When the London Whale thing came out, JPMorgan made one sort of clever attempt to minimize it by saying this:

Since March 31, 2012, CIO has had significant mark-to-market losses in its synthetic credit portfolio, and this portfolio has proven to be riskier, more volatile and less effective as an economic hedge than the Firm previously believed. The losses in CIO’s synthetic credit portfolio have been partially offset by realized gains from sales, predominantly of credit-related positions, in CIO’s AFS [available-for-sale] securities portfolio. As of March 31, 2012, the value of CIO’s total AFS securities portfolio exceeded its cost by approximately $8 billion. Since then, this portfolio (inclusive of the realized gains in the second quarter to date) has appreciated in value.

What did this mean? Well, I think it roughly meant what it said, which is that as if March 31, JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office had about $375bn worth of bonds for which it had paid about $367bn, and that after March 31 (1) that portfolio of bonds increased in value to at least $375,000,000,001 and (2) JPMorgan had sold at least some of those bonds at a profit. But one nice thing about it is that, if you squinted, you could read it as “our hedge decreased in value, yes (and by $2bn), but that’s because the underlying portfolio increased in value (by $8bn), so net-net we’re way ahead, and it was a hedge, and whaddarya gonna do, hedges go down when things-hedged go up, that’s life.” That turned out to be an entirely wrong reading but hey they tried!

Reuters moved that story forward a bit with this kind of interesting parsing of Jamie Dimon’s words, including particularly the statement that JPMorgan had realized $1bn of gains on the CIO portfolio of available-for-sale securities between the end of the first quarter and the beginning of that super-awkward whale-confession conference call. They concluded, based on realized profits on sales of AFS securities in previous quarters, that this probably meant JPM had sold about $25bn of those securities so far in Q2 of 2011. Which! Is a lot of securities. Slightly more than it sold last quarter (just under $20bn, with another $32.2bn maturing), though much less than it sold in Q2 of 2011 ($43bn, with another $39.9bn maturing). So, sort of an average amount, really.

Anyway, there’s some hint that these possibly-slightly-higher-than-usual-though-also-maybe-not sales of AFS securities sacrificed shareholder value – in the form of paying taxes on realized gains and also, strangely, in the form of “eliminating future earnings from the securities” – to meet Wall Street’s desire for a particular accounting EPS number: “rather than creating new value for investors, the transactions merely shift gains in securities from one part of the company’s financial statements to another.”

The eliminating future earnings thing … puzzles me.* The taxes thing may also be a bit of a red herring – lots of JPMorgan’s AFS securities mature each year, so the cost of accelerating taxes on $1bn of gains is not exactly $380mm** but whatever the present value is of paying those taxes now rather than in a couple of years – but it’s hard to object to the basic point, which is basically “JPMorgan is sacrificing real money, in the form of tax payments, in order to earn fake money, in the form of transforming accumulated other comprehensive income into accounting income.”

You could read this as a story of “equity investors are idiots and need to be fed a stream of steady GAAP earnings even if those numbers are bullshit” and, sure, I mean, that’s a pretty popular story about equity investors and I guess not untrue? I’d add another story though, this one mostly about banks. In my earlier attempt to make sense of Whaledemort I suggested that part – just part! – of the reason for the complexity of his hedging program, which after all was not just “buy protection against the stuff we lend to” but was instead “buy some protection and sell other protection” – was the desire to smooth accounting income. The trade wasn’t to make loans and buy bonds, and hedge the risks by buying CDS against those credits: it was to make loans and buy bonds, and hedge the risks of a serious credit downturn with some sort of convexity trade. There were lots of reasons for that, from profitability to existential what-is-a-bank reasons, but one annoying and obvious reason is that mark-to-market changes in CDS prices basically flow through net income and EPS, while mark-to-market changes on things like loans or the AFS securities portfolio basically don’t.

What that means is that if your loans perform well, which after all is what you want (and should happen, like, more than 50% of the time?), then you have an accounting loss on your hedge which is not offset by an accounting gain on your things-hedged. It turns out that this matters, for banks, not only because stupid equity investors are stupid and stupidly want their stupid numbers to steadily increase each stupid quarter, but also because banks care deeply about meeting their capital requirements, since doing so lets them return money to shareholders and not doing so lets them not return money to shareholders and also get made fun of. Bank capital requirements are not based on some platonic ideal of economic value but rather on particular measures of how much equity banks hold. And one rule of the measurement turns out to be that gains and losses on AFS securities don’t influence capital: bank capital includes accumulated other comprehensive income (where AFS gains and losses live), but backs out unrealized securities gains from the amount of capital that you can claim.

Banks generally love this because it reduces volatility of capital, but it may have contributed to Whaledemort’s efforts to find a hedging program that (he thought, or hoped, at least initially, caveat caveat caveat) would not show significant mark-to-market swings in the absence of huge defaults: because the things hedged would not show any offsetting accounting gains. Now, though, the same rule might bail JPMorgan out: it was able to bank a lot of unrealized gains in its AFS portfolio, and could thus sell the most-appreciated securities to realize $1bn of gains this quarter and undo some of what the Whale wrought. This, perhaps, destroys some value for shareholders, what with the taxes and so forth, but it’s important to recognize that it also creates real value for shareholders, and not just in the form of a warm glow around a stable EPS number. It also gets JPMorgan that much closer to repairing the capital damage done by the Whale and thus restarting its share repurchase program. Which, unlike accounting gains either in or out of net income, actually puts money in shareholders’ pockets.

Analysis: JPMorgan dips into cookie jar to offset “London Whale” losses

* Here is a thing that the former chief accountant of the SEC said:

“They really made two stupid decisions,” said Lynn Turner, a consultant and former chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The first was taking risks with derivatives that they did not understand, Turner said.

“The second is selling assets with high income that they can’t replace,” Turner added. In a low interest-rate environment, the bank will struggle to generate as much income with the cash it received from selling the securities, he said.

So! Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure that if the market yield for your assets is 6% and you sell them at 6% you can probably go find similar assets at about a 6% yield because um that’s how come the market yield was 6%? The fact that you bought them at a 9% yield three years ago is why you can sell them for a profit now, but they’re not yielding 9% now oh never mind. Chief accountant of the SEC.

** Because JPMorgan’s effective tax rate is 38%! Ha! Ha!

55 comments (hidden for your protection)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (55)

  1. Posted by guest | May 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM

    i thought the drunk girl article was more entertaining, but that may just be me.

  2. Posted by Been There | May 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM

    Traders shit all over themselves when this stuff happens. Everyone will remember the incident from now on. The first spin you have to put on is that "the model lost the money" and then start talking how the traders are more valuable to 3rd parties because JPM paid the tuition for their recent schooling.

  3. Posted by jeez uz | May 29, 2012 at 7:14 PM

    I think the SEC guy is saying its better to make 500MM in interest revenue and have 9% return on equity than make 500MM in interest revenue and have 6 % return on equity.

    i.e. you have no incentive to release the equity, it will just make things look worse.

  4. Posted by guest | May 29, 2012 at 10:31 PM

    I dunno. I'm still thinking about how at least several weeks elapsed between the time that JPM realized they had a problem and the time that they fessed up. Only JPM knows, then and now, their real positions and real exposure. Two billion (give or take) isn't such a huge amount for a bank that makes twice that per quarter. Is it possible that they did a pretty good job of flattening positions before the announcement? Is it possible that they thought about the market impact of their announcement and used that legal inside information to their advantage?

  5. Posted by Kweku Adoboli | May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM

    Whale- IB me tomorrow. Getting together with Brian Hunter next week to discuss new opportunity…

  6. Posted by U.S Economy | May 30, 2012 at 8:53 AM

    Lynn Turner did a real bang up job at the SEC

  7. Posted by Brett Kirn | September 19, 2012 at 11:28 PM

    Looking forward to your new web-site!

  8. Posted by bookmarking service | September 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM

    JdHwBj Muchos Gracias for your article post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  9. Posted by best amsterdam travel guide | September 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM

    I really like and appreciate your article.Really thank you!

  10. Posted by Plastic Surgeons San Diego | September 28, 2012 at 7:22 AM

    I value the post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  11. Posted by genius | September 28, 2012 at 9:46 AM

    Wow, great post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  12. Posted by wonga loans | October 3, 2012 at 4:34 AM

    I am so grateful for your post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  13. Posted by Phoenix junk yards | October 4, 2012 at 7:01 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  14. Posted by double bed frame | October 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM

    I truly appreciate this article. Fantastic.

  15. Posted by Buy Instagram Followers | October 4, 2012 at 12:17 PM

    Thanks a lot for the article post.Really thank you! Want more.

  16. Posted by blinds melbourne | October 4, 2012 at 3:11 PM

    Wow, great post.

  17. Posted by terry | October 4, 2012 at 9:22 PM

    I truly appreciate this article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  18. Posted by glimmer of hope | October 5, 2012 at 3:34 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog post. Cool.

  19. Posted by T-mobile | October 5, 2012 at 4:00 AM

    wow, awesome post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  20. Posted by Home Business | October 5, 2012 at 5:49 AM

    I really enjoy the article. Cool.

  21. Posted by buy instagram followers | October 5, 2012 at 7:38 AM

    Major thankies for the blog.Really thank you! Awesome.

  22. Posted by budget web hosting | October 5, 2012 at 10:51 AM

    Great blog article.Really thank you! Awesome.

  23. Posted by zombie information | October 8, 2012 at 3:53 AM

    Thanks again for the post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  24. Posted by manual watch Moonrise Kingdom online | October 8, 2012 at 7:52 AM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Much thanks again.

  25. Posted by iphone 5 tear down | October 8, 2012 at 3:57 PM

    Im thankful for the post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  26. Posted by Buy Instagram Followers | October 8, 2012 at 4:32 PM

    I really enjoy the article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  27. Posted by pimples | October 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM

    A big thank you for your article.Thanks Again.

  28. Posted by top funky shark team | October 9, 2012 at 3:55 AM

    Wow, great article.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  29. Posted by indianapolis emergency vet | October 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM

    Fantastic article post. Want more.

  30. Posted by advoyant | October 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  31. Posted by Wall Street Journal Wine Promo Codes | October 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM

    I think this is a real great article post. Much obliged.

  32. Posted by orthodontics | October 10, 2012 at 2:51 AM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog post. Will read on…

  33. Posted by here | October 10, 2012 at 12:53 PM

    Enjoyed every bit of your article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  34. Posted by locksmith in san antonio | October 10, 2012 at 4:14 PM

    I really like and appreciate your post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  35. Posted by Sex Kontakte | October 10, 2012 at 7:29 PM

    Wow, great post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  36. Posted by personal growth | October 11, 2012 at 1:24 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  37. Posted by Fleshlight | October 11, 2012 at 3:15 AM

    Im thankful for the article post. Will read on…

  38. Posted by forums | October 11, 2012 at 8:35 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Thanks Again. Great.

  39. Posted by new movies | October 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM

    This is one awesome blog post.Really looking forward to read more.

  40. Posted by Aeropostale | October 12, 2012 at 8:00 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  41. Posted by christina-fashion.com | October 12, 2012 at 10:43 PM

    Hey, thanks for the article. Much obliged.

  42. Posted by clutches | October 12, 2012 at 10:47 PM

    I value the post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  43. Posted by forexsignalsprovider.com | October 12, 2012 at 11:20 PM

    Really informative blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  44. Posted by hair replacement | October 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM

    Major thankies for the blog post.Much thanks again. Great.

  45. Posted by Emergency locksmith Salt Lake City | October 15, 2012 at 6:49 PM

    Thanks a lot for the article. Want more.

  46. Posted by click here to watch | October 15, 2012 at 7:47 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  47. Posted by tree pruning | October 16, 2012 at 1:32 AM

    I truly appreciate this blog post. Awesome.

  48. Posted by payday loans | October 16, 2012 at 2:49 AM

    Thanks so much for the article post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  49. Posted by Web Design | October 16, 2012 at 3:28 AM

    I really liked your article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  50. Posted by Bolt Themeforest | October 16, 2012 at 5:26 AM

    Major thankies for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  51. Posted by office cleaning | October 16, 2012 at 8:30 AM

    I really enjoy the blog post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  52. Posted by Get Commissions For Free | October 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great article post.

  53. Posted by die cutter | October 16, 2012 at 7:36 PM

    Thanks again for the blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  54. Posted by Sotheby's Boca | October 16, 2012 at 10:34 PM

    Great artical, had no problems printing this page either.

  55. Posted by sohbet | May 12, 2013 at 8:20 PM

    Relative game comment sounds like pr straight from ir talking points to me written by an underpaid res associate rather than an honest opinion of what matters: will financing costs for banks rise and will corporates that have stronger ratings than the banks wake up and disintermediation