I’m not the only person who noticed that Mark Zuckerberg is going to have more than the usual amount of control over Facebook (Facebook Facebook Facebook), both unto his grave and beyond. As a conceptual matter I’m kind of down with that though I’m not going to, like, buy shares in the IPO or anything.* But my basic take is that, if you’re going to buy stock in in a poking machine that makes about a penny per user per day, you should be willing to trust Mark Zuckerberg. Because if you were the inventor of Facebook, you would have invented Facebook, or something.

The alternative to giving a hoodied 27-year-old complete control over all aspects of a multibillion dollar business is to have a team of professional managers being all professional and managing by committee and checking each others’ work. It is not clear what is better. I suspect Facebook would not be a $100 billion asset today if it had sold to Yahoo in 2006 though, also, no one has ever accused Yahoo of being professionally managed. But the point is that those are two distinct styles and there are arguments for both. Professionalism has much to recommend it but so does complete domination by one visionary; for instance, founder dominated firms outperform the market.

On the other hand there is a downside to dominant visionaries, as some (non-Zynga-based) hog farmers now know all too well:

Michael Roseman, MF Global’s chief risk officer until early 2011, and his successor, Michael Stockman, testified that they warned the firm’s top executives and directors about the danger of the European bets months before the firm’s downfall. Mr. Stockman took the reins of controlling risk after Mr. Roseman exited amid repeated clashes with the firm’s top executives.

“We did our job during this period,” a defiant Mr. Stockman told the oversight panel of the House Financial Services Committee. “In my view, the board and senior management were highly sophisticated; they knew and understood how the” European debt bets worked.

Lawmakers were dubious. While the positions were the brainchild of Jon S. Corzine, the firm’s chief executive and the former governor of New Jersey, lawmakers noted that it was up to the risk chiefs to control their boss’ risk taking.

“You were not a lowly clerk,” Representative Bill Posey, a Republican from Florida, told Mr. Stockman. …

In November, when the positions grew to nearly $5 billion, Mr. Roseman outlined the risks to the board, saying the bets hinged on the European countries not defaulting.

“The risk scenarios I presented were challenged as being implausible,” Mr. Roseman told lawmakers.

The board sided with Mr. Corzine. And about the same time, MF Global began a search to replace Mr. Roseman.

Not having been there you could think a lot of things about this, like:
(1) if the risk scenarios that Roseman presented consisted of Italy, Spain, Belgium, Ireland or Portugale defaulting on their short-dated (~1-year) bonds before they matured,
(2) that hasn’t happened,
(3) yet,
(4) so maybe it was implausible?

But that’s not really true – worrying about European peripheral bonds would not exactly put you outside the mainstream of financially aware humans, particularly those who by nature or circumstance ended up in the slow-paced field of risk management. On the other hand, while you’d certainly want risk managers to be able to keep an eye on what the traders are up to, you do ultimately have to have a hierarchy, where the board is the boss of the CEO and the CEO is the boss of the risk officer. And if the CEO is a gung-ho trader and the board is okay with that, then a chief risk officer who constantly says “I’m afraid I can’t let you do that Dave” is eventually going to be out. That doesn’t make him a lowly clerk – it just makes him not the last word on trading decisions.

It’s easy to forget when Jon Corzine is remembered mainly as the guy who prevented hog farmers from buying feed (or, in some circles, as the second-most-motivated seller on Dealbreaker Homes & Estates), but there was a time lo these six months ago when he was viewed as essential to MF Global’s business plan, so much so that they were going to pay bondholders more if he left, which in hindsight maybe they should have paid bondholders more when Roseman left. And he was not viewed as essential for his calm and steady hand – S&P downgraded MF Global exactly because of Corzine’s plans to transform it into a higher risk investment bank.

That’s exactly what the board was looking for: a higher-risk, higher-reward transformation from a boring broker into a sexy investment bank. And they were aware they had to take the bad with the good. Roseman and Stockman both presented the risks to the board and the board – was pretty uncomfortable with them! And told Corzine that! And he told them, though not in so many words, that they could take their pick of Eurozone bonds and Corzine, or no bonds and no Corzine. And they went with Corzine. And his bonds. And now look at them.

You can have all sorts of worries about governance at MF Global but my basic sense is that a lot of people got what they paid for. MF Global’s directors wanted to be a new Goldman Sachs, and so they hired a guy who was as close as they were going to get to a Goldman Sachs CEO. They couldn’t hire, like, Lloyd, because let’s face it, they were MF Global, so they hired a Goldman Sachs executive with some warts – specifically the kind of warts that made him an inveterate gambler. This upped their risk tolerance notably, and they stuck to that decision, to the extent that they went along with Corzine’s gambles and fired the risk manager who objected. Shareholders were not specifically aware of the details, but from MF’s disclosure, press, analyst reports, S&P downgrades, etc., it was pretty clear that they were buying into a riskier enterprise than MF once was, and one that was based mostly on Corzine’s fevered imagination. That leaves the hog farmers, who are out of luck, only partly through their own fault. In the future the CME will help them sleep ever so slightly better at night, but for now I’m sure they wish MF Global’s risk guys didn’t have quite such a lowly role at the firm.

MF Global’s Former Risk Officers Defend Their Tenures

* Actually I guess I should try, right? I have semi-legit private-client-ish accounts at two of the underwriters and am going to look into this.

35 comments (hidden for your protection)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (35)

  1. Posted by Salut2FKApmco | February 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM

    veni, vidi, vici

    - Jon Corzine

  2. Posted by Alt_EST | February 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM

    Forget the Z4, just tell your lady coworker you have two semi-private client-ish accounts.

  3. Posted by Guest | February 2, 2012 at 3:58 PM

    he looks like he is about to eat out an @$shole

  4. Posted by Guest | February 2, 2012 at 4:01 PM

    omg…a well written (funny) Matt Levine article

  5. Posted by N. Peretsman | February 2, 2012 at 4:09 PM

    Pretty sure Herb Allen was joking when he said you could open one up at his firm.

  6. Posted by MF Global Board | February 2, 2012 at 4:16 PM

    Michael Stockman, Head of Risk for UBS North America from 2006-2008. Wow.

    Sounds like an experienced hire!

  7. Posted by VandelayCapital | February 2, 2012 at 4:18 PM

    "A poking machine that makes about a penny per user per day" a.k.a. Corzine in 6 months

    Pimp Quant, Ja Rule Capital

  8. Posted by Inquisitive Soul | February 2, 2012 at 4:24 PM

    But was he the egg mcmuffin?

  9. Posted by true story | February 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM

    We had to let him go. Kept asking if we had any cds on those super seniors. Told him we used ipods now and don't like that old timer music anyway.

    - UBS Management Committee

  10. Posted by Man Financial | February 2, 2012 at 4:49 PM

    What's not widely remembered is that prior to the July '07 IPO Man Financial ( cum MF global thereafter ) was owned by the largest publicly listed hedge fund family in the world, Man Group. Spun out for three billion. The then CEO was on the board of Man Group, and many of the people there were close colleagues, though none of the funds were available to US clients. AHL ( Adams, Harding Lueck ) was and is a mechanical futures only fund that cleared man fiancial. It really is what is called by sell side people generally now, "managed futures". Basically trend following moving average breakout stuff. Things started to fuck up when we took over refco after their bankruptcy. Total scumbags.

  11. Posted by Egg Mason | February 2, 2012 at 4:49 PM

    His name was Craig McGuffin.

    His name was Craig McGuffin.

  12. Posted by HAM05 | February 2, 2012 at 4:50 PM

    great premise, well executed, AND a humblebrag – solid

  13. Posted by Glory Days | February 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM

    In high school I once scored 4 touchdowns in a single game.

    - A. Bundy

  14. Posted by Nailz6 | February 2, 2012 at 5:35 PM

    Beat me to the punch.

    Matt, do you not consider my TD Ameritrade account private banking?

  15. Posted by Guest | February 2, 2012 at 7:22 PM

    What does James Lipton have to do with MF Global

  16. Posted by CarlwClark | February 2, 2012 at 8:14 PM

    comment of the year

  17. Posted by CarlwClark | February 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM

    See guys? Matt's getting the hang of this thing. Jeez…he got the hang of all that math and those charts, did you think he would not get this?

  18. Posted by Just Got In | February 2, 2012 at 8:33 PM

    What is the green band on his wrist?

  19. Posted by Comment Commissioner | February 2, 2012 at 8:35 PM

    No.

  20. Posted by CarlwClark | February 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM

    Perhaps you have a candidate?

  21. Posted by Gest | February 2, 2012 at 9:07 PM

    "And then…..before me appeared…..a gigantic……….throbbing ……………..goatse…………….

  22. Posted by dick bovay | February 2, 2012 at 9:14 PM

    Levine is,like, the dick fuld of dealbreaker.

  23. Posted by Connecticu | February 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM

    Really informative. Highly recommended for this site. I personally like this site.

  24. Posted by Guest | February 3, 2012 at 9:36 AM

    Good article. Could use an infusion of links though.

  25. Posted by samsung 1080p hdtv | April 24, 2012 at 10:26 AM

    The ideas you bring up in your article are unique. I was previously bored with the same old content on this subject. It’s just so refreshing to see something different. Thank you for this information. http://www.samsung1080phdtv.net/

  26. Posted by Evonne Hafferkamp | May 7, 2012 at 2:19 PM

    Hey, want more freebies stuff? GO to freebieseden.com

  27. Posted by ggmwqr | August 26, 2012 at 9:03 PM

    gk8h5o oumgzdtjrkco, [url=http://honyusqavikh.com/]honyusqavikh[/url], [link=http://hclfeopmjugy.com/]hclfeopmjugy[/link], http://mgdpkkszmggv.com/

  28. Posted by seo software | September 16, 2012 at 1:22 PM

    Hi, how’s it going? Just shared this post with a colleague, we had a good laugh.

  29. Posted by Bramantya juragan jaket | September 17, 2012 at 10:54 PM

    Amazing find out, My partner and i simply passed this onto the associate who had been doing a little investigation on that. Plus they really obtained myself lunchtime break as a lead effect I ran across the idea concerning your pet have a good laugh So i would like to rephrase that may: Thanks related to meal! No matter the reason, within my vocabulary, generally there arent greatly great offer like this specific.

  30. Posted by Bramantya Ahli SEO | September 18, 2012 at 9:49 AM

    Amazing discover, I essentially handed this on top of typically the friend who had previously been doing a bit of analysis about this. And they also genuinely purchased me lunch split as being a one on one result I found the idea pertaining to them laugh Thus i would like to rephrase that could: Thanks a lot related to lunch! Whatever the case, within my words, at this time there arent completely good supply like that particular.

  31. Posted by parotur | September 24, 2012 at 4:27 PM
  32. Posted by Next Page | September 27, 2012 at 12:05 PM
  33. Posted by Ameri Ichirose | October 7, 2012 at 7:57 PM

    Excellent figure out, I simply presented with this kind of onto the associate who had previously been doing some exploration on that. And they also truly purchased myself lunchtime crack to be a lead end result I ran across it associated with the dog giggle Thus i want to rephrase that can: Thanks associated with meal! In any case, at my terminology, presently there arent a lot great deliver such as this certain.

  34. Posted by Ai Takeuchi | October 8, 2012 at 4:23 AM

    Great learn, We essentially handed this particular on top of the actual colleague who was simply using research about this. Plus they absolutely acquired us lunch time break as being a lead consequence I discovered the item associated with him chuckle Thus i would like to rephrase that could: Thanks associated with lunchtime! In any case, inside my terminology, there arent greatly very good offer similar to this distinct.

  35. Posted by Cloée | October 16, 2012 at 6:06 PM

    I think this is one of the most important information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers