Banks, News

Sheila Bair’s Cruelty To Banks Included Trying To Get Them To Hang On To $33bn They Didn’t Want

There are so many good stories in Jesse Eisinger’s piece in ProPublica about how the Fed let banks return capital to shareholders that they somewhat obscure the central non-story:

In early November 2010, as the Federal Reserve began to weigh whether the nation’s biggest financial firms were healthy enough to return money to their shareholders, a top regulator bluntly warned: Don’t let them.

“We remain concerned over their ability to withstand stress in an uncertain economic environment,” wrote Sheila Bair, the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., in a previously unreported letter obtained by ProPublica. …

Four months later, the Federal Reserve rejected Bair’s appeal. In March 2011, the Federal Reserve green-lighted most of the top 19 financial institutions to deliver tens of billions of dollars to shareholders, including many of their own top executives. The 19 paid out $33 billion in the first nine months of 2011 in dividends and stock buy-backs.

That $33 billion is money that the banks don’t have to cushion themselves — and the broader financial system — should the euro crisis cause a new recession, tensions with Iran flare into war and disrupt the oil supply, or another crisis emerge.*

Here’s one way to think about bank capital:
(1) Banks should have a minimum capital of X**
(2) If banks have less capital than X, they have to raise more until they have X
(3) If banks have more capital than X, they can get rid of some capital until they have X

There are various ways to get rid of capital; my favorite is the money-burning party but other good ones include paying outlandish bonuses, building trophy headquarters, lavishing gifts on your potted plants to make up for your previous callous behavior, and of course the old standby of losing fuckloads of money on bad trades. All have their adherents. Two that are particularly popular are dividends and share buybacks. These are popular in part because, if you think of capital as money that people were nice enough to entrust to you, then when you don’t need it any more it does kind of make sense to give it back to the people who entrusted it to you, though again the other options all have their points too.

But leave that aside for a minute and just think about step (3) of that framework. It’s actually an important part, not so much normatively as just logically: if you think that X is the minimum capital level, and you have a level of capital Y > X, then you have more than the minimum, so you could have less. That’s what a minimum is. Or put another way: if you could only increase capital, but never decrease it, then “X is the minimum level of capital” would simply be an irrelevancy and capital would slowly creep towards 100%, more slowly in the case of Citi.***

That is I think useful back-story for the stories here, which are mostly of the form “the FDIC wanted banks to have to keep all their capital forever, especially BofA, while the Fed was all ‘no, we want to enrich our bankster cronies and also make ourselves look good at the whole rescuing-banks thing, so let’s let them pay huge dividends.'” There are specific fights over things like stress test methodologies and accounting for contingent liabilities that are well worth reading about if you find that sort of thing worth reading about.

But ultimately those fights are about “how much capital is the right level right now?” and you can think some useful things about that question. One thing you could think is, boy, path dependency, huh? There is not a lot of suggestion that the FDIC was pushing for capital raises (outside of the TARP repayment context, which is not quite a net raise). This is sort of a useful test of the seriousness of the FDIC’s belief: maybe they were right that the banks were all undercapitalized, but if so shouldn’t they have been forced to raise capital? Or was every bank that wanted to pay a dividend exactly correctly capitalized? That seems … odd.

Another thing you can do is go ahead and raise an eyebrow at the personal motivations of the people who wanted capital return:

But the Fed’s stress-test decision was lucrative for shareholders and bank executives, who are increasingly paid in stock. Dividend payments are taxed at lower rates than ordinary income. Merely allowing the banks to pay dividends, buy back stock and pay back the government helped boost shares, albeit temporarily. … Bank executives such as Dimon and Pandit stood to gain personally from dividend decisions since much of their compensation comes in the form of stock.

Ha! What dicks! Trying to maximize value for the shareholders who employ them and whose interests they represent! And it’s quite sensible to believe that bank executives have incentives that are too one-sidedly aligned with the interests of shareholders.

But it’s worth noting that the FDIC’s incentives are also kind of one-sided. More capital = less chance of bank failure = less payouts by FDIC = more Sheila Bair saying “see? no banks failed. Go me.” That’s great but of course there’s another side because we don’t actually want all banks to have 100% capital. You might go so far as to say that the Fed’s macroeconomic balancing role might make it more sensitive to the balance it’s striking in bank regulation: you want banks that are well capitalized enough to survive, but leveraged enough to support economic expansion. If that was your model you might not be surprised to find the FDIC regularly being more conservative than the Fed, and you might not assume that the FDIC was always right.

One reason that the FDIC could frequently take principled stands against allowing overcapitalized to return capital is that “overcapitalized” is a debatable term. If you measure capital as sort of assets minus liabilities then you have to think about what “liabilities” are, and you sort of start with GAAP and add some other stuff and squint at it and hope it works, but you eventually reach some limit of contingency:

One major concern was accurately measuring legal liabilities. Banks that had assembled mortgage-backed securities often faced accusations of fraud or deception from investors in those securities. Now, the banks faced a threat that courts would force the banks to take back billions of dollars’ worth of toxic mortgages, known as “put-back” risk. With input from the legal department, the Fed had come up with a system-wide estimate for this risk that the FDIC considered too low, according to two people familiar with the process. …

Estimating these future liabilities was a task the Fed delegated mainly to the banks. In a Dec. 12, 2010, speech, Tarullo said the Fed expected “that firms will have a sound estimate of any significant risks that may not be captured by the stress testing, such as potential mortgage put-back exposures, and the capacity to absorb any consequent losses.” …

The FDIC was puzzled. “The direct connection between the put-back issue and the stress test never has been clear to me. They didn’t take the number and add it to the bottom line,” says the senior regulator familiar with the FDIC’s position. “They didn’t have any sizing on broader servicing liabilities.”

All the more reason, FDIC officials thought, to slow down the dividend payouts and stock buy-backs.

This is an interesting and legitimate debate but you have to be careful about taking it too far. A point – the point? – of bank capital is that when unexpected bad things happen you have some cushion. To some extent trying to predict all those bad things – like, say, potential verdicts of cases many of which haven’t been filed yet – seems like a stretch. And if you take seriously the goal of building a model that correctly accounts for every possible risk and reserves the full cost of those risks – why do you need an 8% capital cushion beyond that? Don’t answer that.

Fed Shrugged Off Warnings, Let Banks Pay Shareholders Billions [ProPublica]

* It seems somehow relevant to point out that the $43 in my wallet is also money that the banks don’t have to cushion themselves — and the universe!!! — from nuclear holocaust.

** Call it X% of A, where X is a number and A is some measure of the category of stuff that you’d like your capital to be a percentage of (RWAs? assets? other? sure!). Or make them arrays: X_1 to X_n% of A_1 to A_n for various categories, really, just, go nuts, pick your favorite numbers. Or make it a sliding scale based on some set of indicators, I don’t know. But there is some number or set of numbers; they can be hard to measure but you can usefully abstract it.

*** But, y’know, also normatively. Forcing banks to 100% capital has its problems. Turns out having liabilities is an important thing for banks to do.

70 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

70 Responses to “Sheila Bair’s Cruelty To Banks Included Trying To Get Them To Hang On To $33bn They Didn’t Want”

  1. Texashedge says:

    "There are various ways to get rid of capital"

    Buy an ocelot?

  2. Einstein says:

    If we had let the banks explode, we'd know what "X" is by now..

  3. theShizznitt says:

    Add "not having a relationship" with Ms. Shamrakova to the list of ways to get rid of capital.

    • Stabby Cabbie says:

      Don't forget to add "executives being forced to expense cab rides far more expensive than originally estimated" to the unexpected risk bucket.

  4. Guest says:

    Prestige Worldwide can help you with that excess capital

    – Brennan

  5. N. Credulous says:

    You expect us to sit here, read this, and believe banks and the FDIC each represented their own interests?

  6. Guest says:

    So Finkel is Einhorn?

  7. Naughty Bawney says:

    SLUT!!

  8. anonymous says:

    The amount of capital banks need in order not to fail is uncertain. The FDIC prefers a greater amount and banks prefer a smaller amount.

    Could this article be less insightful?

    • nonanonymous says:

      The amount of effort spent on this opinion is uncertain. The commenter prefers a greater amount of insight and the writer prefers a smaller amount.

      Could this comment be any less useful?

    • just sayin... says:

      the scarier point imho is the conflict of interest at fed (2/3 of whose directors are elected by the banks they regulate – will eventually change under dodd frank although not enough). when these dividends were made banks were not lending much and to return the capital to shareholders was definately unwarranted. the fact that the fed supported the move is again scary…

      • meta anonymous says:

        You had me until "definately."

        Actually, nah, you didn't have me at all.

      • zeitguest says:

        dude – i hear you, but in the world there are people who understand how banks work and (arguably) should work, and people who do not. those in the former category have a not-unreasonable expectation of at some point getting paid for this understanding; some of them also have a not-entirely-self-serving interest in making the system work the way they think it should. to get paid, they have to work in the private sector. to fix the system, they have to rotate into the public sector.

        their economic incentives are more or less entirely in favor of staying in the private sector – there's no realistic amount of tinkering that can produce enough incremental later income to justify a few years' wages on uncle sam's dime. so while it's tempting to assume the fed system and the c-suites of the mid-to-major banks are a collective of back-slapping old boys playing musical chairs to jamie dimon's (lloyd blankfein's? john rogers'?) fiddle, you have to ask yourself: what would Matt Taibbi do? And then do the opposite.

        – Not the Motives Examiner but a fan of his work

  9. Chart Groupie says:

    A chart of bank capital would be helpful…

  10. average guy says:

    Matt, lets talk about tier 3 capital, mark to market, GAAP, and transparency.

  11. InfiniteGuest says:

    X strikes me as an arbitrary, inflexible requirement that in all likelihood is ultimately too high.

  12. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  13. n6pjJ3 A big thank you for your article post. Awesome.

  14. Deg says:

    "And if you take seriously the goal of building a model that correctly accounts for every possible risk and reserves the full cost of those risks – why do you need an 8% capital cushion beyond that? Don’t answer that."
    For the same reason that a turn on the road that can be taken at 50 mph is rated at 35 mph. If you don't understand why that is…(from your article it seems that you don't)….you should have a chat with an engineer that can explain it to you. It would also be prudent to point out that we just came out of a crisis where there was a huge miscalculation of risk.

  15. They are all terrific :D

  16. Many thanks for this tip. I never ever check the direct messages bad I know but this will definitely help get rid on the old ones.
    Shane Ryans recently posted..Why keyword negatives are important

  17. I have learn some excellent stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much attempt you set to create one of these wonderful informative website.

  18. Marathon says:

    Wonderful paintings! That is the kind of info that are supposed to be shared around the internet. Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this publish higher! Come on over and talk over with my web site . Thank you =)

  19. I’m just writing to make you know what a fine discovery my friend’s daughter had checking your site. She realized such a lot of details, which included what it is like to possess an incredible teaching character to have most people just know just exactly a number of advanced subject matter. You truly surpassed my desires. I appreciate you for distributing the warm and friendly, trustworthy, informative and also easy tips about your topic to Jane.

  20. Very well written story. It will be valuable to everyone who utilizes it, including yours truly :). Keep up the good work – looking forward to more posts.

  21. F*ckin’ tremendous issues here. I’m very satisfied to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i am having a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  22. spread says:

    I have been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this site. Studying this information So i¡¦m happy to show that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I such a lot indisputably will make certain to don¡¦t overlook this website and provides it a glance on a relentless basis.

  23. weblink says:

    Alright….my goal for this week……Gosh, so many things to do! Ok, my goal is to have my sewing room cleaned out of everything that is not sewing/crafting. Its been a WIP for about a month and its so cluttered I cannot even sew in it! (my second goal is to start quilting the new baby quilt for my nephew due next month. Its layered and pinned, so just needs to be quilted! If I have time. After the sewing room is done!)

  24. Daniel Wieto says:

    I have to confess that this article is absolutely appealing. I’ve used up a lot of my free time on this website. Thanks!.

  25. I’d better get moving! I have got to receive the “sandwich” quilted!! LOL

  26. Is Google’s announcement it will stop censoring the internet in China and possibly pull out a marketing ploy?

  27. moved here says:

    I do love the manner in which you have framed this specific concern and it does indeed give us some fodder for thought. On the other hand, coming from just what I have personally seen, I simply trust when the remarks stack on that individuals continue to be on point and not start on a soap box involving the news of the day. Still, thank you for this excellent point and though I can not necessarily concur with it in totality, I regard your standpoint.

  28. Greetings from Idaho! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your site on my iphone during lunch break. I love the info you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, great site!

  29. A lot of of what you say happens to be supprisingly precise and it makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light previously. Your article really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific subject matter goes. Nevertheless there is actually 1 issue I am not necessarily too comfortable with so whilst I make an effort to reconcile that with the actual central idea of your issue, allow me see what all the rest of the subscribers have to point out.Nicely done.

  30. Hi! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to take a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and outstanding design.

  31. Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have any points or suggestions? With thanks

  32. You can use it to ride one. Previous versions would have motors that were powered by chains, while more modern versions have the motor placed on the bicycles can be put together with many different methods.

  33. reference says:

    Neat blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog stand out. Please let me know where you got your design. Cheers

  34. Superb post here, thought I could learn more from but I can learn more from here.

  35. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your weblog. You have some really good posts and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an email if interested. Kudos!

  36. I’m really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility issues? A number of my blog readers have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any ideas to help fix this issue?

  37. (visit site) says:

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this fantastic blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  38. casino movie says:

    The themes about which often most people are sometimes reluctant when you consider. You happen to be impressive located at what you may conduct and in what ways you do it. Not afraid associated with which happens to be any biggest convenience. I hope that you will end up creating articles for as long as conceivable!

  39. I like your blog details! Undoubtedly an exquisite supply of data that is extraordinarily helpful. Cheers.

  40. I wish to get across my respect for your kindness in support of those who absolutely need help on your issue. Your real dedication to passing the message up and down appeared to be pretty invaluable and have permitted employees much like me to get to their desired goals. Your amazing warm and friendly key points can mean much a person like me and further more to my colleagues. Thanks a ton; from everyone of us.

  41. Magnificent items from you, man. I have bear in mind your stuff prior to and you are just too wonderful. I actually like what you’ve acquired right here, really like what you’re stating and the way wherein you assert it. You’re making it enjoyable and you still care for to stay it wise. I can’t wait to learn much more from you. This is really a terrific site.

  42. Spenueseime says:

    There’s a brand new invention that everybody who smokes should really know about. It can be called the electric cigarette, also known as a smokeless cigarette or [url=http://www.vaporultra.com/sitemap/ ]gamucci micro electronic cigarette [/url] , and it is actually switching the lawful panorama for cigarette smokers around the entire world.

    The patented Electric cigarette presents to effectively simulate the encounter of using tobacco an genuine cigarette, devoid of any of the wellbeing or authorized issues surrounding regular cigarettes.

    While E-cigarettes appear, come to feel and taste very like common cigarettes, they function pretty otherwise. You see, e cigs tend not to in fact melt away any tobacco, but fairly, any time you inhale from an e-cigarette, you activate a “flow censor” which releases a water vapor that contains nicotine, propylene glycol, as well as a scent that simulates the flavour of tobacco. All of which basically means that e-cigs permit you to get your nicotine take care of while keeping away from all the most cancers resulting in brokers discovered in common cigarettes these types of as tar, glue, many hundreds of additives, and hydrocarbons.

    In addition to becoming much healthier than conventional cigarettes, and maybe most of all of all, will be the incontrovertible fact that e-cigs are entirely legal. Mainly because Electronic cigarettes usually do not entail tobacco, you could lawfully smoke them anywhere that conventional cigarettes are prohibited these types of as bars, dining establishments, the perform area, even on airplanes. Moreover, electronic cigarettes help you smoke with no fears of inflicting hurt on other folks because of to unpleasant 2nd hand smoke.

    The refillable cartridges come in a multitude of flavors in addition to nicotine strengths. You can get frequent, menthol, even apple and strawberry flavored cartridges and nicotine strengths are available extensive, medium, light, and none. Though e-cigarettes are technically a “smoking alternative” somewhat than a cigarette smoking cessation unit, the selection of nicotine strengths offers some evident likely as an support inside the kinds makes an attempt to quit smoking cigarettes and seems to generally be proving well-known within just that sector.

    The good detail about e cigarettes as apposed to mention, nicotine patches, is the fact e-cigarettes deliver precisely the same tactile sensation and oral fixation that people who smoke wish, although fulfilling ones tobacco cravings also. Once you take a drag from n electric cigarette you really sense the your lungs fill with a heat tobacco flavored smoke and any time you exhale the smoke billows from your lungs much like normal cigarette smoking, nonetheless, as described, that smoke is really a a great deal more healthy drinking water vapor that easily evaporates and therefore doesn’t offend any one inside the rapid vicinity.

    When e cigs have already been close to for some time in several incarnations, it has been modern breakthroughs within the know-how in addition to ever raising limits in opposition to smoking cigarettes that have propelled the e-cigarette into a new uncovered level of popularity. For anyone who is thinking about a healthier alternative to smoking cigarettes, or for those who only wish to hold the flexibility to smoke anywhere and any time you’d like, an electric cigarette might be the solution you’ve got been seeking.

  43. I wish to point out my appreciation for your generosity giving support to folks that absolutely need help on your subject matter. Your real dedication to passing the message along had become certainly significant and has usually encouraged some individuals much like me to realize their endeavors. Your amazing warm and helpful guidelines implies much a person like me and additionally to my office workers. With thanks; from everyone of us.

  44. Ray Hairster says:

    There are actually a number of particulars like that to take into consideration. That could be a nice level to deliver up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration however clearly there are questions like the one you carry up the place a very powerful factor will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged around issues like that, but I’m certain that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each boys and girls really feel the impression of only a moment’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

  45. A lot of thanks for all your efforts on this web site. My daughter take interest in making time for internet research and it’s really obvious why. Most people learn all regarding the dynamic form you make very useful items by means of the blog and therefore recommend contribution from some others about this concern while my daughter is undoubtedly understanding a great deal. Have fun with the remaining portion of the new year. You are always doing a pretty cool job.

  46. price Nokia N9 White Unlocked Mobile Excellent buy, happy with this! Individuals need to keep yourself informed that the critical reviews you see for the Nokia N9 White Unlocked Mobile. Good thing for use. A homerun on the deal!

  47. Tilda Rysz says:

    I genuinely like this internet site a whole lot, there is certainly something really particular about it. Not only the all round graphic design but additionally the content material that in fact kept me occupied for hours reading. Effectively I just wanted to say congrats and thanks for sharing your website.

  48. I like the classic Hitchcock movies. As for your newer one, I might have to state thirteen ghost.

  49. Which is quite amazing, You are an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your feed and look ahead to searching for added of your outstanding publish. Additionally, I’ve shared your web internet site in my social networks

  50. I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website :). “The part can never be well unless the whole is well.” by Saul Bellow.

  51. I’ve to mention that for your previous couple of several hours i have been hooked with the remarkable articles on this web page. Hold up the fantastic perform.

  52. how can i change my billing info (or am i getting stupid, the following?)

  53. weterynarza says:

    I?m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back down the road. Many thanks|

  54. Looduale says:

    Searching for a grafiti t-shirt? For anybody who is, take a look no farther than the Kase 2 Graffiti T-Shirt made available by the Style Wars Restoration Project. Created by famous graffiti writer Kase 2 (sometimes called Kase 2), it’s an absolute unbelievable illustration showing the hallmark “Computer Rock Style” which motivated just about every generation of graffiti writers following its conceiving during the early Eighties.

  55. Salvador says:

    Greetings! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew
    where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form?
    I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one?

    Thanks a lot!

  56. sohbet says:

    Relative game comment sounds like pr straight from ir talking points to me written by an underpaid res associate rather than an honest opinion of what matters: will financing costs for banks rise and will corporates that have stronger ratings than the banks wake up and disintermediation