal in the sense that I understand the law and morality. But then these are big bankers and apparently they are a different species.

  6. xe6FFF I really enjoy the blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  7. lawl says:

    Thank you for your article. Great.

  8. blog says:

    Really informative blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  9. Great post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  10. Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  11. Office says:

    Really enjoyed this blog article.Really thank you! Want more.

  12. Very good blog.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  13. Thanks again for the blog.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  14. I really like and appreciate your article post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  15. Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  16. Hey, thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  17. Looking forward to reading more. Great blog.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  18. I truly appreciate this blog.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  19. Awesome article post. Want more.

  20. Erotismo says:

    I value the article.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

  21. I loved your blog post. Awesome.

  22. Wow, great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  23. xxx videos says:

    Thanks again for the article post. Will read on…

  24. Im thankful for the blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  25. Thank you for your post. Awesome.

  26. Im thankful for the blog post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  27. Really informative blog article.Much thanks again.

  28. A big thank you for your article.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  29. Im obliged for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  30. Werewolves says:

    Muchos Gracias for your article post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  31. Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  32. I cannot thank you enough for the blog post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  33. LPuxl9 Muchos Gracias for your blog.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  34. Very neat article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  35. A big thank you for your blog post. Will read on…

  36. courses says:

    I value the article post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  37. Appreciate you sharing, great post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  38. I am so grateful for your article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  39. procera avh says:

    I really enjoy the article post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  40. Very neat blog article.Thanks Again. Cool.

  41. Say, you got a nice blog. Keep writing.

  42. Really enjoyed this blog article. Really Great.

  43. Major thanks for the blog post.Much thanks again. Great.

  44. I really like and appreciate your blog article. Cool.

  45. astrology says:

    I loved your blog.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  46. I cannot thank you enough for the article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  47. Very good post. Fantastic.

  48. buy phen375 says:

    I really enjoy the blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

  49. Enjoyed every bit of your blog. Keep writing.

  50. A big thank you for your article post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  51. Awesome blog.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  52. I really liked your blog. Fantastic.

  53. I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  54. Extremely easy by words but in reality�, a lot of things don`t correspond. Not everything is so rosy..!

  55. Major thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Cool.

  56. Thanks-a-mundo for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  57. You are aware of, power steering was not widely out there and I can assure you that it took strength to operate people heavy old Buicks. Wonderful riding cars nevertheless, I am aware. I uncover it hard to think about an extremely aged female parking that car. Oh perfectly, what do I know?

  58. wow, awesome post. Cool.

  59. Current blog, fresh information, I read it from time to time!!…

  60. Post brought me to think, went to mull over!!…

  61. free porn says:

    This is one awesome blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  62. George says:

    I loved your article post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  63. I wanted to write you this very little note so as to give many thanks as before for these fantastic basics you have contributed on this page. It has been simply extremely generous with you to supply unreservedly all a number of people would have marketed for an e-book to get some bucks for their own end, and in particular considering that you might well have tried it in case you decided. The strategies in addition served to provide a easy way to understand that the rest have a similar eagerness just as my personal own to realize way more when it comes to this matter. Certainly there are a lot more pleasurable instances ahead for individuals who look into your site.

  64. resveratrol says:

    I read and feel at home. Thanks the creators for a good resource..!