Banks, News

JPMorgan Banker Fined For Pitching A Client’s Stock To A Potential Investor

What is your model of what the FSA is thinking in its insider-trading crackdown? Here is this Decision Notice against JPMorgan global ECM chairman and general mining-industry macher Ian Hannam, shown here being unspeakably awesome in Afghanistan*, and he got in quite a bit of trouble for some pretty minor badness. Basically he was advising Heritage Oil and its CEO, Tony Buckingham, on a bunch of things including (1) being acquired by another company which is unnamed but let’s just call it Acme and (2) selling a stake in itself to “Mr A, a representative of an organisation with interests in Kurdistan (Organisation C),” which, there is a part of me that thinks that the organization was actually named “Organisation C” and that the guy would call Hannam and be like “Ian? Mr. A here.” No? I refer you again to that picture.

Anyway as things got serious with Acme in September ’08, Hannam sent an email to Mr. A saying:

“I thought I would update you on discussions that have been going on with a potential acquirer of Tony Buckingham’s business. Tony, advised by myself, has deferred engaging with the client until Thursday of next week although we know they are very excited about the recent drilling results of Heritage Oil … I believe that the offer will come in in the current difficult market conditions at £3.50-£4.00 per share. I am not trying to force your hand, just wanted to make you aware of what is happening.”

Later, he sent another email to Mr. A ending “PS – Tony has just found oil and it is looking good,” and bcc’ed Mr. B, “a businessman with interests in Kurdistan,” about whom we get no further information though I’m guessing pretty much everyone named or pseudonymed here could have someone killed on 24 hours’ notice if it came to that.

It’s not entirely clear what the motivations were here, but there are tantalizing hints. First of all Hannam was clearly dealing with Mr. A on Heritage’s behalf – he went to meetings with Buckingham and Mr. A where they talked about strategic investments and where Buckingham told A that he’d fielded some potential M&A offers. Hannam apparently went a bit further with details, which is how he got in trouble, but the FSA itself says he “had implicit authority to make the disclosure of the information contained in the September email to Mr A, and was acting in his client’s interests.”

On the other hand, a month later:

On 8 October 2008 at 3.30pm, Mr Hannam attended an internal Commitments Committee meeting at J.P. Morgan where he sought the committee’s approval to take on Mr A and Organisation C as clients, and in due course proceed with the fund expected to be set up by Organisation C. That approval was obtained.

So how shady is this? On the one hand, shady! He gave these people nonpublic information. Was it material? I don’t know, but the surrounding facts are sort of bad – the FSA forced Heritage to discuss the M&A bid a week later because of trading activity in the stock, and Heritage employees were blacked out around the time it found oil because of the presumptive materiality of the discovery. So presumably it was material.

On the other hand – trafficking in information about potential acquirers, targets, JV partners, and competitors is sort of what investment bankers do, especially ones as connected as Hannam. What happened here is definitely poor form – it sounds like Mr. A and Organisation C had not signed any sort of NDA or standstill, and Heritage was/is a public company, so they could have gone and traded on that information in the public markets rather than transacting with Heritage directly – though, in the event, they apparently did neither.** But this sort of exchange of information about who might be buying whom, especially in the context of Hannam trying to talk Mr. A into investing in Heritage, is not far from the norm. Here is a revealing comment:

“I don’t think this sort of stuff goes on [widely]. You don’t disclose inside information. You would not write that,” says one M&A banker.

Who knows what the FT replaced with “widely,” but I’m pretty sure “you would not write that” means “but you’d say it!”

I try to understand the FSA’s insider trading crackdown through the lens of US securities law, with mixed results, and I suspect that in the US this case almost certainly wouldn’t have been pursued. Not because it wouldn’t violate US securities laws – it would I guess violate Reg FD – but because nobody traded on, or contemplated trading on, the material nonpublic information. No harm, no foul. To the extent there’s a theory of US insider trading prosecutions, it’s that regular investors and Raj Rajaratnam should have the same access to information so that they have a level playing field in trading stocks, which is maybe silly but at least it’s a theory. If the people with access to the privileged information aren’t trading stocks – because their interest in the information is strategic rather than market-driven – then they’re of less interest to the SEC.

What some people in the US are interested in, though, besides insider trading, is conflicts of interest involving bankers. And boy did Hannam have them! Not that clients are complaining – they’re all over the media today saying he was a stand-up guy and gave them good advice – but there is something suggestive about him passing along nonpublic information about one one client (Heritage) to another contact (Organisation C) who was a potential investor in Heritage – but also a potential client in its own right. And then going to Comm Comm a month later to formalize that client relationship.***

As a smart man once pointed out, big-ticket bankers like Hannam are basically paid for their contacts and relationships, and the way they cultivate those relationships is in part by trafficking in information. That traffic in information is actually not particularly harmful to “market integrity,” whatever the FSA means by that, since it rarely leads to insider trading. But maybe it leads to – I don’t know, clients or courts or shareholders being a bit sad that their financial adviser had incentives on both sides of the transaction. In the US we deal with that concern with massive doses of shareholder lawsuits. Maybe the UK is going to deal with it with occasional, randomly applied, enormous fines?

King of mining M&A quits to fight fine [FT]
Decision Notice: Ian Charles Hannam [FSA]
Buccaneering spirit suffers fall from grace [FT]

* Is this the most amazing mini-bio of a banker ever? Yes, yes it is:

“Ian Hannam was one of the most outstanding investment bankers I have met in the last 50 years,” says Lord Leach, a director at conglomerate Jardine Matheson and an old friend and business associate of Mr Hannam’s. …

That’s echoed by a long-time friend of his. “He’s no smoothy-chops in a pin-striped suit,” the friend says. …

Friends insist it is his unconventionality that was his downfall. “I suspect that people like Ian make the deskbound civil servant wallah feel a bit uneasy,” says one City grandee who knows him well. “He’s out of their comfort zone.”

And someone unironically says “He thought the word team had the letter ‘I’ in it.”

** Also it sounds like Hannam had a subordinate write that email and then failed to check it carefully. How bad does that subordinate feel right now?

*** Also, when Hannam says in that email “Tony, advised by myself, has deferred engaging with the client” – is that a typo, or is Acme also a Hannam client?

107 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

107 Responses to “JPMorgan Banker Fined For Pitching A Client’s Stock To A Potential Investor”

  1. Guest says:

    Aww Matt you have a crush!!

  2. dumb says:

    We should focus on cracking down abuse in IB and forget about Anna Gristina.

    – Eliot Spitzer

  3. Guest says:

    I'm getting pretty sick of no charts Matt.

    -Guy who is sick of chartless posts.

  4. PermaGuestII says:

    Picture Caption: "It's 'Soulfinger,' by the BarKays"

  5. Bitchtern says:

    Is this the same Tony Buckingham from Sandline? If so, good guy.

  6. Cpt IceCool Platini says:

    Tish and pish. No one, I repeat, no one commits crimes at JPM.

    -IQ212

  7. Anon says:

    When I read DB postings, I know within the first sentence (without looking at the author) whether the piece was written by Matt or someone else. When I realize it's by Matt, a little piece of me dies.

    Matt, you suck at writing. You always make your posts way too long-winded with random stuff thrown into run-on sentences in an effort to be cute/funny. It's not funny or cute. Just get to the point: The content should speak for itself. If the material you're writing about is too boring, then find something else.

    • Matt Fan says:

      Kill yourself.

      Alternatively, Matt, please start turning out more articles so that more little pieces of this guy die and he goes away. Just think, it could be like Governance Day, every day!

    • HFguy says:

      “So I said, ‘All right, you son of a bitch, send me the right stars for the exact time, 4.20am on April 15, 1912, and I’ll put it in the movie.’ So that’s the one shot that has been changed.”

      This should be Matt's standard reply to all his haters as well.

  8. Black Scholes says:

    I have to agree. The kid's writing is long and windy, with a point in there somewhere I guess but I usually can't find it.

  9. Guest of a Guest says:

    1) Is it nonpublic?
    2) Is it material?

    Then don't disclose it. Or trade on it.

    Not rocket science.

  10. Guest says:

    "it sounds like Mr. A and Organisation C had not signed any sort of NDA or standstill, and Heritage was/is a public company, so they could have gone and traded on that information in the public markets rather than transacting with Heritage directly"

    How many times do people have to explain this… The UK is not part of the US and so is allowed to have securities laws that are different from the US. In the UK you would not have to show that the defendant violated a contract or a fiduciary duty in order to make a finding of insider trading. You just have to show that they traded on information that was material and relevant to the price, and was non-public. See Part VIII of FSMA 2000. Therefore it would probably not have been OK for them to trade on this information in the market.

  11. Mr Smoothy-chops says:

    i see no problem here.

    Mr Smoothy-chops

  12. zeitguest says:

    this was a completely new paradigm for matt tags

  13. PermaGuestII says:

    There are Brits who still refer to people as "wallah"?

    -Guy who thought the Raj fell in 1947

  14. of course like your internet web-site but you will need to test the spelling on quite a few of your respective posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and i in finding it quite troublesome to tell the reality then yet again I’ll certainly come all over again again.

  15. True! but, as pointed out above, they didn't trade.

  16. Nikke says:

    I meant the whole “virus-situation” on the “Mac-side” of life

  17. Dong Cobbley says:

    Nntp has been online for any quite a while. It truly is even over the age of the globe wide web- precisely what most everyone knows since the

  18. Hi there very nice website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionally¡KI’m satisfied to find so many helpful info here in the post, we want develop extra techniques on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

  19. Netnews has been online to get a quite a while. It really is even over the age of the globe wide web- precisely what nearly everyone knows because the

  20. You’ve made some high quality components there. We seemed online for the difficulty determined the general public may keep company with together with your internet site. http://www.phlebotomycertificationhq.com

  21. wonderful points altogether, you just received a new reader. What could you recommend about your put up that you simply made some days in the past? Any positive?

  22. make money says:

    Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part :) I care for such information much. I was looking for this particular info for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  23. Someone essentially help to make seriously articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I surprised with the research you made to make this particular publish extraordinary. Excellent job!

  24. Home Page says:

    This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!

  25. link says:

    Hello very cool site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also¡KI am glad to find so many useful information here in the publish, we’d like work out extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  26. whoah this blog is wonderful i love reading your posts. Keep up the great work! You recognize, many people are hunting round for this info, you could aid them greatly.

  27. You truly help it become look really easy using your demonstration however discover this specific matter being truly the a very important factor i think I’d professionally by no means understand. The idea kind of seems as well difficult and extremely wide i think. http://www.phlebotomycertificationhq.com/

  28. I necessary to publish on my weblog the like. Am i allowed to please take a portion of your posting to my site? That is our very first visit here; your internet site introduced me personally beneficial particulars to work on. Many thanks a good deal! http://www.slidingdoorsideas.com/sliding-glass-doors-2

  29. Appreciate your finding the time to go over this, I feel strongly over it and also adore understanding more about this matter. If possible, while you acquire experience, would you head modernizing your blog with more information? I am very interesting for you to reading your website. Cheers, awaiting your feed revisions. http://www.slidingdoorsideas.com/japanese-sliding-doors

  30. I relish, cause I discovered just what I used to be taking a look for. You have ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

  31. ITPpHS I value the post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  32. I relish, lead to I found just what I was taking a look for. You’ve ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

  33. Im thankful for the blog post. Really Great.

  34. Really informative post.Really thank you! Want more.

  35. Appreciate you sharing, great post. Much obliged.

  36. I appreciate you sharing this article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  37. Major thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  38. blog says:

    I really like and appreciate your blog. Want more.

  39. I just wanted to type a small remark to appreciate you for all the splendid strategies you are sharing on this site. My time intensive internet research has at the end of the day been rewarded with reasonable facts to write about with my companions. I ‘d mention that most of us site visitors are unquestionably blessed to exist in a very good site with many special people with great guidelines. I feel somewhat happy to have come across the webpages and look forward to many more fabulous minutes reading here. Thank you again for a lot of things.

  40. Thank you for your blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  41. South Shore says:

    Thanks a lot for the blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  42. I truly appreciate this post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  43. Thanks again for the article post. Fantastic.

  44. Thanks-a-mundo for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  45. Hello very cool web site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also¡KI am happy to find a lot of useful information here within the submit, we want develop more techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

  46. Very neat blog article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  47. Excellent blog right here! Additionally your site a lot up fast! What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate hyperlink in your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  48. diamant says:

    I value the blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  49. Great blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.

  50. Thanks again for the blog. Much obliged.

  51. information says:

    A round of applause for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  52. A word of caution Squidoo does have fairly strict rules on spam subjects. Do acquire time to see what they do allow and what they really don’t allow else you will discover your lens (and your hard work) deleted.

  53. Thanks so much for the post.Thanks Again. Great.

  54. I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  55. I recently found your website along with desired to say that I’ve really enjoyed searching your blog post posts. A fantastic website along with interesting content material, itrrrs this that I would like. I really believe this article content here is rattling wonderful, enjoy it for your hard work. You ought to continue the good work permanently! http://www.autoglassrepairhq.info/

  56. Helpful information. Lucky me I found your site by chance, and I am stunned why this accident didn’t happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

  57. CEI Awning says:

    I really like and appreciate your article post.Thanks Again.

  58. I need to say your site is really helpful I also love the theme, its amazing!

  59. Major thanks for the article. Awesome.

  60. Great, thanks for sharing this article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  61. Very neat post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  62. Everything is vastly open with a cloudless explanation of the issues. It was truly informative. Your website is very practical. Show gratitude you for sharing!

  63. Major thankies for the blog article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  64. Major thankies for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  65. Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  66. Great, thanks for sharing this article post.Really thank you! Great.

  67. A round of applause for your blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  68. wow, awesome blog.Much thanks again. Cool.

  69. Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  70. Very informative blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  71. Appreciating the time and effort you put into your blog and in depth information you provide. It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed information. Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  72. I think this is a real great article.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  73. Seitensprung says:

    Great, thanks for sharing this article post. Keep writing.

  74. Im thankful for the article.Much thanks again. Cool.

  75. I appreciate you sharing this blog. Really Cool.

  76. social says:

    Thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Great.

  77. Wow, great blog.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  78. I’m not sure exactly why but this blog is loading very slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  79. tone says:

    wow, awesome blog.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  80. Really informative blog post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  81. Used Vans says:

    wow, awesome blog.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  82. Looking forward to reading more. Great article post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  83. adult porn says:

    I truly appreciate this blog. Much obliged.

  84. Fantastic blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  85. I really like and appreciate your blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  86. Fantastic post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  87. Thank you for your article post.Thanks Again.

  88. Comrade kill yourself.

  89. stencil says:

    I value the post. Want more.

  90. calenders says:

    Muchos Gracias for your article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  91. I intended to compose you a tiny remark just to give thanks again with your amazing concepts you have provided at this time. This has been so surprisingly generous with you to allow unhampered exactly what some people could have supplied as an e-book to end up making some dough for themselves, even more so now that you could have tried it if you ever wanted. The points in addition served like the great way to be sure that other individuals have similar zeal just as my very own to grasp whole lot more around this issue. I’m sure there are numerous more pleasant sessions up front for those who examine your website.

  92. ridefinders says:

    It’s pleasant sitting at work to distract from it�to relax and read the information written here:D

  93. Sent the first post, but it wasn`t published. I am writing the second. It’s me, the African tourist.

  94. sohbet says:

    Relative game comment sounds like pr straight from ir talking points to me written by an underpaid res associate rather than an honest opinion of what matters: will financing costs for banks rise and will corporates that have stronger ratings than the banks wake up and disintermediation

Our Sites

  • Above the Law
  • How Appealing
  • ATL Redline
  • Breaking Defense
  • Breaking Energy
  • Breaking Gov
  • Dealbreaker
  • Fashonista
  •